Mental disorder: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
restore the text deleted by mistake
Undid revision 473437851 by Psychiatrick (talk)not a "mistake"; undue weight to material taken out of context from an editorial
Line 101: Line 101:
Abnormal functioning of [[neurotransmitter]] systems has been implicated in several mental disorders, including serotonin, norepinephrine, dopamine and glutamate systems. Differences have also been found in the size or activity of certain brain regions in some cases. Psychological mechanisms have also been implicated, such as [[cognitive]] (e.g. [[reasoning]]) biases, [[emotional]] influences, [[Personality psychology|personality]] dynamics, [[temperament]] and [[Coping (psychology)|coping]] style.
Abnormal functioning of [[neurotransmitter]] systems has been implicated in several mental disorders, including serotonin, norepinephrine, dopamine and glutamate systems. Differences have also been found in the size or activity of certain brain regions in some cases. Psychological mechanisms have also been implicated, such as [[cognitive]] (e.g. [[reasoning]]) biases, [[emotional]] influences, [[Personality psychology|personality]] dynamics, [[temperament]] and [[Coping (psychology)|coping]] style.


==Skepticism about the concept==
==Views about the concept==
Reasons have been put forward to doubt the [[ontic]] status of mental disorders.<ref name=Phillips>{{cite journal|last=Phillips|first=James et al.|title=The Six Most Essential Questions in Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Pluralogue. Part 1: Conceptual and Definitional Issues in Psychiatric Diagnosis.|journal=[[Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine]]|year=2012|month=January 13|volume=7|issue=3|pages=1–51|doi=10.1186/1747-5341-7-3|pmid=22243994|url=http://www.peh-med.com/content/pdf/1747-5341-7-3.pdf|accessdate=24 January 2012|publisher=BioMed Central|issn=1747-5341}}</ref>{{rp|13}} Mental disorders engender [[ontological]] skepticism on three levels:
# Mental disorders are abstract entities that cannot be directly appreciated with the human senses or indirectly, as one might with macro- or microscopic objects.
# Mental disorders are not clearly natural processes whose detection is untarnished by the imposition of values, or human interpretation.
# It is unclear whether they should be [[Concept|conceived]] as abstractions that exist in the world apart from the individual persons who experience them, and thus instantiate them.<ref name=Phillips/>{{rp|13}}

In the scientific and academic literature on the definition or classification of mental disorder, one extreme argues that it is entirely a matter of value judgements (including of what is [[norm (sociology)|norm]]al) while another proposes that it is or could be entirely [[objectivity (science)|objective]] and [[scientific]] (including by reference to statistical norms).<ref>{{Cite journal |author=Berrios G E |title=Classifications in psychiatry: a conceptual history |journal=Aust N Z J Psychiatry |volume=33 |issue=2 |pages=145–60 |date=April 1999|pmid=10336212 |url=http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/resolve/openurl?genre=article&sid=nlm:pubmed&issn=0004-8674&date=1999&volume=33&issue=2&spage=145 |doi=10.1046/j.1440-1614.1999.00555.x}}</ref> Common hybrid views argue that the concept of mental disorder is objective but a "fuzzy [[prototype]]" that can never be precisely defined, or alternatively that it inevitably involves a mix of scientific facts and subjective value judgments.<ref>Perring, C. (2005) [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mental-illness/ Mental Illness] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref>
In the scientific and academic literature on the definition or classification of mental disorder, one extreme argues that it is entirely a matter of value judgements (including of what is [[norm (sociology)|norm]]al) while another proposes that it is or could be entirely [[objectivity (science)|objective]] and [[scientific]] (including by reference to statistical norms).<ref>{{Cite journal |author=Berrios G E |title=Classifications in psychiatry: a conceptual history |journal=Aust N Z J Psychiatry |volume=33 |issue=2 |pages=145–60 |date=April 1999|pmid=10336212 |url=http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/resolve/openurl?genre=article&sid=nlm:pubmed&issn=0004-8674&date=1999&volume=33&issue=2&spage=145 |doi=10.1046/j.1440-1614.1999.00555.x}}</ref> Common hybrid views argue that the concept of mental disorder is objective but a "fuzzy [[prototype]]" that can never be precisely defined, or alternatively that it inevitably involves a mix of scientific facts and subjective value judgments.<ref>Perring, C. (2005) [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mental-illness/ Mental Illness] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref>



Revision as of 01:33, 27 January 2012

Mental disorder
SpecialtyPsychiatry, clinical psychology, psychotherapy Edit this on Wikidata

A mental disorder or mental illness is a psychological or behavioral pattern that is generally associated with distress or disability, and which is not considered part of normal development or a person's culture. Mental disorders are generally defined by a combination of how a person feels, acts, thinks or perceives. This may be associated with particular regions or functions of the brain or rest of the nervous system, often in a social context. The recognition and understanding of mental health conditions have changed over time and across cultures, and there are still variations in definition, assessment and classification, although standard guideline criteria are widely used. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), over a third of people in most countries report problems at some time in their life which meet criteria for diagnosis of one or more of the common types of mental disorder.[1]

The causes of mental disorders are varied and in some cases unclear, and theories may incorporate findings from a range of fields. Services are based in psychiatric hospitals or in the community, and assessments are carried out by psychiatrists, clinical psychologists and clinical social workers, using various methods but often relying on observation and questioning. Clinical treatments are provided by various mental health professionals. Psychotherapy and psychiatric medication are two major treatment options, as are social interventions, peer support and self-help. In a minority of cases there might be involuntary detention or involuntary treatment, where legislation allows. Stigma and discrimination can add to the suffering and disability associated with mental disorders (or with being diagnosed or judged as having a mental disorder), leading to various social movements attempting to increase understanding and challenge social exclusion.

Classifications

The definition and classification of mental disorders is a key issue for researchers as well as service providers and those who may be diagnosed. Most international clinical documents use the term mental 'disorder', while 'illness' is also common. It has been noted that using the term 'mental' (of the mind) is not necessarily meant to imply separateness from brain or body.

There are currently two widely established systems that classify mental disorders—ICD-10 Chapter V: Mental and behavioural disorders, part of the International Classification of Diseases produced by the WHO, and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) produced by the American Psychiatric Association (APA).

Both list categories of disorder and provide standardized criteria for diagnosis. They have deliberately converged their codes in recent revisions so that the manuals are often broadly comparable, although significant differences remain. Other classification schemes may be used in non-western cultures, for example the Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders, and other manuals may be used by those of alternative theoretical persuasions, for example the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual. In general, mental disorders are classified separately to neurological disorders, learning disabilities or mental retardation.

Unlike most of the above systems, some approaches to classification are not based on distinct categories of disorder, or dichotomous symptom profiles intended to separate the abnormal from the normal. There is significant scientific debate about the relative merits of categorical versus non-categorical (or hybrid) schemes, also known as continuum or dimensional models. A spectrum approach may incorporate elements of both.

Disorders

There are many different categories of mental disorder, and many different facets of human behavior and personality that can become disordered.[2][3][4][5][6]

Anxiety or fear that interferes with normal functioning may be classified as an anxiety disorder.[7] Commonly recognized categories include specific phobias, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Other affective (emotion/mood) processes can also become disordered. Mood disorder involving unusually intense and sustained sadness, melancholia or despair is known as major depression (also known as unipolar or clinical depression). Milder but still prolonged depression can be diagnosed as dysthymia. Bipolar disorder (also known as manic depression) involves abnormally "high" or pressured mood states, known as mania or hypomania, alternating with normal or depressed mood. The extent to which unipolar and bipolar mood phenomena represent distinct categories of disorder, or mix and merge together along a dimension or spectrum of mood, is subject to some scientific debate.[8]

Patterns of belief, language use and perception of reality can become disordered (e.g. delusions, thought disorder, hallucinations). Psychotic disorders in this domain include schizophrenia, and delusional disorder. Schizoaffective disorder is a category used for individuals showing aspects of both schizophrenia and affective disorders. Schizotypy is a category used for individuals showing some of the characteristics associated with schizophrenia but without meeting cut-off criteria.

Personality—the fundamental characteristics of a person that influence his or her thoughts and behaviors across situations and time—may be considered disordered if judged to be abnormally rigid and maladaptive. Although considered separately by some, the commonly used categorical schemes include them as mental disorders, albeit on a separate 'axis II' in the case of the DSM. A number of different such personality disorders are listed, including those sometimes classed as 'eccentric' such as paranoid, schizoid and schizotypal personality disorders; types that have described as 'dramatic' or 'emotional' such as antisocial, borderline, histrionic or narcissistic personality disorders; and those sometimes classed as fear-related such as avoidant, dependent, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorders. If an inability to sufficiently adjust to life circumstances begins within three months of a particular event or situation, and ends within six months after the stressor stops or is eliminated, it may instead be classed as an adjustment disorder. There is an emerging consensus that so-called "personality disorders", like personality traits in general, actually incorporate a mixture of acute dysfunctional behaviors that resolve in short periods, and maladaptive temperamental traits that are more stable.[9] Furthermore, there are also non-categorical schemes that rate all individuals via a profile of different dimensions of personality without a symptom-based cut-off from normal personality variation, for example through schemes based on the Big Five personality traits.[10]

Eating disorders involve disproportionate concern in matters of food and weight.[7] Categories of disorder in this area include anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, exercise bulimia or binge eating disorder.

Sleep disorders such as insomnia involve disruption to normal sleep patterns, or a feeling of tiredness despite sleep appearing normal.

Sexual and gender identity disorders may be diagnosed, including dyspareunia, gender identity disorder and ego-dystonic homosexuality. Various kinds of paraphilia are considered mental disorders (sexual arousal to objects, situations, or individuals that are considered abnormal or harmful to the person or others).

People who are abnormally unable to resist certain urges or impulses that could be harmful to themselves or others, may be classed as having an impulse control disorder, including various kinds of tic disorders such as Tourette's syndrome, and disorders such as kleptomania (stealing) or pyromania (fire-setting). Various behavioral addictions, such as gambling addiction, may be classed as a disorder. Obsessive-compulsive disorder can sometimes involve an inability to resist certain acts but is classed separately as being primarily an anxiety disorder.

The use of drugs (legal or illegal, including alcohol), when it persists despite significant problems related to its use, may be defined as a mental disorder. The DSM incorporates such conditions under the umbrella category of substance use disorders, which includes substance dependence and substance abuse. The DSM does not currently use the common term drug addiction, and the ICD simply refers to "harmful use". Disordered substance use may be due to a pattern of compulsive and repetitive use of the drug that results in tolerance to its effects and withdrawal symptoms when use is reduced or stopped.

People who suffer severe disturbances of their self-identity, memory and general awareness of themselves and their surroundings may be classed as having a dissociative identity disorder, such as depersonalization disorder or Dissociative Identity Disorder itself (which has also been called multiple personality disorder, or "split personality"). Other memory or cognitive disorders include amnesia or various kinds of old age dementia.

A range of developmental disorders that initially occur in childhood may be diagnosed, for example autism spectrum disorders, oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which may continue into adulthood.

Conduct disorder, if continuing into adulthood, may be diagnosed as antisocial personality disorder (dissocial personality disorder in the ICD). Popularist labels such as psychopath (or sociopath) do not appear in the DSM or ICD but are linked by some to these diagnoses.

Somatoform disorders may be diagnosed when there are problems that appear to originate in the body that are thought to be manifestations of a mental disorder. This includes somatization disorder and conversion disorder. There are also disorders of how a person perceives their body, such as body dysmorphic disorder. Neurasthenia is an old diagnosis involving somatic complaints as well as fatigue and low spirits/depression, which is officially recognized by the ICD-10 but no longer by the DSM-IV.[11]

Factitious disorders, such as Munchausen syndrome, are diagnosed where symptoms are thought to be experienced (deliberately produced) and/or reported (feigned) for personal gain.

There are attempts to introduce a category of relational disorder, where the diagnosis is of a relationship rather than on any one individual in that relationship. The relationship may be between children and their parents, between couples, or others. There already exists, under the category of psychosis, a diagnosis of shared psychotic disorder where two or more individuals share a particular delusion because of their close relationship with each other.

There are a number of uncommon psychiatric syndromes, which are often named after the person who first described them, such as Capgras syndrome, De Clerambault syndrome, Othello syndrome, Ganser syndrome, Cotard delusion, and Ekbom syndrome, and additional disorders such as the Couvade syndrome and Geschwind syndrome.[12]

Various new types of mental disorder diagnosis are occasionally proposed. Among those controversially considered by the official committees of the diagnostic manuals include self-defeating personality disorder, sadistic personality disorder, passive-aggressive personality disorder and premenstrual dysphoric disorder.

Two recent unique unofficial proposals are solastalgia by Glenn Albrecht and hubris syndrome by David Owen. The application of the concept of mental illness to the phenomena described by these authors has in turn been critiqued by Seamus Mac Suibhne.[13]

Signs and symptoms

Course

The likely course and outcome of mental disorders varies, depends on numerous factors related to the disorder itself, the individual as a whole, and the social environment. Some disorders are transient, while others may be more chronic in nature.

Even those disorders often considered the most serious and intractable have varied courses i.e. schizophrenia, psychotic disorders, and personality disorders. Long-term international studies of schizophrenia have found that over a half of individuals recover in terms of symptoms, and around a fifth to a third in terms of symptoms and functioning, with some requiring no medication. At the same time, many have serious difficulties and support needs for many years, although "late" recovery is still possible. The World Health Organization concluded that the long-term studies' findings converged with others in "relieving patients, carers and clinicians of the chronicity paradigm which dominated thinking throughout much of the 20th century."[14][15]

Around half of people initially diagnosed with bipolar disorder achieve syndromal recovery (no longer meeting criteria for the diagnosis) within six weeks, and nearly all achieve it within two years, with nearly half regaining their prior occupational and residential status in that period. However, nearly half go on to experience a new episode of mania or major depression within the next two years.[16] Functioning has been found to vary, being poor during periods of major depression or mania but otherwise fair to good, and possibly superior during periods of hypomania in Bipolar II.[17]

Disability

Some disorders may be very limited in their functional effects, while others may involve substantial disability and support needs. The degree of ability or disability may vary over time and across different life domains. Furthermore, continued disability has been linked to institutionalization, discrimination and social exclusion as well as to the inherent effects of disorders. Alternatively, functioning may be affected by the stress of having to hide a condition in work or school etc, by adverse effects of medications or other substances, or by mismatches between illness-related variations and demands for regularity.[18]

It is also the case that, while often being characterized in purely negative terms, some mental traits or states labeled as disorders can also involve above-average creativity, non-conformity, goal-striving, meticulousness, or empathy.[19] In addition, the public perception of the level of disability associated with mental disorders can change.[20]

Nevertheless, internationally, people report equal or greater disability from commonly occurring mental conditions than from commonly occurring physical conditions, particularly in their social roles and personal relationships. The proportion with access to professional help for mental disorders is far lower, however, even among those assessed as having a severely disabling condition.[21] Disability in this context may or may not involve such things as:

  • Basic activities of daily living. Including looking after the self (health care, grooming, dressing, shopping, cooking etc) or looking after accommodation (chores, DIY tasks etc)
  • Interpersonal relationships. Including communication skills, ability to form relationships and sustain them, ability to leave the home or mix in crowds or particular settings
  • Occupational functioning. Ability to acquire a job and hold it, cognitive and social skills required for the job, dealing with workplace culture, or studying as a student.

In terms of total Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), which is an estimate of how many years of life are lost due to premature death or to being in a state of poor health and disability, mental disorders rank amongst the most disabling conditions. Unipolar (also known as Major) depressive disorder is the third leading cause of disability worldwide, of any condition mental or physical, accounting for 65.5 million years lost. The total DALY does not necessarily indicate what is the most individually disabling, because it also depends on how common a condition is; for example, schizophrenia is found to be the most individually disabling mental disorder on average but is less common. Alcohol-use disorders are also high in the overall list, responsible for 23.7 million DALYs globally, while other drug-use disorders accounted for 8.4 million. Schizophrenia causes a total loss of 16.8 million DALY, and bipolar disorder 14.4 million. Panic disorder leads to 7 million years lost, obsessive-compulsive disorder 5.1, primary insomnia 3.6, and post-traumatic stress disorder 3.5 million DALYs.[22]

The first ever systematic description of global disability arising in youth, published in 2011, found that among 10 to 24 year olds nearly half of all disability (current and as estimated to continue) was due to mental and neurological conditions, including substance use disorders and conditions involving self-harm. Second to this were accidental injuries (mainly traffic collisions) accounting for 12 percent of disability, followed by communicable diseases at 10 percent. The disorders associated with most disability in high income countries were unipolar major depression (20%) and alcohol use disorder (11%). In the eastern Mediterranean region it was unipolar major depression (12%) and schizophrenia (7%), and in Africa it was unipolar major depression (7%) and bipolar disorder (5%).[23]

Suicide, which is often attributed to some underlying mental disorder, is a leading cause of death among teenagers and adults under 35.[24][25] There are an estimated 10 to 20 million non-fatal attempted suicides every year worldwide.[26]

Causes

Mental disorders can arise from multiple sources, and in many cases there is no single accepted or consistent cause currently established. An eclectic or pluralistic mix of models may be used to explain particular disorders. The primary paradigm of contemporary mainstream Western psychiatry is said to be the biopsychosocial model which incorporates biological, psychological and social factors, although this may not always be applied in practice.

Biological psychiatry follows a biomedical model where many mental disorders are conceptualized as disorders of brain circuits likely caused by developmental processes shaped by a complex interplay of genetics and experience. A common assumption is that disorders may have resulted from genetic and developmental vulnerabilities, exposed by stress in life (for example in a diathesis–stress model), although there are various views on what causes differences between individuals. Some types of mental disorder may be viewed as primarily neurodevelopmental disorders.

Evolutionary psychology may be used as an overall explanatory theory, while attachment theory is another kind of evolutionary-psychological approach sometimes applied in the context of mental disorders. Psychoanalytic theories have continued to evolve alongside cognitive-behavioral and systemic-family approaches. A distinction is sometimes made between a "medical model" or a "social model" of disorder and disability.

Studies have indicated that variation in genes can play an important role in the development of mental disorders, although the reliable identification of connections between specific genes and specific categories of disorder has proven more difficult. Environmental events surrounding pregnancy and birth have also been implicated. Traumatic brain injury may increase the risk of developing certain mental disorders. There have been some tentative inconsistent links found to certain viral infections,to substance misuse, and to general physical health.

Social influences have been found to be important, including abuse, neglect, bullying, social stress, and other negative or overwhelming life experiences. The specific risks and pathways to particular disorders are less clear, however. Aspects of the wider community have also been implicated, including employment problems, socioeconomic inequality, lack of social cohesion, problems linked to migration, and features of particular societies and cultures.

Abnormal functioning of neurotransmitter systems has been implicated in several mental disorders, including serotonin, norepinephrine, dopamine and glutamate systems. Differences have also been found in the size or activity of certain brain regions in some cases. Psychological mechanisms have also been implicated, such as cognitive (e.g. reasoning) biases, emotional influences, personality dynamics, temperament and coping style.

Views about the concept

In the scientific and academic literature on the definition or classification of mental disorder, one extreme argues that it is entirely a matter of value judgements (including of what is normal) while another proposes that it is or could be entirely objective and scientific (including by reference to statistical norms).[27] Common hybrid views argue that the concept of mental disorder is objective but a "fuzzy prototype" that can never be precisely defined, or alternatively that it inevitably involves a mix of scientific facts and subjective value judgments.[28]

Diagnosis

Psychiatrists seek to provide a medical diagnosis of individuals by an assessment of symptoms and signs associated with particular types of mental disorder. Other mental health professionals, such as clinical psychologists, may or may not apply the same diagnostic categories to their clinical formulation of a client's difficulties and circumstances.[29] The majority of mental health problems are, at least initially, assessed and treated by family physicians (in the UK general practitioners) during consultations, who may refer a patient on for more specialist diagnosis in acute or chronic cases.

Routine diagnostic practice in mental health services typically involves an interview known as a mental status examination, where evaluations are made of appearance and behavior, self-reported symptoms, mental health history, and current life circumstances. The views of other professionals, relatives or other third parties may be taken into account. A physical examination to check for ill health or the effects of medications or other drugs may be conducted. Psychological testing is sometimes used via paper-and-pen or computerized questionnaires, which may include algorithms based on ticking off standardized diagnostic criteria, and in rare specialist cases neuroimaging tests may be requested, but such methods are more commonly found in research studies than routine clinical practice.[30][31]

Time and budgetary constraints often limit practicing psychiatrists from conducting more thorough diagnostic evaluations.[32] It has been found that most clinicians evaluate patients using an unstructured, open-ended approach, with limited training in evidence-based assessment methods, and that inaccurate diagnosis may be common in routine practice.[33] In addition, comorbidity is very common in psychiatric diagnosis, where the same person meets the criteria for more than one disorder. On the other hand, a person may have several different difficulties only some of which meet the criteria for being diagnosed. There may be specific problems with accurate diagnosis in developing countries.

Management

Treatment and support for mental disorders is provided in psychiatric hospitals, clinics or any of a diverse range of community mental health services. A number of professions have developed that specialize in the treatment of mental disorders. This includes the medical specialty of psychiatry (including psychiatric nursing),[34][35][36] the field of psychology known as clinical psychology,[37] and the practical application of sociology known as social work.[38] There is also a wide range of psychotherapists (including family therapy), counselors, and public health professionals. In addition, there are peer support roles where personal experience of similar issues is the primary source of expertise.[39][40][41][42] The different clinical and scientific perspectives draw on diverse fields of research and theory, and different disciplines may favor differing models, explanations and goals.[19]

In some countries services are increasingly based on a recovery approach, intended to support each individual's personal journey to gain the kind of life they want, although there may also be 'therapeutic pessimism' in some areas.

There are a range of different types of treatment and what is most suitable depends on the disorder and on the individual. Many things have been found to help at least some people, and a placebo effect may play a role in any intervention or medication. In a minority of cases, individuals may be treated against their will, which can cause particular difficulties depending on how it is carried out and perceived.

Psychotherapy

A major option for many mental disorders is psychotherapy. There are several main types. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is widely used and is based on modifying the patterns of thought and behavior associated with a particular disorder. Psychoanalysis, addressing underlying psychic conflicts and defenses, has been a dominant school of psychotherapy and is still in use. Systemic therapy or family therapy is sometimes used, addressing a network of significant others as well as an individual.

Some psychotherapies are based on a humanistic approach. There are a number of specific therapies used for particular disorders, which may be offshoots or hybrids of the above types. Mental health professionals often employ an eclectic or integrative approach. Much may depend on the therapeutic relationship, and there may be problems with trust, confidentiality and engagement.

Medication

A major option for many mental disorders is psychiatric medication and there are several main groups. Antidepressants are used for the treatment of clinical depression, as well as often for anxiety and a range of other disorders. Anxiolytics (including sedatives are used for anxiety disorders and related problems such as insomnia. Mood stabilizers are used primarily in bipolar disorder. Antipsychotics are used for psychotic disorders, notably for positive symptoms in schizophrenia, and also increasingly for a range of other disorders. Stimulants are commonly used, notably for ADHD.

Despite the different conventional names of the drug groups, there may be considerable overlap in the disorders for which they are actually indicated, and there may also be off-label use of medications. There can be problems with adverse effects of medication and adherence to them, and there is also criticism of pharmaceutical marketing and professional conflicts of interest.

Other

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is sometimes used in severe cases when other interventions for severe intractable depression have failed. Psychosurgery is considered experimental but is advocated by certain neurologists in certain rare cases.[43][44]

Counseling (professional) and co-counseling (between peers) may be used. Psychoeducation programs may provide people with the information to understand and manage their problems. Creative therapies are sometimes used, including music therapy, art therapy or drama therapy. Lifestyle adjustments and supportive measures are often used, including peer support, self-help groups for mental health and supported housing or supported employment (including social firms). Some advocate dietary supplements.[45]

Reasonable accommodations (adjustments and supports) might be put in place to help an individual cope and succeed in environments despite potential disability related to mental health problems. This could include an emotional support animal or specifically trained psychiatric service dog.

Epidemiology

Disability-adjusted life year for neuropsychiatric conditions per 100,000 inhabitants in 2004. Template:Multicol
  <2200
  2200-2400
  2400-2600
  2600-2800
  2800-3000
  3000-3200
Template:Multicol-break
  3200-3400
  3400-3600
  3600-3800
  3800-4000
  4000-4200
  >4200
Template:Multicol-end

Mental disorders are common. World wide more than one in three people in most countries report sufficient criteria for at least one at some point in their life.[1] In the United States 46% qualifies for a mental illness at some point.[46] An ongoing survey indicates that anxiety disorders are the most common in all but one country, followed by mood disorders in all but two countries, while substance disorders and impulse-control disorders were consistently less prevalent.[47] Rates varied by region.[48]

A review of anxiety disorder surveys in different countries found average lifetime prevalence estimates of 16.6%, with women having higher rates on average.[49] A review of mood disorder surveys in different countries found lifetime rates of 6.7% for major depressive disorder (higher in some studies, and in women) and 0.8% for Bipolar I disorder.[50]

In the United States the frequency of disorder is: anxiety disorder (28.8%), mood disorder (20.8%), impulse-control disorder (24.8%) or substance use disorder (14.6%).[51][52][53]

A 2004 cross-Europe study found that approximately one in four people reported meeting criteria at some point in their life for at least one of the DSM-IV disorders assessed, which included mood disorders (13.9%), anxiety disorders (13.6%) or alcohol disorder (5.2%). Approximately one in ten met criteria within a 12-month period. Women and younger people of either gender showed more cases of disorder.[54] A 2005 review of surveys in 16 European countries found that 27% of adult Europeans are affected by at least one mental disorder in a 12 month period.[55]

An international review of studies on the prevalence of schizophrenia found an average (median) figure of 0.4% for lifetime prevalence; it was consistently lower in poorer countries.[56]

Studies of the prevalence of personality disorders (PDs) have been fewer and smaller-scale, but one broad Norwegian survey found a five-year prevalence of almost 1 in 7 (13.4%). Rates for specific disorders ranged from 0.8% to 2.8%, differing across countries, and by gender, educational level and other factors.[57] A US survey that incidentally screened for personality disorder found a rate of 14.79%.[58]

Approximately 7% of a preschool pediatric sample were given a psychiatric diagnosis in one clinical study, and approximately 10% of 1- and 2-year-olds receiving developmental screening have been assessed as having significant emotional/behavioral problems based on parent and pediatrician reports.[59]

While rates of psychological disorders are often the same for men and women, women tend to have a higher rate of depression. Each year 73 million women are afflicted with major depression, and suicide is ranked 7th as the cause of death for women between the ages of 20-59. Depressive disorders account for close to 41.9% of the disability from neuropsychiatric disorders among women compared to 29.3% among men.[60]

History

Early color illustration of psychiatric treatment methods

Ancient civilizations

Ancient civilizations described and treated a number of mental disorders. The Greeks coined terms for melancholy, hysteria and phobia and developed the humorism theory. Mental disorders were described, and treatments developed, in Persia, Arabia and in the medieval Islamic world.

Europe

Middle Ages

Conceptions of madness in the Middle Ages in Christian Europe were a mixture of the divine, diabolical, magical and humoral, as well as more down to earth considerations. In the early modern period, some people with mental disorders may have been victims of the witch-hunts but were increasingly admitted to local workhouses and jails or sometimes to private madhouses. Many terms for mental disorder that found their way into everyday use first became popular in the 16th and 17th centuries.

Eighteenth century

By the end of the 17th century and into the Enlightenment, madness was increasingly seen as an organic physical phenomenon with no connection to the soul or moral responsibility. Asylum care was often harsh and treated people like wild animals, but towards the end of the 18th century a moral treatment movement gradually developed. Clear descriptions of some syndromes may be rare prior to the 19th century.

Nineteenth century

Industrialization and population growth led to a massive expansion of the number and size of insane asylums in every Western country in the 19th century. Numerous different classification schemes and diagnostic terms were developed by different authorities, and the term psychiatry was coined, though medical superintendents were still known as alienists.

Twentieth century

The turn of the 20th century saw the development of psychoanalysis, which would later come to the fore, along with Kraepelin's classification scheme. Asylum "inmates" were increasingly referred to as "patients", and asylums renamed as hospitals.

Europe and the U.S.

Early in the 20th century in the United States, a mental hygiene movement developed, aiming to prevent mental disorders. Clinical psychology and social work developed as professions. World War I saw a massive increase of conditions that came to be termed "shell shock".

World War II saw the development in the U.S. of a new psychiatric manual for categorizing mental disorders, which along with existing systems for collecting census and hospital statistics led to the first Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) also developed a section on mental disorders. The term stress, having emerged out of endocrinology work in the 1930s, was increasingly applied to mental disorders.

Insulin Shock Therapy

Electroconvulsive therapy, insulin shock therapy, lobotomies and the "neuroleptic" chlorpromazine came to be used by mid-century. An antipsychiatry movement came to the fore in the 1960s. Deinstitutionalization gradually occurred in the West, with isolated psychiatric hospitals being closed down in favor of community mental health services. A consumer/survivor movement gained momentum. Other kinds of psychiatric medication gradually came into use, such as "psychic energizers" (later antidepressants) and lithium. Benzodiazepines gained widespread use in the 1970s for anxiety and depression, until dependency problems curtailed their popularity.

Advances in neuroscience, genetics and psychology led to new research agendas. Cognitive behavioral therapy and other psychotherapies developed. The DSM and then ICD adopted new criteria-based classifications, and the number of "official" diagnoses saw a large expansion. Through the 1990s, new SSRI-type antidepressants became some of the most widely prescribed drugs in the world, as later did antipsychotics. Also during the 1990s, a recovery approach developed.

Society and culture

Different societies or cultures, even different individuals in a subculture, can disagree as to what constitutes optimal versus pathological biological and psychological functioning. Research has demonstrated that cultures vary in the relative importance placed on, for example, happiness, autonomy, or social relationships for pleasure. Likewise, the fact that a behavior pattern is valued, accepted, encouraged, or even statistically normative in a culture does not necessarily mean that it is conducive to optimal psychological functioning.

People in all cultures find some behaviors bizarre or even incomprehensible. But just what they feel is bizarre or incomprehensible is ambiguous and subjective.[61] These differences in determination can become highly contentious. Religious, spiritual, or transpersonal experiences and beliefs are typically not defined as disordered, especially if widely shared, despite meeting many criteria of delusional or psychotic disorders.[62][63] Even when a belief or experience can be shown to produce distress or disability—the ordinary standard for judging mental disorders—the presence of a strong cultural basis for that belief, experience, or interpretation of experience, generally disqualifies it from counting as evidence of mental disorder.

The process by which conditions and difficulties come to be defined and treated as medical conditions and problems, and thus come under the authority of doctors and other health professionals, is known as medicalization or pathologization.

Movements

The consumer/survivor movement (also known as user/survivor movement) is made up of individuals (and organizations representing them) who are clients of mental health services or who consider themselves survivors of psychiatric interventions. Activists campaign for improved mental health services and for more involvement and empowerment within mental health services, policies and wider society.[64][65][66] Patient advocacy organizations have expanded with increasing deinstitutionalization in developed countries, working to challenge the stereotypes, stigma and exclusion associated with psychiatric conditions. There is also a carers rights movement of people who help and support people with mental health conditions, who may be relatives, and who often work in difficult and time-consuming circumstances with little acknowledgement and without pay. An antipsychiatry movement fundamentally challenges mainstream psychiatric theory and practice, including in some cases asserting that psychiatric concepts and diagnoses of 'mental illness' are neither real nor useful.[67][68][69] Alternatively, a movement for global mental health has emerged, defined as 'the area of study, research and practice that places a priority on improving mental health and achieving equity in mental health for all people worldwide'.[70]

Cultural bias

Current diagnostic guidelines, namely the DSM and to some extent the ICD, have been criticized as having a fundamentally Euro-American outlook. Opponents argue that even when diagnostic criteria are used across different cultures, it does not mean that the underlying constructs have validity within those cultures, as even reliable application can prove only consistency, not legitimacy.[71] Advocating a more culturally sensitive approach, critics such as Carl Bell and Marcello Maviglia contend that the cultural and ethnic diversity of individuals is often discounted by researchers and service providers.[72]

Cross-cultural psychiatrist Arthur Kleinman contends that the Western bias is ironically illustrated in the introduction of cultural factors to the DSM-IV. Disorders or concepts from non-Western or non-mainstream cultures are described as "culture-bound", whereas standard psychiatric diagnoses are given no cultural qualification whatsoever, revealing to Kleinman an underlying assumption that Western cultural phenomena are universal.[73] Kleinman's negative view towards the culture-bound syndrome is largely shared by other cross-cultural critics. Common responses included both disappointment over the large number of documented non-Western mental disorders still left out and frustration that even those included are often misinterpreted or misrepresented.[74]

Many mainstream psychiatrists are dissatisfied with the new culture-bound diagnoses, although for partly different reasons. Robert Spitzer, a lead architect of the DSM-III, has argued that adding cultural formulations was an attempt to appease cultural critics, and has stated that they lack any scientific rationale or support. Spitzer also posits that the new culture-bound diagnoses are rarely used, maintaining that the standard diagnoses apply regardless of the culture involved. In general, mainstream psychiatric opinion remains that if a diagnostic category is valid, cross-cultural factors are either irrelevant or are significant only to specific symptom presentations.[71]

Clinical conceptions of mental illness also overlap with personal and cultural values in the domain of morality, so much so that it is sometimes argued that separating the two is impossible without fundamentally redefining the essence of being a particular person in a society.[75] In clinical psychiatry, persistent distress and disability indicate an internal disorder requiring treatment; but in another context, that same distress and disability can be seen as an indicator of emotional struggle and the need to address social and structural problems.[76][77] This dichotomy has led some academics and clinicians to advocate a postmodernist conceptualization of mental distress and well-being.[78][79]

Such approaches, along with cross-cultural and "heretical" psychologies centered on alternative cultural and ethnic and race-based identities and experiences, stand in contrast to the mainstream psychiatric community's alleged avoidance of any explicit involvement with either morality or culture.[80] In many countries there are attempts to challenge perceived prejudice against minority groups, including alleged institutional racism within psychiatric services.[81] There are also ongoing attempts to improve professional cross cultural sensitivity.

Laws and policies

Three quarters of countries around the world have mental health legislation. Compulsory admission to mental health facilities (also known as involuntary commitment) is a controversial topic. It can impinge on personal liberty and the right to choose, and carry the risk of abuse for political, social and other reasons; yet it can potentially prevent harm to self and others, and assist some people in attaining their right to healthcare when they may be unable to decide in their own interests.[82]

All human rights oriented mental health laws require proof of the presence of a mental disorder as defined by internationally accepted standards, but the type and severity of disorder that counts can vary in different jurisdictions. The two most often utilized grounds for involuntary admission are said to be serious likelihood of immediate or imminent danger to self or others, and the need for treatment. Applications for someone to be involuntarily admitted usually come from a mental health practitioner, a family member, a close relative, or a guardian. Human-rights-oriented laws usually stipulate that independent medical practitioners or other accredited mental health practitioners must examine the patient separately and that there should be regular, time-bound review by an independent review body.[82] The individual should also have personal access to independent advocacy.

In order for involuntary treatment to be administered (by force if necessary), it should be shown that an individual lacks the mental capacity for informed consent (i.e. to understand treatment information and its implications, and therefore be able to make an informed choice to either accept or refuse). Legal challenges in some areas have resulted in supreme court decisions that a person does not have to agree with a psychiatrist's characterization of the issues as constituting an "illness", nor agree with a psychiatrist's conviction in medication, but only recognize the issues and the information about treatment options.[83]

Proxy consent (also known as surrogate or substituted decision-making) may be transferred to a personal representative, a family member or a legally appointed guardian. Moreover, patients may be able to make, when they are considered well, an advance directive stipulating how they wish to be treated should they be deemed to lack mental capacity in future.[82] The right to supported decision-making, where a person is helped to understand and choose treatment options before they can be declared to lack capacity, may also be included in legislation.[84] There should at the very least be shared decision-making as far as possible. Involuntary treatment laws are increasingly extended to those living in the community, for example outpatient commitment laws (known by different names) are used in New Zealand, Australia, the United Kingdom and most of the United States.

The World Health Organization reports that in many instances national mental health legislation takes away the rights of persons with mental disorders rather than protecting rights, and is often outdated.[82] In 1991, the United Nations adopted the Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and the Improvement of Mental Health Care, which established minimum human rights standards of practice in the mental health field. In 2006, the UN formally agreed the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to protect and enhance the rights and opportunities of disabled people, including those with psychosocial disabilities.[85]

The term insanity, sometimes used colloquially as a synonym for mental illness, is often used technically as a legal term. The insanity defense may be used in a legal trial (known as the mental disorder defence in some countries).

Perception and discrimination

Stigma

The social stigma associated with mental disorders is a widespread problem. Some people believe those with serious mental illnesses cannot recover, or are to blame for problems.[86] The US Surgeon General stated in 1999 that: "Powerful and pervasive, stigma prevents people from acknowledging their own mental health problems, much less disclosing them to others."[87] Employment discrimination is reported to play a significant part in the high rate of unemployment among those with a diagnosis of mental illness.[88]

Efforts are being undertaken worldwide to eliminate the stigma of mental illness,[89] although the methods and outcomes used have sometimes been criticized.[90]

A 2008 study by Baylor University researchers found that clergy in the US often deny or dismiss the existence of a mental illness. Of 293 Christian church members, more than 32 percent were told by their church pastor that they or their loved one did not really have a mental illness, and that the cause of their problem was solely spiritual in nature, such as a personal sin, lack of faith or demonic involvement. The researchers also found that women were more likely than men to get this response. All participants in both studies were previously diagnosed by a licensed mental health provider as having a serious mental illness.[91] However, there is also research suggesting that people are often helped by extended families and supportive religious leaders who listen with kindness and respect, which can often contrast with usual practice in psychiatric diagnosis and medication.[92]

Media and general public

Media coverage of mental illness comprises predominantly negative and pejorative depictions, for example, of incompetence, violence or criminality, with far less coverage of positive issues such as accomplishments or human rights issues.[93][94][95] Such negative depictions, including in children's cartoons, are thought to contribute to stigma and negative attitudes in the public and in those with mental health problems themselves, although more sensitive or serious cinematic portrayals have increased in prevalence.[96][97]

In the United States, the Carter Center has created fellowships for journalists in South Africa, the U.S., and Romania, to enable reporters to research and write stories on mental health topics.[98] Former US First Lady Rosalynn Carter began the fellowships not only to train reporters in how to sensitively and accurately discuss mental health and mental illness, but also to increase the number of stories on these topics in the news media.[99][100] There is also a World Mental Health Day, which in the US and Canada falls within a Mental Illness Awareness Week.

The general public have been found to hold a strong stereotype of dangerousness and desire for social distance from individuals described as mentally ill.[101] A US national survey found that a higher percentage of people rate individuals described as displaying the characteristics of a mental disorder as "likely to do something violent to others", compared to the percentage of people who are rating individuals described as being "troubled".[102]

Violence

Despite public or media opinion, national studies have indicated that severe mental illness does not independently predict future violent behavior, on average, and is not a leading cause of violence in society. There is a statistical association with various factors that do relate to violence (in anyone), such as substance abuse and various personal, social and economic factors.[103]

In fact, findings consistently indicate that it is many times more likely that people diagnosed with a serious mental illness living in the community will be the victims rather than the perpetrators of violence.[104][105] In a study of individuals diagnosed with "severe mental illness" living in a US inner-city area, a quarter were found to have been victims of at least one violent crime over the course of a year, a proportion eleven times higher than the inner-city average, and higher in every category of crime including violent assaults and theft.[106] People with a diagnosis may find it more difficult to secure prosecutions, however, due in part to prejudice and being seen as less credible.[107]

However, there are some specific diagnoses, such as childhood conduct disorder or adult antisocial personality disorder or psychopathy, which are defined by, or are inherently associated with, conduct problems and violence. There are conflicting findings about the extent to which certain specific symptoms, notably some kinds of psychosis (hallucinations or delusions) that can occur in disorders such as schizophrenia, delusional disorder or mood disorder, are linked to an increased risk of serious violence on average. The mediating factors of violent acts, however, are most consistently found to be mainly socio-demographic and socio-economic factors such as being young, male, of lower socioeconomic status and, in particular, substance abuse (including alcoholism) to which some people may be particularly vulnerable.[19][104][108][109]

High-profile cases have led to fears that serious crimes, such as homicide, have increased due to deinstitutionalization, but the evidence does not support this conclusion.[109][110] Violence that does occur in relation to mental disorder (against the mentally ill or by the mentally ill) typically occurs in the context of complex social interactions, often in a family setting rather than between strangers.[111] It is also an issue in health care settings[112] and the wider community.[113]

In animals

Psychopathology in non-human primates has been studied since the mid-20th century. Over 20 behavioral patterns in captive chimpanzees have been documented as (statistically) abnormal for frequency, severity or oddness—some of which have also been observed in the wild. Captive great apes show gross behavioral abnormalities such as stereotypy of movements, self-mutilation, disturbed emotional reactions (mainly fear or aggression) towards companions, lack of species-typical communications, and generalized learned helplessness. In some cases such behaviors are hypothesized to be equivalent to symptoms associated with psychiatric disorders in humans such as depression, anxiety disorders, eating disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder. Concepts of antisocial, borderline and schizoid personality disorders have also been applied to non-human great apes.[114][115]

The risk of anthropomorphism is often raised with regard to such comparisons, and assessment of non-human animals cannot incorporate evidence from linguistic communication. However, available evidence may range from nonverbal behaviors—including physiological responses and homologous facial displays and acoustic utterances—to neurochemical studies. It is pointed out that human psychiatric classification is often based on statistical description and judgment of behaviors (especially when speech or language is impaired) and that the use of verbal self-report is itself problematic and unreliable.[114][116]

Psychopathology has generally been traced, at least in captivity, to adverse rearing conditions such as early separation of infants from mothers; early sensory deprivation; and extended periods of social isolation. Studies have also indicated individual variation in temperament, such as sociability or impulsiveness. Particular causes of problems in captivity have included integration of strangers into existing groups and a lack of individual space, in which context some pathological behaviors have also been seen as coping mechanisms. Remedial interventions have included careful individually tailored re-socialization programs, behavior therapy, environment enrichment, and on rare occasions psychiatric drugs. Socialization has been found to work 90% of the time in disturbed chimpanzees, although restoration of functional sexuality and care-giving is often not achieved.[114][117]

Laboratory researchers sometimes try to develop animal models of human mental disorders, including by inducing or treating symptoms in animals through genetic, neurological, chemical or behavioral manipulation,[118][119] but this has been criticized on empirical grounds[120] and opposed on animal rights grounds.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ a b WHO International Consortium in Psychiatric Epidemiology (2000) Cross-national comparisons of the prevalences and correlates of mental disorders, Bulletin of the World Health Organization v.78 n.4
  2. ^ Gazzaniga, M.S., & Heatherton, T.F. (2006). Psychological Science. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
  3. ^ WebMD Inc (2005, July 01). Mental Health: Types of Mental Illness. Retrieved April 19, 2007, from http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/mental-health-types-illness
  4. ^ United States Department of Health & Human Services. (1999). Overview of Mental Illness. Retrieved April 19, 2007
  5. ^ NIMH (2005) Teacher's Guide: Information about Mental Illness and the Brain Curriculum supplement from The NIH Curriculum Supplements Series
  6. ^ Phillip W. Long M.D. (1995–2008). "Disorders". Internet Mental Health. Retrieved 5 October 2009.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  7. ^ a b "Mental Health: Types of Mental Illness". WebMD. Retrieved 2009-09-29.
  8. ^ Akiskal HS, Benazzi F (May 2006). "The DSM-IV and ICD-10 categories of recurrent [major] depressive and bipolar II disorders: evidence that they lie on a dimensional spectrum". J Affect Disord. 92 (1): 45–54. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2005.12.035. PMID 16488021.
  9. ^ Clark LA (2007). "Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization". Annu Rev Psychol. 58: 227–57. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190200. PMID 16903806.
  10. ^ Morey LC, Hopwood CJ, Gunderson JG; et al. (July 2007). "Comparison of alternative models for personality disorders". Psychol Med. 37 (7): 983–94. doi:10.1017/S0033291706009482. PMID 17121690. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. ^ Gamma A, Angst J, Ajdacic V, Eich D, Rössler W (March 2007). "The spectra of neurasthenia and depression: course, stability and transitions". Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 257 (2): 120–7. doi:10.1007/s00406-006-0699-6. PMID 17131216.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  12. ^ Trimble, M. (NaN undefined NaN). "Uncommon psychiatric syndromes, 4th edn: Edited by M David Enoch and Hadrian N Ball (Pp 260, pound25.00). Published by Arnold Publishers, London, 2001. ISBN 0-340-76388-4". Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 73 (2): 211-c–212. doi:10.1136/jnnp.73.2.211-c. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  13. ^ Mac Suibhne, S. (2009). "What makes "a new mental illness"?: The cases of solastalgia and hubris syndrome". Cosmos and History. 5 (2): 210–225.
  14. ^ Harrison G, Hopper K, Craig T; et al. (June 2001). "Recovery from psychotic illness: a 15- and 25-year international follow-up study". Br J Psychiatry. 178 (6): 506–17. doi:10.1192/bjp.178.6.506. PMID 11388966. Retrieved 2008-07-04. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  15. ^ Jobe TH, Harrow M (December 2005). "Long-term outcome of patients with schizophrenia: a review" (PDF). Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 50 (14): 892–900. PMID 16494258. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
  16. ^ Tohen M, Zarate CA, Hennen J; et al. (December 2003). "The McLean-Harvard First-Episode Mania Study: prediction of recovery and first recurrence". Am J Psychiatry. 160 (12): 2099–107. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.12.2099. PMID 14638578. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. ^ Judd LL, Akiskal HS, Schettler PJ; et al. (December 2005). "Psychosocial disability in the course of bipolar I and II disorders: a prospective, comparative, longitudinal study" (PDF). Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 62 (12): 1322–30. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.12.1322. PMID 16330720. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  18. ^ Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation What is Psychiatric Disability and Mental Illness? Boston University, Retrieved January 2012
  19. ^ a b c Pilgrim, David; Rogers, Anne (2005). A sociology of mental health and illness (3rd ed.). [Milton Keynes]: Open University Press. ISBN 0-335-21583-1.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. ^ Ferney, V. (2003) The Hierarchy of Mental Illness: Which diagnosis is the least debilitating? New York City Voices Jan/March
  21. ^ Ormel, J. (1 May 2008). "Disability and treatment of specific mental and physical disorders across the world". The British Journal of Psychiatry. 192 (5): 368–375. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.039107. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  22. ^ Pamela Y. Collins, Vikram Patel, Sarah S. Joestl Grand challenges in global mental health 7 JULY 2011 | VOL 475 | NATURE | 27
  23. ^ Gore, FM (2011 Jun 18). "Global burden of disease in young people aged 10-24 years: a systematic analysis" (PDF). Lancet. 377 (9783): 2093–102. PMID 21652063. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  24. ^ "CIS: UN Body Takes On Rising Suicide Rates – Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty 2006".
  25. ^ O'Connor, Rory; Sheehy, Noel (29 Jan 2000). Understanding suicidal behaviour. Leicester: BPS Books. pp. 33–37. ISBN 978-1-85433-290-5.
  26. ^ Bertolote JM, Fleischmann A (2002). "Suicide and psychiatric diagnosis: a worldwide perspective". World Psychiatry. 1 (3): 181–5. ISSN 1723-8617. PMC 1489848. PMID 16946849. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  27. ^ Berrios G E (April 1999). "Classifications in psychiatry: a conceptual history". Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 33 (2): 145–60. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.1999.00555.x. PMID 10336212.
  28. ^ Perring, C. (2005) Mental Illness Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  29. ^ Kinderman P, Lobban F (2000). "Evolving formulations: Sharing complex information with clients". Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 28 (3): 307–10. doi:10.1017/S1352465800003118.
  30. ^ HealthWise (2004) Mental Health Assessment. Yahoo! Health
  31. ^ Davies T (May 1997). "ABC of mental health. Mental health assessment". BMJ. 314 (7093): 1536–9. PMC 2126757. PMID 9183204.
  32. ^ Kashner TM, Rush AJ, Surís A; et al. (May 2003). "Impact of structured clinical interviews on physicians' practices in community mental health settings". Psychiatr Serv. 54 (5): 712–8. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.54.5.712. PMID 12719503. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  33. ^ Shear MK, Greeno C, Kang J; et al. (April 2000). "Diagnosis of nonpsychotic patients in community clinics". Am J Psychiatry. 157 (4): 581–7. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.4.581. PMID 10739417. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  34. ^ Andreasen NC (1 May 1997). "What is psychiatry?". Am J Psychiatry. 154 (5): 591–3. PMID 9137110.
  35. ^ University of Melbourne. (2005, August 19). What is Psychiatry?. Retrieved April 19, 2007, from http://www.psychiatry.unimelb.edu.au/info/what_is_psych.html
  36. ^ California Psychiatric Association. (2007, February 28). Frequently Asked Questions About Psychiatry & Psychiatrists. Retrieved April 19, 2007, from http://www.calpsych.org/publications/cpa/faqs.html
  37. ^ American Psychological Association, Division 12, http://www.apa.org/divisions/div12/aboutcp.html
  38. ^ Golightley, M. (2004) Social work and Mental Health Learning Matters, UK
  39. ^ Goldstrom ID, Campbell J, Rogers JA; et al. (January 2006). "National estimates for mental health mutual support groups, self-help organizations, and consumer-operated services". Adm Policy Ment Health. 33 (1): 92–103. doi:10.1007/s10488-005-0019-x. PMID 16240075. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  40. ^ The Joseph Rowntree Foundation (1998) The experiences of mental health service users as mental health professionals
  41. ^ Chamberlin J (2005). "User/consumer involvement in mental health service delivery". Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 14 (1): 10–4. PMID 15792289.
  42. ^ Terence V. McCann, John Baird, Eileen Clark, Sai Lu (2006). "Beliefs about using consumer consultants in inpatient psychiatric units". International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 15 (4): 258–265. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0349.2006.00432.x. PMID 17064322.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  43. ^ Mind Disorders Encyclopedia Psychosurgery [Retrieved on August 5th 2008]
  44. ^ Mashour GA, Walker EE, Martuza RL (June 2005). "Psychosurgery: past, present, and future" (PDF). Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 48 (3): 409–19. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.09.002. PMID 15914249.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  45. ^ Lakhan SE, Vieira KF (2008). "Nutritional therapies for mental disorders". Nutr J. 7 (1): 2. doi:10.1186/1475-2891-7-2. PMC 2248201. PMID 18208598.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  46. ^ Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE (June 2005). "Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication". Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 62 (6): 593–602. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593. PMID 15939837.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  47. ^ "The World Mental Health Survey Initiative".
  48. ^ Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Posada-Villa J; et al. (June 2004). "Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys". JAMA. 291 (21): 2581–90. doi:10.1001/jama.291.21.2581. PMID 15173149. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  49. ^ Somers JM, Goldner EM, Waraich P, Hsu L (February 2006). "Prevalence and incidence studies of anxiety disorders: a systematic review of the literature". Can J Psychiatry. 51 (2): 100–13. PMID 16989109.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  50. ^ Waraich P, Goldner EM, Somers JM, Hsu L (February 2004). "Prevalence and incidence studies of mood disorders: a systematic review of the literature". Can J Psychiatry. 49 (2): 124–38. PMID 15065747.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  51. ^ Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE (June 2005). "Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication". Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 62 (6): 593–602. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593. PMID 15939837.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  52. ^ Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Merikangas KR, Walters EE (June 2005). "Prevalence, Severity, and Comorbidity of Twelve-month DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R)". Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 62 (6): 617–27. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617. PMC 2847357. PMID 15939839.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  53. ^ US National Institute of Mental Health (2006) The Numbers Count: Mental Disorders in America Retrieved May 2007
  54. ^ Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Bernert S; et al. (2004). "Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project". Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 109 (420): 21–7. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0047.2004.00327.x. PMID 15128384. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  55. ^ Wittchen HU, Jacobi F (August 2005). "Size and burden of mental disorders in Europe—a critical review and appraisal of 27 studies". Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 15 (4): 357–76. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.04.012. PMID 15961293.
  56. ^ Saha S, Chant D, Welham J, McGrath J (May 2005). "A Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Schizophrenia". PLoS Med. 2 (5): e141. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020141. PMC 1140952. PMID 15916472.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  57. ^ Torgersen S, Kringlen E, Cramer V (June 2001). "The prevalence of personality disorders in a community sample". Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 58 (6): 590–6. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.58.6.590. PMID 11386989.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  58. ^ Grant BF, Hasin DS, Stinson FS; et al. (July 2004). "Prevalence, correlates, and disability of personality disorders in the United States: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions". J Clin Psychiatry. 65 (7): 948–58. doi:10.4088/JCP.v65n0711. PMID 15291684. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  59. ^ Carter AS, Briggs-Gowan MJ, Davis NO (January 2004). "Assessment of young children's social-emotional development and psychopathology: recent advances and recommendations for practice". J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 45 (1): 109–34. doi:10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00316.x. PMID 14959805.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  60. ^ World Health Organization Gender disparities and mental health: The Facts Last retrieved January 12 2012
  61. ^ Heinimaa M (October 2002). "Incomprehensibility: the role of the concept in DSM-IV definition of schizophrenic delusions" (PDF). Med Health Care Philos. 5 (3): 291–5. doi:10.1023/A:1021164602485. PMID 12517037.
  62. ^ Pierre JM (May 2001). "Faith or delusion? At the crossroads of religion and psychosis". J Psychiatr Pract. 7 (3): 163–72. doi:10.1097/00131746-200105000-00004. PMID 15990520.
  63. ^ Johnson CV, Friedman HL (2008). "Enlightened or Delusional? Differentiating Religious, Spiritual, and Transpersonal Experiences from Psychopathology". Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 48 (4): 505–27. doi:10.1177/0022167808314174.
  64. ^ Everett B (1994). "Something is happening: the contemporary consumer and psychiatric survivor movement in historical context". Journal of Mind and Behavior. 15 (1–2): 55–7.
  65. ^ Rissmiller DJ, Rissmiller JH (June 2006). "Evolution of the antipsychiatry movement into mental health consumerism". Psychiatr Serv. 57 (6): 863–6. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.57.6.863. PMID 16754765.
  66. ^ Oaks D (August 2006). "The evolution of the consumer movement". Psychiatr Serv. 57 (8): 1212, author reply 1216. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.57.8.1212. PMID 16870979.
  67. ^ The Antipsychiatry Coalition. (2005, November 26). The Antipsychiatry Coalition. Retrieved April 19, 2007, from antipsychiatry.org
  68. ^ O'Brien AP, Woods M, Palmer C (March 2001). "The emancipation of nursing practice: applying anti-psychiatry to the therapeutic community". Aust N Z J Ment Health Nurs. 10 (1): 3–9. doi:10.1046/j.1440-0979.2001.00183.x. PMID 11421968.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  69. ^ Weitz D (2003). "Call me antipsychiatry activist—not "consumer"". Ethical Hum Sci Serv. 5 (1): 71–2. PMID 15279009.
  70. ^ Patel, V., Prince, M. (2010). Global mental health - a new global health field comes of age. JAMA, 303, 1976-1977.
  71. ^ a b Widiger TA, Sankis LM (2000). "Adult psychopathology: issues and controversies". Annu Rev Psychol. 51: 377–404. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.377. PMID 10751976.
  72. ^ Shankar Vedantam, Psychiatry's Missing Diagnosis: Patients' Diversity Is Often Discounted Washington Post: Mind and Culture, June 26
  73. ^ Kleinman A (1997). "Triumph or pyrrhic victory? The inclusion of culture in DSM-IV". Harv Rev Psychiatry. 4 (6): 343–4. doi:10.3109/10673229709030563. PMID 9385013.
  74. ^ Bhugra, D. & Munro, A. (1997) Troublesome Disguises: Underdiagnosed Psychiatric Syndromes Blackwell Science Ltd
  75. ^ Clark LA (2006). "The role of moral judgment in personality disorder diagnosis". J Pers Disord. 20 (2): 184–5. doi:10.1521/pedi.2006.20.2.184.
  76. ^ Karasz A (April 2005). "Cultural differences in conceptual models of depression". Social Science in Medicine. 60 (7): 1625–35. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.011. PMID 15652693.
  77. ^ Tilbury, F.; Rapley, M. (2004). "'There are orphans in Africa still looking for my hands': African women refugees and the sources of emotional distress". Health Sociology Review. 13 (1): 54–64. doi:10.5555/hesr.2004.13.1.54. {{cite journal}}: Check |doi= value (help)
  78. ^ Bracken P, Thomas P (March 2001). "Postpsychiatry: a new direction for mental health". BMJ. 322 (7288): 724–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7288.724. PMC 1119907. PMID 11264215.
  79. ^ Lewis B (2000). "Psychiatry and Postmodern Theory". J Med Humanit. 21 (2): 71–84. doi:10.1023/A:1009018429802.
  80. ^ Kwate NO (2005). "The heresy of African-centered psychology". J Med Humanit. 26 (4): 215–35. doi:10.1007/s10912-005-7698-x. PMID 16333686.
  81. ^ Commentary on institutional racism in psychiatry, 2007
  82. ^ a b c d World Health Organization (2005) WHO Resource Book on Mental Health: Human rights and legislation ISBN 924156282 (PDF)
  83. ^ Sklar R (June 2007). "Starson v. Swayze: the Supreme Court speaks out (not all that clearly) on the question of "capacity"". Can J Psychiatry. 52 (6): 390–6. PMID 17696026.
  84. ^ Manitoba Family Services and Housing. The Vulnerable Persons Living with a Mental Disability Act, 1996
  85. ^ ENABLE website UN section on disability
  86. ^ CAMH: Toronto Star Opinion Editorial: Ending stigma of mental illness
  87. ^ Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General - Chapter 8
  88. ^ Stuart H (September 2006). "Mental illness and employment discrimination". Curr Opin Psychiatry. 19 (5): 522–6. doi:10.1097/01.yco.0000238482.27270.5d. PMID 16874128.
  89. ^ Stop Stigma
  90. ^ Read J, Haslam N, Sayce L, Davies E (November 2006). "Prejudice and schizophrenia: a review of the 'mental illness is an illness like any other' approach". Acta Psychiatr Scand. 114 (5): 303–18. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00824.x. PMID 17022790.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  91. ^ Study Finds Serious Mental Illness Often Dismissed by Local Church Newswise, Retrieved on October 15, 2008.
  92. ^ Psychiatric diagnoses are less reliable than star signs Times Online, June 2009
  93. ^ Coverdate J, Nairn R, Claasen D (2001). "Depictions of mental illness in print media: a prospective national sample". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 36 (5): 697–700. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.00998.x. PMID 12225457.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  94. ^ Edney, RD. (2004) Mass Media and Mental Illness: A Literature Review Canadian Mental Health Association
  95. ^ Diefenbach DL (1998). "The portrayal of mental illness on prime-time television". Journal of Community Psychology. 25 (3): 289–302. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199705)25:3<289::AID-JCOP5>3.0.CO;2-R.
  96. ^ Sieff, E (2003). "Media frames of mental illnesses: The potential impact of negative frames". Journal of Mental Health. 12 (3): 259–69. doi:10.1080/0963823031000118249. [dead link]
  97. ^ Wahl, O.F. (2003). "News Media Portrayal of Mental Illness: Implications for Public Policy". American Behavioral Scientist. 46 (12): 1594–600. doi:10.1177/0002764203254615.
  98. ^ The Carter Center (2008-07-18). "The Carter Center Awards 2008-2009 Rosalynn Carter Fellowships for Mental Health Journalism". Retrieved 2008-07-21.
  99. ^ The Carter Center. "The Rosalynn Carter Fellowships For Mental Health JournalisM". Retrieved 2008-07-21.
  100. ^ The Carter Center. "Rosalynn Carter's Advocacy in Mental Health". Retrieved 2008-07-21.
  101. ^ Link BG, Phelan JC, Bresnahan M, Stueve A, Pescosolido BA (September 1999). "Public conceptions of mental illness: labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance". Am J Public Health. 89 (9): 1328–33. doi:10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1328. PMC 1508784. PMID 10474548.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  102. ^ Pescosolido BA, Monahan J, Link BG, Stueve A, Kikuzawa S (September 1999). "The public's view of the competence, dangerousness, and need for legal coercion of persons with mental health problems". Am J Public Health. 89 (9): 1339–45. doi:10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1339. PMC 1508769. PMID 10474550.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  103. ^ Elbogen EB, Johnson SC (February 2009). "The intricate link between violence and mental disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions". Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 66 (2): 152–61. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2008.537. PMID 19188537.
  104. ^ a b Stuart H (June 2003). "Violence and mental illness: an overview". World Psychiatry. 2 (2): 121–124. PMC 1525086. PMID 16946914.
  105. ^ Brekke JS, Prindle C, Bae SW, Long JD (October 2001). "Risks for individuals with schizophrenia who are living in the community". Psychiatr Serv. 52 (10): 1358–66. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.52.10.1358. PMID 11585953.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  106. ^ Linda A. Teplin, PhD; Gary M. McClelland, PhD; Karen M. Abram, PhD; Dana A. Weiner, PhD (2005) Crime Victimization in Adults With Severe Mental Illness: Comparison With the National Crime Victimization Survey Arch Gen Psychiatry. 62(8):911-921.
  107. ^ Petersilia, J.R. (2001) Crime Victims With Developmental Disabilities: A Review Essay Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 28, No. 6, 655-694 (2001)
  108. ^ Steadman HJ, Mulvey EP, Monahan J, Robbins PC, Appelbaum PS, Grisso T, Roth LH, Silver E. (1998) Violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and by others in the same neighborhoods. Archives of General Psychiatry. May;55(5):393-401.
  109. ^ a b Fazel S, Gulati G, Linsell L, Geddes JR, Grann M (August 2009). McGrath, John (ed.). "Schizophrenia and Violence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". PLoS Med. 6 (8): e1000120. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000120. PMC 2718581. PMID 19668362.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  110. ^ Taylor, P.J., Gunn, J. (1999) Homicides by people with mental illness: Myth and reality British Journal of Psychiatry Volume 174, Issue JAN., 1999, Pages 9-14
  111. ^ Solomon, PL., Cavanaugh, MM., Gelles, RJ. (2005). "Family Violence among Adults with Severe Mental Illness". Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 6 (1): 40–54. doi:10.1177/1524838004272464. PMID 15574672.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  112. ^ Chou KR, Lu RB, Chang M (December 2001). "Assaultive behavior by psychiatric in-patients and its related factors". J Nurs Res. 9 (5): 139–51. doi:10.1097/01.JNR.0000347572.60800.00. PMID 11779087.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  113. ^ B. Lögdberg, L.-L. Nilsson, M. T. Levander, S. Levander (2004). "Schizophrenia, neighborhood, and crime". Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 110 (2): 92. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0047.2004.00322.x/abs/.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  114. ^ a b c Brüne M, Brüne-Cohrs U, McGrew WC, Preuschoft S (2006). "Psychopathology in great apes: concepts, treatment options and possible homologies to human psychiatric disorders". Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 30 (8): 1246–59. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.09.002. PMID 17141312.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  115. ^ Ferdowsian, HR (2011). "Signs of mood and anxiety disorders in chimpanzees". PloS one. 6 (6): e19855. PMID 21698223. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  116. ^ Fabrega H (2006). "Making sense of behavioral irregularities of great apes". Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 30 (8): 1260–73, discussion 1274–7. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.09.004. PMID 17079015.
  117. ^ Lilienfeld SO, Gershon J, Duke M, Marino L, de Waal FB (December 1999). "A preliminary investigation of the construct of psychopathic personality (psychopathy) in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)". J Comp Psychol. 113 (4): 365–75. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.113.4.365. PMID 10608560.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  118. ^ Moran M (June 20, 2003). "Animals Can Model Psychiatric Symptoms". Psychiatric News. 38 (12): 20.
  119. ^ Sánchez MM, Ladd CO, Plotsky PM (2001). "Early adverse experience as a developmental risk factor for later psychopathology: evidence from rodent and primate models". Dev. Psychopathol. 13 (3): 419–49. doi:10.1017/S0954579401003029. PMID 11523842.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  120. ^ Matthews K, Christmas D, Swan J, Sorrell E (2005). "Animal models of depression: navigating through the clinical fog". Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 29 (4–5): 503–13. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.03.005. PMID 15925695.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

Further reading

  • Atkinson, J. (2006) Private and Public Protection: Civil Mental Health Legislation, Edinburgh, Dunedin Academic Press ISBN 1903765617
  • Hockenbury, Don and Sandy (2004). Discovering Psychology. Worth Publishers. ISBN 0-7167-5704-4.
  • Fried, Yehuda and Joseph Agassi, (1976). Paranoia: A Study in Diagnosis. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 50. ISBN 90-277-0704-9.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Fried, Yehuda and Joseph Agassi, (1983). Psychiatry as Medicine. The HAgue, Nijhoff. ISBN 90-247-2837-1.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Porter, Roy (2002). Madness: a brief history. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-280266-6.
  • Weller M.P.I. and Eysenck M. The Scientific Basis of Psychiatry, W.B. Saunders, London, Philadelphia, Toronto etc. 1992
  • Wiencke, Markus (2006) Schizophrenie als Ergebnis von Wechselwirkungen: Georg Simmels Individualitätskonzept in der Klinischen Psychologie. In David Kim (ed.), Georg Simmel in Translation: Interdisciplinary Border-Crossings in Culture and Modernity (pp. 123–155). Cambridge Scholars Press, Cambridge, ISBN 1-84718-060-5

External links

Listen to this article
(2 parts, 12 minutes)
Spoken Wikipedia icon
These audio files were created from a revision of this article dated
Error: no date provided
, and do not reflect subsequent edits.

Template:Medical conditions Template:Mental illness (alphabetical list)