User talk:Bejnar/Archive 12
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Archive 12
- January 2013 - December 2013
Disambiguation link notification for January 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diosdado Cabello, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United Socialist Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Acta Geotechnica Slovenica
Hello. Thanks for taking care of the DAB problem - changing Ei to Engineering Index. With the other two recently created academic journal articles I also created Acta Geotechnica Slovenica. This is because I noticed it on a Google page with Acta Geotechnica.
Interestingly, I am noticing that Acta Geotechnica Slovenica appears to be notable, on par with Acta Geotechnica. I am wondering if Acta Geotechnica Slovenica should also be included in the list of List of engineering journals and magazines (under the section "Mining engineering"). ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 06:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Bisonó (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Altamira
- Oruro Diablada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Oruro
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
inre waaaay old news
Thirty-four months ago you commented on a poorly sourced article on Jami Floyd at AFD. While I am in full agreement that the deleted version contained only one deadlink as a source and her awards were not explained, expanded, nor themselves sourced... I felt back then that issues were addressable under WP:ANYBIO and WP:ENT. Sorry to say, and still feeling the issues were addressable, it took me until now to actually get to improving it (with help). I'd much appreciate your looking at User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox/Jami Floyd to see if your concerns from 3 years ago have finally been addressed to the point where we might finally have something to serve the project and its readers. Thanks, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:08, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Deletion review for Jami Floyd
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Jami Floyd. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:30, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Al Wahat District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basic People's Congress (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Golkonda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Hyderabad District
- São Mateus River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to São Mateus
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
I came for another topic, but see the notifications. If random topics would be placed at the base name, the bot would not detect false links. This primary topic rule is really hurting the quality. A link to a dab page is really fine, but a link to a false topic is a big no no. Pedro Gonzalez-Irusta (talk) 04:12, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Narayanpur
I agree with you and started Talk:Narayanpur#Requested move. But there should be a general improvement of the policy/guideline. And a bot should check all "X" where there is "X (disambiguation)". You may also be interested in Talk:Tyler#Requested move Pedro Gonzalez-Irusta (talk) 04:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Narayanpur Dam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Indi, Devadurga and Bijapur district
- Bilagi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Bijapur District
- Hoskera (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Shahpur
- Wanadurga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Shahpur
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Guaviare department
Sorry for not using citation, have been so stressed at the moment that I forgot to put the source, but got all the information both population and area of all Colombian Departments. The source I used is: [1]. In the source it states that the Guaviare department and Vaupés department area's are 42,327km2 and 65,268km2 respectively.
--Alex 06:17, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Motavita, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sora (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Geology of Europe
Hi Bejnar! Just in case you don't have it watchlisted anymore (it has been 5 years). I implemented some of your ideas into the Geology of Europe template. I'm not finished yet, but I thought I would let you know: Template_talk:Geology_of_Europe. --Tobias1984 (talk) 18:12, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Joshua tree
Your opinion is needed at Joshua tree talk page. -- Robinlarson (talk) 20:26, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Concerning B-class...
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
TCN7JM 14:44, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Charles Pickering Bowditch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Mayan
- George Bowen (missionary) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Union Theological Seminary
- John G. Owens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Maya
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:57, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Photos as references
Hi Bejnar, I'm curious how photos can be used as references except under extraordinary circumstances. Even a photo from a reliable source requires interpretation of some kind, which is almost invariably WP:Original research. We need to rely on an expert's interpretation of the photo, which should be provided in the text accompanying the photo. In the case of sandfalls in Antelope Canyon, we might have a photo from a reliable source of sand falling in the canyon, but that doesn't support the claim that the phenomenon is called "sandfall", nor does it provide any evidence about the frequency or rarity of the phenomenon. Pburka (talk) 16:16, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- The key is with proper provenance. That means that we know that the image is not altered, that it in fact shows what it purports to show, all the stuff that is often included in the caption. The caption alone may not be adequate, but, coupled with the photo, may be a reliable source for things like double and triple rainbows, litmus behaviour, anything involving color, the size of villages, all sorts of things. --Bejnar (talk) 16:24, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response. I'm willing to agree to that, as long as we're treating the caption as the authoritative interpretation of the photo. Pburka (talk)
- The caption may not contain any interpretation of the contents of the photo, it may be just descriptive of the time and place of occurrence, and other such labels, and be from a reliable source. The caption and the photo go together. --Bejnar (talk) 16:35, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- Without an interpretation in the caption, how can you draw conclusions from the image without conducting original research? Pburka (talk) 16:57, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- In that sense, How can you read a sentence without conducting original research? Read the prohibition on WP:OR, it is about putting the editor's OR in the article, not about a reader's thought processes. --Bejnar (talk) 17:02, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- Fair point, but I think interpretation of images must be done with great caution. They're of very limited utility as they represent a single instance in time and space. Drawing generalizations from a photo would be risky. Pburka (talk) 17:08, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- Again, it depends upon what the photo is showing. Science depends upon repeatability. However a photo that shows a town on the left bank of a river, and the riverflow direction is shown by rapids, doesn't need much repeatability. Some people don't believe in double and triple rainbows. An authenticated photo can be quite enlightening. --Bejnar (talk) 17:16, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- I don't strongly disagree with those examples, but I worry that, from the town on the river example, it's but a small step to editors describing features on Mars based on (indisputably reliable) rover or orbiter photos, which surely must be OR. Also, a photo of a double rainbow could be an artifact of the lens. I wouldn't be comfortable using a photo of one as a reference unless the caption supported the double rainbow claim. Pburka (talk) 19:15, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- That's why we have sources that are generally considered reliable, so that each individual factoid does not have to be authenticated, with a chain of evidence, etc., as opposed to the high number of Wikipedia references that are, upon inspection, to more questionable sources. On Mars photos, descriptions like See the dendritic pattern would be just fine, no conclusion is being drawn, there is no original research. Connecting that pattern to water erosion would be synthesis, and inappropriate without citation to a reliable source. --Bejnar (talk) 19:40, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- I don't strongly disagree with those examples, but I worry that, from the town on the river example, it's but a small step to editors describing features on Mars based on (indisputably reliable) rover or orbiter photos, which surely must be OR. Also, a photo of a double rainbow could be an artifact of the lens. I wouldn't be comfortable using a photo of one as a reference unless the caption supported the double rainbow claim. Pburka (talk) 19:15, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- Again, it depends upon what the photo is showing. Science depends upon repeatability. However a photo that shows a town on the left bank of a river, and the riverflow direction is shown by rapids, doesn't need much repeatability. Some people don't believe in double and triple rainbows. An authenticated photo can be quite enlightening. --Bejnar (talk) 17:16, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- Fair point, but I think interpretation of images must be done with great caution. They're of very limited utility as they represent a single instance in time and space. Drawing generalizations from a photo would be risky. Pburka (talk) 17:08, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- In that sense, How can you read a sentence without conducting original research? Read the prohibition on WP:OR, it is about putting the editor's OR in the article, not about a reader's thought processes. --Bejnar (talk) 17:02, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- Without an interpretation in the caption, how can you draw conclusions from the image without conducting original research? Pburka (talk) 16:57, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- The caption may not contain any interpretation of the contents of the photo, it may be just descriptive of the time and place of occurrence, and other such labels, and be from a reliable source. The caption and the photo go together. --Bejnar (talk) 16:35, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response. I'm willing to agree to that, as long as we're treating the caption as the authoritative interpretation of the photo. Pburka (talk)
Indic scripts
Please stop adding indic scripts. See WP:INDICSCRIPT for more. — Abhishek Talk 07:06, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- I disagree. Indic script is appropriate in settlement infoboxes where I have been adding them. WP:INDICSCRIPT says There is community consensus that the lead sentence of an article should not contain any regional or Indic language script. That is not a blanket prohibition on native names. I have initiated a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#Indic scripts in lead to resolve this, I hope. --Bejnar (talk) 07:39, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muddebihal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bijapur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
April 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kali River (Karnataka) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave my operator a message on his talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:42, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
桂琳 listed at Redirects for discussion
I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect 桂琳. Since you created the redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion. Gorobay (talk) 11:57, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Latur district (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Lohara
- Mamadapur, Bijapur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Bijapur district
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Lohara dynasty
I've reverted you at Lohara dynasty because I do not understand the point of your changes - they seem to be change for change's sake. I am, of course, open to constructive contributions and if I have missed the point that you were making then please could you explain. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 05:02, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Osmanabad district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jamia Masjid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:12, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
May 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ajanale may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:53, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ahmednagar district may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:21, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Grand Trunk Road may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:36, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Satellite map images with missing or unclear data
Bejnar - I see you changed the Ultricht item to say "Starting in 2010, only one building on Google, larger area apparent mistake." I don't know what this sentence is saying. The citation you provide is not very useful - it is in Dutch. Citations are not necessary in this article. Things are either obscured or they aren't. GroveGuy (talk) 03:26, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- Discussion moved to Talk:Satellite map images with missing or unclear data#Citations. --Bejnar (talk) 03:44, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jama Masjid, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Timurid and Gurid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Osian Taluka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Osian
- Raisinghnagar tehsil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Golden temple
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 21:23, 21 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Sitush (talk) 21:23, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of districts of West Bengal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nadia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jakhau may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tera Fort may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:52, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Warning label may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- the United States until in 1965 Congress passed the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act (FCLAA.<ref>Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act, Pub. L. No. 89-92, 79 Stat. 282 (1965) (
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:53, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Perhaps you could offer your insight
At Talk:Pride_parade#Should_Category:Pride_parades_be_a_subcategory_to_Protest_marches.3F and Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_May_30#Category:Activism_by_method. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:36, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kuldip Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjab University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Invitation
I'd like to invite you to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Sociology. I think you'll find it of interest! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:07, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dumara, Gujarat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Industrial and domestic use of dam
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hey Bejnar
I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).
So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.
What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.
The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.
Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:38, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Talback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 19:27, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
DRN needs your help!
Hi there. I've noticed it's been a while since you've been active at DRN, and we could really use your help! DRN is going to undergo some changes soon, so it'd really be great if our backlog is cleared before the start of August and we have as many people on board to help with the changes (they include a move to subpages and the creation of a rotating "co-ordinator" role to help manage things day-to-day. Hope to see you soon! Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 11:09, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
The new face of DRN: Bejnar
Recently the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard underwent some changes in how it operates. Part of the change involved a new list of volunteers with a bit of information about the people behind the names.
You are listed as a volunteer at DRN currently, to update your profile is simple, just click here. Thanks, Cabe6403(Talk•Sign) 17:05, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Mediation - Needle Exchange Programme conflict
Bejnar, you might advise as to whether the issues listed on the Mediation page re the conflict over the Needle Exchange reviews are beyond your time availabilities to mediate. I understand that there is recourse to a more formal mediation process if the issues are too conflicted or difficult. Could you please advise whether we should be moving this issue toward more formal mediation or even arbitration, or whether you still see yourself as being able to assist at this more informal level. Minphie (talk) 11:42, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Your involvement with DRN
Hi there, I noticed that you haven't been as active at DRN as you was before. DRN has been a bit backlogged lately and we could use some extra hands. We have updated our volunteer list to a new format, Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteers (your name is still there under the old format if you haven't updated it) and are looking into ways to make DRN more effective and more rewarding for volunteers (your input is appreciated!). If you don't have much time to volunteer at the moment, that's fine too, just move your name to the inactive list (you're free to add yourself back to active at any time). Hope to see you again soon :) Steven Zhang (talk) 13:13, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Diveagar
This is supposedly a part of doctoral thesis. This should have more credibility. It mentions about Golden Ganesh temple and Roop Narayan, Sundar Narayan temple. This Indian Express news article has covered more details. Can you include those in Diveagar article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redr (talk • contribs) 15:25, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cầu Giấy District may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- gave its name to the district.<ref name="CamHoi">{{Cite web|title=Các đường phố Hà Nội theo vần C (The streets of Hanoi alphabetically C |date=25 February 2010|language=Vietnamese|publisher=Báo điện
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:09, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Felipe Carrillo Puerto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mérida (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Bribery
Thanks, it took a while to get the citation. Good work, nonetheless! John Smith's (talk) 19:11, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Osmel Sousa may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * {{es icon}} {{Cite web|title=Osmel Sousa Responde a Reportaje del New York Times {Osmel Sousa Responds to the
- Sousa Responde a Reportaje del New York Times {Osmel Sousa Responds to the New York Times Article)|url=http://www.missvenezuela.com/noticias/?id_noticia=635195394911|archiveurl=https://web.archive.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:17, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Typhlopidae may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Zootaxa|number=2255|pages=1–100|url=http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2009/f/z02255p100f.pdf}}</ref>
- |}
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:29, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aulacaspis may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- }}
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Shwebomin
Re: article Shwebomin Thank you for reminder and sorry for not keeping a cool head. I became hot-headed when Shwebomin himself was using that Wikipedia entry as evidence. I will try to keep myself away from that topic. Thanks. SWH® talk 00:19, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks again for your edit. I now have split opinion. I think if we keep and maintain properly, readers could make better judgement of him. SWH® talk 00:30, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Before this current kerfluffle, the article was viewed only about four or five times a month. WP traffic Aug 2012. --Bejnar (talk) 20:39, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Gharb-Chrarda-Béni Hssen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Sidi Slimane
- Match fixing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Watchdog
- San José Xicohténcatl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Jalapa
- Yunnan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Conglomerate
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 27 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Silverleaf whitefly page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 28 December 2013 (UTC)