Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 June 30

< June 29	July 1 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 8. Primefac (talk) 23:37, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Language_politics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cgtimeline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was subst and delete. Primefac (talk) 23:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cgtimeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use template. Izno (talk) 21:07, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SVGify or otherwise convert: substing would create a mess in the article, see the source code. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 12:52, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is in its own section in the target article. I see no reason not to subst. The article editors can decide whether it needs further resolution. --Izno (talk) 22:42, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:First Day of Winter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 12:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:First Day of Winter (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Subst-only template that hasn't been used since 2008. Izno (talk) 21:02, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Unused and no need.--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of Rabindranath Tagore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was "subst" and delete via histmerge. I know this may seem like an odd closing rationale, but the Timeline of Rabindranath Tagore is a transclusion of the template plus a sentence and a navbox. Preserving the history of the template is possible because there are not parallel histories. Primefac (talk) 23:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Timeline of Rabindranath Tagore (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use template. Izno (talk) 20:52, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SVGify or otherwise convert: substing would create a mess in the article, see the source code. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 12:52, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is in its own section in the target article (in fact, it's the only part of the article). I see no reason not to subst. The article editors can decide whether it needs further resolution. --Izno (talk) 22:42, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:DocumentHistory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after suitable replacement is made (looks like one of them is a {{merged from}} candidate). Primefac (talk) 23:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DocumentHistory (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Two-use template that doesn't seem to have been adopted in the past decade. (I'm doubtful that {{article history}} couldn't do this now either.) Izno (talk) 20:46, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom. Definitely no need; and makes life harder for end editors to have this sort of thing lying around.--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Substing this as-is seems rough for the pages to which it will be substed. Any thought on whether that's the best way to deal with the template? --Izno (talk) 16:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Led Zeppelin Invite

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:05, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Led Zeppelin Invite (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A subst-only template used only 4 times. Izno (talk) 20:29, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, but potentially keep until the Wikiproject itself is deleted? Not seeing the harm in keeing this--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This was substed 4 times in 2007 and never since. No-one is using it now... --Izno (talk) 03:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WPBreakfast assessment level category-main

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 12:53, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPBreakfast assessment level category-main (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Currently unused. TheImaCow (talk) 19:57, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. We have other standard templates for this sort of thing. --Izno (talk) 16:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WPBiography WorkGroupDiv banner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:33, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPBiography WorkGroupDiv banner (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. TheImaCow (talk) 19:56, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Unnecessary--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gigiband

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gigiband (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant. Not sure if this could be speedily deleted under G6, but this navbox serves no purpose: apart from being created under the wrong name, the only bluelink to any album or song is to an unrelated article. So the only bluelinks left are to Wikipedia articles for the band's record labels, which aren't directly related to the band. Richard3120 (talk) 19:47, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Doesn't seem to have any actual links relating to the primary topic.--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Trains/tasks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Trains/tasks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Izno (talk) 19:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - This is a remnant of a feature of the Trains WikiProject banner that is not used. The feature was better integrated into the project banner when the banner was redesigned in 2009. Slambo (Speak) 19:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Universal Pictures films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 19:13, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Universal Pictures films (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox; contains only one blue link. TheImaCow (talk) 18:44, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the nominator's rationale. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Coquote

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect. to {{quote}} after ensuring parameter/output compatibility with that template. Primefac (talk) 23:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Coquote (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not obviously necessary non-guideline compliant template (MOS:QUOTE, MOS:COLLAPSE) that forks Template:Quote and is used only 5 times. Izno (talk) 17:50, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom per WP:INFOCOL (roughly).--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Replace all transclusions with an appropriate quote template, then redirect to {{quote}} or another template that matches its functionality and parameters closely, if possible. It looks like it is a partial translation of ru:Template:Coquote; having a redirect in place can help when people are translating articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I support this, —Paleo Neonate – 10:50, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Improve Olympic Sailing Article

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Improve Olympic Sailing Article (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I think this template is overly specific and therefore, not needed. It's only used on about 100+ pages, and typically used on pages like this to add meaningless empty sections (Notes, Other Information, etc). At a push, it could be merged into Template:More citations needed section. This template was nominated about two years ago, but with little participation. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:41, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete, I cleaned up all the articles (removing some pointless empty sections and replacing others with either {{empty section}} or {{more citations needed}}. the remaining appear to be from the boilerplate article templates being transcluded on the talk page, which seems kind of pointless (i.e., {{Sailing at the xxxx Summer Olympic event standard}} and {{Sailing at the xxxx Summer Olympics – Classpage}}). we should really remove the transclusions of {{Sailing at the xxxx Summer Olympic event standard}} and {{Sailing at the xxxx Summer Olympics – Classpage}} from the talk pages. Frietjes (talk) 21:27, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clean-up work. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:29, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2019–20 Pittsburgh Penguins Schedule

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. This is an empty copy of the schedule in 2019–20 Pittsburgh Penguins season Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2019–20 Pittsburgh Penguins Schedule (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Even if it were to be used it a) wouldn't be its own template and b) wouldn't use deprecated NavFrame. Izno (talk) 17:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TotalHumanSpaceFlightByNation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Pulling this since this isn't really the point of the exercise and it seems to be doing fruitful things. No prejudice against someone renominating. Izno (talk) 17:09, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TotalHumanSpaceFlightByNation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use template. Nothing so excessive as to need its own page. Izno (talk) 16:37, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On review, I'm actually concerned that this is an automated task affecting mainspace content without an approval. Thoughts are welcome. --Izno (talk) 16:40, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I bumped into this template is that I am trying to remove uses of deprecated NavFrame, so it is also possible I will be reverted on that point. --Izno (talk) 16:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Izno: Is this not a minor modification (transcluding a template that the bot edits, rather than a direct edit of the given page) of the task that was approved at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SpaceFactsBot? --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:46, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That was not linked on the user page. oof. Good start there. --Izno (talk) 16:48, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:First Day Of Fall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:First Day Of Fall (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Subst-only template that appears never to have been used. Izno (talk) 16:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Unnecessary.--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the nominator's rationale. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MTRinterchange/TWH/Bus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:20, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MTRinterchange/TWH/Bus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use template. May not be generally valuable per WP:NOT. Izno (talk) 16:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Completely agree.--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the nominator's rationale. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MTRinterchange/TWH/Minibus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:20, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MTRinterchange/TWH/Minibus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

single-use template Izno (talk) 16:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Completely agree.--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the nominator's rationale. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Music eras

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 7. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Music_eras (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Games based on Arthurian legends

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Games based on Arthurian legends (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A navbox based upon a common thematic element, the Arthurian legend (or, the Matter of Britain). That fails WP:NAVBOX: there is no single coherent subject like 'Arthurian legend video game'. Different styles of gameplay, different developers and the articles listed do not refer to each other. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 13:45, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the games are clearly linked by relationship to the arthur legend. I don't think there is a requirement that every navbox must have an article matching its title. The navbox has a clear scope. Second best option would be delete and convert to category. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:21, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Tom (LT), thanks for taking the time to reply. There actually already is Category:Video games based on Arthurian legend. I should've elaborated that because there isn't such a thing as 'Arthurian legend video game', it borders WP:OR / WP:SYNTH on how it is based upon the Arthurian legend. Dance of Death: Du Lac & Fey for instance is set in Victorian London of 1888; in Excalibur 2555 AD Merlin sends a young warrior to the future; in Blazing Dragons "the player controls Flicker, a dragon who lives in Camelhot castle". I just went through a bunch of the listed games, and some don't mention the Arthurian legend at all, I've taken those out of the navbox for now. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 15:53, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Suit better as a category instead. No strong ties between the articles listed. OceanHok (talk) 11:23, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheTVExpert (talk) 13:41, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I tend toward delete. These articles are not strongly related to each other. No opinion on the category alternative, though it doesn't strongly call to me as a valuable addition itself. --Izno (talk) 16:23, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Izno. The articles aren't related to each other. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ginga-ya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 7. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:15, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ginga-ya (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Troy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Troy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, all links redirect to David Gemmell. TheImaCow (talk) 09:10, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tricolour-chairman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tricolour-chairman (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox, contains only one link TheImaCow (talk) 09:08, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Too much vandalism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:15, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Too much vandalism (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. WP:RFPP is for cases of "much vandalism". TheImaCow (talk) 08:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The past, present, and future of gibbons in China

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The past, present, and future of gibbons in China (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, seems not very useful. TheImaCow (talk) 08:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This template is quite specific.--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Worship Initiative

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Worship Initiative (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox; contains only one blue link. TheImaCow (talk) 08:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Water is My Sky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Water is My Sky (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. TheImaCow (talk) 08:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Australian Institute of Food Science and Technology (AIFST)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Australian Institute of Food Science and Technology (AIFST) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. TheImaCow (talk) 08:05, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Town Councils in Singapore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:10, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Town Councils in Singapore (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused template, undeveloped for at least 6 months. none of the entries seem to have articles either -- AquaDTRS (talk) 03:39, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Heads of state of France

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was split. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:09, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Heads of state of France (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

One could argue that having Macron and de Gaulle in the same template as Napoleon is not entirely insane but putting them alongside Louis XIV, Charlemagne, and Clovis I undoubtedly is. Also, "heads of state of the Franks" is a ridiculous Wikipedia neologism. This should be split into at least two templates, Template:Monarchs of France and Template:Presidents of France. Surtsicna (talk) 19:27, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Split per nom. I agree with nom. It does make more sense to portray these in different ways --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:50, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:52, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not entirely sure why this got a relist, but the analysis is reasonable. --Izno (talk) 16:41, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

FART templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:09, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FART color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:FART lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:FART stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

s-line data module

Template:S-line/FART right/ (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

{{s-line}} templates for the Regional Bus and Rail Company of Ticino (Italian: Ferrovie Autolinee Regionali Ticinesi...). Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/FART. All transclusions replaced. There is one dependent s-line data module that should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 00:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Monuments and memorials removed during the George Floyd protests

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 7. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:36, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Monuments_and_memorials_removed_during_the_George_Floyd_protests (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).