User talk:SaucyJimmy
Welcome
[edit]
|
October 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm Jamesx12345. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Monk's Walk School, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jamesx12345 16:25, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:SaucyJimmy
[edit]User:SaucyJimmy, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SaucyJimmy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:SaucyJimmy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:21, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Incidentally, you may wish to take a copy of the wikicode of the page, so that, if it does get deleted, you could restore it at Wikia or another appropriate place. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:28, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
[edit] Hello, I'm DerbyCountyinNZ. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of oldest people by year of birth because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!
Adding fictional people to year articles
[edit]You added an obviously fake person to 1551 and 1564 and created an unsuitable page for him, this is considered nonconstructive editing, please stop this. Elassint Hi 21:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
[edit] Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to David Cameron, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 18:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Cameron with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 18:30, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to David Cameron with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. BethNaught (talk) 18:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at David Cameron shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Even if the edits were constructive, you would still be edit warring. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
August 2014
[edit] Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. January (talk) 20:03, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Arthur Holland. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Douglas Adams because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Arthur Holland (talk) 19:55, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1999, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
September 2014
[edit]- I'm not going to use the template {{uw-vand2}} here. Your recent edit to 2010 was clearly vandalism, even if the pipe to "sausage" weren't there, it would have been inappropriate, per WP:RY. I'm not presently going to check your recent edits to see if they are usually vandalism; if I did, I would probably have to block you. Please don't make me angry. You won't like me when I'm angry. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Steve Wozniak, you may be blocked from editing. It would have been better if you had taken the advice from Arthur Rubin above. Vandalism adding death information to a BLP article is a Big Deal, and not in a good way. Please don't do this sort of thing. Unician ∇ 06:25, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:SaucyJimmy
[edit]I've nominated it, again. It's, again, a WP:FAKEARTICLE, although this time it looks as if it might be real, until you investigate. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:17, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Better place to put articles
[edit]You should consider moving (or copying) some of your creations to http://www.wikia.com/ That site does not have the same restrictions as Wikipedia, and if you wanted, you could even start your own "Wikia" wiki there, to contain biographical articles of whatever sort you need.
It uses the exact same format as Wikipedia, and the articles look the same, though I think it has adverts.
Creating things there, is a lot easier than creating things here and having to fight off deletions all the time (which will eventually result in you being blocked from editing).
(For the curious... I have no connection with Wikia and I don't think I have ever edited there.) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:31, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
October 2014
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Myocardial infarction, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 20:51, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Arthur Holland. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Douglas Adams, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Arthur Holland (talk) 19:51, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Arthur Holland. I wanted to let you know that your your recent contributions to Fury (2014 film) has been removed, because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Arthur Holland (talk) 19:54, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
[edit] Hello, I'm EBY3221. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bill Hicks because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! EBY (talk) 18:25, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bob Marley, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding incorrect birth and death dates like you've done in 4 different articles that I've found so far. That kind of editing harms the encyclopedia and puts work on other editors. EBY (talk) 18:31, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Edward Upward. EBY (talk) 01:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — MusikAnimal talk 16:53, 23 November 2014 (UTC)January 2015
[edit] Hello, I'm Sɛvɪnti faɪv. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 1991 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 75* 19:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
April 2015
[edit] Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Andrew Marr. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 23:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
[edit] Hello. An editor noticed that you made a change to an article, Doctor Who (series 9), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think that he/she made a mistake, you can leave a message on their talk page. Thank you. McDonald of Kindness (talk • contributions) 17:49, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Doctor Who (series 9). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alex|The|Whovian 14:16, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 16:53, 15 June 2015 (UTC)Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
January 2016
[edit] Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:41, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist (talk) 23:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
March 2016
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Wiley (rapper). Chaheel Riens (talk) 12:38, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
May 2016
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Petrarch. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been or will be undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alex2006 (talk) 18:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:BionicleLogo2015.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:BionicleLogo2015.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, SaucyJimmy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello. It seems to me that you feel strongly that the first sentence of Malcolm X should include full dates of birth and death. You may not be aware that I proposed removing them as part of an improvement to the opening sentence nearly two months ago. Please see Talk:Malcolm X#Opening sentence of article. If you disagree with the consensus that was reached, please discuss it instead of edit-warring over it. Thank you. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 15:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
August 2017
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Trump, you may be blocked from editing. Scjessey (talk) 12:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, SaucyJimmy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not changes dates unless you have a source for the new date. Without a source, your edits will look like sneaky numbers vandalism. In the case of the change you made to this article, the previous date was sourced. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:17, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Jeanne Calment
[edit]
Message added 13:02, 29 July 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, SaucyJimmy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Very important
[edit]@SaucyJimmy: Hello. I have studied your edits and talk page for a few minutes and it immediately strikes me with WP:NOTHERE behavior. Despite warnings spanning multiple years, you continue with these edits. Your latest edit looks like you're just trying to subtly troll or disrupt, as these reliable sources explicitly state that he died of liver cancer in the titles. Also, please pay attention to your talk page. Wretchskull (talk) 17:27, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |