User talk:Wani/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, WaninokoZ, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ϫ 02:01, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: Marvel vs. Capcom 3: Fate of Two Worlds

I certainly wouldn't object. IMO, both MvC3 and the MvC series page could use it... -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 19:37, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

  • Sounds fine. You get the series page protected, I'll take care of MvC3. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 19:50, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

If a character is playable, we shouldn't need to add them as a cameo appearance in the same game, though alternate versions that appear as separate characters would stay. I also think that we don't need to mention WHERE a character makes a cameo so long as their cameo status is established on its own. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 13:58, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

I dunno; seems fine to me. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 18:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Tough call. I dunno about Rush; I put Issun as a cameo since he only hops around on Ammy's back at the start and end of a match, and doesn't actually do any fighting or help with the moves...but since Megs is the playable one and not him, I'd put him as a cameo instead. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 02:44, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:45, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.   — Jeff G.  ツ 02:45, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Marvel vs Capcom 3 Theme of Gambit

I've found this theme from someone who find it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpsaHpsNx4U -- ScottKazama (talk) 04:02 AM, Thursday 19 August 2010 (UTC)

I did'nt put Gambit on Marvel side but. I just add Do not Silver Surfer & Gambit just yet, we'll wait for an official reveal on this<-- -->!. That's all. 06:35 PM, Friday 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Did you already check & translate the japanese blog. Rie Tanaka is new Morrigan.

Check the blog. It was Rie Tanaka. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ScottKazama (talk • contribs) 14:37, 8 October 2010 (UTC) It's from the capcom.co.jp/blog/mvsc3, translate it.


Magneto, MODOK, Spencer & Arthur

http://cdnmo.coveritlive.com/media/image/201010/phpOhXB61spencer.jpg
http://cdnmo.coveritlive.com/media/image/201010/phppWvsc0arthur.jpg
http://cdnmo.coveritlive.com/media/image/201010/phpPRkOzNmagneto1.jpg

Magneto, MODOK, Specer Commando & Athur Confirmed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ScottKazama (talk • contribs) 23:56, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

No more shoto's

http://gamrfeed.vgchartz.com/story/82454/marvel-vs-capcom-3-no-more-shotos-says-seth-killian/

EDIT: It's an information y'know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ScottKazama (talk • contribs) 13:05, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Saw articles

Thank you for your contributions to the List of Saw characters and Saw II: Flesh & Blood. Also a big thank you for helping out with the Saw 3D page. The page was protected in May until October 22 (the then-planned release date) because of anonymous users posting crazy people in the cast, amongst other unhelpful edits. It's probably the same people doing it. Anyway, the page is going to get hit by a lot of these edits in the upcoming week. Apparently I've read that some people in another country will get to see Saw 3D this weekend... so I'm scared someone will be posting spoilers---just like ole' smart Lionsgate releasing that clip of Jill for only god knows why. Just a heads up.  :) Mike Allen 01:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm glad I could help. -WANINOKOZ (TALK) 01:40, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Apparently, the film was not released this weekend.. so that's good news. :) Mike Allen 02:02, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Neon Genesis Evangelion timeline

I proposed a deletion for this article. But unfortunately, if only one disagrees with the proposal (or remove it) even without a reason, then it can no longer be added again. I was wanted to actually AfD the article considering it's not even close to it being justifiable but, i'm too self conscious to do bold edits such as that. espsecially when the proposed one was removed. I was wondering if you could judge the article for yourself and see if it's worthy.Bread Ninja (talk)

Umm...Ok. I'm just wondering why you're asking me to do this. -WANINOKOZ (TALK) 00:25, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

I've noticed the total drama page, and thought you could help. If you dont want to. i understand. but the articles realted to Neon Genesis Evangelion are being run by minor editors and one hard core fan. it's nearly impossible for me to do edits ,and the wikiprojects seem to lost interest. the only way i know how is find someone else willing to help that isn't in the wikiprojects.Bread Ninja (talk) 00:34, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Oh, it's no problem at all. I'll try to help you out. -WANINOKOZ (TALK) 00:38, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. I appreciate this.Bread Ninja (talk) 00:40, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Sorry if I'm taking too long. I'm looking up notability guidelines, "What Wikipedia is not", and things like that. -WANINOKOZ (TALK) 00:49, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

I understand. i really appreciate this. i'm not that big of an editor unless i'm sure no one will object.Bread Ninja (talk) 02:37, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

So I guess there's nothing we can really do until this person responds to our discussion. -WANINOKOZ (TALK) 22:18, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
although it's recommended, i don't think we need his/her opinion depending on how much consensus there is. But i'll see how it goes if s/he ever replies.Bread Ninja (talk) 19:04, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I haven't been helping you out all that much with the whole timeline issue, though it seems you have everything under control at the moment. -WANINOKOZ (TALK) 19:20, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Cyclops MvC3 discussion

Are you sure this is right about this:

Although Cyclops' exclusion is kind of debatable because Niitsuma implied his absence and didn't exactly say "he's not in", it was confirmed at NYCC that Gambit won't be in the game.

Well if it was. Let's find out soon enough. I just hope if he was re-confirmed to be in, Ken Master & Guile should too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ScottKazama (talk • contribs) 10:58, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Haggar shows possibly in MvC3

Hey, Haggar is gonna be confirmed next day at Paris. The is on:

http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2010/oct/29/3d-model-haggar-shows-possibly-mvc3/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by ScottKazama (talk • contribs) 00:46, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Can you stop sending me these links, please? I was online on Capcom-Unity the moment that picture was posted on its blog, so I already knew about the "leak". I don't want to offend you or anything...but I have my own ways of getting MvC3 updates. You keep sending me old news, and frankly...it's kind of annoying. Again, no offense. -WANINOKOZ (TALK) 19:01, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

I would like to inform you.

That your nomination for List of relationships in the Total Drama series has been resulted in a tie between transwiki and delete. The article has been kept. SeventhBase (talk) 17:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Oh, OK. -WANINOKOZ (TALK) 17:44, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
I have filed a deletion review here. Cheers. Hairhorn (talk) 02:23, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Oh, wow. I didn't even realize SeventhBase wasn't an admin. Guess I've got a lot more to learn about Wiki. Thanks. -WANINOKOZ (TALK) 02:26, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: Voices

It probably wouldn't hurt to do so for now. We can get rid of them later when the game's out, at which point the game's credits will be the only source we need.

Just for the record, here's who we know 100% and where to find a source.

- Deadpool: Nolan North (US, confirmed by Seth Killian in a UStream chat; the link's probably in the Deadpool Bugle's archives somewhere)
- Dante: Reuben Langdon (US, confirmed at SDCC where he did an interview on Capcom's UStream)
- Trish: Danielle Burgio (US, see Dante)
- Morrigan: Rie Tanaka (JP, confirmed at TGS, where she appeared on stage with Niitsuma at one of the game demos)
- Spider-Man: Josh Keaton (US, confirmed via Keaton's FaceBook)
- Wesker: DC Douglas (US, confirmed via Douglas's FaceBook), Joji Nakata (JP, see Morrigan)
- MODOK: Wally Wingert (US, confirmed via Wingert's website)

Additional notes:
- Despite sounding near-identical, Kyle Hebert said back when the game was first announced that he hadn't been called in to do Ryu. Of course, there was probably some NDA business going on there at the time, so it wouldn't surprise me if he actually WAS playing Ryu, but we can always verify that when we get the credits.
- Dee Bradley Baker confirmed he's not doing Joe, and that it's a different actor in the videos. Seeing as it doesn't sound the least bit like him, I'm willing to bet there's no NDA stuff and that it's really not him. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 03:11, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: Playable characters sources

Oops, sorry. I just got on and saw your message. You already changed it, though. I'll just say that I approve. The list now looks much cleaner. Alex.liu064 (talk) 22:44, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Zero is hidden character.

Yep. Y'know, do you see the licensed card & mission mode news detail from MvC3 in here, both Zero & Dormammu became a hidden & this is why & Dormy & Shulkie trade place in that picture:

http://www.capcom-unity.com/jgonzo/blog/2010/11/19/marvel_vs._capcom_3:_of_modes_and_license_cards —Preceding unsigned comment added by ScottKazama (talk • contribs) 13:25, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Do you have any proof? All you have is a guess you made from a picture you looked at. Do you even understand what kind of info should be put on Wikipedia? It's info that has a VERIFIABLE REFERENCE THAT EXPLICITLY STATES THAT SAID INFO IS TRUE. I'm not saying that you're wrong, but you have to understand. Have you ever wonder why most of your edits are reverted? It's because you never listen. So start now, so that you can actually help this site. (This is Alex, by the way.) The Stick Man (talk) 22:33, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Probably should have put that message on ScottKazama's discussion page instead. -WANINOKOZ (TALK) 22:46, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
...Right. Wasn't thinking there. I'm just... frustrated. The Stick Man (talk) 22:50, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Me too, my friend. -WANINOKOZ (TALK) 22:52, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: Cameos

Eh... well... I have no clue. Maybe Cyberlink knows? I haven't been looking at the endings... TheStickMan[✆Talk] 03:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Our friend ScottKazama has come through. TheStickMan[✆Talk] 02:42, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Whoa. Please don't post spoilers, at least not on my page. If it's gameplay, I'm fine with that, but I want to unlock the endings myself when I download the characters. Thanks. -wANINOKOZ ♪♫♪ 03:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Ooh, my bad. Sorry about that. TheStickMan[✆Talk] 00:01, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Jin's appearence in SFxT...

It's no more speculation than saying Ken will appear in the game due to a hazy screenshot. I have proof, but posting YouTube links seems to be banned. It's worth adding to the article if I could just figure out how to legally cite it.SuperSonicTH (talk) 22:52, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

ABDC season 6

Hey, I just wanted to know if it would be okay with you if i added the songs/challenges for this season, I already did BEP and Katy Perry.Goth67 (talk) 17:54, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm assuming you check out Blogging America's Best Dance Crew for the challenges and play list. The thing is...I'm not sure if BABDC counts as a reliable third-party source. They do try to bring accurate information to us though...so it's probably alright. However, be wary that the posts do get changed sometime, such as today. Phunk Phenomenon's challenge changed from "Vegas-themed wedding" to "make a roulette wheel". I changed it accordingly. -wANINOKOZ ♪♫♪ 18:14, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

October 2011

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. WikiPuppies! (bark) 04:35, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Re: Need some feedback

Looking good so far, but who are you going to use for the NPC section? I figure MvC1 assists and characters that appear as part of someone's moveset would be a given, but how much further will it go? DLC costumes? Background and ending cameos? -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 15:25, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Jin SFxT...

While I find the hard logic of your reason to remove Jin correct, I must point out that neither Juri or Xiaoyu had "official tag partners" in the most recent gameplay trailer but appeared alongside Bison and Jin in the cinematic trailer. Bison is already confirmed by virtue of the accidental screenshot on Xbox LIVE Marketplace and the cinematic trailer pairs Juri with him. Jin being Xiaoyu's tag partner seems like the next logical step.SuperSonicTH (talk) 00:47, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

I erased this because I noticed I had already contacted you about an almost identical yet different scenario about Jin in the game earlier but you never replied to it.SuperSonicTH (talk) 01:29, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
Yep, but I replied on your talk page this time. WANI ♪♫♪ 01:34, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, I saw. That's why I restored this post when you caught onto my deletion. SuperSonicTH (talk) 04:33, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Mr Arrogant

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:137.120.238.48 Could you please have another word with him? He's still not listening. Now he's (essentially) claiming that the official Japanese website and the site where Xiaoyu and M Bison were leaked do not exist. I've already responded, but he obviously won't listen to me. 85.210.188.117 (talk) 07:51, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Well, I'm not really the kind of person to "confront" other users to be honest, but I'll see what I can do. Have you ever asked for help from an admin before? WANI ♪♫♪ 22:17, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes, and they said the only thing that could realistically be done was to caution him...which is difficult considering he's so full of himself he won't listen. Besides, I don't really know any admins. 88.109.31.73 (talk) 23:06, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Sorry I haven't really done anything yet. I've been kinda busy recently with "real life" obligations. I would have to agree with that admin; we can't really do anything besides warn this IP about his attitude. I think you should just ignore this person. If this IP attacks you, or his/her attitude develops into disruptive editing, that's when I think we should take action.
Also, since you seem to have also made a good number of edits and have talked on people's talk pages, it would be convenient if you would sign up for an account. Unless you are using a different computer every single time you use Wikipedia, your computer has a dynamic IP and it's hard to know whether I'm talking to same person or not. WANI ♪♫♪ 18:36, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

The Glee Project

I'm in Australia, so I haven't seen the episode yet, but I was wondering if season 2, episode 6 has actually aired. My question is related to these edits, as I've made comment on the article's talk page.[1] --AussieLegend (talk) 06:22, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I live in the Midwestern United States, and the episode aired about four hours ago for me. I can understand why Jack Sebastian reverted my edits...but yeah...since the episode has already aired over here, I don't see the need for a secondary source for my edits. WANI ♪♫♪ 06:26, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
As I thought. No, there is no absolute need for a secondary source since the episode has aired. --AussieLegend (talk) 09:33, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
I would argue that there is, at least in the interest of slowing the hell down. We aren't in a hurry here, and shouldn't be. By posting the reveal information from the end of the episode, we are (apart from failing to source information not generally available to the readership yet) interfering with Glee Project's copyright. They charge more for commercial airtime for the last commercial than they do for the first. That's tv advertising 101. I'm really hoping this sort of fast-draw edit doesn't happen again. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 13:49, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
If the episode has aired, there's nothing at all wrong with posting the information and copyright isn't even an issue, especially once the episode has aired. The US isn't the only TV market in the world. If we were concerned about advertising we'd have to refrain from posting anything until a program had aired everywhere in the world. --AussieLegend (talk) 14:03, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Again, its a copyvio to release that sort of info onthe same day the episode airs. I am not talking about waiting until it broadcasts everywhere; just wait until the reviewers can get a word in the day afterwards. After all, the encyclopedia isn't about our observations, opinions, etc. - its about what cited sources say. Don't use WP:V as an argument because - quite pointedly, one wasn't offered; indeed, it was initially argued that one wasn't even necessary. Don't use WP:SPOILER, either, since I wasn't advocating waiting an extreme amount of time - 24 hours at most. Why the hell is there such a hurry to beat the reviewers to the punch? - Jack Sebastian (talk) 14:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
"its a copyvio to release that sort of info onthe same day the episode airs" - Really? Do you have a source for that? --AussieLegend (talk) 15:12, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Glee Project edits

Here's the thing, Wani: while we don't worry about spoilers in Wikipedia, it does tend to infringe on the copyright of the show to post who is eliminated the very day the show airs. How does it do this, you may ask? Most people watch the program for the end of show reveal. The show is predicated upon this, and advertising for the commercials before that are more expensive than earlier breaks. There is a reason for that pricing schedule. When you rush to reveal the end of the show, why would anyone watch?
We are not in a hurry here in Wikipedia. Period. The mindset that we should be rushing to get info into articles is both irritating and anathema to what we seek to accomplish in the encyclopedia. I'm not going to revert you again, since its the day after (and, of course, the damage is done), but I think you should seriously reconsider before doing something like that again. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 13:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Alright. If you can provide a source that states that I cannot write about the events of the show "on the same day the episode airs", then sure. I'll comply. WANI ♪♫♪ 18:30, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
There is no source. Jack Sebastian raised the matter at WP:AN#Spoiler vs copyvio and the consensus is that he's wrong. --AussieLegend (talk) 09:13, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Yep, I am wrong, I guess. I raised a point of concern, and received clarification. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 20:10, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
And one more thing. While I certainly understand your position about rushing to edit articles...as far as I am aware, there isn't any sort of style guide on Wikipedia instructing the users on how quickly they should add information. The information I add to the Glee Project article is verifiable, and I'm not breaking any of Wikipedia's policies to my knowledge. If it "irritates" you about how quickly I like to update articles, like the Glee Project, then I'm sorry you feel that way. Once again, just show me a source that states "rushing to get info into articles is [an] anathema to what we seek to accomplish in the encyclopedia", and I'll adhere to your concern. Still, I'll keep your advice in mind when I edit other articles in the future. Thanks. WANI ♪♫♪ 02:14, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Neddy1234

Hello. I am just placing this here to thank you for your review of several of my articles, consecutive critisism always helps. However, I can't get over my dissatisfaction with the proposed deletion of Tiffany Derry, I strongly believe that she (chef Derry) is notable not only for her appearances on Top Chef. I also believe that many other Top Chef-related articles such as Kelly Liken, Dale Levitski, and Angelo Sosa are equally as notable as Tiffany Derry (if not less notable), but these articles were not proposed for deletion. I believe that if the content of Tiffany Derry is really as non-notable as you claim, it would not have lasted as long as it did (I wrote that article two years ago). Even so, if the content must be removed, I believe that we should redirect the article to Top Chef (season 8). This would, however, eliminate any reference to Tiffany's experience as an executive chef at a notable Dallas restaurant from Wikipedia.

Again, I thank you for your support, and I'm sorry to sound so defensive with this message. I simply believe that this article should be kept. (I wrote a list of sources on the page and on the talk page, I believe that they are notable enough to keep the article).

Neddy1234

Thank you for your response. However, the length of stay for an article does not indicate if the subject is notable or not. Many of the Top Chef contestant-related articles you have created have remained underdeveloped, (but most importantly) unsourced stubs over the years that have not established notability for these people beyond their appearances on Top Chef. I honestly would have nominated Dale Levitski and Angelo Sosa for deletion as well, but after nominating five of your articles all in the same day, I didn't want to seem like I was targeting you in bad faith or something. However, I may proceed to nominate them in the future, if their articles remain the same condition. To answer your question on the Tiffany Derry talk page, Kelly Liken may or may not be "as notable", but the article is well-sourced, so I didn't bother with it. In addition, being a finalist on a reality TV show does not warrant an article, especially if it was a one-time occasion (WP:ONEEVENT). Most of your articles also fail the basic criteria for WP:BIO.
If you can improve the quality of the Tiffany Derry article by providing more sources (that are reliable, mind you), while, again, clearly providing notability besides Top Chef, it can probably stay. This applies to the other articles I have already nominated as well. WANI (talk) 17:12, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Wani,

Thanks again for your support, it'll help me improve articles in the future. If the content of the articles I created (particularly Tiffany Derry) is deemed not notable, could we at least redirect them to the various Top Chef season articles? That way the topic will at least be covered on the Top Chef page.

As for the articles besides Tiffany Derry, I understand the lack of notability. If they are deleted or (preferably) redirected, I understand the philosophy behind that decision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neddy1234 (talk • contribs) 15:09, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Darkstalkers

I apologize for seeming really dumb, I'm completely unsure how to use a regular wiki or where to post on a talk page. This also leads to my reason for messaging you. I'm the admin for the Darkstalkers wiki on wikia (Wiki here). I want to try and spruce things up and I'd love to have more input or editors. I try my best to expand and create and add more for a wikia sake but I feel the "wiki" info is slightly lost. What I mean is there is more pictures than actual "right" info. I pretty much try and make pretty but fail at policing the dumb.

I hope I made some sense, please feel free to message me on here, I'll be sure to check it soon or event he wikia site!

Edit: I don't know how to put my post outside of your archive template. Sorry :[ Notesworth Paddington (talk) 06:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

It's all good. When you want to start a discussion on someone's talk page, you can hit the 'New Section' tab near the top of the screen, give your message a subject/headline, and...you pretty much know the rest. As for your request, I'm willing to help out. No promises though...since I only really edit when I feel like it. WANI (鰐鮫) 19:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

King of the Nerds

Just a friendly note from a veteran editor that since the show King of the Nerds doesn't give contestants' last names on the official site, we can't include alleged last names without reliable-source citations, which cannot include such self-published sources as blogs unless it is the blog of the subject him/herself. This falls under the core Wikipedia policy regarding biographies of living persons. As you might imagine, given the frequent hoaxing on Wikipedia, admins are very cautious that any personal information about a living person be thoroughly cited. Thanks. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:36, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Ahh...I suspected as much. The last names of the cast were already posted by someone else, sans Hendrik, but their sources weren't added. I wasn't entirely sure whether or not to post my own source for Hendrik's surname, so I didn't. I'll be sure do that. WANI (鰐鮫) 19:28, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Cool. It's very good to be working with an editor who can track down such high-quality journalistic sources, as you're doing. My compliments, my colleague! --Tenebrae (talk) 20:31, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Darkstalkers Resurrection Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Darkstalkers Resurrection Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:36, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2013

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2013, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Skullgirls may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:18, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Injustice

Please stop your editing with Injustice: Gods Among Us. They are playable characters in this game. Thanks - User:TreCoolGuy

They may be alternate skins but they are voiced by different voice actors/actresses. So technically they are playable characters. User:TreCoolGuy

Whatever dude - User:TreCoolGuy

Michigan Wikipedians

Greetings Wani! I noticed that you made mention of the University of Michigan or Ann Arbor on your userpage. If you are a current student, faculty, or other affiliate at the University of Michigan, I would like to welcome you, on behalf of the Michigan Wikipedians, to our next weekly meeting on Monday September 30 (and every Monday thereafter). The meetings are held at 8:00 PM (EDT) in the University of Michigan Shapiro Library, room 4041. New and experienced editors alike are most welcome. Do not hesitate to leave me a message if you have any questions, and feel free to stop by the MWiki talk page. The Michigan Wikipedians are excited to meet you! Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:56, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Skullgirls screenshot.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Skullgirls screenshot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:57, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Super Smash Bros for 3DS and Wii U

I added a paragraph about rumored characters for the new games which was one hundred percent true and you deleted it. Can you tell me why you did that??? -Harmonmj13

I wrote my reasons in my edit summary. Look up WP:CRYSTAL. You said it yourself. It's a rumor. We don't add unverifiable rumors/speculation to Wikipedia. Even Sal, the person who reported the leak about Shulk, Chrom, Palutena, etc., cannot completely verify his leak due to the nature of his source...so how can you say it's "100% true"? WANI (talk) 18:24, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Global account

Hi Wani! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Skullgirls

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Skullgirls you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 11:20, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Skullgirls

The article Skullgirls you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Skullgirls for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 15:01, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Skullgirls

The article Skullgirls you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Skullgirls for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 05:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Injustice: Gods Among Us

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Injustice: Gods Among Us you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 11:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Injustice: Gods Among Us

The article Injustice: Gods Among Us you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Injustice: Gods Among Us for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 12:41, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Injustice: Gods Among Us

The article Injustice: Gods Among Us you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Injustice: Gods Among Us for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 07:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 17:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3

The article Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 13:01, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3

The article Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 16:01, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel vs. Capcom 3: Fate of Two Worlds

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marvel vs. Capcom 3: Fate of Two Worlds you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 16:21, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Indivisible) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Indivisible, Wani!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for the construction template.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Your GA nomination of Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anarchyte -- Anarchyte (talk) 02:20, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel vs. Capcom 3: Fate of Two Worlds

The article Marvel vs. Capcom 3: Fate of Two Worlds you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom 3: Fate of Two Worlds for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 04:40, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes

The article Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anarchyte -- Anarchyte (talk) 08:40, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes/GA1#Overall review

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes/GA1#Overall review. Thanks. Anarchyte 04:25, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes/GA1#Overall review

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes/GA1#Overall review. (again) Thanks. Anarchyte 07:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes

The article Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anarchyte -- Anarchyte (talk) 23:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel vs. Capcom 3: Fate of Two Worlds

The article Marvel vs. Capcom 3: Fate of Two Worlds you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom 3: Fate of Two Worlds for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 04:01, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For your impressive work on fighting game articles. From Skullgirls to Marvel vs. Capcom 3: Fate of Two Worlds, your articles are constantly improving after every GAN review. Keep up the good work! AdrianGamer (talk) 04:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Hooray! My very first barnstar! Thank you for giving up your time to review my nominations. I really appreciate it! Wani (talk) 04:15, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel vs. Capcom: Clash of Super Heroes

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marvel vs. Capcom: Clash of Super Heroes you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 12:20, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Copyediting

I am not sure whether you are interested or not, but would you mind checking article Avalanche Studios and help copyedit/proofread it? I mean, I have reviewed four of your good article submissions and all of them are engaging to read and most importantly, free from any grammatical error, and I think you would be the perfect person for this! AdrianGamer (talk) 14:46, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Sure. It's the least I could do. I'm probably not going to be able to get to it today, but maybe tomorrow. Wani (talk) 16:51, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you very much. AdrianGamer (talk) 08:04, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Well, I tried the best I could. Feel free to revert any changes that you don't agree with. Wani (talk) 05:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
The page looks much better now. Thank you very much! AdrianGamer (talk) 07:43, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel vs. Capcom: Clash of Super Heroes

The article Marvel vs. Capcom: Clash of Super Heroes you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom: Clash of Super Heroes for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 16:40, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel vs. Capcom: Clash of Super Heroes

The article Marvel vs. Capcom: Clash of Super Heroes you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom: Clash of Super Heroes for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 10:01, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Re:Scans

Definitely not too much to ask! I'll get them to you as soon as I can, which most likely means tomorrow. And I'll look through my EGM issues for good measure. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 23:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Wani (talk) 23:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Oh, wow. I'm really sorry. I've been so busy off-Wiki lately that I totally forgot about this. I'll get them for you in the next 24 hours, as soon as I can access my magazines. Sorry again. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 04:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Hey, don't sweat it. Take all the time you need. Real life comes first. Wani (talk) 04:56, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Here you go! Keep in mind that most '90s magazine articles were written anonymously—anything in here without obvious writer attribution didn't have any.
Hope these are useful. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 01:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks again! I really appreciate your help! Wani (talk) 02:48, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel Super Heroes vs. Street Fighter

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marvel Super Heroes vs. Street Fighter you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:01, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel Super Heroes vs. Street Fighter

The article Marvel Super Heroes vs. Street Fighter you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Marvel Super Heroes vs. Street Fighter for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of X-Men vs. Street Fighter

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article X-Men vs. Street Fighter you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel Super Heroes vs. Street Fighter

The article Marvel Super Heroes vs. Street Fighter you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Marvel Super Heroes vs. Street Fighter for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 14:42, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of X-Men vs. Street Fighter

The article X-Men vs. Street Fighter you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:X-Men vs. Street Fighter for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel vs. Capcom Origins

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marvel vs. Capcom Origins you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel vs. Capcom Origins

The article Marvel vs. Capcom Origins you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom Origins for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel vs. Capcom Origins

The article Marvel vs. Capcom Origins you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom Origins for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Epic Rap Battles

HI! I'm KingAttack. No offense, but I think you're making a mistake. There were two street toughs and six rebel soldiers. The two street toughs were nicePeter and epicLloyd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KingAttack! (talk • contribs) 16:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

And I'll tell you again, watch the video and look at the credits in the description. Emphasis on the latter. Wani (talk) 16:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry, you were right

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wani. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.

Take the survey now!


You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


about sonson

23:23, 21 January 2017‎ Wani (talk | contribs)‎ . . (41,042 bytes) (+17)‎ . . (Reverted good faith edits by 95.233.29.51 (talk): They share the same name, but it is not the same character. (TW)) (undo)

SonSon (Japanese: ソンソン?) is an arcade video game by Capcom released in July 1984. It is loosely based on the Chinese novel Journey to the West.

Developer(s) Capcom Publisher(s) Capcom Designer(s) Yoshiki Okamoto Composer(s) Ayako Mori Platform(s) Arcade Famicom Release date(s) JP: July 1984 NA: 1984 Genre(s) Shoot 'em up

SonSon II is a platformer game developed by Capcom and originally released on the TurboGrafx/ PC Engine in 1989.

SonSon are the same character playable on MvsC2,

and you are idiot — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.233.29.51 (talk) 00:01, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Wow, rude. The SonSon in the original arcade game is a guy, and the SonSon in Marvel vs. Capcom 2 is a girl. I own a copy of the Marvel vs. Capcom: Original Complete Works, and it states in the character glossary (p. 181) "SonSon III is a monkey girl and the granddaughter of the original SonSon, the Monkey King." Her debut is listed as Marvel vs. Capcom 2, because she is an original character. I'm not the one who needs to do their research, you do. Wani (talk) 00:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Ok is a girl, But she come from the franchise of SonSon not original 100% new concept/idea for CvsM2, you debate over the last column (franchise)come from. if you go on page SonSon read < Ports and related releases> there talk about she. for example: Zangief come from franchise of street fighter BUT not appera in street fighter,, so this are right.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.250.96.87 (talk) 10:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Sure, she was inspired by the original SonSon character and the SonSon franchise as a whole, but she debuted in Marvel vs. Capcom 2. She has never appeared in the actual SonSon franchise and, just like Ruby Heart and Amingo, was specifically designed for MvC2, which qualifies her as an original character. This is also what's listed in the Complete Works character glossary, and I'd opt for that over any original research.
I also don't understand the point you're trying to make about Zangief...he comes from the Street Fighter franchise, but doesn't appear in Street Fighter? Like, are you referring to the first game in the series or something? Wani (talk) 18:59, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Uploading a GIF

I am currently working on the article for the video game series Marvel vs. Capcom, and I want to upload an image for its gameplay section. I was searching Google for a decent screenshot, until I found a pretty good GIF demonstrating some gameplay concepts explained in the section (namely air combos and red health). Here is the image. I've never uploaded a GIF before here; it's the same as uploading any regular screenshot, right? Will I run into any potential copyright issues? Is the size appropriate? And just for your opinion, do you think uploading a GIF would help the reader understand some of the gameplay concepts better than a simple screenshot, or would it not matter that much? Thanks for your help! Wani (talk) 02:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Purely from the technical stand point, uploading a GIF is no different than uploading a still frame, and size should not be a problem. It is the copyright (WP:NFC) issue that is problematic here. You'd have to make a really good case for why a GIF is better than a still frame to get around WP:NFCC#3: an animated gif is obviously several frames away from minimal use in comparison to a screenshot. The question is not why a gif would be better, but why (if at all) a gif is the only conceivable way to illustrate the aspect. I think I've seen a non-free gif animation only once on Wikipedia. It was deleted for a slightly different reason, however (Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2016_May_7#File:Updowntrick2.gif). – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 07:58, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Alright then. Guess I'll just use a screenshot and save myself any potential trouble. Thanks for taking the time to answer my questions. Wani (talk) 08:06, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Injustice 2

I included information about the cinematic process on the video game injustice 2. This is verified by myself Matin Stoltz who is the director of cinematics at Netherrealm studios---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pteor (talk • contribs) 15:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

And we're just supposed to take your word for it? This is Wikipedia, you need to have a reliable reference for everything. Read the rule Wikipedia:No original research. Wani (talk) 16:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

My edits are based of a valid leak I received from a friend who works at Netherrelm Studios. He sent me a pic of Starfire's character bio set to be unlocked on the Injustice site soon which was displayed on one of their screens there. I can assure you it is legit. CJLoizzi (talk) 05:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

If I could send you the picture I would CJLoizzi (talk) 05:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

That's not an acceptable or reliable reference. That's hearsay at best. 79.74.198.156 (talk) 14:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel vs. Capcom

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marvel vs. Capcom you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 19:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel vs. Capcom

The article Marvel vs. Capcom you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 12:21, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheJoebro64 -- TheJoebro64 (talk) 21:02, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite

The article Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheJoebro64 -- TheJoebro64 (talk) 11:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Swap

If you give Knuckles' Chaotix a source review for its FAC, I'll be happy to review Injustice 2. Here's an example of one, in case you're unfamiliar with it. JOEBRO64 20:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

@TheJoebro64: I can maybe get to it on Thursday during my day off, but if I can't, then it'd have to wait until the following Monday. If you need it in a more timely manner, it might be difficult for me given how busy my (real life) job is. I'm willing to attempt it though, if you don't mind. Also, I have no experience with reviewing GANs or FACs myself, so keep that in mind too. Let me know if you're okay with that or not. Wani (talk) 04:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
I'm fine if you have no experience, just that the example that I linked is a good starting point. JOEBRO64 20:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Injustice 2

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Injustice 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheJoebro64 -- TheJoebro64 (talk) 23:01, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wani. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Injustice 2

The article Injustice 2 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Injustice 2 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheJoebro64 -- TheJoebro64 (talk) 15:42, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Injustice 2

The article Injustice 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Injustice 2 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheJoebro64 -- TheJoebro64 (talk) 20:02, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Re:Scans

Sure thing! I'll try to get them to you in the next day or two. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 23:42, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay—I've been pretty swamped these last few days. I'm going to dedicate time to getting you those scans later today. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 09:30, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. Take as much time as you need. Wani (talk) 15:00, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Here are the scans! I was able to find the material on Marvel Super Heroes in the Internet Archive here, along with an earlier review here. The X-Men reviews are here and here. Hope these help! JimmyBlackwing (talk) 18:15, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks again! Wani (talk) 18:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

X-Men article

Hi Wani, here's a quick scan of the article you requested from PC Gamer. The Sept 1997 issue is a double issue so it's pretty fat and doesn't flatten down nicely for scanning. Please let me know if you need me to transcribe the third column of any other parts. Good luck. -Thibbs (talk) 03:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Yeah, if it's not too much trouble, could you transcribe that last bit for me? Wani (talk) 05:02, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Here's a new one taken from a camera (it's just the third column). -Thibbs (talk) 03:44, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks again! Wani (talk) 04:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wani. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Update to scripts by AlexTheWhovian/Alex 21

Information icon Hello! This is a generic message created and copied to all editors using scripts that I have created. As I have recently changed my username from "User:AlexTheWhovian" to "User:Alex 21", any scripts that I have created that are listed at your common.js page may, at the moment, no longer be working. To fix this, simply update all occurrences of "User:AlexTheWhovian" to "User:Alex 21"; see here for an example. All the best! -- /Alex/21 11:07, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Question

I'm trying to upload a new version of "File:Smash Bros Ultimate banner.png". I've downscaled it, but for some reason, it's still displaying the old version of the image. I'm curious about what I'm doing wrong here. Thanks! Wani (talk) 00:30, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Try WP:BYPASSing your cache. It appears correctly for me. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:32, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Oh, it worked. Thank you! Wani (talk) 21:32, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wani/Archive_1&oldid=1146628697"