User talk:Nenyedi

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, SIGN YOUR POSTS (with four tildes: ~~~~),
and use headlines when starting new topics. Thank you.

Previous Archives:

Copyright violation in Image:UnivarenaKzoo.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:UnivarenaKzoo.jpg, by Fuzzy510 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:UnivarenaKzoo.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:UnivarenaKzoo.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Frosty

Hello Nenyedi, and thanks for your message, however, even if it might seem that I made the changes, this is not actually so.

Instead, I only switched the word "four" into "six", as seen from here. I think I marked the edit as a "minor", to indicate a change not related to the contents.

You are probably looking for REexpert44, who included the two new flavours, as seen from here.

Thanks for your attention. ~Iceshark7 09:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

we run on a new register system in wendys of michigan, maybe since it is not corprate it doesnt show up on the old systems, we also use the plurr v.1.01 system of touch based register, not the old manual ones, i can get a system menu today, i go to work and can check it out...REexpert 16:12, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black Eyed Kids

Thanks for giving your views on this article's AfD. perfectblue has since rewritten the article - I'd be grateful if you would look at the article again and state whether your views have changed. Many thanks! Alfa 14:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another stab at adminship

Go ahead, maybe third time's the charm for me. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 17:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ack, you didn't do it right, it says I'm nominating myself, and it points back to my FIRST RfA. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 18:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's still pointing back to my first RfA. It should say "TenPoundHammer 3". Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 18:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lakeview Square Mall

Lakeview Square Mall, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Lakeview Square Mall satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lakeview Square Mall and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Lakeview Square Mall during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Nenyedi • ^{(Deeds•Talk)} 03:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contested CSD

Hallo, Nen! Glad to hear from somebody. I'm a bit puzzled. What's inappropriate about Cliff? Please explain.Anatiomaros 20:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explian that? He's certainly regarded as notable in Cornwall.Anatiomaros —The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 20:14:06, August 19, 2007 (UTC).

Huh?

Heh, last time I try to contribute on here! I'm confused as to how the page was inappropriate as it is similar to other pages on here (ie, Digg, Furl, Netscape, etc). Would appreciate an explanation. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bcuser (talk • contribs) 20:16:05, August 19, 2007 (UTC).

I've noted inter alia his contributions to our cultural life, the details of one of his publications, and his membership of one of our leading cultural organizations. What else would be needed in order to establish notability? Anatiomaros 20:23, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right ... I've cited a readily-available publication. It's by Stephens, and is readily available. What did you find unreliable in it? Anatiomaros 20:33, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abascantus

I removed the speedy delete notice you put on the article. If you actually looked at the article itself, or at the source that bot tagged it as plagiarizing, you'd see it's already tagged with a template as having been transcluded from the public domain Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology (1876). The page our article is supposedly plagiarizing also has a similar tag indicating the origin of its information. Ford MF 21:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon

it may be harsh, but there nothing in the rules against it.

Im also from Michigan wyoming to be more exact BrandonAngelLTD 21:36, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know that, but im not actually new to Wikipedia, I just recently created a new account, in my experience, most articles are vandalism, so i just put that on there as a default.

Mballoon

Sorry, all I wanted was to link to this word internally, so I could start to write a page for it. Won't happen again! ;) Petewillclarkson 21:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cliff Stephens

I wish to request an undelete on this significant figure in Cornish language poetry (as can be seen from a quick Google search). I believe that the article was deleted far too quickly, especially as it was created by a new user unfamiliar with Wikipedia's policies. Other editors were unable to contribute to the development of the article, as it disappeared before it could be noticed!. Thanks, DuncanHill 01:50, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kalamazoo Route Map

Regarding [Image:KAZORoutemap.png]-

Just so you know, you have placed ATL in Alabama and not Georiga...I would change that ASAP if you want the article to pass GA...;) Sox 23 21:16, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL- no problem Sox 23 22:05, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kalamazoo-Battle Creek International Airport GA review

Hello. I'm afraid I failed the review but I've left some extensive notes on the talk page. Let me know if you'd like any help with any of it. All the best, The Rambling Man 07:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Green box (Phreaking)

I am in the middle of creating it. You're already threatening to delete it because my fingers are not as fast as your bot. Piss off already.

Dethme0w 23:52, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also find your response to this condescending, and oblivious to the possibility that your ~~bot's~~ actions might be seen as annoying. If you want civilised discussion, practice civilised actions. Dethme0w 00:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Australian National Pigeon Association

G'day Nenyedi, I can understand your opinion on my creation of the Australian National Pigeon Association article. It has only just been created as a stub after all. It will be linked to from various pigeon related articles in due time. It also has been listed in a specific Category i.e. Category:Organisations based in Australia so ANPA is an Australian Organisation, and since Wikipedia does have the Category for this why not allow creation of the article page? I'd rather that you didn't delete it please. Like I said, the article will be expanded eventually. If not by me then some other aspiring Wikipedian can have a go at it. Cheers Sting au 23:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jr. Bacon Cheeseburger

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Jr. Bacon Cheeseburger, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 22:29, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jr. Bacon Cheeseburger

Jr. Bacon Cheeseburger, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Jr. Bacon Cheeseburger satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jr. Bacon Cheeseburger and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Jr. Bacon Cheeseburger during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Nenyedi • ^{(Deeds•Talk)} 01:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in Wendy's Kids' Meal

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wendy's Kids' Meal, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wendy's Kids' Meal is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wendy's Kids' Meal, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 15:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Wendy's of Michigan

Wendy's of Michigan, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Wendy's of Michigan satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendy's of Michigan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wendy's of Michigan during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mr.Z-man 16:31, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

		My RFA
		I thank you for participating in my successful request for adminship, which ended with 60 supports, no opposes, no neutrals, and one abstain. Edison 16:13, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Ambucs logo.gif

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Ambucs logo.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 16:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LiveScience

Nenyedi, RE your deletion of a page I added (LiveScience), please do not threaten to block me. That is quite inappropriate, espessially given that there was no discussion before this *warning* was given. In fact, your conduct in the removal of the page itself was highly questionable given the facts about this site. Specifically, the website I refered to is quite commonly referred to and deserves some mention.

1. The site get 5 million unique visitors per month 2. there are 1,410,000 references to "livescience.com" on google. 3. More importantly, it is a publisher of content used by yahoo, msn, aol and more.

Dingfelder 00:01, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Frosty Float

A tag has been placed on Frosty Float, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 12:21, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stanleysteemerlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stanleysteemerlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your warning

WP:DTTR? I was tagging an attack page for speedy deletion, but a combination of high server lag and a different admin deleting it at the same time made me accidentally recreate it. east.718 at 21:41, 10/29/2007

No offense taken. :) Just try to see if the editor's new next time before hitting them with a uw- warning. east.718 at 21:45, 10/29/2007

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Janice Brown Kzoo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Janice Brown Kzoo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of indoor malls in Barrie

List of indoor malls in Barrie, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of indoor malls in Barrie satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of indoor malls in Barrie and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of indoor malls in Barrie during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Enyedi

A tag has been placed on Template:Enyedi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Link

Follow the interwiki link to find the Italian original. --VKokielov (talk) 20:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Nenyedi, I would like to clarify about the Italian article. Ask a reliable person who knows Italian, and he will tell you that I translated faithfully from the Italian original. Salvo D'Acquisto is evidently an Italian national hero, which fact is mentioned in black on white in the carabinieri article. --VKokielov (talk) 03:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the passage, word for word.

The Carabinieri are particularly proud of the memory of Brigadier Salvo D'Acquisto, who was executed by the Nazis in Palidoro, near Rome, in World War II, having exchanged his life for the lives of innocent citizens due to be executed in retaliation for the murder of a German soldier. Brigadier D'Acquisto falsely claimed responsibility and was shot for the offence.

--VKokielov (talk) 03:25, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gene Stilp

Hey! What's with PRODing Gene Stilp exactly one minute (!!) after I created it. It is a notable subject, so give me a second to establish that. Do a Google test to see for yourself. --CodeneBlues (talk) 21:06, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harcard Sussex Program

Nenyedi,

You can move forward with deleting this entry.

I was trying reference to the Harvard Sussex Program from Matthew Meselson's entry since it is not really a combination of Harvard University and University of Sussex, but a distinct collaborative program between Matthew and Julian Perry Robinson.

Thanks for your diligent monitoring to make Wikipedia a place worth visiting!

Reid Kirby —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reid Kirby (talk • contribs) 00:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Airzoo5.png}

Thank you for uploading Image:Airzoo5.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BABBrands.png

Thanks for uploading Image:BABBrands.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:03, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:FrostyFloat2.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:FrostyFloat2.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? — Carl (CBM · talk) 23:24, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:AirportBeacon.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:AirportBeacon.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:43, 11 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 20:43, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Walgreensromence49024.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Walgreensromence49024.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:48, 19 December 2008 (UTC) --Skier Dude (talk) 07:48, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Janice Brown (Kalamazoo)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Janice Brown (Kalamazoo), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

A Youtube reference does not suffice for establishing notability per WP:N

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. B. Wolterding (talk) 13:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:HolidayInnExpressLogo-Blue-JPG.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HolidayInnExpressLogo-Blue-JPG.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Airportpicreq

Template:Airportpicreq has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. I proposed this template for deletion because there were only a few pages using it, and {{reqphoto|airports}} works just as well. :-) Tim Pierce (talk) 17:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:HolidayInnExpressLogo-Blue-JPG.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HolidayInnExpressLogo-Blue-JPG.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 21:57, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An exciting opportunity to get involved!

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 03:28, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! :)

Hey there Nenyedi! I couldn't help but notice that you're an amateur radio operator, so I thought that I'd stop and say 73!

Here's a link to my callsign on QRZ --> [1]

Letter ⁷ _{it's the best letter :)} 07:59, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Image-request-airport.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Image-request-airport.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:25, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Promise Billboard.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Promise Billboard.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ezrafitch.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ezrafitch.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Connormah^talk 05:14, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Kalamazoo Promise.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kalamazoo Promise.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:13, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image help

Nenyedi, you posted [2] and the link in the list of Canadian restaurants articles says it's in suburban area of "Stratford". There are a huge number of places with that name, and several in Canada. Where, exactly, was this image taken? Thanks, D O N D E groovily Talk to me 18:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Image-request-airport.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Image-request-airport.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KewpeeLima.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:KewpeeLima.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:25, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Pp53lawsonarenaKzoo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Pp53lawsonarenaKzoo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sumanch (talk) 00:45, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:HyamesKzoo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:HyamesKzoo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sumanch (talk) 00:45, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KzooPLibrary2.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:KzooPLibrary2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [3], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sumanch (talk) 00:46, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:AZO 1935.png

Thank you for uploading File:AZO 1935.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sumanch (talk) 00:51, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wendycloseup.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wendycloseup.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sumanch (talk) 01:14, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Which branch of BMO?

File:BMO_Branch.JPG

Just wondering where this is from? Thanks! -- Zanimum (talk) 17:44, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:BABBrands.png)

Thanks for uploading File:BABBrands.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AZO logo sm.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AZO logo sm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 06:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Un hee hee hee

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Un hee hee hee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 12:34, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:David T. Abercrombie.jpg

I believe you were the original uploader of File:David T. Abercrombie.jpg, back in 2007 (as File:Dabercrombie.png). Do you recall where you found the image? Thanks, Mackensen (talk) 11:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kitchen fresh chicken listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kitchen fresh chicken. Since you had some involvement with the Kitchen fresh chicken redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 10:08, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:KAZORoutemap.png

The file File:KAZORoutemap.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 21:32, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Janice Brown (superintendent) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janice Brown (superintendent) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janice Brown (superintendent) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 02:24, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I've moved some (or all) of your files uploaded here to Wikimedia Commons. What files are those exactly? See here. --TheImaCow (talk) 10:17, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KAOHTerminal.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:KAOHTerminal.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Wendy's Combos" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wendy's Combos and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 23#Wendy's Combos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:03, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hell in the arts and popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hell in the arts and popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hell in the arts and popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]