User talk:Okip: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jubileeclipman (talk | contribs)
Line 39: Line 39:
Thanks for the heads-up on the closing proposals -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|<font color="darkred">Boing<b>!</b></font>]] [[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee#top|<font color="darkgreen">said Zebedee</font>]] 04:38, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads-up on the closing proposals -- [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|<font color="darkred">Boing<b>!</b></font>]] [[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee#top|<font color="darkgreen">said Zebedee</font>]] 04:38, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
:do you really think this is a jimbo whales problem? ain't he just going along with the ''[[Weltanschauung]]'': i.e. it's not the individual, but the movement. ain't it the [[Peter Principle]], they can't pull off ''[[Götterdämmerung]]'', so the insurgents will make lemonade of the lemons. [[User:Pohick2|Pohick2]] ([[User talk:Pohick2|talk]]) 00:47, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
:do you really think this is a jimbo whales problem? ain't he just going along with the ''[[Weltanschauung]]'': i.e. it's not the individual, but the movement. ain't it the [[Peter Principle]], they can't pull off ''[[Götterdämmerung]]'', so the insurgents will make lemonade of the lemons. [[User:Pohick2|Pohick2]] ([[User talk:Pohick2|talk]]) 00:47, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for deletion]] nomination of [[:Little Eichmanns]] ==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>I have nominated [[Little Eichmanns]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Eichmanns]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> [[User:Prezbo|Prezbo]] ([[User talk:Prezbo|talk]]) 01:56, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
:Copied from user talk:Ikip (if you dont want me to keep doing this, let me know and I'll stop ... Im doing it for lots of other inactive/name0changed users too, not just you) '''[[User:Soap|<font color="green">—</font>]][[User talk:Soap|<font color="057602">''Soap''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Soap|<font color="green">—</font>]]''' 01:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:59, 1 March 2010

The Unreferenced living persons contest
Please help us build this contest.
Your suggestions are warmly welcome.
>> Sign up now. <<

Category:All unreferenced BLPs

{{db-r2}}

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:MovePage/ABC&wpNewTitle=Thispage 

"Disagreeable and closed to new ideas - that's the picture that emerges of contributors to...Wikipedia from a survey of their psychological attributes." Aldhous, Peter (January 03, 2009). "Psychologist finds Wikipedians grumpy and closed-minded". NewScientist. Retrieved 2009-05-08. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help) Source: "Personality Characteristics of Wikipedia Members" CyberPsychology & Behavior (DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0225)

This project does not exist to help editors grow a thicker skin. Our mission is to build an encyclopedia, not establish limits for low-level abuse that we think our volunteer editors should be willing to suffer. If we drive away more people than we attract, then it's a genuine loss to the project and we should fix it rather than label those who would prefer to work in a civil environment as "thin skinned." -- User:Cool Hand Luke [2]

The problem is that our enforcement of civility and NPA has historically been quite selective. If you're unpopular or unpowerful and criticizing somebody popular or powerful, you are likely to be blocked. The other way around, not so much. We ought to come up with objective standards and stick to them. -- User:Jehochman[3]

A reliable measure of prejudice is how many mistakes a person gets forgiven. --Durova

Wikipedia:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard/RfA_Report

...as an approximate guide, you are likely to pass if you achieve at least 75% support. Nominations which receive less than 70% support are unlikely to be successful, except in exceptional circumstances.

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
RfA candidate S O N S % Status Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
DreamRimmer 14 6 1 70 Open 10:02, 4 June 2024 4 days, 22 hours no report

Best welcome template: User:AxG/WikiWelcome1

wikipediareview: History of wikipedia

RfC headcount

Saw your table, and posted a comment on statistics for this sort of polling. Just wanted to see if you had any thoughts. (Like I say, I think in this case, the point I raise is moot, but it might matter in other polls, like Phase I). -- Bfigura (talk) 05:20, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I also responded somewhere in the RfC to a comment you made about one of my !votes, but I forget exactly where. Best, -- Bfigura (talk) 05:21, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

UBLP flags

aerica beats conch republic. hope you don't mind my assigning flags to people, thought you would like the presidential one.

i was kinda responding to WTmitchell's not wanting to use unique flags per the WikiCup, you can pick any image to stand in for you, Vexillology, it is prettier than a list of names. Pohick2 (talk) 14:30, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DASHBot

Re above: what information do you need for the bot to run? Answer on my talk page (unusually for me...). Thanks --Jubilee♫clipman 19:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Answering self but need verification: I just add the project to the list by the looks of it (using the template provided if we need to specify the subpage or widen the seach terms). Correct? Answer here since the info may well help others!  ;) --Jubilee♫clipman 23:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Tim, who created the bot, still needs final approval. [4] I would suggest asking him for final approval. Okip 12:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Will do --Jubilee♫clipman 15:32, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The National Federation of Coffee Growers of Colombia

Hi Okip, I just noticed that the article on the National Federation of Coffee Growers of Colombia was modified on February 20, 2010, at 16:00 by an editor VickyMa, deleting all my contributions with total disregard and without any comment, justification or reason; in my opinion, with total contempt. What should I do here to have my contributions inserted back into the article? I don’t want to do so just on my own initiative in order to avoid any argument or confrontation. Should I ask for comment RFC? Or what do you suggest I do? Please advice. Thanks,--Grancafé (talk) 18:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Okip. You have new messages at Grancafé's talk page.
Message added --Grancafé (talk) 18:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

BLP RfC

Thanks for the heads-up on the closing proposals -- Boing! said Zebedee 04:38, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

do you really think this is a jimbo whales problem? ain't he just going along with the Weltanschauung: i.e. it's not the individual, but the movement. ain't it the Peter Principle, they can't pull off Götterdämmerung, so the insurgents will make lemonade of the lemons. Pohick2 (talk) 00:47, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Little Eichmanns, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Eichmanns. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Prezbo (talk) 01:56, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from user talk:Ikip (if you dont want me to keep doing this, let me know and I'll stop ... Im doing it for lots of other inactive/name0changed users too, not just you) Soap 01:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]