User talk:Logan/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 → Archive 15

DYK Nom

Hi. I've nominated Music Beta by Google, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 04:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks so much, Pesky! Logan Talk Contributions 01:02, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Rosenblatt (2nd nomination)

Hi. I overturned your non-admin closure of this discussion and closed it as "delete" for the reason given there. Closers should weigh the arguments presented, and in this case, the only "weak keep" opinion did not provide a useful analysis of the notability of the article according to our guidelines. Regards,  Sandstein  07:34, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Okay - I personally didn't see consensus, especially with that loaded "Neutral" rationale, but that's fine with me. Logan Talk Contributions 11:38, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Sandstein, I disagree. I think that Logan made the right call to close as No Consensus, and that the article, while in poor condition, should not have been deleted in it's final revision. Logan I would suggest you consider filing this article for Deletion Review, if you care to. Evilphoenix Talk 00:24, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Good luck!

You know what I'm referring too! Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

👍 Like Logan Talk Contributions 01:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Heheh! I didn't even know that template existed! Oh well...back to kinematics of machines homework.... Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:39, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

On another note...

Do you/did you edit the lady gaga article? Maybe that's why I was confused, other than the fact Legolas and Logan begin with L and vowels. Ha Tommy! 21:33, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Not since the beginning of this year, at least, according to the edit history. Very funny, though. Logan Talk Contributions 23:55, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Okay. Good luck on your RfA. Tommy! 23:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Music Beta by Google

The DYK project (nominate) 09:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Snails

But I thought that snails were fungi? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.180.170.150 (talk) 04:58, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

No, sorry - they're part of the Gastropoda class. You can see that article for confirmation that snails are part of that class. Hope that explains it! Logan Talk Contributions 05:01, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Edit to Swift Fox

Hi! Please don't disambiguate links to categories as you did here, as it turns the link into a category which is not visible in the text. --Conti|✉ 14:39, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Ah, yes - that was a result of that Category being the first bullet point on the Dab page. I should fix that. Logan Talk Contributions 14:40, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Deleting a page I created

Dear Logan,

I keep getting messages from you regarding deleting a page I created. I am trying to delete "Christopher Schmidt" I am the only one who has ever added information to the page. Can you please explain to me what I am doing wrong and please educate me on the proper procedure for deletion. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rileyschmidt (talk • contribs) 02:45, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi Riley - the reason why that article cannot be deleted under the G7 criterion is because it was created by another user, User:Schmidtworldwide. If this is you under another account, I would recommend explaining why you registered a new username, as it could otherwise be considered sockpuppetry. If that other user is not you, then I would recommend using the other deletion processes, including PROD and Articles for deletion. Hope this helps! Logan Talk Contributions 02:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

deleting one of two accounts

Logan,

I had no idea that I had two accounts registered until you just informed me. Now it all makes sense. I can log in as SchmidtWorldwide and make the deletion from there. My new question to you is how do I now delete my other account so that I only have one account?? The one I want to delete is username: rileyschmidt. Can I do this or can you do this?

Thank you for all your help. Its so nice to be able to communicate with someone on the inside. Thanks!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rileyschmidt (talk • contribs) 03:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

It should be fine to just continue editing under the Rileyschmidt account. Your previous account name, Schmidtworldwide, is technically a username policy violation because it's promotional. Logan Talk Contributions 03:23, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

RFA

Hello Logan. Sorry for the delay in closing out your RFA, it's something we 'crats need to work on a bit harder, I guess the weekend means there are fewer of us around, but no excuses, so my apologies. Anyway, I'm sorry to say that I have closed the RFA as unsuccessful. You had substantial support from the community, and as you probably already know, your % was in the range where we may sometimes need to discuss things. However, having read through the 29 oppose !votes, I felt there was significant enough community consensus against you receiving the mop at this time. Having been there myself (RFA 1 = fail, RFA 2 = pass) I suggest you take the opinions of the opposers into account, work hard on their comments in the next few months and reapply. Hopefully you'll fly through the next RFA.

Once again, my sincerest apologies for the time taken to finally get you a result, and while not ideal, I hope you'll be encouraged enough to keep plugging away and re-apply at RFA in due course. Naturally, feel free to contact me for anything you'd like to talk about, be it regarding this RFA closure or anything else. All the best, The Rambling Man (talk) 17:12, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Oh well, maybe in another 3 months, after you make a couple DYKs and avoid closing contentious AfDs. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Really sorry about this. RfA is a cesspit nowadays. Don't let it dissuade you from your work in CAT:CSD. - filelakeshoe 19:07, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Nope, it definitely won't dissuade me from my work there. Thanks for your support. Logan Talk Contributions 19:54, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
I was bummed to see that your RfA didn't pass. I agree that in a few months, I think you'll make it through with no problem. You'll be able to count on me for another !support vote, and I'll echo the others when I say I hope that you'll keep contributing like you are now! – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 20:05, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Aw, shucks. :) Logan Talk Contributions 20:05, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Best wishes for next time Logan! —James (Talk • Contribs) • 2:50pm • 04:50, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

PGI page - thanks

Thanks Logan. I have changed it to advert. -A —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.62.232.103 (talk) 19:58, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

No problem :) Logan Talk Contributions 19:59, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Wrong message to me

This is a reply to your message - "The recent edit you made to Berasia constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 17:12, 18 January 2011 (UTC)"

Note: When I read/receive this message, I was not logged in.

But I did not edited 'Berasia'. I even don't know what is that. I am seeing this name first time in life. That was a completely wrong message sent to me. It was sent as it was sent to my IP address but that IP is not mine. Thanks. Rain & Thunderstorm (talk) 04:46, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Welcome

Thanks for the welcome! I hope to be of help here. Greetings Emiduronte (talk) 15:48, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Your note regarding speedy deletion tags

Hi Logan,

I received your note [1] and wanted to let you know that I was just replacing a speedy deletion tag which had been removed by the page creator inappropriately, as noted in this edit: [2]. Cheers! ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 20:19, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Yes - please see this diff that came immediately afterward where I moved it to the original tagger's talk page. :) Logan Talk Contributions 20:20, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing that up! ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 20:30, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

Talkback

I know how to use a watchlist, thank you!

Talkback

I know how to use a watchlist, thank you!

my recent edit

Please read this edit's edit summary for why I warned Tashif. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T or M/Sign mine 05:58, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Your latest edit was much more constructive. Please do not use such inflammatory edit summaries, though. Logan Talk Contributions 06:00, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

POTtY

I thought you might want to know the solution, re the 'noinclude' weirdness over on Commons. [3]. 

Session Start: Tue May 31 04:13:19 2011
<Splarka> what I did:
<Splarka> I put the template into http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ExpandTemplates
<Splarka> then I put the /en version into http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ExpandTemplates
<Splarka> both times I noticed at the end:
<Splarka> </pre>[[Category:Layout templates|2010POTY]]
<Splarka> </noinclude>[[Category:Autotranslated templates|2010POTY]]
<Splarka> [[Category:Commons header templates|2010POTY]]
<Splarka> the pre gets cleaned by tidy
<Splarka> but the noinclude gets escaped
<Splarka> both are bogus,and between them is [[Category:Layout templates|2010POTY]]
<Splarka> so obviously the problem was at /layout
<Splarka> but exactly why it was a problem isn't clear
<Splarka> seems the earlier </noinclude> was closing it

Cheers,  Chzz  ►  03:59, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

Hello, Logan! I wish to discuss the reversion of a recent edit of mine.

Good evening, Logan! As is said in the headline, I contact you at this hour to bring into question the removal of a recent edit that was left on the page for the English plural personal pronoun, "We." Specifically, I would like to ask what about my changes were deconstructive to the article. I feel that, because of the underlying example to where my edits were made ("We mean to stop your evil plans!"), these changes were justified in greater contextual relation to the article. The changed example had shown grammatical correctness and displayed broader usage of a common word, which sums in simple context the versatility of the English language. I would like to discuss this at further length if you see fit to, and will be glad to re-implement my changes if not. I bid you a good night!

Sincerely; 96.248.112.200.


96.248.112.200 (talk) 02:19, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

I have restored your edit and struck out my comment on your talk page - I assumed from the content of the sentence that it was added with an intent to disrupt, but it clearly fits in better with the other example sentence than does the "zoo" sentence. My apologies! Logan Talk Contributions 02:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


96.248.112.200 (talk) 02:46, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

No trouble at all. Thank you!

Contesting speedy deletions; edit summaries explaining your thinking a bit more

Hi -- when contesting speedy deletions, it would be helpful to me (and, perhaps, others) if you would indicate in what way you believe he article makes an assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. And why you find that assertion credible. Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:14, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

There are almost 80 articles at CAT:SD, so I'm trying to sort through them as quickly as possible. About which speedy that I contested do you have a question? Logan Talk Contributions 05:16, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Wow, that's a lot. Good luck. It would probably help all similarly situated people, and save all time and effort long-term (as it would forestall needless AFDs, if convincing). But I was referring to those you posted on my tp, above your talkback. You can respond here. Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:51, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
King Chiaullee passes A7 through a claim of importance ("In 2008 the group performed at Festival Interceltique de Lorient in Brittany and, competing in the festival's band competition, went on to win first prize - the Trophée Cidrerie des Terroirs"). Ziad Boutros passes A7 through the claim that he has "composed for the most successful Arab singers." Let me know if you have any further questions. Logan Talk Contributions 13:51, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

I've added the requested citations-- now what?

RE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remember_the_Triangle_Fire_Coalition

Hi, As requested, new citations to reliable sources have been inserted in the noted section. But I couldn't figure out the proper formatting protocol (sorry)-- can you (or someone) please help and edit the 3 new citations?

The new citation #3 is a repeat source. The new citation #4 and #5 are new sources.

Finally, can the "This section does not cite any references or sources" box now be removed -- or do I just go ahead and do that myself... what's the procedure? Thank you!! Artie04 (talk) 14:50, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Great job adding references. Feel free to just remove that tag yourself - anyone has the power to do that. :) Logan Talk Contributions 13:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

your edit to my userpage

Please read this discussion before you make any more edits to my userpage. Thanks! Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T or M/Sign mine 18:50, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

CSD Helper

With regards to Ale jrb's CSD Helper, there's configuration information here: User:Ale jrb/Scripts. Cheers, —James (Talk • Contribs) • 9:26pm • 11:26, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, why are you telling me this? I'm a bit confused. Logan Talk Contributions 14:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Re:Flickr review mistake

Hi Logan, yes it was my bad. I thought that it was cc-by-2.0. sorry about that. Thank you for pointing that out and I will be more careful in the future. --Ben.MQ (talk) 15:35, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

No problem. :) Logan Talk Contributions 14:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Connor Fabiano

I think you misread the editing history on this article. It was blanked by the author AFTER the IP had made edits to it, therefore G7 was valid at the time the author blanked the page.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 14:19, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

The G7 criterion can only be used "[i]f requested in good faith and provided that the only substantial content to the page and to the associated talk page was added by its author." I believe that you are reading it as "If a user tags a page under the G7 criterion and then another user edits, it invalidates the speedy," which is not true, iirc. It is, "If a user tags a page under the G7 criterion after somebody else has already made substantial contributions, it invalidates the speedy." Hope that makes sense. Logan Talk Contributions 14:21, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Ok, after reading up on it a bit more, I was the one that misunderstood. Thanks for clarifying.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 14:34, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
No problem. Glad that cleared it up. Logan Talk Contributions 14:43, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

Regarding Agamemnon

This has become a minor Internet phenomenon. I find that removing a reference to one of the newest appearances of Agamemnon, indeed, one where quite a few may meet the character for the very first time, compromises the integrity of wikipedia, not the other way around.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kxp8qPEwSXM

This is the video that introduces Legolambnon.

Regards Daniel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.226.248.61 (talk) 00:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

London School of Economics

Thanks for the very - astonishingly- quick update to my page. I was going to convert it back once I snagged a screenshot, in order to congratulate my friend who was recently admitted. I never even had the chance to undo my minor vandalism, you were so fast. Crazy.

You've convinced me to become a wikipedia member and to contribute to the community. thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.105.71.250 (talk) 15:08, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

ScholarMatch

Not to criticize much but how does an article like ScholarMatch get created with a major COI like a user with the same name as the organization, and purposely changing the 'o' to '0' to bypass the COI/Username bots? I am not saying it's speedable, which it is not, but has serious COI issues, wouldnt you agree? I tagged the article as COI and will consider blocking the user for spam username. -- Alexf(talk) 18:32, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

I was going to report the username to UAA, but it seemed to be such an unbiased article that I didn't want to be bitey - however, feel free to do a spam username block at this point. It is obvious by the username that there is a COI issue, but I feel that the article read very well, has many references, and does not evince a conflict of interest. Logan Talk Contributions 18:52, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks to your diligent recent changes patrolling, I've found a bug in the way my anti-edit-test bot handles edit conflicts. Just wanted to drop you a note to say keep up the good work! 28bytes (talk) 01:04, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

No problem. :) Logan Talk Contributions 01:27, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

close <small> tags

Errrr. Thanks, I think. Pdfpdf (talk) 05:54, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Pauric Mahony

Was there really a need for a 7 day delete template ? Surely a template stating that the article needed references would have been more appropriate. The article itself, while not providing reference, clearly shows that the person was notable due to his debut appearance for Waterford earlier that day. ManfromDelmonte (talk) 06:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

WP:BLPPROD is a process that does not inherently account for notability, except for on the negative side (to the point where it doesn't claim enough significance to even pass A7). Even though the person may be notable, sources are required for it to stay on Wikipedia. A BLP PROD does not imply that the subject is not notable. Logan Talk Contributions 00:15, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

I was making a constructive edit...for truth

not sure how to do it correctly. please do it for me. here is the web page where "she" discusses her past

http://www.frontiersla.com/Other/PDF/BackIssues/2707.pdf

not sure how to change it into proper wikipedia citation format. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.114.157.52 (talk) 03:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

FYI, the text in that magazine is searchable, yet I can't find the claim about Amazon Eve in it. —C.Fred (talk) 03:53, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Agree I can't find anything in that PDF file regarding Amazon Eve, or even just the query "Amazon." Logan Talk Contributions 06:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects‎

Hi, I fixed your declined at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects‎ by copy 'n paste your decline comment. Hope that wasn't bad... mabdul 21:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined...

If you didn't already see, another user put up the same templated message. I have took the liberty to merge the 2. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 16:02, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. It was because we both declined at the same time, but only one of ours went through on the actual article. Logan Talk Contributions 16:03, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Invalid speedy

I got the impression from Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Submissions that submissions are not deleted. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 07:13, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

We don't delete if it's just a bad submission; however, if I recall correctly, if the original author tags the submission for a G7, it is pretty uncontroversial to delete it. Logan Talk Contributions 07:15, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
I wasn't sure because they had made some edits to add references after the original was declined and thought they may have just used the wrong tag. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 07:22, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Scott Peterson

An article that you have been involved in editing, Scott Peterson, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.  pablo 13:54, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

living healthcare practitioner

Hi Logan - I am curious if you could direct me to a page about a living healthcare practitioner?

best, D (Danifoth (talk) 22:33, 20 June 2011 (UTC))

Sorry, but I am not sure how to answer your request. I searched Wikipedia for healthcare practitioners, but I could not find any. Logan Talk Contributions 04:27, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the revert on my talk page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:48, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

No problem. :) Logan Talk Contributions 06:49, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
I know how to use a watchlist, thank you!

that was a fake website

the entactogens website IS NOT REAL information let alone science, and is exactly what I wrote. they have no right to compare any of it to anything other than meth, and is the most disgusting thing I have ever seen masquerading as even useless junk information. as a klavern of klan wizards, why does wikipedia acknowledge this worth less garbage as anything other than a child playing in its own feces, as farts are methane, even the klan themselves would disavow THAT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.238.35 (talk) 21:19, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2011

No lo puedo creer

Gabe Logan 190.51.154.194 (talk) 01:48, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thanks for the barnstar and sorry this came so late, but better late than never. Now let us sip on a nice, cold beer! ceradon 19:12, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! :) Logan Talk Contributions 01:03, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Adminship anniversary note

Ooh...it was four years ago I was made an admin! Thanks for the note, Logan! :) Acalamari 08:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Sneakin' up on vandals, like this kitteh. :3

Pilif12p 00:17, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you!

Logan, thank you so much for the very thoughtful Birthday Greeting to me, it meant something and I appreciate it. Take care and best wishes! --RobNS 02:57, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome! Glad you appreciated it. Logan Talk Contributions 02:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 July 2011

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for keeping my User Page Vandalism Free Bentogoa (talk) 17:24, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! Logan Talk Contributions 17:45, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

This IP is a Comcast dynamic IP

Just letting you know that this IP is a Comcast dynamic IP and that I did not make the unreferenced edit in question. 76.97.12.71 (talk) 01:10, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 July 2011

Orphaned non-free image File:Melbourne Football Club logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Melbourne Football Club logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:37, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Bureaucrat removal of adminship policy

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Bureaucrat removal of adminship policy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 06:46, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Stats on my RFA

Thanks for fixing that; I was just in the process of figuring out what I did wrong; did you just copy and paste the info from X!? Or did I miss a parameter in the template? Qwyrxian (talk) 00:22, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

No problem. Yeah, I copied the stats from the edit counter - the template alone doesn't do it. Logan Talk Contributions 00:22, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 July 2011

My bad

Thanks for reverting the error I restored on BS talkpage. That was my bad. My76Strat talk 00:16, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

No problem. :) Logan Talk Contributions 00:18, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Edit warring

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Edit warring. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 16:36, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

editing

i am very sorry just wanted to know what it dose FU — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.45.119.65 (talk) 00:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Great going on the Nancy Pelosi article! But it was worse than it seems. Links to the English article were redirected to the "Witch" title elsewhere--I fixed it on the Irish and Spanish projects. It may be universal. SeoMac (talk) 02:44, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2011

Thank you kindly

Thank you for your participation on my RfA
Thank you for your participation on my RfA. I have noted your concerns my my CSD tagging, and absolutely intend to take them to heart and review all related policies before taking any admin actions in this field. If you ever have any concerns about my actions, or even any advice, feel free to come let me know. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Hey Why did you change my post ?

?? thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.68.140.63 (talk) 20:57, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:39, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Bashar al Assad

Do you know if the US government was involved in Assad's death? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.69.157.79 (talk) 22:57, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Apologies

I read this[4], and skipped the "follow these instructions" line as I had not nominated myself or someone else. "To nominate either yourself or another user for adminship, follow these instructions". My error. Best, ROBERTMFROMLI | TK/CN 04:25, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:03, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Verifiability

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Verifiability. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 23:05, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

File:C.M. Fickert 4545367611 14a985d2b2 o.jpg

Should this file not be renamed to something a little more manageable perhaps? Thanks for hearing, Atomician (talk) 19:40, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

I don't see why not. Feel free to place a {{rename}} template on the File's description page. Logan Talk Contributions 16:54, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Dale Deardorff

What claims of importance are you seeing? The Mark of the Beast (talk)`

There are multiple claims of importance/significance in the article, including having founded a "thinking network" with coverage in multiple media. To pass A7, an article only has to have the slighest claims of importance/significance. PROD and AfD are good next steps if an article does claim importance/significance. Logan Talk Contributions 19:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Well

Well, I guess I finally have my own battle scars from vandal fighting. Joe Chill (talk) 19:06, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

We all experience it. :) Logan Talk Contributions 19:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Username policy

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Username policy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 16:05, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Logan. You have new messages at Nathan2055's talk page.
Message added 21:19, 19 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nathan2055talk - review 21:19, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Logan. You have new messages at Don4of4's talk page.
Message added 17:35, 20 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Don4of4[Talk] 

17:35, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Vulva". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by May 11, 2011.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 18:41, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Thx 4 t3h l33t c0de skillz!!!111llleleven

The Template Barnstar
7|-|4|\||<$ Ph0r |-|3LP1|\|9 \/\/17|-| 4LL 7|-|3 (0/\/\PL1(473D (0D1|\|9-7'/P3 $7UPhPh, 0\/3r 7|-|3 '/34r$  Chzz  ►  01:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
👍 Logan likes this. Logan Talk Contributions 01:41, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Vulva, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK [•] 11:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:070617-Janggeom-Drill.jpg

Hello Logan, thank you for your note. The file is my own, original work. I am the photographer, and I hold legal ownership of the image. The file has been deleted before I have even had a chance to contest the speedy deletion nomination. Please advise on this situation; I will monitor your talk page. Thanks. Janggeom (talk) 23:27, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello again, just a brief note to say that the deleting administrator (RHaworth) has responded to my query, so to avoid doubling up I will continue corresponding with him. Thanks again for your note. Janggeom (talk) 13:13, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:53, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Creative Commons licenses

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Creative Commons licenses. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 04:39, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Blanking user page

I created the user account lokinjo a while back, but I've lost the password and did not set a recovery email. I've waded through pages of account deletion information but I've gotten lost. Blanking the page probably wasn't a good idea. Do you have the power to delete accounts/user pages? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.228.12.212 (talk) 01:47, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

No, unfortunately I do not. I would recommend using the {{adminhelp}} template on your talk page to request help with deleting your old user page. Logan Talk Contributions 19:58, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Images and Media

Hello Logan, I have prepared an drive yesterday to get the most images moved to the Wikimedia Commons. It is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Commons/Drive Sep 2011. It will start at 12 years ago or more precisely at 00:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC). There are some awards you may get. You may sign up now. ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs 17:27, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:24, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

You changed my edit for Angle sharks, which I believe was incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.67.98.194 (talk) 15:34, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Computers Guide blog

Hello Logan!

What do I have to do to keep the blog from being deleted?

Best regards,

Tempo21 (talk) 18:23, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi there. You can participate in the Articles for Deletion discussion in order to determine whether or not your article is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Logan Talk Contributions 18:25, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:09, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:52, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

I am contacting you in relation to a warning you gave me saying that i vandalised a page. Could you please let me know what you mean by this as i was only asking another editor why they were removing my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnwarren1981 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buffalo City FC

Doh! Thanks for sweeping up after me. Bridgeplayer (talk) 00:22, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

No worries. :) It was just that MathBot wasn't picking up on it as a closed AfD (as it looks for certain code), and thus it was still showing up as unclosed at WP:AFDO. Logan Talk Contributions 00:23, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:58, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BendBroadband logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BendBroadband logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Logan/Archive_8&oldid=1153030766"