User talk:True Tech Talk Time/Archive

Re: In Popular Media on BlackBerry Playbook

Please refrain from marketing company products on Wikipedia, as it violates the ToS. Relevancy regarding recording artists using the product for advertising purposes is nil. In addition, the Black Eyed Peas are paid to advertise RIM products, as is Ne-Yo. Do not revert the section in violation of Wikipedia ToS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.7.156.128 (talk) 04:34, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Criticism of Bell Canada

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Anbu121 (talk me) 20:43, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Editing of Alcatel One Touch page

Hello. I'm going to be making some edits to the Alcatel One Touch page. Just wanted to give you a heads up, as I know you’ve worked on it previously. Please review my updates when you get the chance.

Thanks, — Fotdt (talk) 6:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kobo Mini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Friday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited EastLink Wireless, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EastLink (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:New Play Control

Hello, True Tech Talk Time. You have new messages at Axem Titanium's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Axem Titanium (talk) 22:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Hi there, True Tech Talk Time. Thank you for all your work on cellphone-related and other Wikipedia articles! Unforgettableid (talk) 23:28, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Samsung C414" article

Hello. Thank you for creating the "Samsung C414" article. It's a useful article. I almost created my own article about the SGH-C414Y until I discovered your article. May I make two suggestions?

After creating an article, it is important to make sure that at least one or two other Wikipedia articles or navboxes link to it. Otherwise, it might lie undiscovered by other editors for years or forever. Or other editors might create an article about the same subject with a different name.
Try to add at least one reference to a reliable source to each article you create. Either a reliable print source like a Toronto Star article, a reliable online source, or some other reliable source. Your local library should provide you with free access to newspaper-archive databases, probably even from your home. If no reliable source exists, articles can be, and sometimes are, deleted.

Kind regards, —Unforgettableid (talk) 23:29, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Mario Kart: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkToonLink (talk • contribs) 01:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:CTV Two

I'll reciprocate your acknowledgements by commending the work you do with Canadian cellular, but I do have to disagree with your argument on why CTV2 doesn't deserve its own navigational template. On Wikipedia, notability isn't temporary, once the precedent has been set, it's set; since the CTV2 system maintains a long and unique history, I believe the notability has already been set. CTV2 maintains several exclusive programs during primetime that aren't aired on CTV, and while it's true many of its day programs are shared with CTV, a similar situation existed when CHUM owned A-Channel and City and when Canwest owned Global and E!. I'm not sure how infomercials, reruns, fillers or simsub programming somehow detracts from the notability of the article at hand when these types of programs on ALL Canadian networks. Regards. █ EMARSEE 06:15, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your subpage

Hi, True Tech Talk Time. I noticed that you requested that the deleted page List of Bell TV channels was moved to your user subpage at User:True Tech Talk Time/List of Bell TV channels. Storing that information there indefinitely may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline because it contains an identical copy of deleted material, (see the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3rd bundle of channel lineups). If you believe that your userpage does not violate our guidelines, please leave a note on this page. As an alternative, you may add {{Db-userreq}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's userpage guidelines. If not, I will nominate it for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. Thanks. -- Wikipedical (talk) 05:21, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, True Tech Talk Time. I noticed that an IP user undid your revision on your subpage. I'd ask that you either blank the page again or have it speedy deleted to avoid the content being readded. Thanks. -- Wikipedical (talk) 04:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Public Mobile logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Public Mobile logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 18:35, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mario Kart Single-Pak.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Mario Kart Single-Pak.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:47, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot

Sorry for replying so late. The reason I removed the image was because I felt that readers could adequately understand how the single pack design works relative to how the regular game works. It's not a particularly bad image, but if we were going to have that number of images, I feel that we should use something that is absolutely necessary like the first gameplay screenshot is. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 07:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, True Tech Talk Time. You have new messages at Codename Lisa's talk page.
Message added 19:22, 26 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Codename Lisa (talk) 19:22, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, True Tech Talk Time. You have new messages at Codename Lisa's talk page.
Message added 19:42, 26 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Codename Lisa (talk) 19:42, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of Microsoft Windows

Hi.

I was reviewing your edit #579691254 when I realized it was not accurate it had errors. As I reverted to the table version before your edit, I realized it had errors too. Apparently, each time someone convoluted and twisted the data, he or she had introduced an error, including some very funny ones.

Eventually, I discovered the only way to survive this mess is a sortable table, where data can be free sorted back and forth and compared using a spreadsheet. Table also allowed me to quickly find the OS that I needed to find. I suggest we keep it that way, although if you have a better idea, I am all ears.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 22:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Codename Lisa. All 32-bit NT operating systems have a 4 GB limit on RAM, except for Starter editions (XP, Vista and 7 feature ½, 1 and 2 GB limits respectively) plus all Server editions besides the non-Advanced 2000 (2000 Advanced allows 8 GB, 2000 Datacenter allows 32 GB, 2003 series and non-R2 2008 allow 64 GB). Since there are seven RAM limits spread among 25 OSes, it would be shorter to summarize the RAM limits with seven lines rather than 25.

The 64-bit versions are a little trickier. There are 21 OSes, but ten RAM limits imposed:

Three OSes (two Home Basic and one Server Foundation) impose an 8 GB limit.
The two Home Premium OSes allow a maximum of 16 GB.
Four server OSes limit to 32 GB RAM.
No more than 64 GB on Windows Server 2012 Essentials.
Five more OSes (as old as XP Pro and as new as non-Pro 8, with two HPC Server 2008) feature a 128 GB RAM limit.
Binary lovers imposed a special 192 GB for non-Home Windows 7.
512 GB is the ceiling for Windows 8 Pro and Enterprise.
Two server OSes have a 1 TB limit.
Another server limits to 2 TB.
Finally, the latest server limits to 4 TB.

i suggest to keep a summarized list for the 32-bit OSes, but believe a table could be better suited for the 64-bit OSes. Rowspans should be used if it doesn't stop the OSes from being listed in a logical order. Cheers, --True Tech Talk Time (talk) 03:00, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Summaries are only good when they are no more than four sentences, not when they occupy less screen property. Quick test: Choose seven SKUs in random and ask a person who have never worked with Windows to quickly read this summary and extract the memory requirements for them. It takes over two minutes. With sortable table, it takes 13 seconds.

Rowspans prevent sorting. Furthermore, they twist data at source; I saw the result of their use: Mistake being added.

Oh, and by the way, I spotted two mistakes in your summary. But instead of me telling you, try finding them; I imagine it gives you a good measure of how (in)efficient it is. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 04:07, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

In the same article, in your edit #10758793, a lot of errors are added to table. Here are some example. (This list is not comprehensive because I have to rush:)

Internet Explorer 11 does not run on Windows 8; only 8.1
Aero Glass is not supported on Windows Server 2012 or Windows 8; with or without Feature Pack. It is totally discontinued.
COMMAND.COM is not Windows 95's media player
You have confused theme (computing) with visual styles (or desktop theme). "Classic" was originated in Windows 95. "Themes" were originated in Windows 98.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 04:26, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. You footnotes did not have a source. This article is already bristling with unreferenced info and this is not something that one can verify by hopping over to the corresponding Windows article's infobox; so I deleted them. You are welcome to support them with a source. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 04:38, 9 November 2013 (UTC) I Say We should Merge Windows 7 and Vista Editions — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.71.116.165 (talk) 14:54, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Office 2010

Hi.

It appears your edit was the straw that broke the camel's back – sort of. An encyclopedia article should not be a complete exposition of all possible details, but a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject; although it was not your fault, I ended up reverting your edit.

Anyhow, forced number of column is an accessibility evil. Quick test: Next time, try resizing your web browser to that of 640px width to see how some visitors see the article.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 14:55, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Corel WordPerfect Office may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Games, a Linux bean-filled Penguin. Maxspeed Thin Systems featured this WordPerfect Office suite.<ref[http://web.archive.org/web/20000817090201/http://www.corel.com/news/2000/april/april_18d_2000.
*Opens [[Microsoft Office 2007]] documents (Word 2007, Excel 2007, PowerPoint 2007 with WordPerfect X4, Quattro Pro X4, and Presentations X4

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:52, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OneNote for Mac.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OneNote for Mac.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:OneNote for Mac.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OneNote for Mac.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 23:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft OneNote

Hi.

As you might have discovered so far, I have partially reverted your edit Microsoft OneNote because unlike all other Microsoft Office apps, OneNote does not need two infoboxes; one is enough to cover Windows, Mac OS, Windows Phone, iOS and Android editions because version number, licensing terms, release date and everything else is the same.

As for the image, I let it be in the article, but since it was already proposed for deletion, I sent it to Files for Deletion; hopefully, it will be kept.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 00:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Virgin Mobile USA logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Virgin Mobile USA logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alcatel One Touch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alcatel One Touch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alcatel One Touch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. United States Man (talk) 03:05, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merging lists of Windows Phone 8/8.1 devices

Hello,

In the future, please do not merge two distinct pages without first proposing the merge so everyone can have the opportunity to comment (as per WP: MERGE). I have reverted your edits while preserving the improvements that have been made to the articles since they were merged.

Your reasoning for merging the pages ("one list is better than two") also completely ignores the fact that they are separate operating systems. By that logic, we should merge the pages for WP8 and WP8.1 because "one article is better than two". Please see the list of features added to 8.1 and the decision that was made back in April to keep the articles for WP8.0 and WP8.1 separate: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Windows_Phone_8#Merger_proposal Gamer9832 (talk) 20:40, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (SuperNova 2) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating SuperNova 2, True Tech Talk Time!

Wikipedia editor Oiyarbepsy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

So, I redirected to Type II supernova, but I could see some disagreement. Feel free to discuss at the talk page. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Oiyarbepsy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mobilicity

Hi there. Sorry, but I had to revert your last edit on the Mobilicity article to get to a clean version. A vandal has been trying to remove one line from the article for well over a year. The page has been protected in the past, just to prevent this vandal. Just wanted to let you know whey I wiped out your edit. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:28, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 22 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Cineplex Entertainment page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of HTC 8 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HTC 8 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HTC 8 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 12:53, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dance games designed for children

Template:Dance games designed for children has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Soetermans. T / C 10:38, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Un-carrier

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Un-carrier, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 17:22, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm Zppix. I noticed that you recently removed some content from un-carrier without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not remove speedy deleteion template on articles you created. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 17:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WIND-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WIND-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WINDmagazine.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WINDmagazine.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BRD

I had already started a discussion at Template_talk:Dance_Dance_Revolution#Criteria_for_inclusion:_notability. Per BRD, when a proposed change is contested, it reverts to the status quo until it's worked out on the talk page (that's how we avoid an edit war) czar 01:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draftspace

Would it be okay to move Dance Dance Revolution SuperNova to incubate in draftspace? It's in pretty bad condition right now with lots of parts unsourced. Alternatively, we can axe the unsourced parts and you can craft them in draftspace, dump in replacements later, etc. czar 20:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 6 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Landmark Cinemas page, your edit caused a redundant parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, True Tech Talk Time. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wind.ca listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wind.ca. Since you had some involvement with the Wind.ca redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Daylen (talk) 04:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Microsoft Office into Microsoft Office for Mac. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:14, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Virgin Mobile USA logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Virgin Mobile USA logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — kashmiri ^TALK 23:03, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]