User talk:Varing

Terminology

Please be prepared to justify with sources your terminological changes on F&I War-related articles. See Talk:Battle of Fort Necessity. Magic♪piano 21:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When editors initiate discussions on article talk pages, that is the correct place to respond. I asked for a discussion of sources at Talk:Battle of Fort Necessity; please make the discussion there, where other editors watching the article will see it. Thank you. Magic♪piano 22:38, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now, I clearly explained that my edits to Jumonville Glen were tentative -- if you objected to them, you could have civilly raised your issues. I would even not have objected had you reverted them. Magic♪piano 02:36, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Honey or vinegar?

Forking a redirect to a feature article is somewhat provocative. You should have considered that there might be objections to such a move, and asked about it beforehand (e.g. at WT:MILHIST). When people are polite to me, I am generally polite to them -- this should tell you something of your own behavior. I will also remind you that you were the first to throw insults at me in the Fort Necessity discussion. Is it any surprise, under those conditions, that I am mistrustful and harsh with you?

That said, I repeat the offer made at Talk:Fort Carillon: if you want help translating fr:Drapeau du Carillon into Carillon flag, I am willing to help. (You will have to do the rough translation, my French ne pas tres bien.) Magic♪piano 13:57, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A brief story from my youth. As a child, I was given a game by some of my German relatives. It was a board game with a map of Germany, in which you moved from city to city, collecting money for each trip. One of the places on it was called "Stettin". When I tried to find this place in a modern atlas, I failed. I did not find out until some years later that this place is now called Szczecin (you can understand why I had trouble finding it), and had come under Polish control at the end of WW2. Should I (a) complain to the atlas-maker for using the "wrong" name, (b) complain to the game maker who (possibly for ethno-political reasons) put a now-Polish city on a map of Germany, or (c) recognize that place names change, and appreciate their multiethnic heritage? Magic♪piano 13:21, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mfd

Just a note that you shouldn't remove the {{mfd}} notice from a portal that is being discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. The notice has to stay in place until the discussion ends after a week. If you are planning to improve the portal, now would be a good time to start! -- John of Reading (talk) 06:07, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox which might interest you

{{User WP:Normandy}} is available for you to use if you wish. Just add it to your userpage. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 06:57, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Nihonjoe!--Varing (talk) 07:57, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Late reaction

I forgot to thank you for your compliments and your confidence. Regards.Nortmannus (talk) 01:24, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Beauséjour

I believe you found an incorrect image of Fort Beauséjour or the image of a different fort. Check the brochure at the Parks Canada site here: Fort Beauséjour–Fort Cumberland: Une Histoire / A History It shows several layouts of the Forts (Beauséjour and Cumberland) that are all five pointed. The image you have submitted does not match. Please do not revert again unless you have proof the model is accurate. Dger (talk) 01:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just explained myself in Talk. This picture of the model was taken inside the Fort Beauséjour museum. Even the drawing shows an uneven five star fort, and your link shows a building similar to the one inside the model. Prove me different or phone the museum.--Varing (talk) 01:23, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The model is clearly wrong. I trust the Parks Canada brochure which even uses a five-pointed star as the Fort's icon. I also looked at a current top view of the existing foundation using Google Earth and the layout does not match the model. Thus, the model is wrong. I can assure you that there is no one at the museum right now. It is only open in the summer. Cheers. Dger (talk) 01:36, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aimée Eccles

The article Aimée Eccles has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe decker ^{talk to me} 03:47, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Quebec, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. No such 2012 population census of Canada. Adjkasi (discuss me) 04:35, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. When you recently edited Pays d'en Haut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Convert (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:22, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Robert Crosby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Dear John, Wings, Flesh 'n' Blood, The Candidate and Flying Blind

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:54, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited French American, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort Saint-Joseph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to HMCS Victoria (SSK 876) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:26, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fort de Buade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seneca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fort Chécagou, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Algonquian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prod on Robert Crosby

Sorry but can't see how this bio meets WP:GNG? In ictu oculi (talk) 06:25, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited French American, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of pharmacies, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Racine, Jean Coutu and Cloutier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Varing. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Portal:North American Railways, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:28, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Varing. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Railways listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Portal:Railways. Since you had some involvement with the Portal:Railways redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Thryduulf (talk) 15:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Canadian military victories for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Canadian military victories is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Canadian military victories until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

NLeeuw (talk) 19:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]