User talk:MethanoJen

Welcome!

Hello, MethanoJen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

To keep up to date with interesting news and developments, you may also wish to subscribe to The Signpost, our illustrated monthly newspaper, and have it delivered directly to your talk page.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MAXNP (talk) 09:39, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Particulate pollution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthropogenic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Manganese cycle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Manganese cycle, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary sources

Make sure that your students observe WP:SECONDARY. Otherwise contributions risks getting removed. --Smokefoot (talk) 01:12, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Biogeochemical Cycles

Please see my edit of Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Georgia Institute of Technology/Biogeochemical Cycles (Spring 2019). I believe my fix cleans up the display of this article and it fixes an Unclosed quote in heading lint error. I realize this article is created from another source, viz: [1]. I encourage you to make the corresponding fix there. —Anomalocaris (talk) 09:37, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Manganese cycle

Hello, MethanoJen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Manganese cycle.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:46, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Black geoscientists has been nominated for discussion

Category:Black geoscientists has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --bender235 (talk) 21:20, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Would you please read WP:CANVASSING to understand that canvassing your Twitter followers into Wikipedia discussions is completely unacceptable. Thank you.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC) >> I deleted the tweet. I didn't realize I couldn't "canvass" on Twitter. I apologize. MethanoJen (talk) 19:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zelma Maine-Jackson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zelma Maine-Jackson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zelma Maine-Jackson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bender235 (talk) 23:06, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Na'Taki Osborne Jelks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Na'Taki Osborne Jelks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Na'Taki Osborne Jelks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bender235 (talk) 20:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Baross has been accepted

John Baross, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ Amkgp 💬 10:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dungey Cycle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dungey Cycle, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 00:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Georgia Institute of Technology/Biogeochemical Cycles (Spring 2021)

I edited Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Georgia Institute of Technology/Biogeochemical Cycles (Spring 2021) to fix an to fix an Unclosed quote in heading lint error: a serious lint error that turns everything in the table of contents from that point down, and the entire article, into bold italics. You can go to the page history and see the problem in your version and how I fixed it. If there is any chance that this page will be re-created, please fix the source page, https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/courses/Georgia_Institute_of_Technology/Biogeochemical_Cycles_(Spring_2021)/timeline#week-6. Something is wrong with Assignment 3. I do not have the ability to edit this page. —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ferruginous lake moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ferruginous lake, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ost (talk) 23:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chemodenitrification

As a heads up, I have moved chemodenitrification to User:MethanoJen/Chemodenitrification, since it is clearly not ready for mainspace in its present state. Your students can work on it at its new title until it has sources and context, and then it can be moved back to mainspace. I can help with this if you like - just leave a message on my talk page. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brevard Fault moved to draftspace

I would recommend that you develop this article in draft space, rather than causing sub-stubs without any references to appear in the main encyclopedia. This is the approach that all university projects in particular are recommended to use. When the article is in suitable form, move it to mainspace using the "Move" option in the page header menu; or drop me a line on my talkpage and I will do it. Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(as noted in the message above this, developing the article in user space rather than draft space is also fine - just keep it out of mainspace until ready for presentation :) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:57, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Potassium cycle

The article Potassium cycle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. Contradicts itself as to what metal is involved in the cycle.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:24, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zinc cycle

The article Zinc cycle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. A dictionary definition. Contradicts itself as to what element is in the cycle.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:26, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strontium cycle

The article Strontium cycle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. No indication of how the cycle satisfies general notability without references to consult.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lead cycle

The article Lead cycle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. No information as to why the cycle is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Iodine cycle

The article Iodine cycle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. Unverifiable. No explanation of how the cycle is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:36, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gold cycle

The article Gold cycle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. Unverifiable. No information as to how the cycle is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Useless stubs

Hi Jennifer, it appears that you are making some stub articles with almost no content so they are useless for our readers. If these are intended for students to expand on, I suggest that you convert them to drafts. That way they will have more time to get references and content instead of being deleted as articles. When I checked lead cycle, it did appear to be a notable topic though. What you can do is to remove the prod tags and move to names like draft:lead cycle. I will add a ping to @Ian (Wiki Ed): who looks to be the person helping you out with this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just happened on this lot in NPP. I'd also highly recommend moving these to draft for the time being; that's usually the best location for a student to work on them as well (more room to make errors before someone tears into them :) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see below, I have moved the four stubs that were still unreferenced at this time (gold, iodine, lead, potassium) to draft. I would strongly suggest that a) you don't move them back into mainspace before they are in a state that you would consider finished for course purposes, and b) moving the ones that remain in mainspace to draft as well. Things really tend to work out more smoothly if these things are allowed to incubate in safety rather than "in the wild". --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:41, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gold cycle moved to draftspace

In absence of references, I have moved this to draftspace. Please note that it is generally recommended that WikiEd student creations are worked on in draft, to give students more time and space to create something that is ready for the encyclopedia without running afoul of ongoing cleanup efforts. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iodine cycle moved to draftspace

In absence of references, I have moved this to draftspace. Please note that it is generally recommended that WikiEd student creations are worked on in draft, to give students more time and space to create something that is ready for the encyclopedia without running afoul of ongoing cleanup efforts. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lead cycle moved to draftspace

In absence of references, I have moved this to draftspace. Please note that it is generally recommended that WikiEd student creations are worked on in draft, to give students more time and space to create something that is ready for the encyclopedia without running afoul of ongoing cleanup efforts. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:37, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Potassium cycle moved to draftspace

In absence of references, I have moved this to draftspace. Please note that it is generally recommended that WikiEd student creations are worked on in draft, to give students more time and space to create something that is ready for the encyclopedia without running afoul of ongoing cleanup efforts. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:37, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copper cycle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Copper cycle, is not suitable as written to remain published. I have moved this to draftspace. Please note that it is generally recommended that WikiEd student creations are worked on in draft, to give students more time and space to create something that is ready for the encyclopedia without running afoul of ongoing cleanup efforts. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vanadium cycle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vanadium cycle, is not suitable as written to remain published. I have moved this to draftspace. Please note that it is generally recommended that WikiEd student creations are worked on in draft, to give students more time and space to create something that is ready for the encyclopedia without running afoul of ongoing cleanup efforts. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fluorine cycle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fluorine cycle, is not suitable as written to remain published. I have moved this to draftspace. Please note that it is generally recommended that WikiEd student creations are worked on in draft, to give students more time and space to create something that is ready for the encyclopedia without running afoul of ongoing cleanup efforts. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aluminium cycle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aluminium cycle, is not suitable as written to remain published. I have moved this to draftspace. Please note that it is generally recommended that WikiEd student creations are worked on in draft, to give students more time and space to create something that is ready for the encyclopedia without running afoul of ongoing cleanup efforts. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lithium cycle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lithium cycle, is not suitable as written to remain published. I have moved this to draftspace. Please note that it is generally recommended that WikiEd student creations are worked on in draft, to give students more time and space to create something that is ready for the encyclopedia without running afoul of ongoing cleanup efforts. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Boron cycle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Boron cycle, is not suitable as written to remain published. I have moved this to draftspace. Please note that it is generally recommended that WikiEd student creations are worked on in draft, to give students more time and space to create something that is ready for the encyclopedia without running afoul of ongoing cleanup efforts. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chromium cycle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chromium cycle, is not suitable as written to remain published. I have moved this to draftspace. Please note that it is generally recommended that WikiEd student creations are worked on in draft, to give students more time and space to create something that is ready for the encyclopedia without running afoul of ongoing cleanup efforts.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Fen-meadow

added a link pointing to Acidification

The Vanadium Cycle

added a link pointing to Anthropogenic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lead cycle (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAviator was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please make this look like an article (draw inspiration from other articles on geography theories) and fix the weird formatting and oversized photo. Other than that everything else seems fine.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lead cycle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lead cycle, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiAviator^talk 08:28, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MethanoJen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiAviator^talk 08:28, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ferruginous lake

Hello, MethanoJen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ferruginous lake, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dungey cycle

Hello, MethanoJen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dungey cycle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fen-meadow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acidification.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ferruginous lake

Hello, MethanoJen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ferruginous lake".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:38, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dungey cycle

Hello, MethanoJen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dungey cycle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:40, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dungey Cycle has been accepted

Dungey Cycle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 02:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vanadium cycle

Hello, MethanoJen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vanadium cycle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fluorine cycle

Hello, MethanoJen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fluorine cycle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aluminium cycle

Hello, MethanoJen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aluminium cycle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bromine cycle

Hello, MethanoJen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bromine cycle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cadmium cycle

Hello, MethanoJen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cadmium cycle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Loren Williams has been accepted

Loren Williams, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

–Novem Linguae (talk) 09:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ariel Anbar has been accepted

Ariel Anbar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

nearlyevil 665 17:14, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vanadium cycle

Hello, MethanoJen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vanadium cycle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:52, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fluorine cycle

Hello, MethanoJen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fluorine cycle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:53, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aluminium cycle

Hello, MethanoJen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aluminium cycle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:53, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bromine cycle

Hello, MethanoJen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bromine cycle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:42, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cadmium cycle

Hello, MethanoJen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cadmium cycle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:43, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zinc cycle

Hello, MethanoJen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zinc cycle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zinc cycle

Hello, MethanoJen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zinc cycle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:11, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ronald Oremland has been accepted

Ronald Oremland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 23:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Heh

No reason to drop by but this -- I LOL at your username. Well chosen.--Kent G. Budge (talk) 00:26, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gemma Reguera has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gemma Reguera. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:19, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gemma Reguera has been accepted

Gemma Reguera, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:02, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Gemma Reguera, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 14:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]