User talk:Rupertgrint1

Welcome!

Hello, Rupertgrint1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Deepak Nagle, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --k6ka (talk | contribs) 11:03, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Deepak Nagle

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Deepak Nagle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 11:03, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Frozen (2013 film)

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit due to lack of citations. Content on Wikipedia should always have relevant references to check its verifiability. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Abhinav—Ŧ—� 09:08, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Finding Dory, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 09:11, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ununennium. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Periodic table. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Double sharp (talk) 15:23, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sunny Leone without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! KylieTastic (talk) 14:07, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sunny Leone may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

com|accessdate=September 12, 2010}}</ref> better known by her stage name '''Sunny Leone''' (pronounced {{IPAc-en|ˈ|s|ə|n|ē| |l|ē|ˈ|ō|n|ē}}is an Indo-Canadian and American actress,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dismas. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Sunny Leone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dismas|^(talk) 14:30, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to File:Sunnyleone.jpg has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Tabercil (talk) 21:24, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm Dismas. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Sunny Leone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dismas|^(talk) 09:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Indo-Pakistani War of 1947, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Indo-Pakistani War of 1965. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please stop making unsourced edits, as you did to Urdu. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for unsourced, unexplained and unconstructive edits on Urdu. Thomas.W ^talk 17:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Aurangabad district, Maharashtra. Final warning for a considerable number of unconstructive, unsourced and unexplained edits on a wide range of articles, such as these clearly POV edits on Aurangabad, Maharashtra, removing content and falsifying statistics. Thomas.W ^talk 17:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for repeatedly removing content without any stated reason, and trying to promote the Marathi language across a number of India-related articles without sources. You have been impervious to messages left on your talk page, and the only alternative is a block. If you do not start responding to concerns, or you continue with the same behavior when the block expires, you should expect longer blocks to come. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:59, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at B. R. Ambedkar. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. You have been warned several times for adding unsourced content. In your edit on Ambedkar you combined this with unexplained removal of sourced content and extreme POV-pushing (quote: "His thoughts are considered similar to that of Nazism. His Anti-Brahmanism is comparable with Adolf Hitler's Antisemitism. His Dalitism have often resulted in mass murders and execution of non-dalit as a result, his ideology is often condemned and believed to be racist."). JimRenge (talk) 18:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

JimRenge (talk) 19:00, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chennai. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Marek.69 ^talk 04:36, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Marathi language, you may be blocked from editing. Marek.69 ^talk 04:37, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bangalore, you may be blocked from editing. Marek.69 ^talk 04:38, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pune. Marek.69 ^talk 04:39, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Japanese people in India. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dr. K. 04:39, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Maharashtri Prakrit. Marek.69 ^talk 04:43, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:09, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rupertgrint1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was blocked without a reason. i was blocked by a user with name: coffee. he blocked me for reason:Clearly not being here to build an encyclopedia, even though i contributed wikipedia a lot. many users thanked me for editing. i think he blocked me for being indian as he is pakistani and hates indians. please do something

Decline reason:

You ignored numerous warnings and continued to make pointless edits like this fiddling with stats and languages. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:23, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rupertgrint1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]