User talk:Themattster127

November 2019[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Star Wars Resistance, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- /Alex/₂₁ 12:24, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at SpongeBob SquarePants (season 12). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 03:30, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The World According to Jeff Goldblum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:47, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Henry Danger episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The Simpsons (season 31). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 13:52, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Big City Greens. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:36, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Stargirl (film). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. Also, do not WP:EDIT WAR to revert to your preferred version. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:06, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of original programs distributed by Apple TV+, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:46, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of original programs distributed by Disney+, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:18, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amino originals[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amino originals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 14:55, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury • 01:03, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Amaury • 01:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at It's Pony, you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 16:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Day at Disney (TV series) (February 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more news/reviews coverage to meet WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:One Day at Disney (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:One Day at Disney (TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:34, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Themattster127! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:34, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at It's Pony. Magitroopa (talk) 20:53, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Henry Danger episodes, you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 02:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Disney's Fairy Tale Weddings episodes (February 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Disney's Fairy Tale Weddings. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough episode content to be split from the main article. Only 7 episodes + specials.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Disney's Fairy Tale Weddings episodes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Disney's Fairy Tale Weddings episodes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to List of DuckTales (2017 TV series) episodes, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:52, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited One Day at Disney (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imagineer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Coop & Cami Ask the World episodes, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury • 02:52, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:38, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Themattster127-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:38, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Themattster127 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will leave wikipedia for forever if you get rid of the page with all of my accounts.

Decline reason:

That isn't going to happen; the list is a necessary part of Wikipedia's internal administrative processes and will not be deleted. Since this is an ultimatum (and a fairly toothless one, at that) rather than an unblock appeal, I am declining it. Yunshui ^雲 _水 21:26, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock|reason=I don't want to be unblocked. I want leave Wikipedia and never come back, I also want to have the page with my accounts go away because I thought I would just be apart of Wikipedia for fun and I didn't want people that I knew to know that I was on here, so I kept making different accounts. It would be amazing if the page with all of my accounts could go away then I will leave Wikipedia and never make another account again.} Another administrator will review your unblock appeal above. However, since you have expressed your wish to cease editing Wikipedia - along with a thinly-veiled threat to create more accounts if your demands are not acceded to - plus the fact that you are also de facto banned from Wikipedia anyway under the three-strike rule, I have extended the block on this account to indefinite. Yunshui ^雲 _水 21:40, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Themattster127 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I still don't want to be unblocked. I just want all of my accounts terminated and the page with my accounts deleted. After being blocked for life, I have no interest in Wikipedia and I want any sign that I was apart of it to be removed.

Decline reason:

No. We've already told you, no. Stop wasting our time. Yamla (talk) 23:39, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Themattster127 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm going to keep wasting your time because if my accounts are terminated and the page listing them is gone then I will stop wasting your time.

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:42, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:List of Disney's Fairy Tale Weddings episodes[edit]

Hello, Themattster127. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Disney's Fairy Tale Weddings episodes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]