Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 279

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 275←Archive 277Archive 278Archive 279Archive 280Archive 281→Archive 285

Draft:J. Fagg Foster

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 2600:100E:B042:CB34:EC2B:5ED9:FC75:3F2A (talk) 15:45, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Simonetta Lein

The page was done stating facts backed by sourses such as Forbes, Huffington Post, UK Blasting Media, Philadelphia Style Magazine, Vanity Fair, Metro and many more. I am open to review it if you show me what is considered "promotional", but again, everything is a fact backed by legit links. I can give you more sources if you need them. Please let me know as I would kindly ask you to re consider and to make the changes you believe appropriate so that it can be re published. Being an "Influencer" is a legit job related to social media, it is not promotional, and all that is in the page was named by sources. Thank you for your time and your work — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.82.220.102 (talk) 04:10, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

It seems that Athaenara (talk · contribs) deleted it unilaterally without anyone nominating it first. @Athaenara: would you please explain? ~Anachronist (talk) 06:52, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
"influencer"; "fashion icon"; you don't consider crap like that promotional???? (We can forgive the bad English; it's better than my Italian, I'm sure.) --Orange Mike | Talk 01:17, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
I understand "influencer" is an actual job title, and "fashion icon" is a synonym for a fashion designer, which could have been removed or replaced. Nothing else about the article seemed unambiguously promotional. Due to no response from the deleting admin, I have restored the article to draft space for further improvement. ~Anachronist (talk) 12:00, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Exampledraft

I, Evolution and evolvability, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 01:54, 26 August 2017 (UTC)


Skylar Prockner

Further discussion of the relevance of this page is necessary. —198.169.112.19 (talk) 17:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

BMC_Control-M

Control-M is one of the leading workload automation tools globally. I will work to de-orphan the page. —Joobear (talk) 01:07, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Gyanesh Sharma

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Umesh Kumar Sharma (talk) 11:57, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

AutaBuy Magazine

This page was about a nationwide automotive magazine that sells 130,000 copies monthly. The owners started the first nationwide automotive classifieds magazine in 1982, called Deals on Wheels. —Jarrodpage (talk) 03:11, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Well there was no claim of importance in the article like you have mentioned above. You should ask the deleter - User talk:Hut 8.5 about this. Perhaps you could have it as a draft until it is satisfactory. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:52, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ted (Theodore) Downing

I, Vpski, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VPski (talk) 15:41, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

I, Vpski, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VPski (talk) 18:31, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

My reasoning is that I have draft text ready, but not updated on the page, as I have not yet gotten final approval from Ted Downing's employer, University of Arizona —VPski (talk) 18:33, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Octopus Frontier

I, Legacypac, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as it is being used as an example in a WP:CSD_talk discussion. Legacypac (talk) 05:36, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Houston Ship Channel

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —73.76.105.15 (talk) 06:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

To Wikipedia: I accidentally deleted most of the beginning section on the entry "Houston Ship Channel." Below is the text I deleted, or as much of it as I have -- somehow I got it onto a word document on my computer but I could not paste it back onto the Wikipedia entry. Please place this back on the site. I did not make any changes in the text, but I may have deleted a few words without knowing it. Thank you -- a regular reader of yours.

reservoirs, which comprise a major flood control system for the region. The reservoir system plays a crucial role in delaying and attenuating the peak outflow of the river during large rainfall events.[3] Moving eastward, the Buffalo flows under State Highway 6 and into Terry Hershey Park, a linear park which follows the bayou for approximately 6 miles (9.7 km), culminating at Beltway 8. The bayou meanders around the Memorial Villages between Beltway 8 and Loop 610. The banks along this reach are mostly private property, however there is a public access point and official Texas Parks and Wildlife paddling trail canoe launch at Briarbend Park, which is located in a quiet neighborhood south of San Felipe and west of Voss Road. There is another official canoe launch and access point just outside of 610 on Woodway. Additionally, it is legal to access the bayou at all public roadway bridges, but legal parking spots may not exist near these bridges. On the east side of Loop 610, Buffalo Bayou passes along the south side of Memorial Park and the north side of River Oaks Country Club, and is accessible to the public along the entire Memorial Park frontage. Bayou Bend Collection and Gardens, the former estate of Houston philanthropist Ima Hogg, is located on the north bank of the bayou just east of Memorial Park. After passing under Shepherd Drive, the waterway enters Buffalo Bayou Park, which is bordered on the north by Memorial Drive and the south by Allen Parkway. The park continues for 2.3 miles (3.7 km) to Interstate 45, where it enters Downtown Houston.[4] The bayou flows past Allen's Landing and joins White Oak Bayou before exiting the central reservoirs, which comprise a major flood control system for the region. The reservoir system plays a crucial role in delaying and attenuating the peak outflow of the river during large rainfall events.[3] Moving eastward, the Buffalo flows under State Highway 6 and into Terry Hershey Park, a linear park which follows the bayou for approximately 6 miles (9.7 km), culminating at Beltway 8. The bayou meanders around the Memorial Villages between Beltway 8 and Loop 610. The banks along this reach are mostly private property, however there is a public access point and official Texas Parks and Wildlife paddling trail canoe launch at Briarbend Park, which is located in a quiet neighborhood south of San Felipe and west of Voss Road. There is another official canoe launch and access point just outside of 610 on Woodway. Additionally, it is legal to access the bayou at all public roadway bridges, but legal parking spots may not exist near these bridges. On the east side of Loop 610, Buffalo Bayou passes along the south side of Memorial Park and the north side of River Oaks Country Club, and is accessible to the public along the entire Memorial Park frontage. Bayou Bend Collection and Gardens, the former estate of Houston philanthropist Ima Hogg, is located on the north bank of the bayou just east of Memorial Park. After passing under Shepherd Drive, the waterway enters Buffalo Bayou Park, which is bordered on the north by Memorial Drive and the south by Allen Parkway. The park continues for 2.3 miles (3.7 km) to Interstate 45, where it enters Downtown Houston.[4] The bayou flows past Allen's Landing and joins White Oak Bayou before exiting the central

File:Dragon Ball Z logo.png

I would like to use this image for an article. -- Wrath X (talk) 11:27, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft:ISBO Nations Cup

I, Mattyazz, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mattyazz (talk) 11:15, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 11:51, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:List of Natural Monuments in Ramechhap

I, Krish Dulal, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Krish Dulal (talk) 13:59, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 14:06, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:List of Natural Monuments in Udayapur

I, Krish Dulal, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Krish Dulal (talk) 13:57, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 14:06, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

There were over 100 of these pages. Not a single one had a reference and all were abandoned for years. An AfD deleted the head article and judged the rest of the set to be far from mainspace ready. Mass restoration should be discussed soemwhere if more requests come in. Legacypac (talk) 19:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Projective hypersurface

G13 —Taku (talk) 19:06, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Contraction morphism

G13 —Taku (talk) 19:07, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Flat family

G13 —Taku (talk) 19:08, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Deformation of an algebraic scheme

G13 —Taku (talk) 19:08, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Gluing schemes

G13 —Taku (talk) 19:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Sphere bundle

G13 —Taku (talk) 19:10, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Glossary of symplectic geometry

G13 —Taku (talk) 19:11, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Operational Chow ring

G13 —Taku (talk) 19:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Derived ring theory

G13 —Taku (talk) 19:13, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Microfunction

G13 —Taku (talk) 19:14, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Differential graded module

G13 —Taku (talk) 19:14, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Functorial point

G13 —Taku (talk) 19:15, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Kleiman's intersection theory

G13 —Taku (talk) 19:17, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Lie's formula

G13 —Taku (talk) 19:17, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Hamiltonian group action

G13 —Taku (talk) 19:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Compact object

G13 —Taku (talk) 19:19, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Lani Sarem

The author had recently faced controversy after gaming The New York Times Bestseller list ([1] and had some mentions before [2]. —Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 20:34, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

  • The entire contents of the article was "Lani Sarem is an actress, writer and band manager" with a reference to IMDB. I suggest you just write another article if you think the subject is notable. Hut 8.5 22:34, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Chintayami Manasa

I, Gazal world, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gazal world (talk) 17:21, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

 Done If these links are only useful to you, best to put them in your userspace. If it an article draft, the start drafting! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:47, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Manvini Bhavai

I, Gazal world, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gazal world (talk) 17:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

 Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:50, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Remington Model 750

Retrospectively contesting this bad PROD that nobody caught. I wish people would stop nominating guns, calibres etc for deletion on the grounds that they don't personally find them "notable" even though there's inevitably plenty of coverage in gun mags etc that are reliable enough for the purpose. —TiC (talk) 00:06, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jason Porath

I, Eoiae, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Eoiae (talk) 03:59, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Malaykord

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 1.9.172.121 (talk) 04:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

User:Johnvr4/sandbox4

This is a draft I am currently working and it contained changes and improvements from any other previously deleted version. —Johnvr4 (talk) 04:47, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

FYI Deleting editor has admitted it was not Stale. User_talk:Johnvr4#MfD_debate Johnvr4 (talk) 15:58, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
It doesn't make any difference as far as REFUND goes. REFUND is for restoring pages which were deleted for uncontroversial reasons. This page was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion, which is not an uncontroversial reason. I don't have the authority to overturn the result of a deletion discussion because of something you wrote on this page, and neither does anybody else (except maybe the closer). For the third time, if you want this page to be restored you're going to have to use deletion review, which can examine whether a deletion discussion was done properly or whether there are other considerations which justify reopening the issue. Hut 8.5 16:04, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

User:Johnvr4/sandbox & User:Johnvr4/Operation Red Hat

Contains a draft I am still working on updated, improved, condensed, reedited, version with all new sources that was in my sandbox and was updated 1.5 hours before it was nominated for deletion. I would like it restored because I am still improving it. I placed a copy in back in my sandbox4, improved it immediately with a new source, and it was also deleted [User:Johnvr4/sandbox4]. (see: WP:Miscellany_for_deletion/OpRedHat ) I would also Like to have User:Johnvr4/Operation Red Hat restored as it contains all previous versions as well as the edit histories and submissions of several other editors over approximately eight years, six years of new sources and improvements and addressing concerns that got it deleted in the first place (some of which were absurd). The was title meant to be experimental per the suggestion in the original deletion. That version is a bit older and much of the material has already been moved to the main space out of my sand box despite the assertions of the deleting editor that no policy arguments were raised (they were) and that it would never be compliant in main space (it was) as the justification for the deletion, as well as some non-existent time component. What remains of that material that was not moved out was the condensed draft in my sandbox that I am still improving and condensing. —Johnvr4 (talk) 14:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I've tried. They won't budge nor will they elaborate on their reasoning- which seems flawed. User_talk:Premeditated_Chaos#Deletion_of_userspace_material. Can an administrator simply look at edit summaries and diffs to verify moves to the main space, numerous edits to condense and improve, new sources etc. from the original deleted article? That seems to be a simple fix to check all questionable assertions. Johnvr4 (talk) 15:17, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
If the deleting admin won't restore the material then your remaining option is deletion review. Administrators can see the full history of the deleted page. Hut 8.5 15:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
For what it's worth, I very clearly pointed John to deletion review no less than three times during that discussion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
For what it is worth I was very clearly mistakenly directed by that editor to WP:DR (Dispute resolution)- Repeatedly. diff]. Deletion Review is a process that does not exist there. Johnvr4 (talk) 16:03, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Further, the nominating editor has admitted the draft was not WP:STALE User_talk:Johnvr4#MfD_debate
"I have nominated your stale userpage for deletion. Regards Buckshot06 (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2017 (UTC)"
" Yes, of course you were tinkering with the draft. I could see that... Buckshot06 (talk) 08:37, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Please restore the drafts.Johnvr4 (talk) 16:09, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
I don't think that makes nearly as much difference as you do, and it doesn't make this request uncontroversial. Please use deletion review if you want these drafts restored, that is the correct forum. Hut 8.5 16:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
In an opinion on the original article deleted in 2013 the re-edited draft of which the nominating editor NOW says has to be deleted because is not worth keeping yet in that same breath he tells you the draft is unchanged from that 2013 article...: "Keep and Cleanup This article requires further cleanup, and focusing on the primary topic, as well as investigation of sources. There is also an enormous amount of useful material in the previous versions that deserves to be in a wide range of other CW, BW, and Vietnam War related articles." Buckshot06 (talk) 19:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC) [emphasis added]
The justification for restoration is stated by the nominator. There is no controversy over the value of the "enormous amount of useful material in the previous versions that deserves to be in a wide range of other CW, BW, and Vietnam War related articles."- It is this valuable information that I am requesting to be restored. Johnvr4 (talk) 17:35, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
I'm not going to say this again: deletion review is that way and this is not the right forum to request the restoration of this material. Arguing that other people are wrong does not make this request uncontroversial: you're still asking us to overturn the result of a deletion discussion. Hut 8.5 17:48, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
You actually do have that ability. Would you please review WP:Renominating_for_deletion#Requesting_undeletion "? "If the XfD discussion was closed as “delete”, do not nominate the page to be undeleted for at least one month, unless you know and can prove you satisfied the objections."
I appreciate the edit of 17:50, 28 August 2017 (UTC). As you know, I could not go to another forum without it. Thanks, Johnvr4 (talk) 18:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Is a TempUndelete appropriate while it is under discussion? Johnvr4 (talk) 18:25, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:WikiProject My Little Pony articles and more

The empty categories (due to the {{WPBannerMeta/inactive}} template) contain articles once again. —Eflyjason (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Same as above. —Eflyjason (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Same as above. —Eflyjason (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Same as above. —Eflyjason (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Same as above. —Eflyjason (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Same as above. —Eflyjason (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Same as above. —Eflyjason (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Same as above. —Eflyjason (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Same as above. —Eflyjason (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Same as above. —Eflyjason (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Same as above. —Eflyjason (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Same as above. —Eflyjason (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Same as above. —Eflyjason (talk) 05:29, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Done the above, plus Category:My Little Pony articles by importance and Category:My Little Pony articles by quality. Hut 8.5 06:35, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Manin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells

I, Timisstuck, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Timisstuck (talk) 00:40, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

I neglected this page for over 6 months after I created it, but recently went back and filled it in and now it is ready for publication —Timisstuck (talk) 00:46, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Done I've restored the edit history here but what's there isn't much compared to the rewrite, if you want to submit it to Articles for Creation again you'll have to readd the submission template. Hut 8.5 06:38, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:SysTools Inc.

I, Anuraag Singh, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Anuraag Singh (talk) 09:54, 29 August 2017 (UTC) Wants to Start again Same page as having Resource

Phase Shift Torque Measurement

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Tripletedge (talk) 12:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Phase Shift Torque Measurement

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" You will ahve to work on this, as it is unlikely to be restored again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:44, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Elsa Cladera de Bravo.jpg

Elsa Cladera de Bravo isn't alive anymore. Can I enter the same photography as fair use? —Isadora 16:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

  • I doubt it. Non-free images can only be used if there is no free alternative. The article on her already has one free picture of her (albeit as a small child) and I suspect there are likely to be others in existence. Hut 8.5 17:47, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:SEFDM

I, Tongyang xu, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tongyang xu (talk) 15:36, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Manuel González (guitarist)

I, Tsaraiva, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tsaraiva (talk) 15:34, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:André Perrottet von Laban

I, 2A02:AA16:1104:E100:D030:863F:70DA:8C52, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2A02:AA16:1104:E100:D030:863F:70DA:8C52 (talk) 11:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ine Gevers

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Brendafc (talk) 09:37, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ine Gevers

Draft:Stephen Whitson

I, 82.1.103.200, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 82.1.103.200 (talk) 22:47, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

New sources indicate notability —82.1.103.200 (talk) 22:48, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

James Dorsa

Sourcing is adequate, and this user has additional sources to properly cite each of the claims of the subject's background. —Ezekiel H 88 (talk) 20:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Grand Baton (band)

I, Nashaj79, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nashaj79 (talk) 18:42, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Looks like RHaworth deleted it again nine minutes later. --Finngall talk 01:51, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Since no reason was supplied for deletion, it was probably not intended so I have restored it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:46, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

AverageBroTV

I am the creator of AverageBroTV, and I am unsure why the page got deleted. Some of the videos I create are controversial, so perhaps it was requested for deletion by haters of the channel. —96.41.41.61 (talk) 02:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ICTFAX

I, Nasirbest, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nasirbest (talk) 12:27, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Yuri Gurski

Please restore this article to my personal subpage User:Krukau/Yuri Gurski so that I can update it in a neutral style in accordance with the rules of the WP. —Krukau (talk) 17:30, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

You should ask the deleting admin user talk: Alex Shih Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Alex Shih refused without the reason. Krukau (talk) 18:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Surprise Asteroid

The entry is valid because this is a creative entity that has been in existence for over 8 years, and has professionally published work available worldwide (Asia, United States, Europe). Had this been a new entity, completely unknown, and with very little history, I would advocate for its deletion. In this case, however, you may take the time to verify it's legitimacy via records in both news print and digital outlets. Seeking at least a draft status to ensure that it conforms with all WikiPedia policies. —Greigner (talk) 17:59, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft: NAVEX_Global

I removed all objectionable copy from original reviewer. Please advise how I can publish the article. I have not been, nor will I be, compensated for my edits. Thank you. —Mboxcar (talk) 19:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC) Mboxcar (talk) 19:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC)MboxcarMboxcar (talk) 19:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Unfortunately, in this case, both pages were deleted as part of our WP:Deletion policy which cannot be exchanged with anything else. The best alternative here is to weigh what exactly you can use on major independent news that wasn't either influenced or tied to the company as this wouldn't meet the relevant article criteria. SwisterTwister talk 21:32, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Anterior pole

Unaware of Copyright policy completely;new to wiki.Will remove the respective prose after the article is restored. --Kalli navya (talk) 16:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

 We never restore copyright violations. Please write a new draft article from scratch, neither using nor paraphrasing other copyrighted content. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Juozas Rimkevičius

(no text provided) Kazlauskas.pov (talk) 20:32, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jeffgreene3 (talk) 18:32, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Mike Downey

I, F&ME01, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. F&ME01 (talk) 23:29, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Five Bloody Graves

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Gkaiju (talk) 02:56, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Advocates-General and Crown Solicitors of South Australia

I, Bob Flutie, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bob Flutie (talk) 07:33, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Round Kangchenjunga

I, Greenbangalore, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Greenbangalore (talk) 04:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Kosovo at major beauty pageants

I have already resources for the article deleted and please restore the page. —T4mb4y 22 (talk) 11:54, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kosovo at major beauty pageants, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:45, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Angola at major beauty pageants

As a pageant enthusiast, I want to restore the page because I already have main article source for the information itself. Please I want to be the one to hold the information. —T4mb4y 22 (talk) 11:53, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angola at major beauty pageants, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:46, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Gert van Hoef

I, FlyingScotsman72, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FlyingScotsman72 (talk) 13:12, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

TPTB

My page was deleted because I asked for the page Fotbal Club Fcsb to be edited with the right information. It has since then been proven that I was right and that the page should be edited. —TPTB (talk) 21:36, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Shane Krauser

Page was deleted and we wish to clear up on lingering issues that caused it to be deleted, including information in the wikipedia article that had no website attached to support any given statements. and then click the "Save page" button below —184.98.172.150 (talk) 22:48, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Pt. Shibdas Chakraborty

I consider this artist genuine contributor of Indian Classical Music. He is a gem artist and people should know about him. He is a prominent Indian Musician but just because he has very less media coverage, he should not get deleted from Wikipedia. —Shravani chakraborty (talk) 11:51, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Deleted G7 and A11. Legacypac (talk) 03:50, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Ellie Hart

I am planning on turning said name into a redirect to an article named Hart wrestling family, if the article which was previously there is about the person which i have in mind there might be material there which would be worth merging and adding into the main article. —06:50, 31 August 2017 (UTC)★Trekker (talk)

Draft:Donegal Insurance Group

Sorry, didn't mean to post a duplicate request. —C.mccullough14 (talk) 14:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Szilvia Varga

Materials and information in the article was correct and right.And its a translation from another languages wich are acepted beore. —Grindcomber (talk) 15:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Szilvia Varga / Silvia Vargová (actress), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Sandstein (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Anarchyte (work | talk) 16:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_279&oldid=1138664425"