User talk:Hasan Okarvi

Hi Hasan. Please add Order of Merit (Brazil) in the awards of Gen Raheel Sharif. Thanks and take care. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.61.119.201 (talk) 14:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hasan Okarvi, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

The

Adventure

Hi Hasan Okarvi!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:32, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of people from Haryana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Speaker and Kalanaur

Ethnic groups in Pakistan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Khan

List of Muslim Rajputs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Naik

Okara District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Okara

Ranghar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kalanaur

Rao Qamar Suleman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Okara

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ranghar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 02:52, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Charles (talk) 18:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Ranghar, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 08:20, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Maryam Nawaz. Thank you. SMS ^Talk 02:09, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

POV pushing on Sunni Islam template[edit]

Sir, I saw what you did recently on Template:Sunni Islam. While we are all entitled to our own opinions, please keep in mind that personal views can not be promoted as truth on Wikipedia. In sectarian debates, Barelvis often claim to be the only true Sunnis and that Ahle Hadis are Wahhabis. People are free to hold such views, but these are not academic views. Both groups are sub-branches of Sunnism as recognized by scholarly consensus and as such, tampering with the template does not provide readers with a holistic view of the development of Sunnism. Please review what is actually written in both articles before making such adjustments again, as the status of both groups is made clear there. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:57, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Use authentic sources[edit]

Please use authentic sources and also note that for alive persons, only self-identification of caste claim will be considered. because it would be a BLP violation otherwise Rajput334 (talk) 05:55, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Rajputs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Junagarh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PAK[edit]

Welcome!

Hello! You look like someone who might be interested in joining the Pakistan WikiProject and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you help us :-) lTopGunl (talk) 10:35, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm from WikiProject Pakistan. We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

You can give your input at project's main discussion page and keep it on your watchlist: Wikipedia talk:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics.
You can !vote and work on saving articles that are up for deletion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pakistan.
Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Pakistan article in Wikipedia.
Can you code? The automation department uses automated and semi-automated methods to perform batch tasks that would be tedious to do manually.
Please participate in any of our descendant workgroups that might interest you.
Add your name in the members at Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan/Members. There's also a user box template which you can put on your user page to identify yourself as a member: {{User WikiProject Pakistan}}

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or at the Wikiproject Pakistan noticeboard and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We are looking forward to see you around!

lTopGunl (talk) 10:35, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Rajputs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Junagarh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

non authentic sources 2015 January[edit]

You've already been warned many times not to use c-class sources or free websites as a reference. But you are continuing such behavior. As you did to List of Rajputs today. Please stop doing this or I'll request administration to block you from editing. Decentscholar (talk) 21:56, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation links[edit]

I see that you have been receiving messages about linking to disambiguation pages for nearly seven weeks. The idea of those messages is that when you get one, you read it, realise your mistake, and make sure you never do the same again, not that you just ignore the message and continue in the same way. Please make sure when you add links to articles that the links do not point to disambiguation pages. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:33, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rao Qamar Suleman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Okara. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Nargis (actress), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 02:53, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sonia Rao[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sonia Rao, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://pakistanmediaupdates.com/news-anchor-sonia-rao-biography-2185.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:35, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Nargis (actress). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 05:47, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and copyright[edit]

Please note that I have reverted your additions to Nirma (actress) as there were several serious problems with the edit; of most concern is your addition of unsourced personal information and your upload and inclusion of a copyright-violating image. The Biographies of Living Persons and copyright policies are two of the most strict policies we have on Wikipedia, please ensure you familiarize yourself with them. Please also note that, save for a small handful of exceptions, flag icons are not included in infoboxes.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:28, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, the Sonia Rao article you created was a blatant copyright violation which you lifted from another website and has been deleted accordingly. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hasan Okarvi, I have reverted nearly all of your edits from the last two days as they cannot be trusted. You have introduced multiple copyright violations and unsourced personal information to articles. Please do not continue to upload or add images to articles until you have a better grasp on copyright requirements and ensure that information you add to biographies is reliably sourced.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:47, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions[edit]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

This is in light of your contributions to List of Rajputs in particular. Please be careful: it is probably best to add in small doses and discuss on the article talk page in order to avoid further disruption. - Sitush (talk) 22:10, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 12:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sunni Meeladi[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sunni Meeladi, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:22, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi

added a link pointing to Khairabad

Rao Hashim Khan

added a link pointing to Public Accounts Committee

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Hasan Okarvi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:33, Tuesday, November 24, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Flags in infoboxes[edit]

Please do not add flag icons to biography infoboxes, per long-standing consensus, they should not be used. Thank you, --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:09, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rangri dialect[edit]

You have almost blanked the page, without explanation. Please explain.Xx236 (talk) 08:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sawad e Azam (Sunni)[edit]

Hello Hasan Okarvi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sawad e Azam (Sunni) for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Haryanvi language, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Hasan Okarvi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Hasan Okarvi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sonia Rao for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sonia Rao is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonia Rao until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 06:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Sonia Rao. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:10, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Constituency pages[edit]

Can you stop messing up constituency pages? You are confusing hell out of rest of us. This page did not need to be newly created, it already existed under different name, you only needed to move it. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 01:57, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted some of your edits because I found them unconstructive. I suggest you to follow what Sherriff pointed. --Saqib (talk) 17:40, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Your recent editing history at NA-128 (Lahore-VI) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Saqib (talk) 06:58, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tehreek-e-Labbaik Islam for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tehreek-e-Labbaik Islam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tehreek-e-Labbaik Islam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 09:17, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tehreek-e-Labbaik Islam[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tehreek-e-Labbaik Islam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jibran1998 (talk) 18:04, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Help Riaz-ul-Haq, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 15:10, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DHA Graveyard, Lahore for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DHA Graveyard, Lahore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DHA Graveyard, Lahore until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 07:32, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rangri dialect for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rangri dialect is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rangri dialect until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 07:38, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanamonde (talk) 18:58, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inspector General of Police (Punjab, Pakistan) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Inspector General of Police (Punjab, Pakistan), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 19:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Hasan Okarvi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Toofan Singh (film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toofan Singh (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toofan Singh (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DBig Xrayᗙ 06:30, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inspector General of Police (Punjab, Pakistan) (April 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inspector General of Police (Punjab, Pakistan) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Inspector General of Police (Punjab, Pakistan), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 11:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hasan Okarvi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 11:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Inspector General of Police (Punjab, Pakistan) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Inspector General of Police (Punjab, Pakistan), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Inspector General of Police (Punjab, Pakistan)[edit]

Hello, Hasan Okarvi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Inspector General of Police".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 05:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rao Abdur Rasheed moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Rao Abdur Rasheed. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Seawolf35 ^T--C 18:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]