User talk:CambridgeBayWeather

It is approximately 9:37 PM where this user lives (Cambridge Bay). []

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas CambridgeBayWeather
	Hi CambridgeBayWeather, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia,    –Davey2010Talk 19:41, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho

Donner60 (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.

This year passed slower than Christmas!

🔔🎁⛄️🎅🏻 Atsme 💬 📧 10:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!

Hello, CambridgeBayWeather! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Linguist111^talk 23:18, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}

Merry Christmas !

Hello CambridgeBayWeather: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:25, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pasupati Group

Hello CambridgeBayWeather. Could you please consider re-opening this AfD to give it more time to reach consensus? So far there was only the author and one other person who participated, so I think some more time for others to give their opinions would be worthwhile. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 01:02, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

MrsSnoozyTurtle there were three people. You could start another AfD. Better than reopening. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 04:56, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Miminiska

The lodge and lake are named Miminiska, every other Wikipedia page mentioning the lake and lodge also say Miminiska, other than the Eabametoong page. AnOblongBox (talk) 06:19, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Everything is Going to be Alright, Martin Creed, 2015.

Thank you for all your edits and contributions this year. I wish you a happy holiday and good health! Possibly (talk)

PS: I really enjoyed the Cambridge Bay pics. Stay safe. Possibly (talk) 02:54, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Jenna Coleman

Why did you protect the page "Jenna Coleman" while keeping wrong, unverified, and wrong tabloid rumours in there? None of the articles listed that claim that she had split from Tom Hughes provide any evidence whatsoever, while in contrast there is so much evidence to show that they did not split. Do you think Wikipedia is a place to support tabloid lies that have been proven to be wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by EulerLagrange42 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

	Happy New Year!
	Hello CambridgeBayWeather: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:35, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

Happy New Year!

Empire AS ^Talk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2020 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Empire AS ^Talk! 18:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year, CambridgeBayWeather!

Happy New Year!

CambridgeBayWeather,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010^Talk 00:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Deaths in 2021

Hi, happy new year and thanks for protecting the page. However, you set the protection to expire on 5 Jan 2021. The Deaths in XXXX pages are normally protected for the whole year, so could you please change the protection and set it to expire on 5 Jan 2022? Thanks and cheers. --Marbe166 (talk) 15:44, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year. That goes against WP:NO-PREEMPT. If they return it can be protected for longer periods. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:01, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Antifa full protection

Why have you put full protection on Antifa (United States)? Many editors have been working on that page constructively now we're almost all blocked because MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken was edit warring? That's not fair at all. Why not just block MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken for editwarring rather than blocking all of us from contributing? Surely that's a fairer way to approach this? Bacondrum (talk) 23:41, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Bacondrum. It was protected because CLCStudent made a request here and when I looked at the page I saw MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken and Doug Weller both reverting twice. All it needs is a few days discussion and it can be unprotected again. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:55, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Cool, thanks for explaining. All the best. Bacondrum (talk) 23:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. I would have blocked both of them but that Doug Weller is a Florida Man originally and is thus quite scary. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:01, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Do you reckon you could unlock the article now, I've filed an edit warring report. I don't think it's fair we are all locked out because MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken turned up one day and decided to edit war. Just block them. Bacondrum (talk) 06:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

@Bacondrum: They don't seem to have broken 3RR, they've only reverted twice. I doubt that they'll be blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, that's one of the funniest things I've ever been called, thanks! Doug Weller talk 07:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

So why can't we edit the article. Collective punishment? If an editor can't stop reverting then stop them from editing, not all of us. This fella just turned up and started edit warring and now no one can edit, that seems insane to me. Bacondrum (talk) 08:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Oh shit! @Bacondrum: pardon my French, but not having edited that article in a long time I didn't realise it was at 1RR. I can see why CambridgeBayWeather mentions both of us being blocked. Maybe I should revert myself, but I still think it's a BLP violation and besides Admins shouldn't be editing a fully protected article without an excellent reason such as vandalism, copyvio, or BLP issues. Doug Weller talk 12:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

I never thought about it being under discretionary sanctions either. There are too many notices, 13 or 14 boxes, at the top of Talk:Antifa (United States). I don't like fully blocking people in things like this because it stops any productive discussion, which was being held on the talk page at that time. I also forgot about the ability to block from individual pages. It's −37 °C (−35 °F) here and my brain is frozen. Looking at what has been said I don't think there will be any more edit warring so I'll unprotect the page and it looks like EC is there now. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Cambridge. Wouldn't it be usual to log your EC protection in WP:Arbitration enforcement log/2021 even though that's the same level of protection that was there before. EdJohnston (talk) 18:12, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Probably. Done it now. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for that. -37! Wow! Never experienced anything like that. Bacondrum (talk) 21:51, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Welcome. It warmed up as it was −41 °C (−42 °F) last week. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:14, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

CambridgeBayWeather,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

---

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

You've got mail

Hello, CambridgeBayWeather. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Doug Weller talk 12:22, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).

Administrator changes

Hammersoft

Andres • Brion VIBBER • Rkitko • Thatcher

CheckUser changes

Barkeep49 • BDD • CaptainEek • Primefac

Oversight changes

Barkeep49 • BDD • CaptainEek

Joe Roe

Guideline and policy news

• Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.

Technical news

• You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.

Arbitration

• By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes). The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason).
• Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Just FYI - Palagummi Sainath

Hi - I see you page protected Palagummi Sainath for vandalism. There hasn't been any vandalism nor any BLP violations. User:Anasuyas was concerned about edits being made by User:GreenBlueYellow. I was contacted by Anasuya on a non-wiki platform about it and I suggested that they work it out on the talk page, as she had not yet contacted GreenBlueYellow. I did see she asked for some assistance via BLP board, but, didn't think it was necessary. I took the initiative to clean up the article, as it was a mess, and myself and User:MumbaiMedia are now doing a bit of tweaking and clean up to improve. I don't think it needs page protection, but, that's just my opinion. Anyway, have a good day. Missvain (talk) 18:57, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Missvain No problem. Removed. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! Happy New Year! Missvain (talk) 19:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year. You are welcome. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Name modifying of the article Relax(collective)

Hello!

If it's not bothering you, I would like to ask you the reason why you change the name of the president article RELAX(chiarenza & hauser & co) to Relax(collective), as the artists of this collective called themself as RELAX(chiarenza & hauser & co) since 1997? And the recents articles talked about them also used their name RELAX(chiarenza & hauser & co). (ref:https://www.sikart.ch/KuenstlerInnen.aspx?id=11000024) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xinyi Fox Hu (talk • contribs) 14:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Xinyi Fox Hu I checked at http://www.relax-studios.ch/ and there was no indication of an unspaced ( being used. So is the correct name of the company "Relax chiarenza & hauser & co" as shown here or "Relax (chiarenza & hauser & co)" as shown here. It appears that everybody use the () except the collective itself. Wikipedia uses normal English rules so Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks would apply to the word "Relax". CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Reprotecting a page

Hi, on the 4th January you semi-protected the page Dream (YouTuber) with an expiration date of 18 January 2021, however the protection was removed when the page was deleted to merge the history with a draft. Is it possible for you to re-instate the protection? Kind regards, Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:08, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Hemiauchenia. I was taking a break. Looks like it got fixed. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for your help and contribs! -- KindCowboy69 ☮ 02:53 AM January 11, 2021 02:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Cathy Areu

Hi, part of the point of semi-protection is to encourage the IP to create an account so that a discussion can be had about COI and how to request changes on talk. This can't be done when the IP address keeps changing, and pending changes is unlikely to achieve it. If you really are unwilling to add semi-protection, please add the page to your watchlist so that you can maintain it from now on, as I prefer not to work with pending changes. SarahSV ^(talk) 19:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

There is not enough activity at this time to require semi protection. In fact there isn't really much justification for pending but because of who you are I figured it was acceptable. However, you should stop with the attempts to guilt me into doing what you ask. Have you thought about a range block? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Taking the article off my watchlist is no skin off my nose, and it's not a question of trying to "guilt" you. It's that an editor asked for help at RfPP with a long-term problem, and an admin responded by making things harder for that editor (in that editor's opinion), then dug his heels in about it. That's just not a good use of RfPP.

Pending changes is fiddly and adds to the workload. In addition, the problem is long-term, so looking at whether there's "enough activity at this time" for semi-protection missed the point. And if semi-protection can't be justified in your view, a range block certainly can't. The IP isn't doing anything wrong from their perspective; they simply need to be stopped from doing it at that article so they create an account, which will allow discussion to take place about apparent COI and how to request edits. The easiest way to achieve that was with semi-protection. But I'm repeating myself, so I'll leave it there. SarahSV ^(talk) 21:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

RFPP

Thanks a lot for going through the whole list (yet again), much appreciated.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:37, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Request to remove move blocks by User:BereanHunter

Good afternoon User:CambridgeBayWeather Wikipedia Administrator,

As a Cypriot Greek in Camden , London I noticed that trying to submit a draft on Theatro Technis on the Wikipedia EN page has been restricted to administrators by a User Berean Hunter, a) 04:20, 28 February 2020 Berean Hunter talk contribs protected Draft:Theatro Technis [Create=Require administrator access] (indefinite) (Repeatedly recreated) which in reality means zero chance of it happening. b) I noticed on this User`s talk page that BereanHunter has been removed as a check user : changes to functionary team[edit] At his own request, the Oversight permission of Someguy1221 are removed. In addition, in accordance with the policy on CheckUser and Oversighter inactivity, the CheckUser rights of Berean Hunter are removed. The Arbitration Committee sincerely thanks Someguy1221 and Berean Hunter for their service as functionaries. For the Arbitration Committee, Katietalk 15:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC) Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § changes to functionary team c) I also have noticed that you have on a previous occasion removed his administrator access] (indefinite) on the Angelique Rockas article but still restricted its editing. d) There is something wrong here as Theatro Technis and Angelique Rockas are artistically linked , and suspicions arise as to whether this User was an ethno racist. e)Googling and binging the artist Angelique Rockas you can also see that there are serious omissions of her theatre work. Can this be attributed to User:BereanHunter and colluders? Can you remedy this? Thank you IPG adress recorded Keep safe! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.191.67.225 (talk) 11:51, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

I can't make sense of this. It's just a non-stop, small wall of text. Berean Hunter is an administrator and call deal with your request but I suggest that you don't insult people. 12:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Good Morning @CambridgeBayWater

Sorry for the messy post and my inadequacy, and I apologize for the insult. Thank you for the link to Berean Hunter ,which on its contribution page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Berean_Hunter reveals that he has not operated as a Wikipedia administrator and contributor since October 1st 2020. Berean Hunter has also been removed by the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee from being a CheckUser. This leaves the problem that any submission of an article by the lay public on Theatro Technis (in red ) seen in the Angelique Rockas article is restricted to a draft only submitted by administrators. As previously indicated in reality this means zero chance of it happening. My request to you please is that you remove this block by the non operational Berean Hunter on the Draft Theatro Technis , as well as blocks to the lay public on the Angelique Rockas page and allow the lay public to do its job. On the Angelique Rockas page the connection to work at Theatro Technis is considerable , and the work related to Internationalist Theatre and work as an artist is in need of citation, text for the production photographs on this page, performances and reception et. It has not had any contributions for quite some time. As you are the most recent monitor on this artist`s page there is no need for blocks as you will be policing it for any fakery. Thank you Keep safe IPG address recorded — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.191.67.225 (talk) 12:42, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

I'm not the moderator, nobody is, for Angelique Rockas and I don't think reducing the protection level is a good idea. As for the Theatro Technis there is nothing to stop you from creating an account and starting the article in you own user space. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Daniel Hannan

Thanks for semi-protecting Daniel Hannan for two weeks, but I'm afraid the IP edit warrior returned the instant the protection lapsed. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 17:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Jonathan A Jones OK. Try a month. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Rename Bhurgari to Bhurgri

Hello, its important we should rename Bhurgari to mostly spelled Bhurgri, more than 90 percent of people spell is t Bhurgri insted of Bhurgari. Kindly change it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asadbhurgri121 (talk • contribs) 12:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Asadbhurgri121 go to Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves and follow the instructions. I have no idea what the correct name is. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:34, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Bold print in destination charts

Please note that bold print is used to mark seasonal routes in several hundred airport articles in this Wiki as it is stated like that in the airports content template for years. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:A61:10B3:7001:306C:204C:9409:51C0 (talk) 20:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Except that Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Text formatting#When not to use boldface says that it should not be there. Plus there is no reason whatsoever for bolding the airport idents in te infobox or the double ident. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

Administrator changes

Hog Farm

Mattflaschen • Nandesuka • Savidan • Wangi

CheckUser changes

Berean Hunter • Xeno

Oversight changes

Someguy1221 • Xeno

Arbitration

• The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people, replacing the 1932 cutoff.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
• Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Partial issues pending

Hi, thanks for removing WP:SALT from Neel Bhattacharya through request at WP:RfPP per this, but the salt of Talk:Neel Bhattacharya needs to be removed to edit it. Can you help regarding this. Thank you.

Amkgp Done. Sorry I missed that. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 14:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

CambridgeBayWeather, Thanks — Amkgp 💬 14:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Question re: article - Decentralized Trials and Research Alliance (DTRA)

Good morning,

Thanks for the guidance on the DTRA page. I just had two quick questions, and I'm hoping you wouldn't mind sharing your advice. Since the articles cited were publicly available, do I need to obtain the copyright permission to cite or quote from them, or was my use proper? In addition, were the quotes simply too long? I felt that I could make the point with much shorter quotes, but wanted to confirm if the length of the three quotes were problematic.

I edited a few articles some years ago, but this is the first article I've actually written for Wikipedia, so I'm looking for whatever guidance you can share. Thank you, in advance.

John — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnobianchi (talk • contribs) 15:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Jnobianchi. Do you have a link to where the material was released under a licence compatible with Wikipedia. The original posting. Being freely available is not the same thing as being available as CC BY-SA and GFDL. It looked like a press release and as such shouldn't really be added. Short quotes are OK but need to be identified as such. Example "this is a quote" and a reference. Also the article shouldn't be built on what a company says about itself. It should be built on what others say. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:CambridgeBayWeather Thank you - I'm not sure if this is the right way to respond, but can't figure out where else to respond. clearly, I'm having trouble. I'm not sure where I would find the link to where source material is released under license. Do I need to contact the webmaster at the publication's website to get that link? I'm sorry to be asking so many incredibly basic questions, but I'm really very confused by the process. Again, I appreciate your patience. John Jnobianchi (talk) 18:00, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Jnobianchi. Do you have a link to where you saw the material? No worries about the questions. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:CambridgeBayWeather Thank you! Yes, I have.

• https://www.mobihealthnews.com/news/alliance-forms-accelerate-adoption-decentralized-clinical-trials
• https://medcitynews.com/2021/01/strategies-that-will-help-make-2021-a-banner-year-for-life-sciences-industries/
• https://www.clinicalleader.com/doc/the-decentralized-trials-research-alliance-hopes-to-advance-studies-0001
• https://www.bio-itworld.com/pressreleases/2021/01/29/mms-holdings-joins-decentralized-trials-research-alliance-(dtra)-as-a-founding-member-to-accelerate-the-adoption-of-patient-focused-clinical-trials
• https://www.statnews.com/2020/10/28/recruitment-retention-silent-crises-clinical-trials/
• https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20200702.963588/full/#:~:text=The%20COVID%2D19%20pandemic%20has%20materially%20altered%20the%20risk%2Dbenefit,without%20change%20in%20potential%20benefit
• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467053/

Jnobianchi (talk) 15:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Jnobianchi My apologies. I realised that there was only the one line, part of a sentence, from the official press release. I have restored the article at Decentralized Trials & Research Alliance as it doesn't need the (DTRA). I fixed the quote so that it is obvious. However, if you could rewrite that in your own words it would be better. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:CambridgeBayWeather Thank you very much for restoring the article. My apologies for the delay in response. I will go back in and re-write that section in my own words. Thanks again! - john Jnobianchi (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Jnobianchi Welcome. Enjoy. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:26, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Miscellany Direct Differentiation and Integration of Logarithms

I searched the main space and I'm sure it's not covered at all. This is from historical time point of view. Differentiation and Integration remained unsolved for a long time since 80's and before at time of big Calculus. Now a days, it is solved and referenced, and all Mathematics Scientists are using it in their university classes from the highest level to high school levels. So this is famous and important topic showing time passed (on logarithms) while incomplete topic in mathematics. No any article in wikipedia shows this perspective of logarithms and mathematics. This is posted to all voters

Kkmal.Hamouda (talk) 15:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Kkmal.Hamouda I take it you are talking about Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Direct differentiation and integration of logarithms. If so what is your question? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

It is about voting about my article. I expect accepting my article when youbvoted, and not to delete it. It isn't in the main space at all and not in any other formats.

I searched the main space and I'm sure it's not covered at all. This is from historical time point of view. Differentiation and Integration remained unsolved for a long time since 80's and before at time of big Calculus. Now a days, it is solved and referenced, and all Mathematics Scientists are using it in their university classes from the highest level to high school levels. So this is famous and important topic showing time passed (on logarithms) while incomplete topic in mathematics. No any article in wikipedia shows this perspective of logarithms and mathematics. This is posted to all voters

Kkmal.Hamouda (talk) 16:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

It is about voting to accept my article. I answered the following:

I searched the main space and I'm sure it's not covered at all. This is from historical time point of view. Differentiation and Integration remained unsolved for a long time since 80's and before at time of big Calculus. Now a days, it is solved and referenced, and all Mathematics Scientists are using it in their university classes from the highest level to high school levels. So this is famous and important topic showing time passed (on logarithms) while incomplete topic in mathematics. No any article in wikipedia shows this perspective of logarithms and mathematics. This is posted to all voters

Kkmal.Hamouda (talk) 17:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Kkmal.Hamouda. You don't need to start a new section every time you post here. I didn't "vote" on your article. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Direct differentiation and integration of logarithms was a discussion about keeping or deleting the actual draft. I closed the discussion, having read and assessed all the points made, and deleted the article. This was in no way based on the non-existence of an article. The editors discussing felt that the topic was already covered in other places on Wikipedia and that this draft did not expand on that. If you wish I can restore it to User:Kkmal.Hamouda/sandbox where you can work on it and there will be less chance of it being deleted. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 21:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Kkmal.Hamouda Thank you for the message. For drafts, consider consulting to the help desk or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics instead of sending a message to the talk page of all voters. Since it was the same topic, I will reply here.--SilverMatsu (talk) 08:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Please readd these credited sources. Due to vandalism they were repeatedly removed, and now I cannot readd them - page: Jake Angeli

In prosecution against him, prosecutors wrote that "strong evidence, including Chansley's own words and actions at the Capitol, supports that the intent of the Capitol rioters was to capture and assassinate elected officials in the United States government." The filing describes Chansley as "a self-proclaimed leader of the QAnon" and drug user who "demonstrates scattered and fanciful thoughts, and is unable to appreciate reality. He is the shaman of a dangerous extremist group, putting his beliefs into action by attempting to violently overthrow the United States government."

Chansley has since disavowed his allegiance to Trump and has stated he would testify against him, claiming he feels "betrayed" Trump did not pardon him.

References

Wikiaccuracycheckerconfirmation you need to go to Talk:Jake Angeli and open a new section and make the request there. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

template:Nudity marked "historical"

Hello. I do not understand this edit. No explanation given, and it is used on articles. Does seem historical. A mistake or? Christian75 (talk) 17:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Christian75 Thanks for catching that. It was from Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Nudity portal subpages. I was using Twinkle and missed that Portal:Nudity/Nudity-related topics was a redirect to the template. I removed the historical tag and added it the portal page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:26, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Music 2021 Film

Would you mind simply keeping an eye on the page Music (2021 film) after protection expires to help keep an eye if an edit war were to reignite? 188.220.86.46 (talk) 00:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Will do. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

St. Paris, Ohio

Regarding this, thank you for protecting the one page, but I see you did not protect the other two. Do I need to create separate requests for each individual page? - Adolphus79 (talk) 03:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Adolphus79 sorry. I forgot the other two. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 03:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you... - Adolphus79 (talk) 03:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hemiachuneia

I don't argue about the close, but note that R2 and U2 didn't apply because the redirect wasn't a cross-namespace redirect and U2 says that except [...] redirects from misspellings of an established user's user page. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 04:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

I thought of that later but WP:IAR. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

And R2 was supposed to be R3. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Please remove full protection on Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory

Hi, can you please remove the full protection you placed on this article Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory. Those of us who regularly edit that article do so respectfully and without much conflict or disruption overall. Recently this user Jfraatz just turned up and started edit warring, there is no need to punish all of the regular editors because a single disruptive editor turns up launches into an editwar, the article should be open to non-disruptive editors, and Jfraatz should be blocked for edit warring. I don't see a full protection (which looks like collective punishment of non-disruptive and disruptive editors alike) as necessary, it seems like a massive overkill, why cant we just block the disruptive editor: Jfraatz? They turned up, started edit warring and never discussed anything at talk, why are we being punished for their behavior? Can you please remove the full protection and sanction the disruptive party rather than all of us? Bacondrum 01:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Kadir Mısıroğlu

The user Aybeg has reverted all credible news article sources with cheap, yellow journalism conspiracy theory reports. You might want to check out his recent edits and revert his POV inspired changes. He sounds very emotional. Careful. Thanks, 176.55.114.194 (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss at Talk:Kadir Mısıroğlu. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Music (Sia) - Difficulty in reaching discussions...

There are two users, Ssilvers and Peterpie123rww who are proving, difficult to actually get into discussions with. I think they have a rather strong bias against IP editors, and I did let myself get caught up in the heat of the moment in some of the earlier edits of the page a bit (my fault there).

Myself, and other editors really, have tried to open discussions, provide reasoning, and so forth, but these two editors are proving rather difficult to actually properly discuss things with, whenever I raise points they are rather quick to just accuse me of edit warring and sockpuppetry and not actually address the edits. I did try to open a RfC, but they largely refused to participate. The protection period did help things cool down, but it seems to be picking up pace again gradually.

I'm not familiar with all of the different disciplinary and advisory channels, and I'm hesitant to go accusing them of meatpuppetry or some other nefarious activity, but it really does seem like we have a slight problem here.

I guess I'm asking you as a far more senior individual who hasn't really been involved in the page, but is aware of it, to perhaps help sort this mess out a little bit, either opening up an actual discussion with them, or if you feel it's necessary, taking some action in the matter.

Likewise if I'm still making any missteps, I'd love to know so I can fix it out, I am doing my best on learning different bits, but wikipedia does have a tremendous amount of rules, regulations, and community consensuses!

188.220.86.46 (talk) 00:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)