User talk:ThisuserisnolongeronWikipedia

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gadget and the Gadgetinis Episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page YTV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Wayside (TV series), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Blanking the page doesn't prevent me from checking its history... Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 14:09, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of programs broadcast by Teletoon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Totally Spies!]]'' - season 6 ( October 9 2013-The Anti socia network )October 10 2013-Nine lives)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.animationmagazine.net/events/marathon-to-host-totally-spies-event-in-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of programs broadcast by Teletoon. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 13:21, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Grojband, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 15:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Hi Tristan, I am sorry but I had to prevent you from making further edits. You have been changing articles to say things that do not appear to be true, or cannot be shown to be true with references to reliable sources. Also, you have never talked to other editors to explain what you are doing. This is a problem on Wikipedia. Can you please explain what you are doing? Why would it be OK to make the kinds of changes you are? If you can explain what you are doing, or promise you won't make the kinds of changes you have been, your account may be allowed to edit again. Thanks... Zad68 23:18, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Zad68 23:20, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry

I probably never should of edit it could you give m a 2nd Chance am sorry IL never do it again

Welcome back!

Because of your "I'm sorry" message I have unblocked your account. Welcome back! Please continue to use this account and not your Tristan.136 account. Based on how you're using that account, I actually have to block that Tristan.136 account, sorry about that... but keep using this account for your work. Zad68 15:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Totally Spies!. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 22:43, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Hi, I'm really sorry to tell you, but because you have identified as being under the age of 18 and provided excessive levels of information about yourself, it has been necessary to remove your user page. Please review Wikipedia:Child protection before creating a new user page, or feel free to ask me or any other administrator for assistance in producing a safe user page. Nick (talk) 11:06, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Luitenent Gadget for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luitenent Gadget is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luitenent Gadget until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:04, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Vadant

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David Vadant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ...William 14:34, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Please stop adding flag icons to infoboxes per WP:INFOBOXFLAG. Thank you. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 22:49, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Amazing Spiez!, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 01:05, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

General concerns about your contributions

Hi Tristan, I've noticed that you seem to be having difficulty understanding some of the rules at Wikipedia, for example, the ones governing the use of reliable sources, or maybe some of the lesser-known rules, like how flags don't belong in infoboxes. If you are serious about editing here, you might consider asking for a mentor via the Adoptee program.

More pressing, however, is that many of your edits contain significant spelling and grammatical errors, as well as formatting and typographical errors. In these edits you misspelled "Lieutenant", then later created an article on the misspelled Luitenent Gadget. In these edits your write-up under Season 6 contain a number of spelling errors as well as inconsistent capitalization, etc. And there are a variety of problems at the article you've created for And then it Happened.

Wikipedia expects that articles be written in a professional style and tone, consistent with the style and tone of any other professional encyclopedia. Wikipedia editors are told to assume good faith of other editors, and I assume that your intentions are good, but if you are not able to spell adequately or communicate properly, at some point your contributions will be considered disruptive and harmful to the project. If English is not your primary language, you may have more success working on a Wikipedia project in your native tongue. You may also wish to take a look at WP:COMPETENCE to understand why one's abilities are important to being considered useful at Wikipedia. Good luck, and if you have any questions, feel free to ask on my talk page. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:56, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Edo Japan restaurant

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Edo Japan restaurant, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.flyers-on-line.com/restaurants/edo-japan.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 17:04, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edo Japan restaurant

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Edo Japan restaurant, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.flyers-on-line.com/restaurants/edo-japan.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 17:28, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Edo Japan restaurant

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Edo Japan restaurant, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ...William 17:36, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Edo Japan (Restaurant)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Edo Japan (Restaurant), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ...William 04:03, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of St. Julia Catholic Elementary School

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on St. Julia Catholic Elementary School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.

Almost no elementary schools are notable enough to warrant an article. PK T(alk) 14:48, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to List of Mr. Young episodes. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Do not add content without WP:RS WP Editor 2012 (talk) 13:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

This is your final warning. Stop misusing flag icons like you did again here and here. And pay more attention to proper spelling, as "vocied" isn't a word. You have received numerous warnings, and I've attempted to give you friendly guidance. If you are not willing to take the advice and either seek mentorship or improve the quality of your edits, you will likely wind up blocked. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:25, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm Dogmaticeclectic. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rocket Monkeys, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 16:02, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of programs broadcast by ABC Family may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* ''[[Totally Spies!]]'' (Season 1(November 3 2001)-Season 5 (Season 6-July 9,2014)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scott Beaudin

Hello, Tristan.andrade.136. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Scott Beaudin, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Scott Beaudin to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 20:12, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Amazing Spiez!. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 00:00, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, ThisuserisnolongeronWikipedia. You have new messages at Michaelzeng7's talk page.
Message added 02:19, 24 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Michaelzeng7 (talk) 02:19, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, ThisuserisnolongeronWikipedia. You have new messages at Cyphoidbomb's talk page.
Message added 17:42, 24 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:42, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Totally Spies!

Hi Tristan, it appears that you are having difficulty understanding fundamental concepts related to Wikipedia editing, particularly those related to original research and providing reliable sources. Understanding these concepts are crucial to your ability to edit here. I reverted your edits at Totally Spies! for a number of reasons, including the unexplained removal of content (writers/directors, et al from infobox), the unexplained removal of the show's history (as flawed as it may have been), the apparent copy/pasting you did from here, and for the critical reception section you copy/pasted from the same fansite, which is entirely unsourced and makes bold and unsubstantiated statements about critical reception being "mostly positive".

It's okay to make a few mistakes here and there, but you seem to have trouble understanding core principles, for example, that sites like Wikia.com are not suitable as references, and the result is that your edits are damaging existing articles. I've previously given you some advice on where to go for help, but you don't seem interested in taking the advice. I understand that you might be a kid, and kids are welcome to edit, but kids must also be competent editors. This is your last warning that if you submit unsourced content again, or improperly sourced content, you will be reported for administrative intervention. I believe that you want to do a good job, but your execution thus far has not been up to the community's standards. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:09, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Scott Beaudin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Beaudin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Beaudin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 05:21, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, ThisuserisnolongeronWikipedia. You have new messages at Michaelzeng7's talk page.
Message added 03:52, 29 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Michaelzeng7 (talk) 03:52, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, ThisuserisnolongeronWikipedia. You have new messages at Michaelzeng7's talk page.
Message added 17:18, 29 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Michaelzeng7 (talk) 17:18, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at The Amazing Spiez!. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 17:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, ThisuserisnolongeronWikipedia. You have new messages at User talk:Cyphoidbomb/Archive 2#Totally Spies Country.
Message added 19:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Rabbids Invasion episodes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk:Dogmaticeclectic#Programs Brodcasted by Teletoon, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 00:05, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dogmaticeclectic. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of programs broadcast by Teletoon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 00:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Amazing Spiez!. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 03:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marathon Images may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Disney XD (Canada) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.[reply]

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*''[[Skyrunners]]''-2009 (Co-Proudeced with Disney XD Canada

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:23, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Totally Spies! characters may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

===[[Jerry===

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:35, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Disney XD (Canada). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 117Avenue (talk) 03:31, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zodiak Kids

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zodiak Kids requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.zodiakrights.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheLongTone (talk) 23:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Image Entertainment Corporation logo, Image Logo.png

A tag has been placed on File:Image Entertainment Corporation logo, Image Logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 14:17, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Image Entertainment Corporation Logo used Since 2011.png

Thank you for uploading File:Image Entertainment Corporation Logo used Since 2011.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm Dogmaticeclectic. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Teletoon original series, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 02:52, 2 February 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Image Entertainment Corporation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.[reply]

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*''[[Walter (TV Series|Walter]]'' (Co-produced with TV5, Wang Film Productions Ltd., and Spinc)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mari Tranior

Hello, Tristan.andrade.136. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mari Tranior, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Mari Tranior to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 20:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mari Tranior

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mari Tranior requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Flat Out let's discuss it 23:03, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Books for Boys

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Books for Boys, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. BiH (talk) 23:50, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk:Dogmaticeclectic#Teletoon Original Series, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 20:46, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Stoked (TV series). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 13:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced articles

Please do not continue to create articles that do not contain any references. Articles that fail to establish the notability of the subject are likely to be deleted. Given the number of articles that you have created that have been deleted, you should understand this. --AussieLegend (✉) 09:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Image Entertainment Corporation Logo used Since 2011.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Image Entertainment Corporation Logo used Since 2011.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Walter (TV Series

Hello Tristan.andrade.136,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Walter (TV Series for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wgolf (talk) 21:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Walter (TV Series)

Hello, Tristan.andrade.136. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Walter (TV Series), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wgolf (talk) 21:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Walter's Christmas

Hello, Tristan.andrade.136. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Walter's Christmas, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wgolf (talk) 03:36, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of programs broadcast by Teletoon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 23:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jerry Lewis (Totally Spies! character)

Hello, Tristan.andrade.136. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Jerry Lewis (Totally Spies! character), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jerry Lewis (Totally Spies! character) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jerry Lewis (Totally Spies! character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry Lewis (Totally Spies! character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tristan. Unfortunately, from what I can see, you are likely to get indefinitely blocked from editing on the English Wikipedia soon, if you continue what you have been doing.

Maybe you need to slow down and be much more careful. Or, maybe you need a mentoring program that would help you see how to edit.

I don't have time for a mentoring program right now, but other editors including User:Rcsprinter123 might be able to do one. What do you think of that? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:40, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm too busy also. You'd have to find someone else. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (parlez) @ 21:50, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Walter's Christmas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Walter's Christmas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter's Christmas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply at ANI

Hi Tristan, you are invited (and strongly encouraged) to respond to the ANI report about you here. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of programs broadcast by Disney Channel (France), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Violetta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Your addition to Slugterra: Ghoul from Beyond has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 22:57, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Charcter.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Charcter.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:24, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 7 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of programs broadcast by Teletoon page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hornet Films

The article Hornet Films has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article that fails to credibly assert notability of the subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AussieLegend (✉) 09:51, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hornet Films

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hornet Films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://hornetfilms.com/about.html‎. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 11:57, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Many users have attempted to explain to you how things work here, and to get you to edit in accordance with our guidelines, but you have refused to answer their concerns and have continued creating unsuitable pages and making unsourced edits. It seems that you do not currently have sufficient maturity to edit Wikipedia. Please wait a year or two and study the policies and guidelines which govern the site before returning. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui 雲‍水 11:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

To 11:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)User:Yunshui I don't try to disrupt editing I am really bad at it if you give my another change I will try my hardest to not have disruptive editing sorry what do you say. Please unblock me!! I am Sorrry!!!!! From 19:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)User:Tristan.andrade.136[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThisuserisnolongeronWikipedia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should look at the policies of Wikipedia and realized that I feel so sorry for what I did

Decline reason:

Where shall I start?

You're supposed to read the policies before requesting unblocking. Then you are supposed to show (not state) that you understand them in the unblock request.
You have repeatedly violated the copyright policy. In order to be unblocked, you must explicitly show that you understand the copyright policy and that you will clean up after your edits at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20140425. (This is in addition to addressing the other block reasons.)
You didn't even read the text you have copied into Wikipedia! (Special:Undelete/Edo Japan restaurant, Special:Undelete/Hornet Films). If you did, then you have zero appreciation of the purposes of the project.
You have repeatedly evaded this block.

As such, you shouldn't be editing at all. MER-C 04:54, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am nuking all of your major edits per Wikipedia:Copyright violations. MER-C 05:16, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MER-C, FYI, user was indeffed after a trip through WP:ANI over the editor's WP:COMPETENCE. The consensus was to block. One thought was, if the subject is a kid, waiting a couple of years before editing again might improve the quality of their edits. The user didn't participate at ANI in spite of invitations. The fact that they still don't understand why they were blocked, and can't assemble a grammatically coherent unblock request, seems to underscore a competence issue. Or it could just be bargain basement trolling. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:54, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me another chance

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThisuserisnolongeronWikipedia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know you were trying to explain i did not that not copying i putting it in your own words i just learned that a few days ago know i feel like killing myself also i really am sorry about my spelling and grammer i just am a kid but if you could give me another chance i could proof to you that i can not do copyright i will put sources and change most of the words in to my own words please I really am sorry

Decline reason:

I have deleted the multiple repetitions of this request. In my opinion your limited language skills and evident inability to follow Wikipedia policies indicate that you are not at this time competent to edit here. Try again in a year or two. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:28, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I WISH I wasn't so stupid

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThisuserisnolongeronWikipedia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well, I wish I was not such a stupid kid maybe I wouldn't be so bad if I was so stupid I wouldn't get Blocked if I just did look at the rules and did not copyright but could this convince you know I get it (Before I did not understand what copyright would mean if I put a Source but now I know I put it in my own works how about a example for Image Entertainment Corporation:Image Entertainment Corporation is an Worldwide coproduction corporation that has been Professional in audiovisual, cinematographic and multiplatform projects for almost 15 years. ^[1] see I put it in my own words like not violationg any Wikipedia rules do you see I changed if not I might as well not be surprised I am just a stupid kid who no one likes and sorry I made up multiple accounts beucase I thought it might show that I really can edit Wikipedia right but I guess not I really am sorry I am just a big stupid kid:(

Decline reason:

Even you must understand that you aren't ready to edit here. It isn't about stupid, but it is about being mature enough to understand the ramifications of your actions. Even if you have the best of intentions, you are causing too many problems. I think you need to wait a year or two, then request to come back. As this is your third request and you haven't been able to fully address the problem at hand, I'm choosing to extend the block to include this talk page. You can make unblock requests at WP:UTRS, although I strongly suggest you wait a couple of years. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 02:02, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Actually, someone else already blocked with no talk page access, so I will semi protect the page instead. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 02:04, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Novel Series started in 1997

Category:Novel Series started in 1997, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Aristophanes68 (talk) 20:09, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zodiak Kids Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zodiak Kids Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:14, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MasterChef France Junior for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MasterChef France Junior is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MasterChef France Junior until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fuddle (talk) 00:16, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Image Entertainment Corporation Logo used Since 2011.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Image Entertainment Corporation Logo used Since 2011.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

^ http://www.image-cie.com/index.php?lang=en

[1] ttp://www.image-cie.com/index.php?lang=en

[1]