Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Space772 (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Space772 (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Line 62: Line 62:
:I am not an expert on this subject, but I don't think the examples shown at [[Sashimono]] are actually [[Nobori]]. As the name ''nobori'' implies, they have to be long and thin. Another option (if we take for granted that all of these subjects are inherently "Japanese") would be to use [[Umajirushi]] for the material currently at [[Sashimono]] (cf. [[:ja:馬印]]). However, it's also possible just to make a hatnote on the current [[Sashimono]] article if there is another article this is actually in conflict with. The word ''sashimono'' itself has both meanings. [[User:Dekimasu|Dekimasu]]<small>[[User talk:Dekimasu|よ!]]</small> 03:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
:I am not an expert on this subject, but I don't think the examples shown at [[Sashimono]] are actually [[Nobori]]. As the name ''nobori'' implies, they have to be long and thin. Another option (if we take for granted that all of these subjects are inherently "Japanese") would be to use [[Umajirushi]] for the material currently at [[Sashimono]] (cf. [[:ja:馬印]]). However, it's also possible just to make a hatnote on the current [[Sashimono]] article if there is another article this is actually in conflict with. The word ''sashimono'' itself has both meanings. [[User:Dekimasu|Dekimasu]]<small>[[User talk:Dekimasu|よ!]]</small> 03:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
::Ok thanks [[User:Space772|Space772]] ([[User talk:Space772|talk]]) 03:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
::Ok thanks [[User:Space772|Space772]] ([[User talk:Space772|talk]]) 03:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
::would it be ok for me to go and switch the names then? [[User:Space772|Space772]] ([[User talk:Space772|talk]]) 03:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:58, 21 January 2024

WikiProject iconJapan Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 09:14, November 2, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject Japan to do list:
  • Featured content candidates – 

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Talk & archives for WP Japan
Task force talk/archives

= joint task force
Search the archives:
V·T·E
WikiProject Japan (Talk)

Founded: 18 March 2006
(18 years, 7 months and 15 days ago)
Articles: 95,152 (185 featured)

Shortcuts
WP:JAWP:JPWP:JPNWP:WPJWP:JapanWP:JAPAN

Templates

{{WikiProject Japan}}   {{Japan current era date}}   {{Japanese}}   {{nihongo}}   {{Nihongo2}}   {{Nihongo3}}   {{Nihongo foot}}   {{Needhiragana}}   {{Needkanji}}

Project parentage
V·T·E·Q115724607 on Wikidata

Edit war at Nihonjinron

Not trying to forum shop but can some knowledgeable Japanese editors please review this article? I'm trying to improve it and there is a dispute. I could use an opinion from neutral third-party Japanese expert editors, since I only have limited working ability to decipher kanji. Andre🚐 11:43, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Sakurajima

Sakurajima has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Portal banner wonton font

Crossposting for visibility because I think few people saw my other post. I posted this on Portal talk:Japan before.

The banner for Portal:Japan appears to use a wonton font. It's inconsistent whether or not this font bothers people (my guess is that most Japanese people probably wouldn't mind; these types of fonts are even sometimes used throughout Asia), but it may bother some. I'm not necessarily proposing that it be changed, just pointing it out to let people know it can be perceived this way. toobigtokale (talk) 10:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It mostly just seems like a missed opportunity—there are more interesting ways to have the Japanese culture reflected in typography. Remsense 18:45, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese Iraq Reconstruction and Support Group

The Japanese Iraq Reconstruction and Support Group page could use a rewrite. At least with putting sources on the units involved in the Japanese PKO mission into Iraq. Ominae (talk) 15:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Lajonkairia lajonkairii#Requested move 4 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:49, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Dom Justo Takayama#Requested move 5 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Historical prefecture that got merged into osaka, please help me translate this so I dont claw my eyes out or get lazy and translate every の as 's DarmaniLink (talk) 11:15, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tokoyama etymology

Hello everyone, I recently rewrote the article on tokoyama but I find that the terminology section lacks a bit of substance and I must admit that I'd like to know why tokoya (床屋) came to be called tokoyama (床山). Would you have an etymology dictionary to recommend? - OtharLuin (talk) 17:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the sister project wiktionary has a pretty good dictionary, and you can use it to cross-reference kanji if it matters. (wikt:山 for example)If you want an external dictionary, you could use goo or jisho DarmaniLink (talk) 01:43, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the suggestions, but unfortunately nothing conclusive. I'm going to leave the etymology section as it is - OtharLuin (talk) 08:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are examples of the word in documents from the Edo Period, but a short search did not yield any real answers on the origin of the term in the major dictionaries. The kabuki usage seems to be older than the sumo one in the available sources. There is an explanation that the use of yama relates to having so many customers that they were like a mountain, but that sounds like a just-so story to me. I think that given the paucity of information available, adding any specific explanation of the etymology to the article would end up being original research. Dekimasuよ! 03:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and thank you for your advice. I did come across this explanation but the source is more than dubious and my research hasn't turned up anything conclusive either. I'm going to leave the section as it is, as the sources don't seem serious enough to say anything more. - OtharLuin (talk) 08:15, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested merger

I suggest the merger of sashimino in to nobori for the reason that sashimino is the a term for Japanese joinery it is better explained in this comment titled cabinetmaking https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sashimono#%E6%8C%87%E3%81%97%E7%89%A9_=_Cabinetmaking Space772 (talk) 03:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an expert on this subject, but I don't think the examples shown at Sashimono are actually Nobori. As the name nobori implies, they have to be long and thin. Another option (if we take for granted that all of these subjects are inherently "Japanese") would be to use Umajirushi for the material currently at Sashimono (cf. ja:馬印). However, it's also possible just to make a hatnote on the current Sashimono article if there is another article this is actually in conflict with. The word sashimono itself has both meanings. Dekimasuよ! 03:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thanks Space772 (talk) 03:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
would it be ok for me to go and switch the names then? Space772 (talk) 03:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]