User talk:Omajemite

Nomination of Omajemite Don Emmanuel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omajemite Don Emmanuel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omajemite Don Emmanuel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GirthSummit _(blether) 13:10, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion of @Omajemite . Removing sourced materials without any genuinely and legitimate proof. And his account has been marked several times for deletion. This editor may cause more ethnic Cris between a united ethnic group. Streetvibes (talk) 17:40, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your hatred for the Okpe people will not stand... Okpe Tribe can never be Urhobo Tribe Omajemite (talk) 17:50, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think this profile should be published...he deserves it Omajemite (talk) 16:48, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I made a mistake of having duplicated drafts for Rufus Eseoghene Ebegba and Aghalokpe if which is not intentional.

Omajemite (talk) 20:27, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The said subject matter is related to me... Okpe People are different Urhobo People...

You have removed anything Okpe from Wikipedia. Omajemite (talk) 17:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This account needed serious deletion. He is removing sourced and documented history by the Delta State Government. Okpe is one of the Kingdom of Urhobo tribe. Every tribe has her own dialect and Okpe is one of them including Uvwie, Ughievwen, Udu and Orogun Kimgdom. Just recently the our dialect of Urhobo called Okpe became a the new Givermor of the state . Then those that are half Okpe are seprereting Okpe from itself. The incoming Governt of Delta State has never one day decree that Okpe is a tribe or ethnic group of her own. He always claim Okpe of urhobo. Plz this account @Omajemite should speedily go for deletion before he causes more errors. He lacks the knowledge Tribe and dialects. Streetvibes (talk) 18:20, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Omajemite, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! GirthSummit _(blether) 13:10, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Omajemite Don Emmanuel

Judging from the user name, you probably have a connection to the subject Omajemite Don Emmanuel.

Google is exactly the kind of standards we need. Has the subject been covered in multiple third party sources independent of the subject? Have newspapers, magazines, reputable journals, reputable third-party websites, etc. discussed him in length?

Please read this article on notability and this one on biographies of living people to get an idea as to what we expect on biographical articles around here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:19, 12 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]

You know how things are done in Nigeria, Even good people are not recognized. Third party must make publication about someone before is recognized for his achievement. Yes I connect to Omajemite Don Emmanuel, His my relatives and he has contributed to life of many youths. He has trained many bloggers and employer them. He build blog for them and encourage them into good blogging instead of involving in criminal activities

Hi - I know that it can be much more difficult to find reliable sources about African subjects than it can be about, for example, American ones, and I'm always eager to expand our coverage of African subjects. However, you should be aware that being notable has a specific meaning on Wikipedia - it doesn't mean that someone is a good person, or that they have done lots of good things - it means that they have been written about in reliable sources which are independent of the subject - so, a profile on a website that he works for, would not help. I'm sure that your relative is a good and significant person, but I just can't see how we can demonstrate that he is notable according to our guidelines. I hope that makes sense. GirthSummit _(blether) 17:17, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of PROPHET JONES ODE ERUE,

Hello Omajemite,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged PROPHET JONES ODE ERUE, for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 16:33, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Ejiroghene Waive moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Francis Ejiroghene Waive, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheImaCow (talk) 11:21, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone can contribute Omajemite (talk) 16:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:MUHAMMAD NAMI

Hello, Omajemite. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MUHAMMAD NAMI".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aghalokpe moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aghalokpe, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no citation for now Omajemite (talk) 12:31, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Esther Agbaje

Hello, Omajemite. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Esther Agbaje, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Esther Agbaje

Hello, Omajemite. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Esther Agbaje".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! _signed,Iflaq ^(talk) 12:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aghalokpe

Hello, Omajemite. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aghalokpe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:23, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aghalokpe

Hello, Omajemite. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aghalokpe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:31, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aghalokpe moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aghalokpe, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 15:15, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Rufus Eseoghene Ebegba

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Rufus Eseoghene Ebegba requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://seedcouncil.gov.ng/dr-ebegba-rufus-eseoghene/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Signed,The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 16:20, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rufus Eseoghene Ebegba (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Rufus Eseoghene Ebegba may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:15, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Omajemite! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:15, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rufus Ebegba (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

tone is not appropriate for an encyclopaedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rufus Ebegba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rufus Ebegba, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:20, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Omajemite

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Omajemite requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:26, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate pages

Creating more than one copy of essentially the same page, as you did at Draft:Rufus Eseoghene Ebegba and Draft:Rufus Ebegba, is unhelpful for a number of reasons, including the fact that it makes it difficult for editors to keep track of changes to the pages. I have merged the history of those two drafts, so that the entire history of your editing on the subject can easily be found in one place. Please avoid doing similar things again. JBW (talk) 20:00, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying material from other places to Wikipedia

It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account. Certainly we can't accept text copied from a website bearing a copyright notice which says "Alright [sic] reserved." JBW (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was never my intention to...

On Aghalokpe .... I send the copy from Wikipedia to Ejes Gist News to published it so as to have External line source.

On Rufus Eseoghene Ebegba.

It was not intentional... I have being hearing and watching news about him and I felt he should be included on Wikipedia...

I have source for information from the internet with good intentions Omajemite (talk) 09:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elume (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NGEO, lacks any sources or references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elume and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elume, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 12:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elume (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Manpower is not a reliable source so needs be removed. The Vanguard article suggests the Elume exists (or at least a bridge) but that is not enough. Need sources to support the content in the draft along with sources about Elume. Please also see this guide for how to add citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elume and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elume, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 22:55, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rufus Ebegba (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Princess of Ara were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rufus Ebegba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rufus Ebegba, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Princess of Ara 07:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Elume

Hello, Omajemite. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elume, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rufus Ebegba

Hello, Omajemite. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rufus Ebegba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Elume

Hello, Omajemite. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elume".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rufus Ebegba

Hello, Omajemite. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rufus Ebegba".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:40, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Omajemite

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Omajemite requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 09:48, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason why you should nominate me for speed deletion... I didn't use wiki for web hosting service... You can see that it was not referenced to any external website... Is just my own personal profile and nothing more.

You can direct me where to add my personal profile Omajemite (talk) 10:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't anywhere to host a "personal profile" here sorry. See WP:USERPAGE for help. Theroadislong (talk) 11:53, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What should I do to publish that my biography on Wikipedia...i need your advice and how to go about it... if it will cost me let me know Omajemite (talk) 12:05, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

direct me on how to create a user page since I don't have one ... Omajemite (talk) 12:09, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised see Wikipedia:User pages for what you can have on a user page, if you want an article about yourself, you would need to demonstrate that you were notable in Wikipedia terms. Theroadislong (talk) 12:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ede Dafinone moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ede Dafinone, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 17:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benedict Etanabene (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

May be notable, but still needs to be sourced properly. WP:External links need to be removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Benedict Etanabene and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ede Dafinone (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ede Dafinone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benedict Etanabene (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Akevsharma were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Benedict Etanabene and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 01:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing sourced material

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:18, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The name of Okpe King was wrong and I have to remove it... you can check for verification... Omajemite (talk) 16:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use email to communicate with me; I don't use email for routine things that can be discussed on talk pages. Your edit did a lot more than correct the name of the king, which I have done here. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Omajemite you are not only removing or inserting wrong naming of our King but also destroying history base on your own interest leaving the plans of the Governments over many centuries.

You may loose asses to this space given to you if you continue to distort history without government approved sources... Thank you Streetvibes (talk) 17:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted your email without reading it. I've already asked you to not send me email. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anthony Ovayero Ewherido

Hello, Omajemite. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anthony Ovayero Ewherido, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Benedict Etanabene

Hello, Omajemite. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Benedict Etanabene, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anthony Ovayero Ewherido

Hello, Omajemite. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anthony Ovayero Ewherido".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:22, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Benedict Etanabene

Hello, Omajemite. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Benedict Etanabene".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:49, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ejes Gist News

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ejes Gist News requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 14:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Fram. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Fram (talk) 14:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ejes Gist News for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ejes Gist News is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ejes Gist News until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 15:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article can be improved on, and remove any section or part that are against Wikipedia policy Omajemite (talk) 15:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]