Jump to content

Talk:Adolf Hitler: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Adolf Hitler/Archive 64) (bot
→‎Image: Reply
Line 121: Line 121:


:That image has been flipped horizontally; I would not use it. — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 13:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
:That image has been flipped horizontally; I would not use it. — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 13:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
::It’s impossible to use RotateTool to correct it (as it only rotates images clockwise), so it must be flipped manually [[Special:Contributions/83.52.76.251|83.52.76.251]] ([[User talk:83.52.76.251|talk]]) 08:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:02, 23 June 2023

Template:Vital article

Good articleAdolf Hitler has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 26, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 19, 2005Good article nomineeListed
April 22, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
March 26, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 20, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
October 17, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
December 16, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article


Why can't "citizenship" be changed to "nationality" in the infobox?

My edit has been reverted without any explanations so I'm confused. Thedarkknightli (talk) 03:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because "nationality" makes no sense when Hitler was stateless for a period of time. "Citizenship" is the best and most precise description of the field. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Technically he didn't have 'citizenship' either until around 1910 (assuming age of majority to have been 21). I'm not sure that the stateless have 'nationality' either, though they definitely don't have 'citizenship'. No strong feelings either way - just noting this.Pincrete (talk) 06:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Beyond My Ken, I read this discussion before and didn't have any strong feelings either way but on reflection surely saying he was initially a citizen of Austria doesn't make sense because Austria wasn't its own state until after the First World War?--Llewee (talk) 11:43, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bullshit. Both the Austrian Empire (1804–1867) and Austria-Hungary (1867–1918) are previous Austrian states. Dimadick (talk) 12:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For completely other reasons, we looked into this 7 or 8 years ago. If I remember this correctly, citizenship (rights and responsibilities) and nationality (identity?) were both seen as being 'divided' into the different constituents (rather than invested in a unified dual-monarchy) . So yes, AH would have been Austrian, not Austro-Hungarian, which didn't really exist as a legal or practical category. Though he wouldn't have been a citizen of anywhere until he was legally adult, whereas nationality isn't age-linked. Pincrete (talk) 15:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it definitely wouldn't be right to refer "Austro-Hungarian" citizenship. I wasn't entirely sure whether there was even an actual "Austrian" citizenship pre-WW1 because theoretically even the "Austrian" part (Cisleithania) was made up of separate 'crown lands' only in personal union of the emperor - although his birthplace was in the 'Archduchy of Austria' crown land. But according to this source the 1811 Civil Code introduced a common Austrian citizenship among all the crown lands. DeCausa (talk) 16:04, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-Confirmed protect edit request.

I would like to change the parties bit, because the nazi party was founded in 1920 from the dissolved German Workers' party in 1920, and was a member of the nazi party from one day iirc. Death Editor 2 (talk) 18:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was renamed. Slatersteven (talk) 18:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I know but it says 'Political party: Nazi (From 1921)' the 1921 part is what I have a problem with, because he wasn't a member of the nazi party from 1921, he was a member from the very start! Death Editor 2 (talk) 18:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see, yes that needs changing, as that was when he became head (which I suspect is what it is meant to say). Slatersteven (talk) 18:25, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The next line in the infobox says "Other political affiliations: German Workers' Party (1919–1920)" so I'm not sure and additions or amendments are needed. — Diannaa (talk) 19:22, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I added "leader", to make it "party ... Nazi (leader from 1921)" Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:46, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok cool, that makes it clearer. — Diannaa (talk) 23:44, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image

How about changing the current image to this? 83.52.72.154 (talk) 13:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That image has been flipped horizontally; I would not use it. — Diannaa (talk) 13:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It’s impossible to use RotateTool to correct it (as it only rotates images clockwise), so it must be flipped manually 83.52.76.251 (talk) 08:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]