Windows Vista: Difference between revisions
m Reverted 1 edit by Huge chicken; Focusses soley on the negative.... using TWINKLE |
Huge chicken (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
'''Windows Vista''', an [[operating system]] released by [[Microsoft]] in November 2006, has received substantial criticism by reviewers and users. Due to issues with privacy, security, performance, and product activation, [[Windows Vista]] has been the subject of a number of negative assessments by various groups. |
|||
'''Windows Vista''' is an [[operating system]] developed by [[Microsoft]] for use on [[personal computer]]s, including home and business [[Desktop computer|desktops]], [[laptop]]s, [[Tablet PC]]s, and [[media center]] PCs. Prior to its announcement on July 22, 2005, Windows Vista was known by its [[List of Microsoft codenames|codename]] "Longhorn".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2005/jul05/07-22LHMA.mspx|title=Media Alert: Microsoft Unveils Official Name for "Longhorn" and Sets Date for First Beta Targeted at Developers and IT Professionals|author=Microsoft|accessdate=2007-01-02|date=2005-07-22}}</ref> Development was completed on November 8, 2006; over the following three months it was released in stages to computer hardware and software manufacturers, business customers, and retail channels. On January 30, 2007, it was released worldwide,<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://www.microsoft.com/nz/presscentre/articles/2007/jan07_windowsvistalaunch.mspx |
|||
| title = Microsoft Launches Windows Vista and the 2007 Office System to Consumers |
|||
| date=2007-01-30 |
|||
| accessdate = 2007-01-30 |
|||
| work = PressCentre |
|||
| publisher = Microsoft New Zealand |
|||
}}</ref> and was made available for purchase and download from Microsoft's website.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url=http://www.windowsmarketplace.com/content.aspx?ctId=390&tabid=1 |
|||
| title = Windows Marketplace: Windows Vista Upgrade Editions: Get Started |
|||
| date=2007-01-30 |
|||
| accessdate = 2007-01-30 |
|||
| work = Windows Marketplace |
|||
| publisher = Microsoft |
|||
}}</ref> The release of Windows Vista came more than five years after the introduction of its predecessor, [[Windows XP]], the longest time span between successive releases of [[Microsoft Windows]]. |
|||
==Security== |
|||
Windows Vista contains [[Features new to Windows Vista|many changes and new features]], including an updated [[graphical user interface]] and [[Skin (computing)|visual style]] dubbed [[Windows Aero]], improved [[Windows Search|searching]] features, new multimedia creation tools such as [[Windows DVD Maker]], and redesigned networking, audio, print, and display sub-systems. Vista also aims to increase the level of communication between machines on a [[home network]], using [[peer-to-peer]] technology to simplify sharing [[computer file|files]] and [[digital media]] between computers and devices. Windows Vista includes version 3.0 of the [[.NET Framework]], which aims to make it significantly easier for [[software developer]]s to write applications than with the traditional [[Windows API]]. |
|||
According to [[CNET]], some critics are unenthusiastic about the Vista security features, claiming that Vista "offers mostly basic protection and is not the best of its class." Natalie Lambert, an analyst with [[Forrester Research]], stated, "There is no doubt that Vista will be Microsoft's most secure operating system. However, most secure is not equivalent to secure."<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://news.com.com/2100-7355_3-6150948.html |
|||
|title=Security tools ready for Vista launch |
|||
|last=Evers |
|||
|first=Joris |
|||
|publisher=[[CNET News.com]] |
|||
|date=2007-01-17 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-01-20 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
In February 2008, [[Bitlocker Drive Encryption|Bitlocker]] was shown to be vulnerable to a [[cold boot attack]].<ref name="ColdBoot">{{cite paper |
|||
|url=http://citp.princeton.edu/memory/ |
|||
|title=Lest We Remember: Cold Boot Attacks on Encryption Keys |
|||
|author=J. Alex Halderman, [[Seth Schoen|Seth D. Schoen]], Nadia Heninger, William Clarkson, William Paul, Joseph A. Calandrino, Ariel J. Feldman, [[Jacob Appelbaum]], and [[Edward Felten|Edward W. Felten]] |
|||
|publisher=[[Princeton University]] |
|||
|date=2008-02-21 |
|||
|accessdate=2008-06-20 |
|||
}}</ref> According to the researchers, the risk can be mitigated by configuring [[two-factor authentication]] (e.g. a boot [[Personal Identification Number|PIN]] in conjunction with a [[Trusted Platform Module|TPM]]), and by disabling power standby mode. |
|||
===User Account Control=== |
|||
Microsoft's primary stated objective with Windows Vista, however, has been to improve the state of security in the Windows operating system.<ref name="gatesrsa">{{cite web |
|||
The following concerns have been raised about the new [[User Account Control]] (UAC) security technology: Many third-party programs do not follow the [[principle of least privilege]] and therefore need be run as an [[superuser|administrator]], triggering UAC prompts. For some time, Microsoft has recommended that programs be written to run as a standard user. However, because nearly all users are administrators by default in previous versions of Windows, many developers have incorrectly assumed that their applications will always execute with these privileges, or have not regression tested their code for LUA bugs.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc160944.aspx|title=Problems of Privilege: Find and Fix LUA Bugs|author=Aaron Margosis|accessdate=2008-10-27|publisher=[[Microsoft]]|date=2006-08-01}}</ref> Microsoft added ''file and registry virtualization'' technology as well as application compatibility [[shim (computing)|shims]] to reduce the number of these [[Legacy system|legacy]] applications that trigger UAC prompts.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url=http://informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=180201580 |
|||
|url=http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=288259 |
|||
| title = Gates Says Security Is Job One For Vista |
|||
|title=UAC - What. How. Why. |
|||
| date=2006-02-14 |
|||
|date=2007-03-05 |
|||
| accessdate = 2006-08-13 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-03-23 |
|||
| first = Aaron |
|||
|format=video |
|||
| last = Ricadela |
|||
|author=Charles |
|||
| publisher = InformationWeek News |
|||
}}</ref> One common [[criticism of Windows XP]] and its predecessors has been their commonly exploited [[Vulnerability (computing)|security vulnerabilities]] and overall susceptibility to [[malware]], [[computer virus|viruses]] and [[buffer overflow]]s. In light of this, Microsoft chairman [[Bill Gates]] announced in early 2002 a company-wide "[[Trustworthy Computing]] initiative" which aims to incorporate security work into every aspect of software development at the company. Microsoft stated that it prioritized improving the security of Windows XP and [[Windows Server 2003]] above finishing Windows Vista, thus delaying its completion.<ref name="winxpdevpriority">{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://news.com.com/Microsoft+Longhorn+beta+unlikely+this+year/2100-1008_3-5183385.html |
|||
| title = Microsoft: Longhorn beta unlikely this year |
|||
| date=2004-06-01 |
|||
| accessdate = 2006-08-12 |
|||
| first = Mike |
|||
| last = Ricciuti |
|||
| publisher = CNet News |
|||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
User Account Control can be disabled through the Control Panel; however, this also disables privilege separation features such as [[Internet Explorer 7]]'s Protected Mode, which relies on UAC for its operation. |
|||
While these new features and security improvements have garnered positive reviews, Vista has also been the target of much criticism and negative press. [[Criticism of Windows Vista]] has targeted its high system requirements, its more restrictive licensing terms, the inclusion of a number of new [[digital rights management]] technologies aimed at restricting the copying of protected digital media, lack of compatibility with some pre-Vista hardware and software, and the number of authorization prompts for [[User Account Control]]. As a result of these and other issues, Windows Vista has seen adoption and satisfaction rates lower than Windows XP.<ref name="computerworld1">[http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9072218&source=NLT_AM&nlid=1 Leopard drubs Vista in corporate satisfaction]</ref> However Vista is keeping well up with expectations stated by Microsoft before its launch of getting 200 million users by January 2009.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url=http://windowsitpro.com/article/articleid/93552/allchin-200-million-windows-vista-users-in-24-months.html |
|||
| title=Allchin: 200 Million Windows Vista Users in 24 Months |
|||
| author=[[Paul Thurrot]] |
|||
| Publisher=WindowsITPro |
|||
| date=2006-09-16 |
|||
| accessdate=2009-01-03}}</ref><ref>[http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=10]</ref><ref>[http://www.c-i-a.com/pr0106.htm]</ref> |
|||
===Driver signing requirement=== |
|||
==Development== |
|||
{{main|Development of Windows Vista}} |
|||
[[64-bit]] versions of Windows Vista allow only [[code signing|signed]] [[device driver|drivers]] to be installed in [[ring (computer security)|kernel mode]]; this feature cannot be easily overridden by [[system administrator]]s.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
[[Image:Windows Longhorn logo.svg|thumb|left|The Windows Vista Codename (Longhorn) logo]] |
|||
|url=http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/winlogo/drvsign/drvsign.mspx |
|||
|title=Driver Signing Requirements for Windows |
|||
|publisher=[[Microsoft]] |
|||
|accessdate=2008-02-23 |
|||
}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.heise-online.co.uk/security/Microsoft-blocks-64-bit-driver--/news/94035 Microsoft blocks 64-bit driver |
|||
|title=Microsoft blocks 64-bit driver |
|||
|publisher=heise Security UK |
|||
|date=2007-08-08 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
In order for a driver to be signed, a developer will either have to pay Microsoft for the driver to be tested by Microsoft's [[WHQL Testing]].<ref>{{cite web |
|||
Microsoft began work on Windows Vista, known at the time by its codename Longhorn in May 2001,<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| |
|url=http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa906341.aspx |
||
|title=Signing Drivers For Public Release (Windows Server 2008 and Windows Vista) |
|||
| title = Pushing Forward |
|||
|publisher=[[Microsoft]] |
|||
| first = Peter |
|||
|accessdate=2008-02-23 |
|||
| last = Galli |
|||
}}</ref> or, if WHQL testing is not required, to purchase a "Software Publisher [[public key certificate|Certificate]]"<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| date=2001-07-30 |
|||
|url=http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa906334.aspx |
|||
| accessdate = 2006-07-07 |
|||
|title=Software Publisher Certificate |
|||
| publisher = [[eWeek]] |
|||
|publisher=[[Microsoft]] |
|||
}}</ref> five months before the release of Windows XP. It was originally expected to ship sometime late in 2003 as a minor step between Windows XP and Blackcomb, which was planned to be the company's next major operating system release. Gradually, "Longhorn" assimilated many of the important new features and technologies slated for Blackcomb, resulting in the release date being pushed back several times. Many of Microsoft's developers were also re-tasked to build updates to Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 to strengthen security.<ref name="winxpdevpriority"/> Faced with ongoing delays and concerns about [[feature creep]], Microsoft announced on August 27, 2004 that it had revised its plans. The original Longhorn, based on the [[Windows XP]] source code, was scrapped, and Longhorn's development started anew, building on the Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 codebase, and re-incorporating only the features that would be intended for an actual operating system release. Some previously announced features such as [[WinFS]] were dropped or postponed, and a new software development methodology called the [[Security Development Lifecycle]] was incorporated in an effort to address concerns with the security of the Windows codebase.<ref name="sdl">{{cite web |
|||
}}</ref> with which to sign the driver. |
|||
| author = Steve Lipner, Michael Howard |
|||
| title = The Trustworthy Computing Security Development Lifecycle |
|||
The following criticisms/claims have been made regarding this requirement: |
|||
| publisher = Microsoft Developer Network |
|||
| month = March |
|||
* that it reduces Vista's compatibility with older hardware (or, even modern software such as [[VMware Server]], where manufacturers have not released signed drivers either)<ref>[http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?lc=en&cc=us&docname=c00678204&dlc=en in here, HP states that it wont release vista drivers for some hardware. Together with the fact that the old drivers can't be loaded, this renders such hardware unusable under vista]</ref> |
|||
| year = 2005 |
|||
* that it disallows experimentation from the hobbyist community.<ref>[http://www.linchpinlabs.com/resources/atsiv/usage-design.htm Linchpin Labs Response to Microsoft's Classification of Atsiv]</ref> The required authenticode certificate for signing Vista drivers are expensive and out of reach<ref>{{cite web |
|||
| url=http://msdn.microsoft.com/security/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnsecure/html/sdl.asp |
|||
|url=http://www.winwaed.com/info/authenticode/authenticode.shtml |
|||
| accessdate = 2006-08-09 |
|||
|title=Microsoft Authenticode for the Small Independent Software Vendor |
|||
|accessdate=2008-05-27 |
|||
|author=Marsden, Richard |
|||
}}</ref> for small developers, usually about $400-500/year (from [[VeriSign]]). |
|||
* that it might exist not only for security reasons, but also to enforce [[Digital Rights Management]] policies, especially the [[Protected Video Path]].<ref>[http://www.alex-ionescu.com/?p=24 Alex Ionescu’s Blog » Update on Driver Signing Bypass]</ref><ref>[http://www.pagetable.com/?p=12 "the real reason for driver signing on windows vista"]</ref> |
|||
Unsigned drivers could initially be installed through the use of tools included with Vista,<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.mstalkonline.com/vista-install-unsigned-hardware-driver-in-x64-bit/ |
|||
|title=Allowing UnSigned Driver Installation in Vista x64 |
|||
|accessdate=2008-03-02 |
|||
}}</ref>as well as some third party utilities such as Atsiv<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9028440|title=Utility evades Vista kernel defenses|date=2007-06-30|publisher=Computerworld|author=Gregg Keizer|accessdate=2008-09-14}}</ref>. However Microsoft has closed these workarounds with hotfix KB932596,<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://support.microsoft.com/kb/932596 |
|||
|title=Microsoft Security Advisory: Update to improve Kernel Patch Protection |
|||
|publisher=[[Microsoft]] |
|||
|date=2007-10-26 |
|||
|accessdate=2008-03-03 |
|||
}}</ref> which is included in Service Pack 1. |
|||
===Flaws in memory protection features=== |
|||
Security researchers [[Alexander Sotirov]] and Mark Dowd have developed a technique that bypasses many of the new memory-protection safeguards in Windows Vista, such as [[Address space layout randomization]]. The result of this is that any already existing buffer overflow bugs that, in Vista, were previously not exploitable due to such features, may now be exploitable.<ref>[http://taossa.com/archive/bh08sotirovdowd.pdf How to Impress Girls with Browser Memory Protection Bypasses]</ref><ref>[http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080811-the-sky-isnt-falling-a-look-at-a-new-vista-security-bypass.html The sky isn't falling: a look at a new Vista security bypass]</ref> Note that this is not in itself a vulnerability: as Sotirov notes, "''What we presented is weaknesses in the protection mechanism. It still requires the system under attack to have a vulnerability. Without the presence of a vulnerability these techniques don’t really [accomplish] anything.''"<ref name="SotZDNet">[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=513 Alarmed about Vista security? Black Hat researcher Alexander Sotirov speaks out]</ref> The vulnerability Sotirov and Dowd used in their paper as an example was the 2007 animated cursor bug, [[Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures|CVE]]-2007-0038. |
|||
Security researcher Dino Dai Zovi has claimed that this means that it is "completely game over" for Vista security.<ref>http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid14_gci1324395,00.html</ref> Sotirov himself, however, has refuted this, saying that "''The articles that describe Vista security as 'broken' or 'done for,' with 'unfixable vulnerabilities' are completely inaccurate. One of the suggestions I saw in many of the discussions was that people should just use Windows XP. In fact, in XP a lot of those protections we’re bypassing ''[such as [[Address space layout randomization|ASLR]]] ''don’t even exist.''"<ref name="SotZDNet" /> |
|||
==Digital rights management== |
|||
Another common criticism concerns the integration of new forms of [[digital rights management]] (DRM) into the operating system, specifically the [[Protected Video Path]] (PVP), which involves technologies such as [[High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection]] (HDCP) and the [[Image Constraint Token]] (ICT). These features have been added to Vista due to an agreement between Microsoft and major Hollywood studios.<ref name="Microsoft-ocp">{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/device/stream/output_protect.mspx |
|||
|title=Output Content Protection and Windows Vista |
|||
|date=2005-04-27 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-01-08 |
|||
|author=Marsh, Dave |
|||
|publisher=[[Microsoft]] |
|||
}}</ref> Microsoft claims that movie studios and other providers of "premium content"{{Fact|date=May 2008}} will only allow their data to be played back on personal computers if sufficient protection is granted. This will concern, among other things, play-back of protected content on [[HD DVD]] and [[Blu-ray]] discs, but it will not be enabled until at least 2010. |
|||
The Protected Video Path mandates that encryption must be used whenever content marked as "protected" will travel over a link where it might be intercepted. This is called a User-Accessible Bus (UAB). Additionally, all devices that come into contact with premium content (such as graphics cards) have to be certified by Microsoft.<ref name="Microsoft-ocp"/> Before playback starts, all the devices involved are checked using a Hardware Functionality Scan (HFS) to verify if they are genuine and have not been tampered with. Devices are required to switch off or artificially degrade the quality of any signal outputs that are not protected by HDCP. Additionally, Microsoft maintains a global revocation list for devices that have been compromised. This list is distributed to PCs over the Internet using normal update mechanisms. The only effect on a revoked driver's functionality is that high-level protected content will not play; all other functionality, including low-definition playback, is retained.<ref name="Microsoft-ocp"/><ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2007/01/20/windows-vista-content-protection-twenty-questions-and-answers.aspx |
|||
|title=Windows Vista Content Protection - Twenty Questions (and Answers) |
|||
|date=2007-01-20 |
|||
|author=Marsh, Dave |
|||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
===Notable critics=== |
|||
After Longhorn was named Windows Vista in July 2005, an unprecedented [[Development stage|beta-test]] program was started, involving hundreds of thousands of volunteers and companies. In September of that year, Microsoft started releasing regular [[Community Technology Preview]]s (CTP) to beta testers. The first of these was distributed at the 2005 Microsoft [[Professional Developers Conference]], and was subsequently released to beta testers and [[Microsoft Developer Network]] subscribers. The builds that followed incorporated most of the planned features for the final product, as well as a number of changes to the user interface, based largely on feedback from beta testers. Windows Vista was deemed feature-complete with the release of the "February CTP", released on February 22, 2006, and much of the remainder of work between that build and the final release of the product focused on stability, performance, application and driver compatibility, and documentation. Beta 2, released in late May, was the first build to be made available to the general public through Microsoft's Customer Preview Program. It was downloaded by over five million people. Two release candidates followed in September and October, both of which were made available to a large number of users.<ref>{{cite web | first=Paul | last=Thurrott | url=http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/winvista_roadtogold_07.asp | title=Paul Thurrott's SuperSite for Windows: Road to Gold: The Long Road to Windows Vista Part 7: July 2006–Present | publisher=SuperSite for Windows | date=[[2006-11-05]] | accessdate=2007-12-25 }}</ref> |
|||
[[Peter Gutmann (computer scientist)|Peter Gutmann]], a computer security expert from the [[University of Auckland]], New Zealand, has released a [[whitepaper]]<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html |
|||
|title=A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection |
|||
|last=Gutmann |
|||
|first=Peter |
|||
|authorlink=Peter Gutmann |
|||
|date=2007-01-27 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-01-27 |
|||
}} Also available: [http://max-sievers.name/vista_cost.pdf PDF version]</ref> in which he raises the following concerns against these mechanisms: |
|||
* Adding encryption facilities to devices makes them more expensive, a cost that is passed on to the user. |
|||
* If outputs are not deemed sufficiently protected by the media industry, then even very expensive equipment can be required to be switched off (for example, [[S/PDIF]]-based, high-end audio cards). |
|||
* Some newer high-definition monitors are not HDCP-enabled, even though the manufacturer may claim otherwise. |
|||
* The added complexity makes systems less reliable. |
|||
* Since non-protected media are not subject to the new restrictions, users may be encouraged to remove the protection in order to view them without restrictions, thus defeating the content protection scheme's initial purpose. |
|||
* Protection mechanisms, such as disabling or degrading outputs, may be triggered erroneously or maliciously, motivating denial-of-service attacks. |
|||
* Revoking the driver of a device that is in wide use is such a drastic measure that Gutmann doubts Microsoft will ever actually do so. On the other hand, they may be forced to because of their legal obligations to the movie studios. |
|||
[[Steve Gibson]] of [[Gibson Research Corporation]] has stated during his [[Security Now!]] show that he agrees with Peter Gutmann in principle and that what he proposes is a factually accurate description of what is found in the specification from Microsoft.<ref> |
|||
While Microsoft had originally hoped to have the consumer versions of the operating system available worldwide in time for Christmas 2006, it was announced in March 2006 that the release date would be pushed back to January 2007, in order to give the company–and the hardware and software companies which Microsoft depends on for providing [[device driver]]s–additional time to prepare. Through much of 2006, analysts and bloggers had speculated that Windows Vista would be delayed further, owing to anti-trust concerns raised by the European Commission and South Korea, and due to a perceived lack of progress with the beta releases. However, with the November 8, 2006 announcement of the completion of Windows Vista, Microsoft's lengthiest operating system development project came to an end.<ref>{{cite news | first=Nick | last=White | url=http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2006/11/08/windows-vista-releases-to-manufacturing.aspx | title=Windows Vista releases to manufacturing | publisher=Windows Vista team blog | date=[[2006-11-08]] | accessdate=2006-11-08 }}</ref> |
|||
{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.grc.com/sn/SN-074.htm |
|||
|title=Steve Gibson & Peter Gutmann on Vista DRM |
|||
|first=Steve |
|||
|last=Gibson |
|||
|date=2007-01-17 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-01-17 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
The [[Free Software Foundation]] is conducting a campaign called "[[BadVista]]" against Vista on these grounds. |
|||
Windows Vista cost 6 billion dollars to develop, according to Microsoft.<ref name="news.softpedia.com">{{cite web|url=http://news.softpedia.com/news/Vista-a-6-Billion-Dollars-Operating-System-44096.shtml |title=Vista - a $6 Billion Dollars Operating System - The best billions Bill Gates has ever spent - Softpedia |publisher=News.softpedia.com |date= |accessdate=2008-10-02}}</ref> |
|||
[[Apple Inc]], Microsoft's major competitor, frequently made Vista a target of its "[[Get a Mac]]" advertising campaign. |
|||
==New or changed features== |
|||
{{main | Features new to Windows Vista}} |
|||
=== |
===Reaction to criticism=== |
||
Ed Bott, author of Windows Vista Inside Out, has published a 3 part blog which rebuts many of Gutmann's claims.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
[[Image:Windows Explorer Vista.png|thumb|Windows Explorer in Windows Vista]] |
|||
|url=http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=299 |
|||
* '''[[Windows Aero]]:''' The new hardware-based graphical user interface is named ''Windows Aero,'' which [[Jim Allchin]] has said is an acronym for ''Authentic, Energetic, Reflective, and Open''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2006/11/09/the-sounds-of-windows-vista.aspx|title=The Sounds of Windows|author="JimAll", links to page identifying him as Jim Allchin, Co-President, Platform and Services Division|accessdate=2007-12-31|date=2006-11-09|publisher=Windows Vista Team Blog}}</ref> The new interface is intended to be cleaner and more aesthetically pleasing than those of previous Windows versions, including new transparencies, live thumbnails, live icons, and animations, thus providing a new level of [[attractiveness|eye candy]]. [[Laptop]] users report, however, that battery life is shortened with the feature enabled.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/04/vistas-aero-interface-blamed-for-truncated-battery-life/|title=Vista's Aero interface blamed for truncated battery life|author=Darren Murph|publisher=[[Engadget]]|date=May 3, 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://blogs.msdn.com/coding4fun/archive/2007/05/06/2452864.aspx|title=Vista Battery Fix?|date=May 6, 2007|publisher=[[Microsoft]]|accessdate=2008-03-18}}</ref> |
|||
|title=Everything you've read about Vista DRM is wrong. |
|||
* '''[[Windows Shell]]:''' The new Windows shell is significantly different from Windows XP, offering a new range of organization, navigation, and search capabilities. [[Windows Explorer]]'s task pane has been removed, integrating the relevant task options into the toolbar. A "Favorite links" pane has been added, enabling one-click access to common directories. The address bar has been replaced with a [[Breadcrumb (navigation)|breadcrumb navigation]] system. The preview pane allows users to see thumbnails of various files and view the contents of documents. The details pane shows information such as file size and type, and allows viewing and editing of [[Tag (metadata)|embedded tags]] in supported file formats. The [[Start menu]] has changed as well; it no longer uses ever-expanding boxes when navigating through Programs. The word "Start" itself has been removed in favor of a blue Windows Pearl. |
|||
|first=Ed |
|||
* '''[[Instant Search]]''' (also known as ''[[Incremental find|search as you type]]'') : Windows Vista features a new way of searching called Instant Search, which is significantly faster and more in-depth (content-based) than the search features found in any of the previous versions of Windows.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|last=Bott |
|||
| year = 2006 |
|||
|date=2007-09-16 |
|||
| publisher = National Instruments |
|||
|accessdate=2007-09-21 |
|||
| url = http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/5604 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
| title = A Closer Look at Windows Vista Part II: Enhanced Search |
|||
Ed Bott's criticisms can be summarized as follows: |
|||
* Gutmann allegedly based his paper on outdated documentation from Microsoft and second-hand web sources. |
|||
* Gutmann allegedly quotes selectively from the Microsoft specifications. |
|||
* Gutmann allegedly did no experimental work with Vista to prove his theories. Rather, he makes mistaken assumptions and then speculates wildly on their implications. |
|||
* Gutmann's paper, while presented as serious research, is really just an opinion piece. |
|||
Technology writer George Ou claims that Gutmann's paper relies on unreliable sources and that Gutmann has never used Windows Vista to test his theories.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=723 |
|||
|title=Gutmann Vista DRM paper uses shoddy Web Forums as source. |
|||
|first=George |
|||
|last=Ou |
|||
|date=2007-09-01 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-09-22 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
Gutmann has responded to both Bott and Ou in a further article.,<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.cypherpunks.to/~peter/zdnet.html |
|||
|title=Windows DRM: A Response to the Disinformation |
|||
|author=Peter Gutmann |
|||
}}</ref> which states that the central thesis of Gutmann's article has not been refuted and the response of Bott is "disinformation" |
|||
Microsoft has published a blog entry with "Twenty Questions (and Answers)" on Windows Vista Content Protection, intending to refute some of Gutmann's arguments.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2007/01/20/windows-vista-content-protection-twenty-questions-and-answers.aspx |
|||
|title=Windows Vista Content Protection - Twenty Questions (and Answers) |
|||
|author=Nick White and Dave Marsh |
|||
|date=2007-01-20 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-01-22 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
Paul Smith, a [[Microsoft Most Valuable Professional|Microsoft MVP]], has written a response to Gutmann's paper in which he counters some of his arguments.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.dasmirnov.net/blog/2006/12/31/windows_vista_drm_nonsense |
|||
|title=Windows Vista DRM nonsense |
|||
|first=Paul |
|||
|last=Smith |
|||
|date=2006-12-31 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-01-03 |
|||
}}</ref> Specifically, he says: |
|||
* Microsoft is not to blame for these measures. The company has been forced to do this by the movie studios. |
|||
* The Protected Video Path will not be used for quite a while. There is said to be an agreement between Microsoft and Sony that Blu-Ray discs will not mandate protection until at least 2010, possibly even 2012.<ref name="arstechnica">{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060521-6880.html |
|||
|last=Fisher |
|||
|first=Ken |
|||
|date=2006-05-21 |
|||
|title=Hollywood reportedly in agreement to delay forced quality downgrades for Blu-ray, HD DVD |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
* Vista does not degrade or refuse to play any existing media, CDs or DVDs. The protected data paths are only activated if protected content requires it. |
|||
* Users of other operating systems such as [[Linux]] or [[Mac OS X]] will not have official access to this premium content. |
|||
Microsoft also noted that content protection mechanisms have existed in Windows as far back as [[Windows Me]].<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2007/01/20/windows-vista-content-protection-twenty-questions-and-answers.aspx |
|||
|title=Windows Vista Content Protection - Twenty Questions (and Answers) |
|||
|last=Marsh |
|||
|first=Dave |
|||
|date=2007-01-20 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-01-20 |
|||
|work=Windows Vista team blog |
|||
|publisher=Microsoft |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
==Hardware requirements and performance== |
|||
According to Microsoft, "nearly all PCs on the market today will run Windows Vista" and most PCs sold after 2005 are capable of running Vista.<ref name="Judge1">{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9075-2188681,00.html |
|||
|title=Windows revamp 'too advanced for most PCs' |
|||
|date=2006-05-20 |
|||
|accessdate=2006-08-15 |
|||
|last=Judge |
|||
|first=Elizabeth |
|||
|publisher=The Times |
|||
}}</ref><ref name="Hwreqts2">{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1843945,00.asp |
|||
|title=Will Your PC Run Windows Vista? |
|||
|year=2005-08-05 |
|||
|accessdate=2006-08-15 |
|||
|author=Spooner, John G. |
|||
|coatuhors=Foley, Mary Jo |
|||
|publisher=eweek.com |
|||
}}</ref><ref name="Hardware1">{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/49835/49835.html?Ad=1 |
|||
|title=Finally, Microsoft Releases Windows Vista Hardware Requirements |
|||
|date=2006-03-29 |
|||
|accessdate=2006-08-15 |
|||
|last=Thurrott |
|||
|first=Paul |
|||
|authorlink=Paul Thurrott |
|||
|publisher=WinSuperSite.com |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
In addition, many Vista early adopters faced hardware incompatibility problems due to drivers not yet being available for Vista.{{Fact|date=March 2008}} Service Pack 1 for Vista is said to fix many of these problems.<ref name="Hardware Compatibility">{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.articlesbase.com/operating-systems-articles/windows-vista-hardware-compatibility-issues-121465.html |
|||
|title=Windows Vista - Hardware Compatibility Issues |
|||
|year=2007-03-24 |
|||
|accessdate=2006-03-22 |
|||
|author=Anmol Taneja |
|||
|publisher=Articlesbase |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
===Speed=== |
|||
[[Tom's Hardware]] published benchmarks in January 2007 that showed that Windows Vista executed typical applications more slowly than Windows XP with the same hardware configuration.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/ |
|||
|title=New Benchmark Tests for Vista |
|||
|date=2007-05-04 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-05-13 |
|||
|last=Santo Domingo |
|||
|first=Joel |
|||
|publisher=tomshardware.com |
|||
}}</ref>Ten of the 15 application tests that showed performance drops did not consider the radical design changes in Vista. [[Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation]] (or SPEC), the maker of those tests, states that such "results should not be compared to those generated while running Windows XP, even if testing is done with the same hardware configuration." SPEC acknowledges that an apple-to-apples comparison cannot be made in cases such as the one done by Tom's Hardware, calling such studies "invalid comparisons."<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.spec.org/gwpg/publish/vista_paper.html |
|||
|title=Understanding the impact of Windows Vista on SPECviewperf performance measurement |
|||
|date=2007-05-29 |
|||
|accessdate=2008-10-29 |
|||
|last=Williams |
|||
|first=Ian |
|||
|publisher=Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation |
|||
}}</ref> In the two tests involving real world applications, [[WinRAR]] and [[Adobe Photoshop]], Vista was faster by 21.8% and 5.5% respectively. The remaining three application benchmarks showed negligible differences between XP and Vista, with both showing leads of less than 2% among the three. According to Devil Mountain Software, [[Windows XP Service Pack 3]] outshines Windows Vista in performance and in other benchmarking tests.<ref>http://news.cnet.com/Windows-XP-outshines-Vista-in-benchmarking-test/2100-1016_3-6220201.html</ref><ref>http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-9837180-17.html</ref> |
|||
{{cquote|Vista, both with and without SP1, performed notably slower than XP with SP3 in the test, taking over 80 seconds to complete the test, compared to the beta SP3-enhanced XP's 35 seconds.}} |
|||
===File operation performance=== |
|||
When first released in November 2006, Vista performed file operations such as copying and deletion more slowly than other operating systems. Large copies required when migrating from one computer to another seemed difficult or impossible without workarounds such as using the command line. This inability to efficiently perform basic file operations attracted strong criticism.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://forums.microsoft.com/TechNet/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1358057&SiteID=17 |
|||
|title=calculating time remaining moving, deleting, copying files very slow |
|||
}}</ref> After six months, Microsoft confirmed the existence of these problems by releasing a special performance and reliability update,<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=938979 |
|||
|title=An update is available that improves the performance and reliability of Windows Vista |
|||
}}</ref> which was later disseminated through Windows Update, and is included in Service Pack 1.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/pages/windows-vista-service-pack-1-beta-whitepaper.aspx |
|||
|title=Windows Vista Service Pack 1 Beta White Paper |
|||
}} (See 'Performance' section)</ref> |
|||
Nonetheless, one benchmark reported to show that, while improving performance compared to Vista's original release, Service Pack 1 does not increase the level of performance to that of Windows XP.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1332 |
|||
|title=Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked |
|||
|last=Kingsley-Hughes |
|||
|first=Adrian |
|||
|date=2008-02-15 |
|||
|accessdate=2008-02-16 |
|||
}}</ref> However, that benchmark has been questioned by others within ZDNet. Ed Bott both questions his colleagues' methods and provides benchmarks that refute the results.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=369&page=1 |
|||
|title=Another take on Vista vs. XP benchmarks |
|||
|date=2008-02-19 |
|||
}}</ref> It should also be noted that XP's file copy operation may ''seem'' faster than Vista's, when in fact it is not. This is because under XP the operation can be pushed off to cached I/O, meaning that the file copy ''dialog'' may be dismissed long before the file has actually been copied to disk.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/archive/2008/02/04/2826167.aspx |
|||
|title=Inside Vista SP1 File Copy Improvements |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
===Game performance=== |
|||
Early in Vista's lifecycle many games showed a drop in frame rate compared to that experienced in Windows XP.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36148 |
|||
|title=Testing Vista's different memory configurations |
|||
|date=2006-12-04 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-05-13 |
|||
|last=Abazovic |
|||
|first=Fuad |
|||
|publisher=theinquirer.net |
|||
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://techgage.com/article/windows_vista_gaming_performance_reports |
|||
|title=Windows Vista Gaming Performance Reports |
|||
|date=2007-01-29 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-05-26 |
|||
|last=Williams |
|||
|first=Rob |
|||
|publisher=techgage.com |
|||
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.bjorn3d.com/read_pf.php?cID=1015 |
|||
|title=ATI Radeon X1950XTX CrossFire |
|||
|date=2006-11-24 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-05-18 |
|||
|last=Cheatham |
|||
|first=Miles |
|||
|publisher=bjorn3d.com |
|||
}}</ref> These results were largely the consequence of Vista's immature [[graphics processing unit]]s drivers, and higher system requirements for Vista Itself.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2096940,00.asp |
|||
|title=Vista Game Performance: Vista vs. XP and ATI vs. Nvidia |
|||
|date=2007-02-20 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-05-26 |
|||
|last=Cross |
|||
|first=Jason |
|||
|publisher=extremetech.com |
|||
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTMzNCwxLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA== |
|||
|title=XP vs. Vista - A Tale of Framerates |
|||
|date=2007-05-07 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-05-26 |
|||
|last=Wall |
|||
|first=Jason |
|||
|publisher=enthusiast.hardocp.com |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
Recent benchmarks suggest that, as of mid-2008, Vista SP1 is now on par with Windows XP in terms of game performance.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2302500,00.asp |
|||
|title=Gaming Performance: Windows Vista SP1 vs. XP SP3 |
|||
|date=2008-05-12 |
|||
|accessdate=2008-07-29 |
|||
|last=Durham |
|||
|first=Joel |
|||
|publisher=extremetech.com |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
===Software bloat=== |
|||
Concerns have been expressed that Windows Vista may contain [[software bloat]]. Speaking in 2007 at the University of Illinois, Microsoft "Distinguished Engineer" [[Eric Traut]] said, "A lot of people think of Windows as this large, bloated operating system, and that's maybe a fair characterization, I have to admit." He went on to say that, "at its core, the kernel, and the components that make up the very core of the operating system, is actually pretty streamlined."<ref>[http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?newsid=10398 Microsoft to slim down 'bloated' Windows]</ref> |
|||
Former PC World editor Ed Bott has expressed skepticism about the claims of bloat, noting that almost every single operating system that Microsoft has ever sold had been criticized as "bloated" when they first came out; even those now regarded as the exact opposite, such as [[MS-DOS]].<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=18#more-18 |
|||
|title=Windows bloat? It’s always been that way |
|||
|author=Ed Bott |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
===Vista capable lawsuit=== |
|||
Two consumers sued Microsoft in United States federal court alleging the "Windows Vista Capable" marketing campaign was a [[bait and switch]] tactic as some computers originally installed with Windows XP could only run Vista Basic. In February 2008 a [[Seattle]] judge granted the suit [[class action]] status, permitting all purchasers in the class to participate in the case.<ref> |
|||
[http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=206900043 informationweek.com] |
|||
</ref><ref name='NYTimes-Stross-2008-03-09'> |
|||
{{cite news |
|||
|first=Randall |
|||
|last=Stross |
|||
|title=They Criticized Vista. And They Should Know. |
|||
|date=2008-03-08 |
|||
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/business/09digi.html?scp=1&sq=vista&st=nyt |
|||
|work=New York Times |
|||
|accessdate=2008-03-08 |
|||
}} |
|||
</ref> |
|||
Released documents in the case, as well as a [[Dell]] presentation in March 2007, discussed late changes to Windows Vista which permitted hardware to be certified that would require upgrading in order to use Vista, and that lack of compatible drivers forced hardware vendors to "limp out with issues" when Vista was launched.<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/idg/IDG_002570DE00740E18002573FE006B7266.html?ref=technology NYTimes] – Dell Pointed Out Vista Mistakes, Internal Documents Show</ref><ref name='NYTimes-Stross-2008-03-09'/> |
|||
This was one of several Vista launch appraisals included in 158 pages of unsealed documents. |
|||
===Laptop battery life=== |
|||
With the new features of Vista, criticisms have surfaced concerning the use of battery power in laptops by Vista, which can drain the battery much more rapidly than [[Windows XP]], reducing battery life.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6079215.html?tag=nl |
|||
|title=Vista beta sucks up battery juice |
|||
|year=2006-06-02 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-05-06 |
|||
|author=Fried, Ina |
|||
|publisher=news.zdnet.com |
|||
}}</ref> With the Windows Aero visual effects turned off, battery life is equal to or less than Windows XP systems.<ref>[http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1040_22-6181366.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=zdnn Vista draining laptop batteries, patience]</ref> "With the release of a new operating system and its new features and higher requirements, higher power consumption is normal," as Richard Shim, an analyst with IDC noted, "when Windows XP came out, that was true, and when Windows 98 came out, that was true."<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1040_22-6181366.html |
|||
|title=Vista draining laptop batteries, patience |
|||
|year=2007-05-04 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-05-06 |
|||
|author=Krazit, Tom |
|||
|publisher=news.zdnet.com |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
==Software compatibility== |
|||
Significant problems have surfaced with other software running under Vista. According to Gartner, "Vista has been dogged by fears, in some cases proven, that many existing applications have to be re-written to operate on the new system."<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/software/0,39044164,62012902,00.htm |
|||
|title=Gartner: App testing delaying Vista rollouts |
|||
|accessdate=2007-05-22 |
|||
|publisher=zdnetasia.com |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
Cisco has been reported as saying, "Vista will solve a lot of problems, but for every action, there's a reaction, and unforeseen side-effects and mutations. Networks can become more brittle."<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/software/0,39044164,61953911,00.htm |
|||
|title=Microsoft rallies developers behind Vista |
|||
|accessdate=2007-05-22 |
|||
|publisher=zdnetasia.com |
|||
}}</ref> According to PC World, "Software compatibility issues, bug worries keep businesses from moving to Microsoft's new OS."<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,128346-page,1/article.html |
|||
|title=No Rush to Adopt Vista |
|||
|accessdate=2007-05-22 |
|||
|publisher=IDG, quoted on PC World |
|||
}}</ref> Citing "concerns over cost and compatibility," the [[United States Department of Transportation]] prohibited workers from upgrading to Vista.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=CPID0SY4ST0CIQSNDLRCKHSCJUNN2JVN?articleID=197700789 |
|||
|title=Microsoft Hit By U.S. DOT Ban On Windows Vista, Explorer 7, and Office 2007 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-05-22 |
|||
|publisher=Information week [www.informationweek.com] |
|||
}}</ref> The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, said the rollout (of Vista) is significantly behind schedule because "several key programs still aren't compatible, including patient scheduling software."<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19747743/page/2/ |
|||
|title=Six months on, Vista users still griping (page 2 - The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, a member of Microsoft's Vista Technical Adoption Program) |
|||
|accessdate=2007-07-27 |
|||
|publisher=MS NBC [www.msnbc.com] |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
As of July 2007, there were over 2,000 tested applications<ref>{{cite news |
|||
| url = http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/pages/windows-vista-service-pack-1-beta-whitepaper.aspx |
|||
| publisher = [[Microsoft]] |
|||
| title = Windows Vista Service Pack 1 Beta White Paper |
|||
| date = 2007-08-29 |
|||
| accessdate = 2007-08-29 |
|||
| pages = 1 |
|||
}}</ref> that were compatible with Vista. Microsoft has published a list of legacy applications that meet their "Works with Windows Vista" software standards<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=https://winqual.microsoft.com/member/softwarelogo/workswithlist.aspx |
|||
|title="Application List: Works with Windows Vista" |
|||
}}</ref> as well as a list of applications that meet their more stringent "Certified for Windows Vista" standards.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=https://winqual.microsoft.com/member/softwarelogo/certifiedlist.aspx |
|||
|title="Application List: Certified for Windows Vista" |
|||
}}</ref> However, as of July 2007, software compatibility problems were still hindering adoption of Vista.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19747743/ |
|||
|title=Six months on, Vista users still griping |
|||
|accessdate=2007-07-27 |
|||
|publisher=MS NBC [www.msnbc.com] |
|||
}}</ref> Microsoft has released the Application Compatibility Toolkit 5.0 application for migrating Vista-incompatible applications, while [[virtualization]] solutions like [[Microsoft Virtual PC|Virtual PC 2007]] or those from [[VMware]] can also be used as a last resort to continue running Vista-incompatible applications under legacy versions of Windows. |
|||
Microsoft also provides an Upgrade Advisor Tool (.NET must be installed and an Internet connection is required) which can be used on existing XP systems to flag driver and application compatibility issues before upgrading to Vista.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/buyorupgrade/upgradeadvisor.mspx |
|||
|title="Windows Vista Upgrade Advisor" |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
==Removal of announced features== |
|||
Microsoft has also been criticized for removing some heavily discussed features such as [[Next-Generation Secure Computing Base]] in May 2004, [[WinFS]] in August 2004, [[Windows PowerShell]] in August 2005 (though this was released separately from Vista prior to Vista's release, and is being included in Vista's successor, [[Windows 7]]), [[SecurID]] Support in May 2006, [[Data synchronization|PC-to-PC Synchronization]] in June 2006.<ref name="YankedFromVista">{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.itnews.com.au/newsstory.aspx?CIaNID=34120&CIPseq=0 |
|||
{{Dead link|date=August 2008}} |
|||
|title=What's been yanked from Vista, and when |
|||
|date=2006-06-27 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-01-29 |
|||
|publisher=Techweb |
|||
}}</ref> The initial "three pillars" in Vista were all radically altered to reach a release date.<ref>[http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/software/0,39044164,39191794,00.htm zdnetasia.com]</ref> |
|||
==Pricing== |
|||
Microsoft's international pricing of Vista has been criticized by many as too expensive.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://blogs.pcworld.com/staffblog/archives/002683.html |
|||
|title=Windows Vista Versus XP Pricing |
|||
|year=2006 |
|||
|month=September |
|||
|accessdate=2008-20-31 |
|||
|publisher=PC World |
|||
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.itwire.com/content/view/5450/53/ |
|||
|title=Windows Vista Too Expensive Says Users |
|||
|year=2006 |
|||
|month=August |
|||
|accessdate=2008-20-31 |
|||
|publisher=IT Wire |
|||
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://blogs.nzherald.co.nz/blog/griffins-tech-blog/2008/3/5/blog-vista-still-looks-expensive-after-cuts/ |
|||
|title=Vista still looks expensive after cuts |
|||
|year=2008 |
|||
|month=March |
|||
|accessdate=2008-20-31 |
|||
|publisher=New Zealand Harald |
|||
}}</ref> The differences in pricing from one country to another vary significantly, especially considering that copies of Vista can be ordered and shipped worldwide from the United States; this could save between [[USD|$]]42 (€26) and $314 (€200). In many cases, the difference in price is significantly greater than was the case for Windows XP. In Malaysia, the pricing for Vista is at around RM799 ($244/€155).<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.apcmag.com/5079/vistas_rip_off_australian_pricing |
|||
|title=Is Vista's Australian pricing a rip-off? |
|||
|date=2007-01-22 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-01-23 |
|||
|last=Warne |
|||
|first=Dan |
|||
|publisher=apcmag.com |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
At the current exchange rate, [[United Kingdom]] consumers could be paying almost double their United States counterparts for the same software.<ref> {{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37140 |
|||
|title=Vista comes to rip-off Britain |
|||
|date=2007-01-23 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-01-24 |
|||
|publisher=The Inquirer |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
{{Cquote|Microsoft has come under fire from British consumers about the price it is charging for Vista, the latest version of Windows. |
|||
British (and French) customers will pay double the US price. The upgrade from Windows XP to Vista Home Basic will cost £100 (€126), while American users will pay only £51 ($100, €64).<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.computeractive.co.uk/computeractive/news/2173895/vilification-vista-pricing |
|||
|title=Microsoft vilified over price of Vista |
|||
|year=2007 |
|||
|month=February |
|||
|accessdate=2007-01-23 |
|||
|publisher=VNU Business Publications |
|||
}}</ref>|20px|20px|[[Computer Active]]}} |
|||
==Software Protection Platform== |
|||
Vista includes an enhanced set of anti-[[Software piracy|piracy]] technologies, based on Windows XP's [[Windows Genuine Advantage]], called Software Protection Platform (SPP).<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|title=The Skinny on Windows SPP and Reduced Functionality in Vista |
|||
|author=Computerworld |
|||
|url=http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9004970 |
|||
}}</ref> In the initial release of Windows Vista (without Service Pack 1), a major component of this was a reduced-functionality mode, which is entered when it is detected that the user has "failed product activation" or that his or her copy is "identified as counterfeit or non-genuine."<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2006/oct06/10-04SoftwareProtection.mspx |
|||
|title=Microsoft’s Software Protection Platform: Protecting Software and Customers from Counterfeiter |
|||
|author=Microsoft PressPass |
|||
}}</ref> The technology was described in a Microsoft white paper as follows: |
|||
{{Cquote|The default Web browser will be started and the user will be presented with an option to purchase a new product key. There is no start menu, no desktop icons, and the desktop background is changed to black. [...] After one hour, the system will log the user out without warning.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/download/features/2006/10-03-06SoftwareProtectionWP.doc |
|||
|title=White Paper: Microsoft’s Software Protection Platform: Innovations for Windows Vista and Windows Server “Longhorn” |
|||
|format=[[DOC (computing)|DOC]] |
|||
|publisher=Microsoft PressPass |
|||
|date=2006-10-03 |
|||
}}</ref>}} |
|||
This was criticised for being overly [[wiktionary:draconian|draconian]],<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9004916&pageNumber=15#spp |
|||
|title=Hands On: A Hard Look at Windows Vista |
|||
|page=15 |
|||
|date=2006-11-10 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-07-19 |
|||
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=148 |
|||
|first=Ed |
|||
|last=Bott |
|||
|title=For Vista, WGA gets tougher |
|||
|work=Ed Bott's Microsoft Report |
|||
|date=2006-10-04 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-07-19 |
|||
}}</ref> especially given an imperfect false-positive record on behalf of SPP's predecessor,<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=150 WGA failures |
|||
|author=Ed Bott |
|||
|title=Another wave of WGA failures |
|||
|work=Ed Bott's Microsoft Report |
|||
|date=2006-10-04 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-07-19 |
|||
}}</ref> and at least one temporary validation server outage.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070825-windows-genuine-advantage-suffers-worldwide-outage-problems-galore.html |
|||
|title=Windows Genuine Advantage suffers worldwide outage, problems galore (updated) |
|||
|accessdate=2007-08-24 |
|||
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://blogs.msdn.com/wga/archive/2007/08/27/update-on-validation-issues.aspx Update on Validation Issues |
|||
|title=Update on Validation Issues |
|||
|accessdate=2007-07-28 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
SPP was significantly altered in [[Windows Vista Service Pack 1]]. Instead of the reduced functionality mode, an installation of Vista left unactivated for 30 days presents the user with a [[nag screen]] prompting them to activate the operating system when they log in, changes the desktop to a solid black colour every hour, and periodically warn the user about software counterfeiting with notification balloons. In addition, updates classified as optional are not available to unactivated copies of Vista.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1253 |
|||
|title=ZDNET Hardware 2.0: SP1 brings with it a softer, gentler, naggier WGA |
|||
|date=2008-09-02 |
|||
|accessdate=2008-07-22 |
|||
}}</ref> Microsoft maintains a technical bulletin providing further details on product activation for Vista.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=5cb10f03-27f6-461d-a3db-d440b4ced7f6&DisplayLang=en |
|||
|title=Product Activation for Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 |
|||
|date=2007-11-06 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
==Sales figure inflation== |
|||
According to industry sources, as of late July 2008 [[Windows XP]] is still outselling [[Windows Vista]], especially in business sales. According to [[HP]], [[Microsoft]] is unethically manipulating and inflating Windows Vista sales figures.<ref>http://apcmag.com/xp_still_killing_vista_in_sales_volume_hp.htm</ref><ref>http://www.infopackets.com/news/business/microsoft/2008/20080801_windows_xp_still_outselling_windows_vista.htm</ref> An HP manager is quoted in ''[[APC (magazine)|APC]]'': |
|||
{{cquote| |
|||
:"From the 30th of June [2008], we have no longer been able to ship a PC with a XP license," said Jane Bradburn, Market Development Manager, Commercial Notebooks for HP Australia. |
|||
:"However, what we have been able to do with Microsoft is ship PCs with a Vista Business license but with XP pre-loaded. That is still the majority of business computers we are selling today." |
|||
So, in other words, Microsoft counts a sale for Vista, even though the computer manufacturer has used the downgrade rights of the Vista license and preinstalls XP. |
|||
}} |
|||
==Windows Ultimate Extras== |
|||
Windows Vista Ultimate users can download exclusive Windows Ultimate Extras. These extras have been released much more slowly than expected, with only four available as of June 2008, which has prompted some criticism.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://windowsconnected.com/blogs/joshs_blog/archive/2007/06/13/ultimate-extras-where-are-you.aspx |
|||
|title=Ultimate Extras, Where are you? |
|||
|date=2007-07-04 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-07-04 |
|||
|first=Josh |
|||
|publisher=windowsconnected.com |
|||
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://windowssecrets.com/comp/070628/ |
|||
|title=Microsoft evades promise of Vista Ultimate Extras |
|||
|date=2007-07-04 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-07-04 |
|||
|last=Dunn |
|||
|first=Josh |
|||
|publisher=windowsconnected.com |
|||
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070614/windows-ultimate-extras-sham |
|||
|title=Windows Ultimate Extras is a sham - where’s the responsibility? |
|||
|author=Long Zheng |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
Barry Goffe, Director of Windows Vista Ultimate for Microsoft states that they were unexpectedly delayed on releasing several of the extras, but that "Microsoft plans to ship a collection of additional Windows Ultimate Extras that it is confident will delight its passionate Windows Vista Ultimate customers."<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://web.archive.org/web/20080211120503/http://windowsultimate.com/blogs/announcements/archive/2007/09/25/windows-dreamscene-released.aspx |
|||
{{link|date=August 2008}} |
|||
|title=Windows DreamScene released! |
|||
|date=2007-09-25 |
|||
|accessdate=2007-10-05 |
|||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
* '''[[Windows Sidebar]]:''' A transparent panel anchored to the side of the screen where a user can place [[Desktop Gadgets]], which are small applets designed for a specialized purpose (such as displaying the weather or sports scores). Gadgets can also be placed on other parts of the desktop. |
|||
* '''[[Internet Explorer 7|Windows Internet Explorer 7]]:''' New user interface, [[tabbed browsing]], [[RSS (file format)|RSS]], a search box, improved printing,<ref name="ieprint">Windows Internet Explorer, Printing Advances [http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/features/details/ie7printing.mspx Printing in IE7].</ref> Page Zoom, Quick Tabs (thumbnails of all open tabs), Anti-Phishing filter, a number of new security protection features, Internationalized Domain Name support (IDN), and improved web standards support. IE7 in Windows Vista runs in isolation from other applications in the operating system (protected mode); exploits and malicious software are restricted from writing to any location beyond Temporary Internet Files without explicit user consent. |
|||
[[Image:Windows Media Player 11 Vista.png|thumb|[[Windows Media Player]] 11]] |
|||
* '''[[Windows Media Player|Windows Media Player 11]]''', a major revamp of Microsoft's program for playing and organizing music and video. New features in this version include word wheeling (or "search as you type"), a new [[GUI]] for the media library, photo display and organization, the ability to share music libraries over a network with other Windows Vista machines, [[Xbox 360]] integration, and support for other [[Windows Media Center Extender|Media Center Extenders]]. |
|||
* '''[[Backup and Restore Center]]:''' Includes a backup and restore application that gives users the ability to schedule periodic backups of files on their computer, as well as recovery from previous backups. Backups are incremental, storing only the changes each time, minimizing disk usage. It also features Complete PC Backup (available only in Ultimate, Business, and Enterprise versions) which backs up an entire computer as an image onto a hard disk or DVD. Complete PC Backup can automatically recreate a machine setup onto new hardware or hard disk in case of any hardware failures. Complete PC Restore can be initiated from within Windows Vista or from the Windows Vista installation CD in the event the PC is so corrupt that it cannot start up normally from the hard disk. |
|||
* '''[[Windows Mail]]:''' A replacement for Outlook Express that includes a new mail store that improves stability,<ref name="winmail">Windows Mail Features Explained, See Reliability Section [http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/features/details/mail.mspx Windows Mail].</ref> and features integrated Instant Search. It has the Phishing Filter like IE7 and [[spam filter|Junk mail filtering]] that is enhanced through regular updates via Windows Update.<ref name="windowsmail">Windows Mail was demonstrated by the development team in [http://channel9.msdn.com/showpost.aspx?postid=116711 this Channel 9 video].</ref> |
|||
* '''[[Windows Calendar]]''' is a new calendar and task application. |
|||
* '''[[Windows Photo Gallery]]''', a photo and movie library management application. It can import from digital cameras, tag and rate individual items, adjust colors and exposure, create and display slideshows (with pan and fade effects) and burn slideshows to DVD. |
|||
* '''[[Windows DVD Maker]]''', a companion program to [[Windows Movie Maker]] that provides the ability to create video DVDs based on a user's content. Users can design a DVD with title, menu, video, soundtrack, pan and zoom motion effects on pictures or slides. |
|||
* '''[[Windows Media Center]]''', which was previously exclusively bundled in a separate version of Windows XP, known as [[Windows XP Media Center Edition]], has been incorporated into the Home Premium and Ultimate editions of Windows Vista. |
|||
* '''Games and [[Windows Vista Games Explorer|Games Explorer]]:''' Games included with Windows have been modified to showcase Vista's graphics capabilities. New games are [[Chess Titans]], [[Mahjong Titans]] and [[Purble Place]]. A new Games Explorer special folder contains shortcuts and information to all games on the user's computer. |
|||
[[Image:Windows Mobility Center screenshot.png|thumb|[[Windows Mobility Center]].]] |
[[Image:Windows Mobility Center screenshot.png|thumb|[[Windows Mobility Center]].]] |
Revision as of 17:57, 15 January 2009
File:Windows Aero.png | |
Developer | Microsoft |
---|---|
OS family | Microsoft Windows |
Source model | Closed source / Shared source[1] |
Released to manufacturing | RTM: November 8, 2006; Vol. Lic.: November 30, 2006; Retail: January 30, 2007 |
Latest release | 6.0 Service Pack 1 (SP1) (Build 6001) (6001.18063.080425-1930[2]) / April 25, 2008[3] |
Latest preview | 6.0 Service Pack 2 (SP2) v.113 (Build 6002) (CPP Beta) (6.0.6002.16497[4]) / December 4, 2008[5] |
Update method | Windows Update, Windows Server Update Services, SCCM |
Platforms | x86, x86-64 |
Kernel type | Hybrid kernel |
License | MS-EULA |
Official website | Windows Vista: Homepage |
Support status | |
Mainstream support | |
Articles in the series | |
|
Windows Vista, an operating system released by Microsoft in November 2006, has received substantial criticism by reviewers and users. Due to issues with privacy, security, performance, and product activation, Windows Vista has been the subject of a number of negative assessments by various groups.
Security
According to CNET, some critics are unenthusiastic about the Vista security features, claiming that Vista "offers mostly basic protection and is not the best of its class." Natalie Lambert, an analyst with Forrester Research, stated, "There is no doubt that Vista will be Microsoft's most secure operating system. However, most secure is not equivalent to secure."[6]
In February 2008, Bitlocker was shown to be vulnerable to a cold boot attack.[7] According to the researchers, the risk can be mitigated by configuring two-factor authentication (e.g. a boot PIN in conjunction with a TPM), and by disabling power standby mode.
User Account Control
The following concerns have been raised about the new User Account Control (UAC) security technology: Many third-party programs do not follow the principle of least privilege and therefore need be run as an administrator, triggering UAC prompts. For some time, Microsoft has recommended that programs be written to run as a standard user. However, because nearly all users are administrators by default in previous versions of Windows, many developers have incorrectly assumed that their applications will always execute with these privileges, or have not regression tested their code for LUA bugs.[8] Microsoft added file and registry virtualization technology as well as application compatibility shims to reduce the number of these legacy applications that trigger UAC prompts.[9]
User Account Control can be disabled through the Control Panel; however, this also disables privilege separation features such as Internet Explorer 7's Protected Mode, which relies on UAC for its operation.
Driver signing requirement
64-bit versions of Windows Vista allow only signed drivers to be installed in kernel mode; this feature cannot be easily overridden by system administrators.[10][11]
In order for a driver to be signed, a developer will either have to pay Microsoft for the driver to be tested by Microsoft's WHQL Testing.[12] or, if WHQL testing is not required, to purchase a "Software Publisher Certificate"[13] with which to sign the driver.
The following criticisms/claims have been made regarding this requirement:
- that it reduces Vista's compatibility with older hardware (or, even modern software such as VMware Server, where manufacturers have not released signed drivers either)[14]
- that it disallows experimentation from the hobbyist community.[15] The required authenticode certificate for signing Vista drivers are expensive and out of reach[16] for small developers, usually about $400-500/year (from VeriSign).
- that it might exist not only for security reasons, but also to enforce Digital Rights Management policies, especially the Protected Video Path.[17][18]
Unsigned drivers could initially be installed through the use of tools included with Vista,[19]as well as some third party utilities such as Atsiv[20]. However Microsoft has closed these workarounds with hotfix KB932596,[21] which is included in Service Pack 1.
Flaws in memory protection features
Security researchers Alexander Sotirov and Mark Dowd have developed a technique that bypasses many of the new memory-protection safeguards in Windows Vista, such as Address space layout randomization. The result of this is that any already existing buffer overflow bugs that, in Vista, were previously not exploitable due to such features, may now be exploitable.[22][23] Note that this is not in itself a vulnerability: as Sotirov notes, "What we presented is weaknesses in the protection mechanism. It still requires the system under attack to have a vulnerability. Without the presence of a vulnerability these techniques don’t really [accomplish] anything."[24] The vulnerability Sotirov and Dowd used in their paper as an example was the 2007 animated cursor bug, CVE-2007-0038.
Security researcher Dino Dai Zovi has claimed that this means that it is "completely game over" for Vista security.[25] Sotirov himself, however, has refuted this, saying that "The articles that describe Vista security as 'broken' or 'done for,' with 'unfixable vulnerabilities' are completely inaccurate. One of the suggestions I saw in many of the discussions was that people should just use Windows XP. In fact, in XP a lot of those protections we’re bypassing [such as ASLR] don’t even exist."[24]
Digital rights management
Another common criticism concerns the integration of new forms of digital rights management (DRM) into the operating system, specifically the Protected Video Path (PVP), which involves technologies such as High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP) and the Image Constraint Token (ICT). These features have been added to Vista due to an agreement between Microsoft and major Hollywood studios.[26] Microsoft claims that movie studios and other providers of "premium content"[citation needed] will only allow their data to be played back on personal computers if sufficient protection is granted. This will concern, among other things, play-back of protected content on HD DVD and Blu-ray discs, but it will not be enabled until at least 2010.
The Protected Video Path mandates that encryption must be used whenever content marked as "protected" will travel over a link where it might be intercepted. This is called a User-Accessible Bus (UAB). Additionally, all devices that come into contact with premium content (such as graphics cards) have to be certified by Microsoft.[26] Before playback starts, all the devices involved are checked using a Hardware Functionality Scan (HFS) to verify if they are genuine and have not been tampered with. Devices are required to switch off or artificially degrade the quality of any signal outputs that are not protected by HDCP. Additionally, Microsoft maintains a global revocation list for devices that have been compromised. This list is distributed to PCs over the Internet using normal update mechanisms. The only effect on a revoked driver's functionality is that high-level protected content will not play; all other functionality, including low-definition playback, is retained.[26][27]
Notable critics
Peter Gutmann, a computer security expert from the University of Auckland, New Zealand, has released a whitepaper[28] in which he raises the following concerns against these mechanisms:
- Adding encryption facilities to devices makes them more expensive, a cost that is passed on to the user.
- If outputs are not deemed sufficiently protected by the media industry, then even very expensive equipment can be required to be switched off (for example, S/PDIF-based, high-end audio cards).
- Some newer high-definition monitors are not HDCP-enabled, even though the manufacturer may claim otherwise.
- The added complexity makes systems less reliable.
- Since non-protected media are not subject to the new restrictions, users may be encouraged to remove the protection in order to view them without restrictions, thus defeating the content protection scheme's initial purpose.
- Protection mechanisms, such as disabling or degrading outputs, may be triggered erroneously or maliciously, motivating denial-of-service attacks.
- Revoking the driver of a device that is in wide use is such a drastic measure that Gutmann doubts Microsoft will ever actually do so. On the other hand, they may be forced to because of their legal obligations to the movie studios.
Steve Gibson of Gibson Research Corporation has stated during his Security Now! show that he agrees with Peter Gutmann in principle and that what he proposes is a factually accurate description of what is found in the specification from Microsoft.[29]
The Free Software Foundation is conducting a campaign called "BadVista" against Vista on these grounds.
Apple Inc, Microsoft's major competitor, frequently made Vista a target of its "Get a Mac" advertising campaign.
Reaction to criticism
Ed Bott, author of Windows Vista Inside Out, has published a 3 part blog which rebuts many of Gutmann's claims.[30]
Ed Bott's criticisms can be summarized as follows:
- Gutmann allegedly based his paper on outdated documentation from Microsoft and second-hand web sources.
- Gutmann allegedly quotes selectively from the Microsoft specifications.
- Gutmann allegedly did no experimental work with Vista to prove his theories. Rather, he makes mistaken assumptions and then speculates wildly on their implications.
- Gutmann's paper, while presented as serious research, is really just an opinion piece.
Technology writer George Ou claims that Gutmann's paper relies on unreliable sources and that Gutmann has never used Windows Vista to test his theories.[31]
Gutmann has responded to both Bott and Ou in a further article.,[32] which states that the central thesis of Gutmann's article has not been refuted and the response of Bott is "disinformation"
Microsoft has published a blog entry with "Twenty Questions (and Answers)" on Windows Vista Content Protection, intending to refute some of Gutmann's arguments.[33]
Paul Smith, a Microsoft MVP, has written a response to Gutmann's paper in which he counters some of his arguments.[34] Specifically, he says:
- Microsoft is not to blame for these measures. The company has been forced to do this by the movie studios.
- The Protected Video Path will not be used for quite a while. There is said to be an agreement between Microsoft and Sony that Blu-Ray discs will not mandate protection until at least 2010, possibly even 2012.[35]
- Vista does not degrade or refuse to play any existing media, CDs or DVDs. The protected data paths are only activated if protected content requires it.
- Users of other operating systems such as Linux or Mac OS X will not have official access to this premium content.
Microsoft also noted that content protection mechanisms have existed in Windows as far back as Windows Me.[36]
Hardware requirements and performance
According to Microsoft, "nearly all PCs on the market today will run Windows Vista" and most PCs sold after 2005 are capable of running Vista.[37][38][39]
In addition, many Vista early adopters faced hardware incompatibility problems due to drivers not yet being available for Vista.[citation needed] Service Pack 1 for Vista is said to fix many of these problems.[40]
Speed
Tom's Hardware published benchmarks in January 2007 that showed that Windows Vista executed typical applications more slowly than Windows XP with the same hardware configuration.[41]Ten of the 15 application tests that showed performance drops did not consider the radical design changes in Vista. Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (or SPEC), the maker of those tests, states that such "results should not be compared to those generated while running Windows XP, even if testing is done with the same hardware configuration." SPEC acknowledges that an apple-to-apples comparison cannot be made in cases such as the one done by Tom's Hardware, calling such studies "invalid comparisons."[42] In the two tests involving real world applications, WinRAR and Adobe Photoshop, Vista was faster by 21.8% and 5.5% respectively. The remaining three application benchmarks showed negligible differences between XP and Vista, with both showing leads of less than 2% among the three. According to Devil Mountain Software, Windows XP Service Pack 3 outshines Windows Vista in performance and in other benchmarking tests.[43][44]
Vista, both with and without SP1, performed notably slower than XP with SP3 in the test, taking over 80 seconds to complete the test, compared to the beta SP3-enhanced XP's 35 seconds.
File operation performance
When first released in November 2006, Vista performed file operations such as copying and deletion more slowly than other operating systems. Large copies required when migrating from one computer to another seemed difficult or impossible without workarounds such as using the command line. This inability to efficiently perform basic file operations attracted strong criticism.[45] After six months, Microsoft confirmed the existence of these problems by releasing a special performance and reliability update,[46] which was later disseminated through Windows Update, and is included in Service Pack 1.[47]
Nonetheless, one benchmark reported to show that, while improving performance compared to Vista's original release, Service Pack 1 does not increase the level of performance to that of Windows XP.[48] However, that benchmark has been questioned by others within ZDNet. Ed Bott both questions his colleagues' methods and provides benchmarks that refute the results.[49] It should also be noted that XP's file copy operation may seem faster than Vista's, when in fact it is not. This is because under XP the operation can be pushed off to cached I/O, meaning that the file copy dialog may be dismissed long before the file has actually been copied to disk.[50]
Game performance
Early in Vista's lifecycle many games showed a drop in frame rate compared to that experienced in Windows XP.[51][52][53] These results were largely the consequence of Vista's immature graphics processing units drivers, and higher system requirements for Vista Itself.[54][55] Recent benchmarks suggest that, as of mid-2008, Vista SP1 is now on par with Windows XP in terms of game performance.[56]
Software bloat
Concerns have been expressed that Windows Vista may contain software bloat. Speaking in 2007 at the University of Illinois, Microsoft "Distinguished Engineer" Eric Traut said, "A lot of people think of Windows as this large, bloated operating system, and that's maybe a fair characterization, I have to admit." He went on to say that, "at its core, the kernel, and the components that make up the very core of the operating system, is actually pretty streamlined."[57]
Former PC World editor Ed Bott has expressed skepticism about the claims of bloat, noting that almost every single operating system that Microsoft has ever sold had been criticized as "bloated" when they first came out; even those now regarded as the exact opposite, such as MS-DOS.[58]
Vista capable lawsuit
Two consumers sued Microsoft in United States federal court alleging the "Windows Vista Capable" marketing campaign was a bait and switch tactic as some computers originally installed with Windows XP could only run Vista Basic. In February 2008 a Seattle judge granted the suit class action status, permitting all purchasers in the class to participate in the case.[59][60] Released documents in the case, as well as a Dell presentation in March 2007, discussed late changes to Windows Vista which permitted hardware to be certified that would require upgrading in order to use Vista, and that lack of compatible drivers forced hardware vendors to "limp out with issues" when Vista was launched.[61][60] This was one of several Vista launch appraisals included in 158 pages of unsealed documents.
Laptop battery life
With the new features of Vista, criticisms have surfaced concerning the use of battery power in laptops by Vista, which can drain the battery much more rapidly than Windows XP, reducing battery life.[62] With the Windows Aero visual effects turned off, battery life is equal to or less than Windows XP systems.[63] "With the release of a new operating system and its new features and higher requirements, higher power consumption is normal," as Richard Shim, an analyst with IDC noted, "when Windows XP came out, that was true, and when Windows 98 came out, that was true."[64]
Software compatibility
Significant problems have surfaced with other software running under Vista. According to Gartner, "Vista has been dogged by fears, in some cases proven, that many existing applications have to be re-written to operate on the new system."[65] Cisco has been reported as saying, "Vista will solve a lot of problems, but for every action, there's a reaction, and unforeseen side-effects and mutations. Networks can become more brittle."[66] According to PC World, "Software compatibility issues, bug worries keep businesses from moving to Microsoft's new OS."[67] Citing "concerns over cost and compatibility," the United States Department of Transportation prohibited workers from upgrading to Vista.[68] The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, said the rollout (of Vista) is significantly behind schedule because "several key programs still aren't compatible, including patient scheduling software."[69]
As of July 2007, there were over 2,000 tested applications[70] that were compatible with Vista. Microsoft has published a list of legacy applications that meet their "Works with Windows Vista" software standards[71] as well as a list of applications that meet their more stringent "Certified for Windows Vista" standards.[72] However, as of July 2007, software compatibility problems were still hindering adoption of Vista.[73] Microsoft has released the Application Compatibility Toolkit 5.0 application for migrating Vista-incompatible applications, while virtualization solutions like Virtual PC 2007 or those from VMware can also be used as a last resort to continue running Vista-incompatible applications under legacy versions of Windows.
Microsoft also provides an Upgrade Advisor Tool (.NET must be installed and an Internet connection is required) which can be used on existing XP systems to flag driver and application compatibility issues before upgrading to Vista.[74]
Removal of announced features
Microsoft has also been criticized for removing some heavily discussed features such as Next-Generation Secure Computing Base in May 2004, WinFS in August 2004, Windows PowerShell in August 2005 (though this was released separately from Vista prior to Vista's release, and is being included in Vista's successor, Windows 7), SecurID Support in May 2006, PC-to-PC Synchronization in June 2006.[75] The initial "three pillars" in Vista were all radically altered to reach a release date.[76]
Pricing
Microsoft's international pricing of Vista has been criticized by many as too expensive.[77][78][79] The differences in pricing from one country to another vary significantly, especially considering that copies of Vista can be ordered and shipped worldwide from the United States; this could save between $42 (€26) and $314 (€200). In many cases, the difference in price is significantly greater than was the case for Windows XP. In Malaysia, the pricing for Vista is at around RM799 ($244/€155).[80] At the current exchange rate, United Kingdom consumers could be paying almost double their United States counterparts for the same software.[81]
Microsoft has come under fire from British consumers about the price it is charging for Vista, the latest version of Windows. British (and French) customers will pay double the US price. The upgrade from Windows XP to Vista Home Basic will cost £100 (€126), while American users will pay only £51 ($100, €64).[82]
Software Protection Platform
Vista includes an enhanced set of anti-piracy technologies, based on Windows XP's Windows Genuine Advantage, called Software Protection Platform (SPP).[83] In the initial release of Windows Vista (without Service Pack 1), a major component of this was a reduced-functionality mode, which is entered when it is detected that the user has "failed product activation" or that his or her copy is "identified as counterfeit or non-genuine."[84] The technology was described in a Microsoft white paper as follows:
The default Web browser will be started and the user will be presented with an option to purchase a new product key. There is no start menu, no desktop icons, and the desktop background is changed to black. [...] After one hour, the system will log the user out without warning.[85]
This was criticised for being overly draconian,[86][87] especially given an imperfect false-positive record on behalf of SPP's predecessor,[88] and at least one temporary validation server outage.[89][90]
SPP was significantly altered in Windows Vista Service Pack 1. Instead of the reduced functionality mode, an installation of Vista left unactivated for 30 days presents the user with a nag screen prompting them to activate the operating system when they log in, changes the desktop to a solid black colour every hour, and periodically warn the user about software counterfeiting with notification balloons. In addition, updates classified as optional are not available to unactivated copies of Vista.[91] Microsoft maintains a technical bulletin providing further details on product activation for Vista.[92]
Sales figure inflation
According to industry sources, as of late July 2008 Windows XP is still outselling Windows Vista, especially in business sales. According to HP, Microsoft is unethically manipulating and inflating Windows Vista sales figures.[93][94] An HP manager is quoted in APC:
:"From the 30th of June [2008], we have no longer been able to ship a PC with a XP license," said Jane Bradburn, Market Development Manager, Commercial Notebooks for HP Australia.
- "However, what we have been able to do with Microsoft is ship PCs with a Vista Business license but with XP pre-loaded. That is still the majority of business computers we are selling today."
So, in other words, Microsoft counts a sale for Vista, even though the computer manufacturer has used the downgrade rights of the Vista license and preinstalls XP.
Windows Ultimate Extras
Windows Vista Ultimate users can download exclusive Windows Ultimate Extras. These extras have been released much more slowly than expected, with only four available as of June 2008, which has prompted some criticism.[95][96][97] Barry Goffe, Director of Windows Vista Ultimate for Microsoft states that they were unexpectedly delayed on releasing several of the extras, but that "Microsoft plans to ship a collection of additional Windows Ultimate Extras that it is confident will delight its passionate Windows Vista Ultimate customers."[98]
- Windows Mobility Center is a control panel that centralizes the most relevant information related to mobile computing (brightness, sound, battery level / power scheme selection, wireless network, screen orientation, presentation settings, etc.).
- Windows Meeting Space replaces NetMeeting. Users can share applications (or their entire desktop) with other users on the local network, or over the Internet using peer-to-peer technology (higher versions than Starter and Home Basic can take advantage of hosting capabilities, Starter and Home Basic editions are limited to "join" mode only)
- Shadow Copy automatically creates daily backup copies of files and folders. Users can also create "shadow copies" by setting a System Protection Point using the System Protection tab in the System control panel. The user can be presented multiple versions of a file throughout a limited history and be allowed to restore, delete, or copy those versions. This feature is available only in the Business, Enterprise, and Ultimate editions of Windows Vista and is inherited from Windows Server 2003.[99]
- Windows Update: Software and security updates have been simplified,[100] now operating solely via a control panel instead of as a web application. Windows Mail's spam filter and Windows Defender's definitions are updated automatically via Windows Update. Users who choose the recommended setting for Automatic Updates will have the latest drivers installed and available when they add a new device.
- Parental controls: Allows administrators to control which websites, programs and games each standard user can use and install. This feature is not included in the Business or Enterprise editions of Vista.
- Windows SideShow: Enables the auxiliary displays on newer laptops or on supported Windows Mobile devices. It is meant to be used to display device gadgets while the computer is on or off.
- Speech recognition is integrated into Vista.[101] It features a redesigned user interface and configurable command-and-control commands. Unlike the Office 2003 version, which works only in Office and WordPad, Speech Recognition in Windows Vista works for any accessible application. In addition, it currently supports several languages: British and American English, Spanish, French, German, Chinese (Traditional and Simplified) and Japanese.
- New fonts, including several designed for screen reading, and improved Chinese (Yahei, JhengHei), Japanese (Meiryo) and Korean (Malgun) fonts. ClearType has also been enhanced and enabled by default.
- Problem Reports and Solutions, a control panel which allows users to view previously sent problems and any solutions or additional information that is available.
- Improved audio controls allow the system-wide volume or volume of individual audio devices and even individual applications to be controlled separately. New audio functionalities such as Room Correction, Bass Management, Speaker Fill and Headphone virtualization have also been incorporated.
- Windows System Assessment Tool is a tool used to benchmark system performance. Software such as games can retrieve this rating and modify its own behavior at runtime to improve performance. The benchmark tests CPU, RAM, 2-D and 3-D graphics acceleration, graphics memory and hard disk space.[102][103]
- Windows Ultimate Extras: The Ultimate edition of Windows Vista provides, via Windows Update, access to some additional features. These are a collection of additional MUI language packs, Texas Hold 'Em (a Poker game) and Microsoft Tinker (a strategy game where the character is a robot), BitLocker and EFS enhancements which allow users to back up their encryption key online in a Digital Locker, and Windows Dreamscene, which enables the use of videos in MPEG and WMV formats as the desktop background. On April 21, 2008, Microsoft launched two more Ultimate Extras; three new Windows sound schemes, and a content pack for Dreamscene. Various DreamScene Content Packs have been released since the final version of DreamScene was released.
- Reliability and Performance Monitor includes various tools for tuning and monitoring system performance and resources activities of CPU, disks, network, memory and other resources. It shows the operations on files, the opened connections, etc.
- Disk Management: The Logical Disk Manager in Windows Vista supports shrinking and expanding volumes on-the-fly.
Core technologies
This section needs additional citations for verification. (December 2007) |
Windows Vista is intended to be a technology-based release, to provide a base to include advanced technologies, many of which are related to how the system functions and thus not readily visible to the user. An example is the complete restructuring of the architecture of the audio, print, display, and networking subsystems; although the results of this work are visible to software developers, end-users will only see what appear to be evolutionary changes in the user interface.
Vista includes technologies such as ReadyBoost and ReadyDrive which employ fast flash memory (located on USB drives and hybrid hard disk drives) to improve system performance by caching commonly used programs and data. This manifests itself in improved battery life on notebook computers as well, since a hybrid drive can be spun down when not in use. Another new technology called SuperFetch utilizes machine learning techniques to analyze usage patterns to allow Windows Vista to make intelligent decisions about what content should be present in system memory at any given time. It uses almost all the extra RAM as disk cache. In conjunction with SuperFetch, an automatic built-in Windows Disk Defragmenter makes sure that those applications are strategically positioned on the hard disk where they can be loaded into memory very quickly with the least amount of physical movement of the hard disk’s read-write heads. [104]
As part of the redesign of the networking architecture, IPv6 has been fully incorporated into the operating system and a number of performance improvements have been introduced, such as TCP window scaling. Earlier versions of Windows typically needed third-party wireless networking software to work properly, but this is not the case with Vista, which includes more comprehensive wireless networking support.
For graphics, Vista introduces a new Windows Display Driver Model and a major revision to Direct3D. The new driver model facilitates the new Desktop Window Manager, which provides the tearing-free desktop and special effects that are the cornerstones of Windows Aero. Direct3D 10, developed in conjunction with major display driver manufacturers, is a new architecture with more advanced shader support, and allows the graphics processing unit to render more complex scenes without assistance from the CPU. It features improved load balancing between CPU and GPU and also optimizes data transfer between them.[105]
At the core of the operating system, many improvements have been made to the memory manager, process scheduler and I/O scheduler. The Heap Manager implements additional features such as integrity checking in order to improve robustness and defend against buffer overflow security exploits, although this comes at the price of breaking backward compatibility with some legacy applications.[106] A Kernel Transaction Manager has been implemented that enables applications to work with the file system and Registry using atomic transaction operations.
Security-related technologies
This section needs additional citations for verification. (December 2007) |
Improved security was a primary design goal for Vista.[107] Microsoft's Trustworthy Computing initiative, which aims to improve public trust in its products, has had a direct effect on its development. This effort has resulted in a number of new security and safety features.
User Account Control, or UAC is perhaps the most significant and visible of these changes. UAC is a security technology that makes it possible for users to use their computer with fewer privileges by default, with a view to stopping malware from making unauthorized changes to the system. This was often difficult in previous versions of Windows, as the previous "limited" user accounts proved too restrictive and incompatible with a large proportion of application software, and even prevented some basic operations such as looking at the calendar from the notification tray. In Windows Vista, when an action requiring administrative rights—such as installing/uninstalling software or making system-wide configuration changes—is performed, the user is first prompted for an administrator name and password; in cases where the user is already an administrator, the user is still prompted to confirm the pending privileged action. Regular use of the computer such as running programs, printing, or surfing the Internet does not trigger UAC prompts. User Account Control asks for credentials in a Secure Desktop mode, in which the entire screen is dimmed, and only the authorization window is active and highlighted. The intent is to stop a malicious program misleading the user by interfering with the authorization window, and to hint to the user the importance of the prompt.
Testing by Symantec Corporation has proved the effectiveness of UAC. Symantec used over 2,000 active malware samples, consisting of backdoors, keyloggers, rootkits, mass mailers, trojan horses, spyware, adware, and various other samples. Each was executed on a default Windows Vista installation within a standard user account. UAC effectively blocked over 50 percent of each threat, excluding rootkits. 5 percent or less of the malware which evaded UAC survived a reboot.
Internet Explorer 7's new security and safety features include a phishing filter, IDN with anti-spoofing capabilities, and integration with system-wide parental controls. For added security, ActiveX controls are disabled by default. Also, Internet Explorer operates in a protected mode, which operates with lower permissions than the user and runs in isolation from other applications in the operating system, preventing it from accessing or modifying anything besides the Temporary Internet Files directory.[108] Microsoft's anti-spyware product, Windows Defender, has been incorporated into Windows, providing protection against malware and other threats. Changes to various system configuration settings (such as new auto-starting applications) are blocked unless the user gives consent.
Whereas prior releases of Windows supported per-file encryption using Encrypting File System, the Enterprise and Ultimate editions of Vista include BitLocker Drive Encryption which can protect entire volumes, notably the operating system volume. However, BitLocker requires approximately a 1.5-gigabyte partition to be permanently unencrypted and to contain system files in order for Windows to boot. In normal circumstances, the only time this partition is accessed is when the computer is booting, or when there is a Windows update that changes files in this area which is a legitimate reason to access this section of the drive. The area can be a potential security issue, because a hexadecimal editor (such as dskprobe.exe), or malicious software running with administrator and/or kernel level privileges would be able to write to this "Ghost Partition" and allow a piece of malicious software to compromise the system, or disable the encryption. BitLocker can work in conjunction with a Trusted Platform Module (TPM) cryptoprocessor (version 1.2) embedded in a computer's motherboard, or with a USB key.[109] However, as with other full disk encryption technologies, BitLocker is vulnerable to a cold boot attack, especially where TPM is used as a key protector without a boot PIN being required too.[7]
A variety of other privilege-restriction techniques are also built into Vista. An example is the concept of "integrity levels" in user processes, whereby a process with a lower integrity level cannot interact with processes of a higher integrity level and cannot perform DLL–injection to a processes of a higher integrity level. The security restrictions of Windows services are more fine-grained, so that services (especially those listening on the network) have no ability to interact with parts of the operating system they do not need to. Obfuscation techniques such as address space layout randomization are used to increase the amount of effort required of malware before successful infiltration of a system. Code Integrity verifies that system binaries haven’t been tampered with by malicious code.
As part of the redesign of the network stack, Windows Firewall has been upgraded, with new support for filtering both incoming and outgoing traffic. Advanced packet filter rules can be created which can grant or deny communications to specific services.
The 64-bit versions of Vista require that all device drivers be digitally signed, so that the creator of the driver can be identified.[110]
Business technologies
While much of the focus of Vista's new capabilities has been on the new user interface, security technologies, and improvements to the core operating system, Microsoft is also adding new deployment and maintenance features.
- The Windows Imaging Format (WIM) is the cornerstone of Microsoft's new deployment and packaging system. WIM files, which contain a HAL-independent image of Windows Vista, can be maintained and patched without having to rebuild new images. Windows Images can be delivered via Systems Management Server or Business Desktop Deployment technologies. Images can be customized and configured with applications then deployed to corporate client personal computers using little to no touch by a system administrator. ImageX is the Microsoft tool used to create and customize images.
- Windows Deployment Services replaces Remote Installation Services for deploying Vista and prior versions of Windows.
- Approximately 700 new Group Policy settings have been added, covering most aspects of the new features in the operating system, as well as significantly expanding the configurability of wireless networks, removable storage devices, and user desktop experience. Vista also introduced an XML based format (ADMX) to display registry-based policy settings, making it easier to manage networks that span geographic locations and different languages.[111]
- Services for UNIX has been renamed "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications," and is included with the Enterprise and Ultimate editions of Vista. Network File System (NFS) client support is also included.
- Multilingual User Interface–Unlike previous version of Windows which required language packs to be loaded to provide local language support, Windows Vista Ultimate and Enterprise editions support the ability to dynamically change languages based on the logged on user's preference. It is not possible to change the language, even for all users, in Windows Vista Home. [citation needed]
- Wireless Projector support
Developer technologies
Windows Vista includes a large number of new application programming interfaces. Chief among them is the inclusion of version 3.0 of the .NET Framework, which consists of a class library and Common Language Runtime. Version 3.0 includes four new major components:[112]
- Windows Presentation Foundation is a user interface subsystem and framework based vector graphics, which makes use of 3D computer graphics hardware and Direct3D technologies. It provides the foundation for building applications and blending together application UI, documents, and media content. It is the successor to Windows Forms.
- Windows Communication Foundation is a service-oriented messaging subsystem which enables applications and systems to interoperate locally or remotely using Web services.
- Windows Workflow Foundation provides task automation and integrated transactions using workflows. It is the programming model, engine and tools for building workflow-enabled applications on Windows.
- Windows CardSpace is a component which securely stores digital identities of a person, and provides a unified interface for choosing the identity for a particular transaction, such as logging into a website.
These technologies are also available for Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 to facilitate their introduction to and usage by developers and end users.
There are also significant new development APIs in the core of the operating system, notably the completely re-architected audio, networking, print, and video interfaces, major changes to the security infrastructure, improvements to the deployment and installation of applications ("ClickOnce" and Windows Installer 4.0) , new device driver development model ("Windows Driver Foundation") , Transactional NTFS, mobile computing API advancements (power management, Tablet PC Ink support, SideShow) and major updates to (or complete replacements of) many core subsystems such as Winlogon and CAPI.
There are some issues for software developers using some of the graphics APIs in Vista. Games or programs which are built solely on the Windows Vista-exclusive version of DirectX, version 10, cannot work on prior versions of Windows, as DirectX 10 is not available for previous Windows versions. Also, games which require the features of D3D9Ex, the updated implementation of DirectX 9 in Windows Vista are also incompatible with previous Windows versions.[113] According to a Microsoft blog, there are three choices for OpenGL implementation on Vista. An application can use the default implementation, which translates OpenGL calls into the Direct3D API and is frozen at OpenGL version 1.4, or an application can use an Installable Client Driver (ICD) , which comes in two flavors: legacy and Vista-compatible. A legacy ICD disables the Desktop Window Manager, a Vista-compatible ICD takes advantage of a new API, and is fully compatible with the Desktop Window Manager.[114] At least two primary vendors, ATI and NVIDIA provided full Vista-compatible ICDs.[115] However, hardware overlay is not supported, because it is considered as an obsolete feature in Vista. ATI and NVIDIA strongly recommend using compositing desktop/Framebuffer Objects for same functionality.[116]
Removed features
Some notable Windows XP features and components have been replaced or removed in Windows Vista, including Windows Messenger, NTBackup, the network Messenger Service, HyperTerminal, MSN Explorer, Active Desktop, and the replacement of NetMeeting with Windows Meeting Space. Windows Vista also does not include the Windows XP "Luna" visual theme, or most of the classic color schemes which have been part of Windows since the Windows 3.x era. The "Hardware profiles" startup feature has also been removed, along with support for older motherboard technologies like the EISA bus, APM and Game port support (though game port support can be enabled by applying an older driver).[117] IP over FireWire (TCP/IP over IEEE 1394) has been removed as well.[118] The IPX/SPX Protocol has also been removed, although it can be enabled by a third-party plugin.[119]
Editions
Windows Vista ships in six editions.[120] These are roughly divided into two target markets, consumer and business, with editions varying to cater for specific sub-markets. For consumers, there are four editions, with three available for developed countries. Windows Vista Starter edition is limited to emerging markets. Windows Vista Home Basic is intended for budget users with low needs. Windows Vista Home Premium covers the majority of the consumer market, and contains applications for creating and using multimedia. The home editions cannot join a Windows Server domain. For businesses, there are two editions. Windows Vista Business is specifically designed for small and medium-sized businesses,[121] while Windows Vista Enterprise[122] is only available to customers participating in Microsoft's Software Assurance program. Windows Vista Ultimate contains the complete feature-set of both the Home and Business (combination of both Home Premium and Enterprise) editions, as well as a set of Windows Ultimate Extras, and is aimed at enthusiasts.
All editions except Windows Vista Starter support both 32-bit (x86) and 64-bit (x64) processor architectures.
In the European Union, Home Basic N and Business N versions are also available. These come without Windows Media Player, due to EU sanctions brought against Microsoft for violating anti-trust laws. Similar sanctions exist in South Korea.
Dell and Microsoft partnered to support (PRODUCT) RED. Microsoft released the Windows Vista Ultimate (PRODUCT) RED that exclusively will come together with Dell (PRODUCT) RED Computers.
Visual styles
Windows Vista has four distinct visual styles.[123]
- Windows Aero
- Vista's premier visual style, Windows Aero, is built on a new desktop composition engine called Desktop Window Manager. Windows Aero introduces support for 3D graphics (Windows Flip 3D), translucency effects (Glass), live thumbnails, window animations, and other visual effects, and is intended for mainstream and high-end video cards. To enable these features, the contents of every open window are stored in video memory to facilitate tearing-free movement of windows. As such, Windows Aero has significantly higher hardware requirements than its predecessors. The minimum requirement is for 128 MB of graphics memory, depending on resolution used.[124] Windows Aero (including Windows Flip 3D) is not included in the Starter and Home Basic editions.
- Windows Vista Standard
- This style is a variation of Windows Aero without the glass effects, window animations, and other advanced graphical effects such as Windows Flip 3D. Like Windows Aero, it uses the Desktop Window Manager, and has generally the same video hardware requirements as Windows Aero. This mode is only included in the Windows Vista Home Basic Edition as a replacement of Windows Aero style.
- Windows Vista Basic
- This style has aspects that are similar to Windows XP's visual style with the addition of subtle animations such as those found on progress bars. It does not employ the Desktop Window Manager(DWM); as such, it does not feature transparency or translucency, window animation, Windows Flip 3D or any of the functions provided by the DWM. The Basic mode does not require the new Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) for display drivers, and has similar video card requirements to Windows XP. For computers with video cards that are not powerful enough to support Windows Aero, this is the default graphics mode.
- Windows Classic
- Windows Classic resembles Windows 2000 and Windows Server 2003, does not use the Desktop Window Manager, and does not require a WDDM driver. As with previous versions of Windows, this visual style supports color schemes, which are collections of color settings. Windows Vista includes six classic color schemes, comprised of four high-contrast color schemes and the default color schemes from Windows 98 and Windows 2000/Windows Me.
Hardware requirements
Computers capable of running Windows Vista are classified as Vista Capable and Vista Premium Ready.[125] A Vista Capable or equivalent PC is capable of running all editions of Windows Vista although some of the special features and high-end graphics options may require additional or more advanced hardware. A Vista Premium Ready PC can take advantage of Vista's high-end features.[126]
Windows Vista's Basic and Classic interfaces work with virtually any graphics hardware that supports Windows XP or 2000; accordingly, most discussion around Vista's graphics requirements centers on those for the Windows Aero interface. As of Windows Vista Beta 2, the NVIDIA GeForce 6 series and later, the ATI Radeon 9500 and later, Intel's GMA 950 and later integrated graphics, and a handful of VIA chipsets and S3 Graphics discrete chips are supported. Although originally supported, the GeForce FX 5 series has been dropped from newer drivers from NVIDIA. The last driver from NVIDIA to support the GeForce FX series on Vista was 96.85.[127][128] Microsoft offers a tool called the Windows Vista Upgrade Advisor[126] to assist Windows XP and Vista users in determining what versions of Windows their machine is capable of running. Although the installation media included in retail packages is a 32-bit DVD, customers needing a CD-ROM or customers who wish for a 64-bit install media are able to acquire this media through the Windows Vista Alternate Media program.[129] The Ultimate edition includes both 32-bit and 64-bit media.[130] The digitally downloaded version of Ultimate includes only one version, either 32-bit or 64-bit, from Windows Marketplace.
Vista Capable | Vista Premium Ready | |
---|---|---|
Processor | 800 MHz[131] | 1 GHz |
Memory | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Graphics card | DirectX 9.0 capable | DirectX 9.0 capable and WDDM 1.0 driver support |
Graphics memory | 32 MB | 128 MB supports up to 2,756,000 total pixels (e.g. 1920 × 1200) or 256 MB for greater resolutions such as 2560x1600[132] |
HDD capacity | 20 GB | 40 GB |
HDD free space | 15 GB | |
Other drives | DVD-ROM | |
Audio | Audio output |
Service packs
Microsoft occasionally releases service packs for its Windows operating systems to fix bugs and add new features.
Service Pack 1
Windows Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1) was released on February 4, 2008 alongside Windows Server 2008 to OEM partners, after a five-month beta test period. The initial deployment of the service pack caused a number of machines to continually reboot, rendering the machines unusable. [133] This caused Microsoft to temporarily suspend automatic deployment of the service pack until the problem was resolved. The synchronized release date of the two operating systems reflected the merging of the workstation and server kernels back into a single code base for the first time since Windows 2000. MSDN subscribers were able to download SP1 on February 15, 2008. SP1 became available to current Windows Vista users on Windows Update and the Download Center on March 18, 2008.[134][135][136] Initially, the service pack only supported 5 languages - English, French, Spanish, German and Japanese. Support for the remaining 31 languages was released on April 14, 2008.[137]
A whitepaper published by Microsoft near the end of August 2007 outlined the scope and intent of the service pack, identifying three major areas of improvement: reliability and performance, administration experience, and support for newer hardware and standards.
One area of particular note is performance. Areas of improvement include file copy operations, hibernation, logging off on domain-joined machines, JavaScript parsing in Internet Explorer, network file share browsing,[135] Windows Explorer ZIP file handling,[138] and Windows Disk Defragmenter.[139] The ability to choose individual drives to defragment is being reintroduced as well.[135]
Service Pack 1 introduces support for some new hardware and software standards, notably the exFAT file system,[135] 802.11n wireless networking,[140] IPv6 over VPN connections,[140] and the Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol. Booting a system using Extensible Firmware Interface on x64 systems is also being introduced;[135] this feature had originally been slated for the initial release of Vista but was delayed due to a lack of compatible hardware at the time.
Two areas have seen changes in SP1 that have come as the result of concerns from software vendors. One of these is desktop search; users will be able to change the default desktop search program to one provided by a third party instead of the Microsoft desktop search program that comes with Windows Vista, and desktop search programs will be able to seamlessly tie in their services into the operating system.[136] These changes come in part due to complaints from Google, whose Google Desktop Search application was hindered by the presence of Vista's built-in desktop search. In June 2007, Google claimed that the changes being introduced for SP1 "are a step in the right direction, but they should be improved further to give consumers greater access to alternate desktop search providers".[141] The other area of note is a set of new security APIs being introduced for the benefit of antivirus software that currently relies on the unsupported practice of patching the kernel (see Kernel Patch Protection).[142][143]
An update to DirectX 10, named DirectX 10.1,[135] makes mandatory several features which were previously optional in Direct3D 10 hardware. Graphics cards will be required to support DirectX 10.1.[144] SP1 includes a kernel (6001) that matches the version shipped with Windows Server 2008.
The Group Policy Management Console (GPMC) is being replaced by the Group Policy Object Editor. An updated downloadable version of the Group Policy Management Console was released soon after the service pack.
SP1 enables support for hotpatching, a reboot-reduction servicing technology designed to maximize uptime. It works by allowing Windows components to be updated (or "patched") while they are still in use by a running process. Hotpatch-enabled update packages are installed via the same methods as traditional update packages, and will not trigger a system reboot.[145]
Service Pack 2
Template:Future software Service Pack 2 is currently under development,[146] and a beta was released to a small group of Technology Adoption Program customers on 29 October 2008. The final release date will be dependent on feedback from the beta testing.[147][148] The press has reported that the next Windows Vista service pack will be released before Windows 7 in order to lessen confusion for customers who are undecided whether to deploy Vista or wait for Windows 7.[149] On 2 December 2008, Microsoft announced that the Service Pack 2 Beta would be made available to everyone through a Customer Preview Program (CPP) from December 4.[150]
In addition to a number of security and other fixes, the following new features will also be added in Vista SP2:[151]
- Windows Search 4.0 (currently available for SP1 systems as a standalone update).
- Bluetooth 2.1 Feature Pack supporting the most recent specification for Bluetooth Technology.
- Ability to record data on to Blu-ray media natively in Windows Vista.
- Windows Connect Now (WCN) to simplify Wi-Fi configuration.
- Improved support for resuming with active Wi-Fi connections.
- Enables the exFAT file system to support UTC timestamps, which allows correct file synchronization across time zones.
- Support for ICCD/CCID smart cards.
- Support for VIA 64-bit CPUs.
- DirectX 11[152]
Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 will share a single service pack binary, reflecting the fact that their code bases were joined with the release of Server 2008.[151]
Criticism
Windows Vista has received a number of negative assessments. Criticism targets include protracted development time, more restrictive licensing terms, the inclusion of a number of technologies aimed at restricting the copying of protected digital media,[153] and the usability of the new User Account Control security technology. Reviewers[who?] have also noted some similarities between Vista's Aero interface and that of Apple's Aqua interface for the Mac OS X operating system. Moreover, some concerns have been raised[who?] about many PCs meeting "Vista Premium Ready" hardware requirements and Vista's pricing.
- Hardware requirements
- While Microsoft claimed "nearly all PCs on the market today [2005] will run Windows Vista",[38] the higher requirements of some of the "premium" features, such as the Aero interface, have impacted many upgraders. According to the UK newspaper The Times in May 2006, the full set of features "would be available to less than 5 percent of Britain’s PC market", however, this prediction was made several months before Vista was released.[37] This continuing lack of clarity eventually led to a class action against Microsoft as people found themselves with new computers that were unable to use the new software to its full potential despite the assurance of "Vista Capable" designations.[154] The court case has made public internal Microsoft communications that indicate that senior executives have also had difficulty with this issue. For example, his laptop's lack of an appropriate graphics chip so hobbled Vista features that vice president Mike Nash commented "I now have a $2,100 e-mail machine."[155]
- Licensing and cost
- Criticism of upgrade licenses pertaining to Windows Vista Starter through Home Premium was expressed by Ars Technica's Ken Fisher, who noted that the new requirement of having a prior operating system already installed was going to cause irritation for users who reinstall Windows on a regular basis.[156] It has been revealed that an Upgrade copy of Windows Vista can be installed clean without first installing a previous version of Windows. On the first install, Windows will refuse to activate. The user must then reinstall that same copy of Vista. Vista will then activate on the reinstall, thus allowing a user to install an Upgrade of Windows Vista without owning a previous operating system.[157] As with Windows XP, separate rules still apply to OEM versions of Vista installed on new PCs: Microsoft asserts that these versions are not legally transferable (although whether this conflicts with the right of first sale has yet to be decided clearly legally).[158]
- The cost of Windows Vista has also been a source of concern and commentary. A majority of users in a poll said that the prices of various Windows Vista editions posted on the Microsoft Canada website in August 2006 make the product too expensive.[159] A BBC News report on the day of Vista's release suggested that, "there may be a backlash from consumers over its pricing plans—with the cost of Vista versions in the US roughly half the price of equivalent versions in the UK."[160]
- Digital rights management
- Windows Vista supports additional forms of digital rights management protections. One aspect of this is the Protected Video Path, which is designed so that "premium content" from HD DVD or Blu-ray Discs may mandate that the connections between PC components be encrypted. Depending on what the content demands, the devices may not pass premium content over non-encrypted outputs, or they must artificially degrade the quality of the signal on such outputs or not display it all. Drivers for such hardware must be approved by Microsoft; a revocation mechanism is also included which allows Microsoft to disable drivers of devices in end-user PCs over the Internet.[26] Peter Gutmann, security researcher and author of the open source cryptlib library, claims that these mechanisms violate fundamental rights of the user (such as fair use), unnecessarily increase the cost of hardware, and make systems less reliable (the "tilt bit" being a particular worry; if triggered, the entire graphic subsystem performs a reset) and vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks.[161] However despite several requests [162] for evidence supporting such claims Peter Gutman has never supported his claims with any researched evidence. Proponents have claimed that Microsoft had no choice but to follow the demands of the movie studios, and that the technology will not actually be enabled until after 2010;[163][35] Microsoft also noted that content protection mechanisms have existed in Windows as far back as Windows Me, and that the new protections will not apply to any existing content (only future content).[164]
- User Account Control
- Although UAC is considered an important part of Vista's security infrastructure, as it blocks software from silently gaining administrator privileges without the user's knowledge, it has been widely criticized for generating too many prompts. This has led many Vista UAC users to consider it annoying and tiresome, with some consequently either turning it off or putting it in auto-approval mode.[165] Responding to this criticism, Microsoft altered the implementation to reduce the number of prompts with SP1.[145] Though the changes have resulted in some improvement, it has not alleviated the concerns completely.[166]
Reception
Initially it was thought that the adoption of Vista has been generally low, due to largely poor reviews and harsh criticism, but a later Gartner research report predicted that Vista business adoption in 2008 will actually beat that of XP during the same time frame (21.3% vs. 16.9%)[168] while IDC had indicated that the launch of Windows Server 2008 served as a catalyst for the stronger adoption rates.[169][170] Earlier, PC World rated it as the biggest tech disappointment of 2007,[171] and it was rated by InfoWorld as #2 of Tech's all-time 25 flops.[172] The internet-usage market share for Windows Vista, taking the latest statistic, was 20.45% as of November 2008.[173] This figure combined with World Internet Users and Population Stats yields a user base of roughly 300 million[174] which exceeded Microsofts expectations prior to launch.[175]
Within its first month, 20 million copies of Vista were sold, double the amount of Windows XP sales within its first month in October 2001, five years earlier.[176] In China, only 244 genuine retail copies were sold within the first two weeks, leading authorities to believe that software piracy left many copies unaccounted for.[177][178][179] However, PC World indicated that the visitor base of Windows Vista was increasing at a much slower rate compared to that of Windows XP. Within the first year of its release, the percentage of Windows XP users visiting PC World's website reached 36%; in the same time frame, however, Windows Vista visitors reached only 14%, with 71% of users still running XP.[180] In November 2006, PC World had expected the overall first-year adoption rate to be 15% (vs. 12-14% for XP).[181] Due to Vista's relatively low adoption rates and continued demand for Windows XP, Microsoft continued to sell Windows XP until June 30, 2008 instead of the previously planned date of January 31, 2008.[182] There were reports of Vista users downgrading their operating systems, as well as reports of businesses planning to skip Vista.[183][184] A study conducted by ChangeWave in March 2008 showed that the percentage of corporate users who are "very satisfied" with Vista was dramatically lower than other operating systems, with Vista at 8%, compared to the 40% who said they were "very satisfied" with Windows XP.[185]
Although business adoption of Vista has been far higher than Apple or Linux platforms, it has been slower than expected; while businesses do tend to delay upgrading their operating systems, there have been reports that Vista is installed on considerably fewer enterprise PCs than previously projected.[186] According to InformationWeek, in December 2006, 6% of business enterprises were expected to employ Vista within the first year, yet as of October 2007, only about 1% of enterprise PCs were actually using Vista.[187] While a large number of businesses had bought early-adopter licenses to run Windows Vista, many of these companies delayed deployment.[188]
There have been a number of organizations who have denounced Vista due to its problems. For example, in October 2007, The Dutch Consumers' Association called for a boycott of Windows Vista after Microsoft refused to offer free copies of Windows XP to users who had problems with Vista.[189]
Amid the negative reviews and reception, there have also been significant positive reviews of Vista, most notable from among PC gamers and the advantages brought about with DirectX 10, which allows for better gaming performance and more realistic graphics, as well as support for many new capabilities brought about in new video cards and GPUs.[190] However, many DirectX 9 games showed a drop in frame rate compared to that experienced in Windows XP.[191][192][193] These results were largely the consequence of Vista's immature graphics processing units drivers, and higher system requirements for Vista itself.[194][195] Recent benchmarks suggest that, as of mid-2008, Vista SP1 is now on par with Windows XP in terms of game performance.[196]
On February 29, 2008, Microsoft announced that it will lower the price of the Vista operating system sold at retail outlets in order to aid in its adoption.[197] These price cuts only apply to the retail versions sold in shops, which account for less than 10% of total Vista sales. Vista Ultimate, for example, will see a 20% drop in its price, from US$399 to $319.[198]
On July 17, 2008, Microsoft announced that it had sold 180 million licenses,[199] which would amount to between 36 and 57 billion dollars in gross retail sale price using February 29, 2008 price tags of the various versions. Initial development of the software was claimed to be 6 billion dollars. However, according to HP, Microsoft's sales figures include business systems that ship with Vista licences but are "downgraded" and preloaded with XP.[200][201]
On July 30, 2008, Microsoft indicated that Vista appears to be causing a shift in the PC industry from 32-bit to 64-bit. The installed base of 64-bit editions of Windows Vista, as a percentage of all Windows Vista systems, had more than tripled in the United States in the previous three months, while worldwide adoption had more than doubled during the same period. Another view showed that 20% of new Windows Vista PCs in the United States connecting to Windows Update in June were 64-bit PCs, up from 3% in March. Microsoft stated that the falling price of RAM and increased use of multitasking are benefits from SuperFetch, which accelerates performance with the installation of more RAM allowed 64-bit editions of Windows Vista.[202] This has also been projected by Brad Brooks in an interview on October 13, 2008.[203]
Competition with Windows XP
In July 2008, according to a marketing manager working for HP Australia, Windows XP was still being chosen over Windows Vista for the majority of business computer sales. As all customers of OEM versions of Vista Business and Ultimate are eligible for a free downgrade to Windows XP Professional,[204] these Windows XP licenses are sold as Vista Business licenses, thus increasing Vista's sales figures.[205] Some computer manufacturers have chosen to ship Windows XP restore disks along with new computers with Vista Business and Ultimate editions pre-installed,[206] as well as new computers with XP instead of Vista.
The "Mojave Experiment"
In July 2008, Microsoft introduced a web-based advertising campaign called the "Mojave Experiment", that depicts a group of people who are asked to evaluate the newest operating system from Microsoft, calling it Windows 'Mojave'. Participants are first asked about Vista, if they have used it, and their overall satisfaction with Vista on a scale of 1 to 10. They are then shown a demo of some of the new operating system's features, and asked their opinion and satisfaction with it on the same 1 to 10 scale. After respondents rate "Mojave", they are then told that they were really shown a demo of Windows Vista. The object was to test "A theory: If people could see Windows Vista firsthand, they would like it." According to Microsoft, the initial sample of respondents rated Vista an average of 4.4 out of 10, and Mojave received an average of 8.5, with no respondents rating Mojave lower than they originally rated Windows Vista before the demo.[207][208]
See also
- History of Microsoft Windows
- Comparison of Microsoft Windows versions
- Comparison of Windows Vista and Windows XP
- Microsoft Office 2007—the current release of Microsoft Office that was released simultaneously with Windows Vista.
- Patch Tuesday
Notes and references
- ^ "Windows Licensing Programs". Microsoft. Retrieved 2008-09-21.
- ^ "Upgrade Windows Vista to 6001.18063.080425-1930 with KB952709 Update". Retrieved 2008-07-19.
- ^ http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2008/02/04/announcing-the-rtm-of-windows-vista-sp1.aspx
- ^ "Vista Sp2 Beta WinFuture-Forum.de". Retrieved 2008-12-05.
- ^ http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/dd262148.aspx
- ^ Evers, Joris (2007-01-17). "Security tools ready for Vista launch". CNET News.com. Retrieved 2007-01-20.
- ^ a b J. Alex Halderman, Seth D. Schoen, Nadia Heninger, William Clarkson, William Paul, Joseph A. Calandrino, Ariel J. Feldman, Jacob Appelbaum, and Edward W. Felten (2008-02-21). "Lest We Remember: Cold Boot Attacks on Encryption Keys". Princeton University. Retrieved 2008-06-20.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) Cite error: The named reference "ColdBoot" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). - ^ Aaron Margosis (2006-08-01). "Problems of Privilege: Find and Fix LUA Bugs". Microsoft. Retrieved 2008-10-27.
- ^ Charles (2007-03-05). "UAC - What. How. Why" (video). Retrieved 2007-03-23.
- ^ "Driver Signing Requirements for Windows". Microsoft. Retrieved 2008-02-23.
- ^ Microsoft blocks 64-bit driver "Microsoft blocks 64-bit driver". heise Security UK. 2007-08-08.
{{cite web}}
: Check|url=
value (help) - ^ "Signing Drivers For Public Release (Windows Server 2008 and Windows Vista)". Microsoft. Retrieved 2008-02-23.
- ^ "Software Publisher Certificate". Microsoft.
- ^ in here, HP states that it wont release vista drivers for some hardware. Together with the fact that the old drivers can't be loaded, this renders such hardware unusable under vista
- ^ Linchpin Labs Response to Microsoft's Classification of Atsiv
- ^ Marsden, Richard. "Microsoft Authenticode for the Small Independent Software Vendor". Retrieved 2008-05-27.
- ^ Alex Ionescu’s Blog » Update on Driver Signing Bypass
- ^ "the real reason for driver signing on windows vista"
- ^ "Allowing UnSigned Driver Installation in Vista x64". Retrieved 2008-03-02.
- ^ Gregg Keizer (2007-06-30). "Utility evades Vista kernel defenses". Computerworld. Retrieved 2008-09-14.
- ^ "Microsoft Security Advisory: Update to improve Kernel Patch Protection". Microsoft. 2007-10-26. Retrieved 2008-03-03.
- ^ How to Impress Girls with Browser Memory Protection Bypasses
- ^ The sky isn't falling: a look at a new Vista security bypass
- ^ a b Alarmed about Vista security? Black Hat researcher Alexander Sotirov speaks out
- ^ http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid14_gci1324395,00.html
- ^ a b c d Marsh, Dave (2005-04-27). "Output Content Protection and Windows Vista". Microsoft. Retrieved 2007-01-08. Cite error: The named reference "Microsoft-ocp" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ Marsh, Dave (2007-01-20). "Windows Vista Content Protection - Twenty Questions (and Answers)".
- ^ Gutmann, Peter (2007-01-27). "A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection". Retrieved 2007-01-27. Also available: PDF version
- ^ Gibson, Steve (2007-01-17). "Steve Gibson & Peter Gutmann on Vista DRM". Retrieved 2007-01-17.
- ^ Bott, Ed (2007-09-16). "Everything you've read about Vista DRM is wrong". Retrieved 2007-09-21.
- ^ Ou, George (2007-09-01). "Gutmann Vista DRM paper uses shoddy Web Forums as source". Retrieved 2007-09-22.
- ^ Peter Gutmann. "Windows DRM: A Response to the Disinformation".
- ^ Nick White and Dave Marsh (2007-01-20). "Windows Vista Content Protection - Twenty Questions (and Answers)". Retrieved 2007-01-22.
- ^ Smith, Paul (2006-12-31). "Windows Vista DRM nonsense". Retrieved 2007-01-03.
- ^ a b Fisher, Ken (2006-05-21). "Hollywood reportedly in agreement to delay forced quality downgrades for Blu-ray, HD DVD". Cite error: The named reference "arstechnica" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ Marsh, Dave (2007-01-20). "Windows Vista Content Protection - Twenty Questions (and Answers)". Windows Vista team blog. Microsoft. Retrieved 2007-01-20.
- ^ a b Judge, Elizabeth (2006-05-20). "Windows revamp 'too advanced for most PCs'". The Times. Retrieved 2006-08-15. Cite error: The named reference "Judge1" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b Spooner, John G. (2005-08-05). "Will Your PC Run Windows Vista?". eweek.com. Retrieved 2006-08-15.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|coatuhors=
ignored (help)CS1 maint: year (link) Cite error: The named reference "Hwreqts2" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). - ^ Thurrott, Paul (2006-03-29). "Finally, Microsoft Releases Windows Vista Hardware Requirements". WinSuperSite.com. Retrieved 2006-08-15.
- ^ Anmol Taneja (2007-03-24). "Windows Vista - Hardware Compatibility Issues". Articlesbase. Retrieved 2006-03-22.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: year (link) - ^ Santo Domingo, Joel (2007-05-04). "New Benchmark Tests for Vista". tomshardware.com. Retrieved 2007-05-13.
- ^ Williams, Ian (2007-05-29). "Understanding the impact of Windows Vista on SPECviewperf performance measurement". Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Retrieved 2008-10-29.
- ^ http://news.cnet.com/Windows-XP-outshines-Vista-in-benchmarking-test/2100-1016_3-6220201.html
- ^ http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-9837180-17.html
- ^ "calculating time remaining moving, deleting, copying files very slow".
- ^ "An update is available that improves the performance and reliability of Windows Vista".
- ^ "Windows Vista Service Pack 1 Beta White Paper". (See 'Performance' section)
- ^ Kingsley-Hughes, Adrian (2008-02-15). "Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked". Retrieved 2008-02-16.
- ^ "Another take on Vista vs. XP benchmarks". 2008-02-19.
- ^ "Inside Vista SP1 File Copy Improvements".
- ^ Abazovic, Fuad (2006-12-04). "Testing Vista's different memory configurations". theinquirer.net. Retrieved 2007-05-13.
- ^ Williams, Rob (2007-01-29). "Windows Vista Gaming Performance Reports". techgage.com. Retrieved 2007-05-26.
- ^ Cheatham, Miles (2006-11-24). "ATI Radeon X1950XTX CrossFire". bjorn3d.com. Retrieved 2007-05-18.
- ^ Cross, Jason (2007-02-20). "Vista Game Performance: Vista vs. XP and ATI vs. Nvidia". extremetech.com. Retrieved 2007-05-26.
- ^ Wall, Jason (2007-05-07). "XP vs. Vista - A Tale of Framerates". enthusiast.hardocp.com. Retrieved 2007-05-26.
- ^ Durham, Joel (2008-05-12). "Gaming Performance: Windows Vista SP1 vs. XP SP3". extremetech.com. Retrieved 2008-07-29.
- ^ Microsoft to slim down 'bloated' Windows
- ^ Ed Bott. "Windows bloat? It's always been that way".
- ^ informationweek.com
- ^ a b Stross, Randall (2008-03-08). "They Criticized Vista. And They Should Know". New York Times. Retrieved 2008-03-08.
- ^ NYTimes – Dell Pointed Out Vista Mistakes, Internal Documents Show
- ^ Fried, Ina (2006-06-02). "Vista beta sucks up battery juice". news.zdnet.com. Retrieved 2007-05-06.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: year (link) - ^ Vista draining laptop batteries, patience
- ^ Krazit, Tom (2007-05-04). "Vista draining laptop batteries, patience". news.zdnet.com. Retrieved 2007-05-06.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: year (link) - ^ "Gartner: App testing delaying Vista rollouts". zdnetasia.com. Retrieved 2007-05-22.
- ^ "Microsoft rallies developers behind Vista". zdnetasia.com. Retrieved 2007-05-22.
- ^ "No Rush to Adopt Vista". IDG, quoted on PC World. Retrieved 2007-05-22.
- ^ "Microsoft Hit By U.S. DOT Ban On Windows Vista, Explorer 7, and Office 2007". Information week [www.informationweek.com]. Retrieved 2007-05-22.
- ^ "Six months on, Vista users still griping (page 2 - The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, a member of Microsoft's Vista Technical Adoption Program)". MS NBC [www.msnbc.com]. Retrieved 2007-07-27.
- ^ "Windows Vista Service Pack 1 Beta White Paper". Microsoft. 2007-08-29. p. 1. Retrieved 2007-08-29.
- ^ ""Application List: Works with Windows Vista"".
- ^ ""Application List: Certified for Windows Vista"".
- ^ "Six months on, Vista users still griping". MS NBC [www.msnbc.com]. Retrieved 2007-07-27.
- ^ ""Windows Vista Upgrade Advisor"".
- ^ [http://www.itnews.com.au/newsstory.aspx?CIaNID=34120&CIPseq=0
%5b%5bCategory:All articles with dead external links%5d%5d%5b%5bCategory:Articles with dead external links from August 2008%5d%5d%5b%5bCategory:Articles with invalid date parameter in template%5d%5d[%5b%5bWikipedia:Link rot|dead link%5d%5d ] "What's been yanked from Vista, and when"]. Techweb. 2006-06-27. Retrieved 2007-01-29.
{{cite web}}
: Check|url=
value (help); line feed character in|url=
at position 62 (help) - ^ zdnetasia.com
- ^ "Windows Vista Versus XP Pricing". PC World. 2006. Retrieved 2008-20-31.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ "Windows Vista Too Expensive Says Users". IT Wire. 2006. Retrieved 2008-20-31.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ "Vista still looks expensive after cuts". New Zealand Harald. 2008. Retrieved 2008-20-31.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ Warne, Dan (2007-01-22). "Is Vista's Australian pricing a rip-off?". apcmag.com. Retrieved 2007-01-23.
- ^ "Vista comes to rip-off Britain". The Inquirer. 2007-01-23. Retrieved 2007-01-24.
- ^ "Microsoft vilified over price of Vista". VNU Business Publications. 2007. Retrieved 2007-01-23.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ Computerworld. "The Skinny on Windows SPP and Reduced Functionality in Vista".
- ^ Microsoft PressPass. "Microsoft's Software Protection Platform: Protecting Software and Customers from Counterfeiter".
- ^ "White Paper: Microsoft's Software Protection Platform: Innovations for Windows Vista and Windows Server "Longhorn"" (DOC). Microsoft PressPass. 2006-10-03.
- ^ "Hands On: A Hard Look at Windows Vista". 2006-11-10. p. 15. Retrieved 2007-07-19.
- ^ Bott, Ed (2006-10-04). "For Vista, WGA gets tougher". Ed Bott's Microsoft Report. Retrieved 2007-07-19.
- ^ Ed Bott (2006-10-04). WGA failures "Another wave of WGA failures". Ed Bott's Microsoft Report. Retrieved 2007-07-19.
{{cite web}}
: Check|url=
value (help) - ^ "Windows Genuine Advantage suffers worldwide outage, problems galore (updated)". Retrieved 2007-08-24.
- ^ Update on Validation Issues "Update on Validation Issues". Retrieved 2007-07-28.
{{cite web}}
: Check|url=
value (help) - ^ "ZDNET Hardware 2.0: SP1 brings with it a softer, gentler, naggier WGA". 2008-09-02. Retrieved 2008-07-22.
- ^ "Product Activation for Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008". 2007-11-06.
- ^ http://apcmag.com/xp_still_killing_vista_in_sales_volume_hp.htm
- ^ http://www.infopackets.com/news/business/microsoft/2008/20080801_windows_xp_still_outselling_windows_vista.htm
- ^ "Ultimate Extras, Where are you?". windowsconnected.com. 2007-07-04. Retrieved 2007-07-04.
{{cite web}}
:|first=
missing|last=
(help) - ^ Dunn, Josh (2007-07-04). "Microsoft evades promise of Vista Ultimate Extras". windowsconnected.com. Retrieved 2007-07-04.
- ^ Long Zheng. "Windows Ultimate Extras is a sham - where's the responsibility?".
- ^ [http://web.archive.org/web/20080211120503/http://windowsultimate.com/blogs/announcements/archive/2007/09/25/windows-dreamscene-released.aspx
{{%5b%5bTemplate:Link|Link%5d%5d}} is ambiguous. Please use a more specific template. "Windows DreamScene released!"]. 2007-09-25. Retrieved 2007-10-05.
{{cite web}}
: Check|url=
value (help); line feed character in|url=
at position 141 (help) - ^ "Selected Scenarios for Maintaining Data Integrity with Windows Vista". Microsoft. 2006. Retrieved 2006-08-24.
- ^ Windows Update, Easier and Less Disruptive Windows Update in Windows Vista.
- ^ Windows Vista, SAPI Talking Windows
- ^ "TWAR05002_WinHEC05.ppt at download.microsoft.com". Retrieved 2007-01-25.
- ^ Windows Vista, The System Assessment Tool WinSat.
- ^ "Understand how SuperFetch uses RAM to enhance system performance | Microsoft Windows | TechRepublic.com". Blogs.techrepublic.com.com. Retrieved 2008-10-02.
- ^ "blogs.technet.com". Retrieved 2007-01-25.
- ^ "Kernel Enhancements for Windows Vista and Windows Server Longhorn". Microsoft. May 9, 2006. Retrieved 2008-03-13.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
gatesrsa
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Protected Mode IE has been described in detail at the Internet Explorer team blog: Protected Mode in Vista IE7 and More details on Protected Mode IE in Windows Vista.
- ^ "BitLocker Drive Encryption: Executive Overview". Microsoft. 2006-04-05. Retrieved 2007-06-19.
- ^ Windows Vista Feature Focus: 64-Bit (x64) Support
- ^ "What's New in Group Policy in Windows Vista and Windows Server "Longhorn"". TechNet. Microsoft. Retrieved 2006-05-18.
- ^ .NET Framework 3.0 Technologies, Microsoft
- ^ Booker, Logan (2005-09-15). "DirectX 10: More harm than good for graphics?". Maximum Power Computing Atomic. Retrieved 2006-05-28.
- ^ VedBrat, Kam (2006-02-22). "more comments..." MSDN Blogs. Retrieved 2006-05-28.
- ^ Trevett, Neil (2006). "OpenGL on Vista". Khronos Group. Retrieved 2006-11-09.
- ^ Nguyen, Tuan. "OpenGL Now Natively Supported in Windows Vista". Retrieved 2007-01-25.
- ^ "Enable Game port on vista". Creative. 2004-12-08. Retrieved 2007-06-22.
- ^ "Discontinued Support for IP over 1394". Microsoft. 2004-12-08. Retrieved 2007-06-22.
- ^ "IPX/SPX Protocol in Vista (32bit)". Starbase.com. 2008-05-05. Retrieved 2008-05-05.
- ^ "Microsoft Unveils Windows Vista Product Lineup". PressPass (Press release). Microsoft. 2006-02-26. Retrieved 2006-10-31.
- ^ "Windows Vista Business".
- ^ "Windows Vista Enterprise".
- ^ VedBrat, Kam. "Desktop And Presentation Impact On Hardware Design (Powerpoint presentation)". Microsoft. Retrieved 2006-09-01.
- ^ a b "Windows Vista Enterprise Hardware Planning Guidance". TechNet. Microsoft. 2006. Retrieved 2006-10-26.
- ^ "Microsoft and PC Manufacturers Make It Easier for Customers to Get Ready for Windows Vista". PressPass. Microsoft. 2006-05-18. Retrieved 2006-05-18.
- ^ a b "Windows Vista Upgrade Advisor". Retrieved 2006-06-25.
- ^ "ForceWare Release 95". Nvidia.com. Retrieved 2008-10-02.
- ^ "MsBetas' List of Vista Ready GPUs". Retrieved 2007-07-30.
- ^ name="Windows Vista system requirements""Windows Vista Alternate Media". Retrieved 2007-08-20.
- ^ Windows Vista 64-bit Editions
- ^ Windows Vista minimum supported system requirements "Windows Vista: Recommended System Requirements". Microsoft. Retrieved 2008-03-13.
- ^ 64 MB RAM supports Aero with up to 1,310,720 total pixels (e.g. 1280 × 1024), but is not Premium Ready [1]
- ^ "No update from Microsoft on Vista SP1, Media Center problems". Zdnet. 2008-02-18. Retrieved 2008-10-08.
- ^ "Announcing the RTM of Windows Vista SP1". Microsoft. 2008-02-04. Retrieved 2008-02-04.
- ^ a b c d e f "Windows Vista Service Pack 1 Beta White Paper". Microsoft. 2007-08-29. p. 1. Retrieved 2007-08-29.
- ^ a b "Feb. Launch Now Set for Windows Vista SP1". PC World Magazine. 2008-01-31. Retrieved 2008-01-31.
- ^ Download Details: Windows Vista SP1 All Language Standalone (KB936330)
- ^ Mark Russinovich (August 7, 2007). "The Case of the Failed File Compression". Mark's Blog. MSDN Blogs.
- ^ "Don't judge a book by its cover–why Windows Vista Defrag is cool". The Filing Cabinet. MSDN Blogs. January 26, 2007. Retrieved 2007-04-06.
- ^ a b Zheng, Long (2007-07-22). "Collection of published Vista SP1 API changes from MSDN". Retrieved 2007-07-23.
- ^ Ken Fisher (June 21, 2007). "Google says Vista search changes not enough". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2007-10-20.
- ^ Fulton, Scott M., III (2006-10-19). "Vista SP1 to Include Common Security APIs for Partners". BetaNews. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "Kernel Patch Protection Criteria Evaluation Document". Microsoft. 2006-12-19. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- ^ Hruska, Joel (2007-08-09). "Microsoft releases information on upcoming D3D 10.1 update". Retrieved 2008-08-10.
- ^ a b "Notable Changes in Vista Service Pack 1". Microsoft. Retrieved 2008-05-02.
- ^ Kelly Fiveash (2008-10-20). "Vista SP2 beta could land within next four weeks". The Register. Retrieved 2008-10-21.
- ^ "Windows Vista Team Blog : Windows Vista Service Pack 2 Beta". 2008-10-24. Retrieved 2008-10-24.
- ^ "Information about Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 and Windows Vista Service Pack 2". Microsoft. 2008-10-02. Retrieved 2008-10-17.
- ^ "Microsoft aiming to deliver Vista SP2 before Windows 7". ZDNet. 2008-10-15. Retrieved 2008-10-19.
- ^ "Windows Vista Team Blog : WAnnouncing the Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 Customer Preview Program (CPP)". 2008-12-02. Retrieved 2008-12-02.
- ^ a b Mike Nash (2008-10-24). "Windows Vista Team Blog : Windows Vista Service Pack 2 Beta". Retrieved 2008-10-24.
- ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DirectX#Release_history
- ^ Sullivan, John (2007-03-06). "What's wrong with Microsoft Windows Vista?". Bad Vista. Retrieved 2007-03-24.
- ^ Gregg Keizer (November 26, 2007).Lawyers: Even Microsoft Confused Over Vista Marketing
- ^ "They Criticized Vista. And They Should Know.", The New York Times, March 9, 2008.
- ^ Fisher, Ken (2007-01-28). "Vista "upgrade" drops compliance checking, requires old OS to install". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2007-01-28.
- ^ Thurrott, Paul (2007-02-03). "How to Clean Install Windows Vista with Upgrade Media". Paul Thurrott. Retrieved 2007-02-05.
- ^ Fried, Ina (2006-10-16). "Microsoft limits Vista transfers". CNET News.com. Retrieved 2006-10-19.
- ^ Beer, Stan (2006-08-30). "Windows Vista too expensive says users". ITWire.com. Retrieved 2006-10-19.
- ^ "Microsoft starts Vista hard sell". Technology. BBC News. 2007-01-30. Retrieved 2007-01-30.
- ^ Gutmann, Peter (2007-01-27). "A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection". Retrieved 2007-01-27. Also available: PDF version
- ^ Bott and Ou call out Gutmann's Vista FUD
- ^ Smith, Paul (2006-12-31). "Windows Vista DRM nonsense". Retrieved 2007-01-03.
- ^ Marsh, Dave (2007-01-20). "Windows Vista Content Protection—Twenty Questions (and Answers)". Windows Vista team blog. Microsoft. Retrieved 2007-01-20.
- ^ InformationWeek: Don't Shut Off Vista UAC, There's A Better Way
- ^ Christina Torode, "Minasi says Vista SP1 solves problems, adds new ones.", SearchWinIT.com, April 2, 2008.
- ^ ComputerWorld on ChangeWave statistics
- ^ http://www.informationweek.com/news/windows/operatingsystems/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207600845
- ^ http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=211087
- ^ http://www.pcworld.com/article/153089/vista_fights_for_relevancy_against_poor_sales_xp_windows_7.html
- ^ Dan Tynan (2007-12-16). "The 15 Biggest Tech Disappointments of 2007". PC World. IDG. Retrieved 2007-12-18.: listed as #1 of "The 15 Biggest Tech Disappointments of 2007"
- ^ Neil McAllister (2008-01-21). "Tech's all-time top 25 flops". InfoWorld. IDG. Retrieved 2008-01-27.
- ^ http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=11
- ^ Internet Usage Statistics "Internet World Stats—Usage and Population Statistics". Miniwatts Marketing Group. 2008-06-30. Retrieved 2008-11-02.
{{cite web}}
: Check|url=
value (help) - ^ Paul Thurrot (2006-09-16). "Allchin: 200 Million Windows Vista Users in 24 Months". Retrieved 2009-01-03.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|Publisher=
ignored (|publisher=
suggested) (help) - ^ Microsoft: First Month Vista Sales Double XP, article by Nate Mook
- ^ "Only 244 copies of Genuine Windows Vista sold in China". newlaunches.com. 2007-04-18. Retrieved 2008-08-01.
- ^ "正規版Windows Vista簡体字中国版の販売本数は244本?". 中国で見つけたWindows Vista“Professional 2007”ってなに? (in Japanese). ITmedia. 2007-03-15. Retrieved 2008-08-01.
- ^ Farrell, Nick (2007-04-19). "Vista flops in China". The Inquirer. Retrieved 2008-08-01.
- ^ PC World's Techlog PCWorld.com Year-End Stats: IE 7, Firefox, Vista, Mac
- ^ http://www.pcworld.com/article/128027/vista_adoption_rate_predicted_to_outpace_windows_xp.html Vista Adoption Rate Predicted to Outpace Windows XP
- ^ Ina Fried, CNET (2007-09-27). "Microsoft extends Windows XP's stay".
- ^ Windows XP vs. Vista: An Explosion of Opinion
- ^ A computer shop's sales pitch: 'We remove Vista'
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
computerworld1
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ bMighty.com: Vista is Bad. Should Smaller Businesses Go For it Anyway?
- ^ IT Pros Grapple With Timing Of Windows Vista Deployment
- ^ Microsoft: Vista bought but not deployed
- ^ "Dutch Consumer Association declares war on Vista".
- ^ DirectX 10: The Future of PC Gaming, Tim Smalley, November 30, 2006
- ^ Abazovic, Fuad (2006-12-04). "Testing Vista's different memory configurations". theinquirer.net. Retrieved 2007-05-13.
- ^ Williams, Rob (2007-01-29). "Windows Vista Gaming Performance Reports". techgage.com. Retrieved 2007-05-26.
- ^ Cheatham, Miles (2006-11-24). "ATI Radeon X1950XTX CrossFire". bjorn3d.com. Retrieved 2007-05-18.
- ^ Cross, Jason (2007-02-20). "Vista Game Performance: Vista vs. XP and ATI vs. Nvidia". extremetech.com. Retrieved 2007-05-26.
- ^ Wall, Jason (2007-05-07). "XP vs. Vista - A Tale of Framerates". enthusiast.hardocp.com. Retrieved 2007-05-26.
- ^ Durham, Joel (2008-05-12). "Gaming Performance: Windows Vista SP1 vs. XP SP3". extremetech.com. Retrieved 2008-07-29.
- ^ eFluxMedia: Will Price Cuts Help Windows Vista Fly Off The Shelves?
- ^ BBC News article retrieved February 29, 2008
- ^ Microsoft's Annual Revenue Reaches $60 Billion: Fastest annual revenue growth since 1999 fuels 32% increase in earnings per share.
- ^ http://apcmag.com/xp_still_killing_vista_in_sales_volume_hp.htm
- ^ http://www.infopackets.com/news/business/microsoft/2008/20080801_windows_xp_still_outselling_windows_vista.htm
- ^ Windows Vista 64-bit Today
- ^ Microsoft: Mac buyers pay Apple tax
- ^ "Microsoft Royalty OEM Reference Sheet" (PDF). 2008-07-01.
- ^ HP. "XP still killing Vista in sales volume: HP". Apcmag.com. Retrieved 2008-10-02.
- ^ Ina Fried, CNET (2007-09-21). "The XP alternative for Vista PCs" (Article).
- ^ "The Mojave Experiment". Mojaveexperiment.com. Retrieved 2008-10-02.
- ^ "The Mojave Experiment: Microsoft Windows Vista".
External links
Microsoft
- Microsoft Windows Vista—Microsoft Windows Vista homepage
- Microsoft Windows Vista Upgrade Info—Windows Vista Upgrade planning
- Microsoft Windows Vista Product Guide—Contains complete, feature-by-feature comparisons of the various Windows Vista editions
- Microsoft Windows Vista Hardware Design—Hardware Design for Windows Vista—News for Driver Developers and Hardware Engineers
- Microsoft Technet—Windows Vista: Resources for IT Professionals
- MSDN—Windows Vista Developer Center on MSDN
- The Windows Vista Blog—Official blog of the Windows Vista Team
- See Windows Vista—Official Microsoft website with information on how the new Windows Vista Operating System works
- The behavior of reduced functionality mode in Windows Vista–Microsoft support explaining the Reduced functionality mode.
- Mojave Experiment An experiment related with user's experience about Windows Vista.
- Microsoft Windows Vista Images Website—Official Microsoft website with Screenshots, Icons, Logos
Reviews and screenshots
- Windows Vista Screenshots Gallery—Collection of Vista Screenshots from Different Builds
- Paul Thurrott's SuperSite for Windows—Windows Vista Activity Center
- How secure is Windows' new Vista?
- Features of Windows Vista
- Windows Vista 32-bit and 64-bit Performance Compared
- Windows Vista Ultimate—CNET review
- Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown—Tom's Hardware Guide review
- Windows Vista Software Compatibility List—ieXbeta's Wiki
- Windows Vista Feature Comparison—Yes/No Feature Comparison of Vista Versions
- Best Windows Vista Websites - The best Windows Vista sites on the web (competition)
Criticism
- CNET—Hollywood, Microsoft align on new Windows
- Technology Review—Will Windows Upgrade Hand Power To Big Media?
- Bad Vista–Free Software Foundation
Security vulnerabilities
- Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Vista including known unpatched vulnerabilities from Secunia
- Vista vulnerabilities from SecurityFocus