Hello, General Clanker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Disambiguation link notification for March 13[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Star Wars: Battlefront, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wookie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, General Clanker. Please stop excessively expanding plot sections of articles, as you have done with Grand Theft Auto IV, The Ballad of Gay Tony, Liberty City Stories, San Andreas, Bully, and several others. The Manual of Style states that "Plot sections should generally be no more than approximately 700 words, to retain focus." You have ignored several warnings about this, and are now disruptively editing. – Rhain☔ 12:59, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This a warning to please stop excessively expanding plot sections of articles concerning video games. You have been advised about this, and must now heed this. If you wish to know how to handle these articles, please refer to MOS:VG. GUtt01 (talk) 08:42, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is a moderate warning to please stop excessively expanding plot sections of articles concerning video games. Please heed this advice - leave these articles alone, and only work on them to fix errors in terms of grammar, spelling, and so forth. If you should wish to work on the plot sections, try using your Sandbox, as stated in WP:ABOUTSAND. GUtt01 (talk) 18:14, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Rhain and GUtt01: Seeing as to how you two are the ones to criticize my work the most (this is not a complain, I understand why you do it, so don't take it personally), I wanted to let you know that i made a version of the plot summaries for GTA 4 and San Andreas I have in mind in my sandbox. You may take a look and judge. If you want, of course.
@General Clanker: If you'd like to see my suggestions for your version of the San Andreas plot, see here. As I've mentioned before, I think your version mentions too many characters who are not relevant to the overarching narrative, including OG Loc, Ken Rosenberg, and Salvatore Leone. The entire casino heist storyline is optional within the game, so its inclusion within the main plot seems completely unnecessary. I think your version of the Grand Theft Auto IV plot suffers from the same issues too. – Rhain☔ 14:19, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You have been given enough warnings about your edits. Now heed this one, CAREFULLY! Per WP:BRD, if you are having your edits reverted over a dispute on an article, go to the article's talk page and discuss it with the other editor(s) involved. If you continue to not heed warnings and learn to understand what other editors are telling you, you may find yourself receiving severe warnings over disruptive editing. Heed what Rhain is telling you, and use your Sandbox for test edits; if you are having your edits reverted, understand the reasoning, and consider taking it either to discussion for debate, or dropping the matter. GUtt01 (talk) 08:39, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas instead.
The comment the reviewer left was:
'Plot' should probably not have a standalone article of its own but rather be incorporated into the existing page. There is already a detailed plot section at the existing article, much of which seems to have been copied to here. For future reference please see WP:CWW for procedure when copyin from other Wiki pages.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:General Clanker/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:General Clanker/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, General Clanker!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 16:01, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi General Clanker, just letting you know that I reverted your removed of a section from Talk:Grand Theft Auto IV. Wikipedia works primarily through discussion and consensus building so it's important that discussions aren't removed so people can following discussions. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:10, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:
This draft is a request to spin off an article. Proposals to spin out a topic from an article into another stand-alone article should be discussed at the talk page of the existing article, unless the draft satisfies a special notability guide. If the draft satisfies a special notability guide, please identify the notability criterion with a reliable source.
This does not mean that the draft should be spun off, and it does not mean that the draft should not be spun off. It does mean that discussion should be on the talk page of the existing article, Talk:Grand Theft Auto IV]. (If this draft is resubmitted without discussion on the talk page of the existing article and does not satisfy a special notability guide, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.)
IMDB is not a reliable source. This draft appears to be sourced entirely to IMDB. Do not resubmit this draft without discussing at Talk:Grand Theft Auto IV and without providing better sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Grand Theft Auto IV characters, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
This is just to let you know that there is currently a discussion going on regarding a number of articles concerning character lists for other GTA games, and as such, you may find your draft indefinitely declined if you cannot provide reliable sources. GUtt01 (talk) 09:32, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. IceWelder [✉] 13:52, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello General Clanker, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Star Wars: Battlefront II (2005 video game) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 18:00, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
16 KB of quotation is far too excessive and skirts the line of copyright violation. I've reverted your edits here and revdel'd them. I strongly recommend you stop making edits of this sort, especially considering your earlier warnings about excessive plot expansion. -- ferret (talk) 18:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Plot Expansion vs. Reasons for Wikipedia's existence[edit]
Hi, I just want to advise you that is not often wise to expand a plot of a fictional medium (video game, TV program, film, or book/comic) for a number of reasons. First, adding further details that are excessive are not helpful, especially if doesn't add more to the context of information given to help viewers understand the story, or overloads that context. Secondly, some major series have Wikis dedicated to this sort of information, and as such, any considerable details are more suited for these, than within Wikipedia, which is aimed at being a more generalised encyclopedia for various articles, including those on fictional works of art. Take a read of WP:VG/PLOT to understand the guidelines surrounding plot sections for video game articles. GUtt01 (talk) 12:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Amanda(aka DQ) 16:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think you can expand on Batman character Iman Avesta on “The Enemy Within”, “List of Batman supporting characters”, and “Emily O’Brien” articles? 80.2.22.175 (talk) 10:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars Battlefront II (2017 video game), you may be blocked from editing. Your editing, blanking of content, excessive plot expansions, lack of edit notes or explanations for why you're making sweeping changes, and refusal to communicate with editors who try to engage you is becoming excessively disruptive. If your editing patterns do not change, you are likely to be blocked. -- ferret (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yo my g you better stop what you’re doing RossButsy (talk) 12:04, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:57, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Michael De Santa.jpg[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Michael De Santa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Michael De Santa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael De Santa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Rhain☔ 05:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. Please understand that I am not actively targeting you out of spite or some malicious desire. I am just simply looking out for Wikipedia and other Wikipedians in general. I'm doing my best to uphold Wikipedia's rules such as WP:CMOS#PLOT and WP:TRIVIA, but your edits are making that difficult for me. I get that you want to make sure readers are as well informed as possible, but they don't need to know every single little detail about a piece of media or character nor does it need to be worded in such a long-winded, unprofessional fashion. Your edits tend to be on the unprofessional side, using jargon that adults would use in a casual sense instead of a professional one. Once again, I'm not targeting you specifically, and I apologize if it feels like that. It's just that there are hundreds of editors who feel the need to put in every single detail they can just because they think it's important, and I do this to them as well because they're either knowingly or unknowingly violating Wikipedia's rules. I'm just making sure the information is as concise as possible with as little words as possible. No useless filler or fat, just the meat of it all. Once more, I'm sorry if it feels like I've been picking on you. I'm just doing my best to keep Wikipedia neutral, professional, and concise. On a similar but sort of unrelated note, I also recommend using the "Show preview" button so you can iron out typos before someone else catches them. Blazewing16 (talk) 04:49, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: I undid your edit to Ghost because it was in violation of WP:CMOS#PLOT, and I had just condensed the information that was already there. Have you ever worked hard on something, only for someone else to come in and ruin it? That's how I felt when you added all that fancruft to Ghost's page. Not only that, you straight up copied the information from Ava Starr's section of the List of Marvel Characters page and pasted it into Ghost's film section like some student cheating on an important paper by copy/pasting someone else's information and passing it off as their own with little to no modification or acknowledgement. That is not okay. In fact, it's tantamount to plagiarism. I can't recall the rule forbidding that off the top of my head, but I'm pretty sure you can't just copy/paste information from one Wikipedia page to another and just leave it at that. You have to state the information in your own words. I apologize for being negative towards you again, but I cannot abide by your most recent work and I want to make sure you can continue using Wikipedia without getting in trouble for breaking the rules. Please be more careful of your edits and please read WP:CMOS#PLOT, WP:TRIVIA, WP:FANCRUFT, and WP:CONCISE. Blazewing16 (talk) 01:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The extra spaces in the infobox are often there to aid readability for editors, please don't remove them. Thank you.★Trekker (talk) 08:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Disambiguation link notification for January 11[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Claude (Grand Theft Auto), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drifter.
Hello, General Clanker. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Grand Theft Auto IV characters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to thank you for the wonderful job you did with your edits to the Batman '89 page. You summed up the first issue perfectly! Well done! Partyclams (talk) 23:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Connor (Assassin's Creed). You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly-licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 17:32, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assassins in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I've noticed from some of your past edits that you have a tendency to add prose to articles not explicitly stated by the sources. For example, in your expansion of the history section in Assassin's Creed earlier this year, you have given numerous details that are not mentioned in the source used. This is a violation of WP:OR; please also be aware of WP:SYNTH, in that you must not combine details from a source to reach a conclusion not explicitly stated by the source. Such material needs to either be backed up by reliable sources, or alternatively—if this is not possibled—not mentioned at all. I appreciate that you want to further benefit articles by providing more information, however any material added that is likely to be questioned needs to be sufficiently sourced (also note that linking to other articles that backs up what you are adding is not a sufficient method of sourcing). Wikibenboy94 (talk) 17:47, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Same thing on Tyr, this is Wikipedia, not a video game fandom site. You're free to add such details on those, but they are undue on articles about mythology figures. TylerBurden (talk) 07:39, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@General Clanker: This still seems to be happening, particularly with summarising a game's reception summary in the lead when the sources in the article don't appear to have been taken in account. Wikibenboy94 (talk) 15:09, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ratonhnhaké:ton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altaïr Ibn-LaʼAhad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This a warning to please stop excessively expanding plot sections of articles concerning video games. You have been advised about this, and must now heed this. If you wish to know how to handle these articles, please refer to MOS:VG. GUtt01 (talk) 08:42, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
This is a moderate warning to please stop excessively expanding plot sections of articles concerning video games. Please heed this advice - leave these articles alone, and only work on them to fix errors in terms of grammar, spelling, and so forth. If you should wish to work on the plot sections, try using your Sandbox, as stated in WP:ABOUTSAND. GUtt01 (talk) 18:14, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello General Clanker, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Star Wars: Battlefront II (2005 video game) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
Please stop your disruptive editing.
Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:57, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
