User talk:Hindian1947: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:30, 30 September 2020

Welcome!

Hello, Hindian1947, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Religion in Seychelles have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:55, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

Leaving your question in italics like the following will be very much appreciated and will help us both:

  eg. Hinduism in Tonga - Why did you create this article?

Questions Below:

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hinduism in New Zealand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamilton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hinduism in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Levy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Religion in Seychelles, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 19:32, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your new article Federation of Northern Syria

Hi, as your new article Federation of Northern Syria seems redundant to Rojava, I started a discussion on Talk:Federation of Northern Syria asking for your clarification. Unless you can point out some striking arguments why a separate article would be a good idea, I'm tempted to file an WP:AfD request. Note also that the federation doesn't mean a partition of Syria. Regards, PanchoS (talk) 11:09, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hindian1947. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hindian1947. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hindian1947. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced material

Please add proper sources when you add material to any article, and don't add categories unless there is content in the article which support them. For example, you added a category to Papatoetoe, but there was no mention of the subject in the article. You also added Papatoetoe to the article Hindu enclave, saying that 2013 census data was used, but didn't specify where you got this data from (eg, a URL). According to http://archive.stats.govt.nz/Census/2013-census/profile-and-summary-reports/quickstats-about-a-place.aspx?request_value=13475&tabname=Culturaldiversity, 19% of residents of Central Papatoetoe speak Hindi, which is not a plurality, so you will need to have a better source than I could immediately find.-gadfium 22:45, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Response with Source

Hi, I just collected some data from the 2013 census through nz.stat. First off, Hindi is a language so that's not relevant. Second, an enclave is loosely defined, but over 10% of the population is a good measuring stick. I collected the data from papatoetoe central, as well as east, north and west(no south exists) and uploaded the file directly here: http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=01411423459795357035\ The only problem is that we have to go through an intermediary since these tables cannot be loaded up like a url.

I also calculated the percentages since nz stat doesn't do it for some reason. The Hindu percentage in pap west is 16.8%, north 15.0%, central 18.9% and 18% in east. I put in the other two major denominations in nz(anglican/catholic) and found that Hinduism in all of the suburbs mentioned is the single largest denomination, and not only above 10%, but above 15%.(If the threshhold were to be 15%, then Australia would lose a lot of enclaves that are around 10-14%.) Hindian1947 (talk) 01:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to supply a source, not a spreadsheet of your own making. Also, the article Hindu enclave, which you wrote, says "A Hindu Enclave is a type of religious enclave in which Hindus constitute either a clear majority or a plurality in a foreign land", and the figures in your spreadsheet do not constitute a majority or plurality.-gadfium 03:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- I don't know why you're being so difficult. 1. Spreadsheet was not "of my making", it was directly from Stats NZ, even has their watermark thing. 2. The one I wrote you seem to have by accident skipped the second line("Hindu enclaves are also when their proportion of the population exceeds 10% of the population in an area."), and both of these sentences were there from the start. Hopefully that clears up the confusion. 3. Like I said, there is no direct source FOR RELIGION in a suburb except the online tool which one has to use themselves with the correct variables. 4. An indirect source that takes from Stats NZ: http://www.mashblock.nz/area-unit/papatoetoe-central Hindian1947 (talk) 05:02, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - The 10% criteria for an ethnic enclave appears rather extreme. If this is your definition, you don't need your first sentence referring to a majority or plurality. You do need a source. Our ethnic enclave article doesn't give a definition in terms of proportions, but says "an ethnic enclave is a geographic area with high ethnic concentration, characteristic cultural identity, and economic activity". You will need to provide a source for each item in Hindu enclave to demonstrate this.-gadfium 18:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

similarly for Bali/Indonesia - WP:RS please - please do not add without as that is WP:OR - thanks JarrahTree 23:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hindu enclave for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hindu enclave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu enclave until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. regentspark (comment) 21:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Allahabad, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DBig Xrayᗙ 09:44, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Faizabad division

Do not move pages without abiding by WP:COMMONNAME. No consensus has been reached regarding change of Faizabad district or division to Ajodhya in Wikipedia. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:43, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Politics of Ladakh

Hello, Hindian1947,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Politics of Ladakh, for deletion, because it's impossible to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 21:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Kautilya3 (talk) 13:35, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why you have changed the redirect target for Jammu and Kashmir, while it is under an RFD? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:51, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning: if you do this again, you will be looking at a t-ban. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:39, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jammu and Kashmir (princely state); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 00:30, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jammu and Kashmir (union territory

A tag has been placed on Jammu and Kashmir (union territory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:59, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jammu and Kashmir union territory)

A tag has been placed on Jammu and Kashmir union territory) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:59, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COMMONNAME

We follow WP:COMMONNAME. So do not move article to a name if it is not the most common in English language. Simple google searches would yield 200 million for Hyderabad-Karnataka but only 2 million for Kalyana-Karnataka. There are a lot of things like Bangalore, Allahabad, etc that didn't get their names changed as per WP:COMMONNAME. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:23, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anis Farooqui for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anis Farooqui is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anis Farooqui until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 12:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of TAG TV for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TAG TV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TAG TV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 18:04, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hamid Bashani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hamid Bashani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamid Bashani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 18:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Shyama Murkherjee Port

You mightly provide wrong spelling. Honorable prime minister Modi tweet wrong spelling by mistake. (https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/pm-modi-renames-kolkata-port-trust-after-shyama-prasad-mukherjee-1636156-2020-01-12 ) It needless to say that Honorable prime minister mistake on Twitter by writing wrong spelling. But This is not fact. Original spelling is Shyama. AmitMondal1299 (talk) 10:00, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amit Thackeray

The article Amit Thackeray has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't deserve standalone article yet, references only establishes that subject is WP:BLP1E, fails WP:NPOL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Accesscrawl (talk) 06:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amit Thackeray for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amit Thackeray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Thackeray until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Accesscrawl (talk) 16:54, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your recent edits concerning Khotan. Most of the work I have done on Xinjiang focuses on Chinese source material, so please add more Indian sources to the Kashgar, Yarkant, Taxkorgan, Kuqa, Turpan, etc pages as you can. Kanishka's empire reached this area [1] but I don't know much about it. Thanks again! Geographyinitiative (talk) 09:44, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 2020 Delhi riots, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. SerChevalerie (talk) 20:00, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Jammu and Kashmir Workers Party logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jammu and Kashmir Workers Party logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amjad Ayub Mirza

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amjad Ayub Mirza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amjad Ayub Mirza. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 04:05, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amjad Ayub Mirza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amjad Ayub Mirza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amjad Ayub Mirza (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 13:23, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mirpur District

Hi. I tweaked the language in your addition a bit but am unsure as to who did the killing (Pakistani tribesmen?). Could you complete the sentence "were killed by ..." appropriately? Thanks. --RegentsPark (comment) 00:48, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Violence against Hindus has been nominated for merging

Category:Violence against Hindus has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 14:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1947–1948 Rajouri massacre

The article 1947–1948 Rajouri massacre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, made-up term, with scanty evidence. Only passing mentions in sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:27, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 1947-48 Rajouri Massacre into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 255: / Line 255: @@
 Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 15:27, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
+== September 2020 ==
+[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Hindian1947|your contributions]] to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from [[:1947-48 Rajouri Massacre]] into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, [[WP:Copyrights|Wikipedia's licensing]] does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and [[Help:Link#Wikilinks|linking]] to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>[[page name]]</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at [[Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying --> [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 15:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)