Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎==: Draft:Milk Crate Theatre
Line 358: Line 358:
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -[[User:Milk Crate Theatre|Milk Crate Theatre]] ([[User talk:Milk Crate Theatre|talk]]) 05:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -[[User:Milk Crate Theatre|Milk Crate Theatre]] ([[User talk:Milk Crate Theatre|talk]]) 05:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
:*<!-- Begin Template:UND -->[[File:Yes check.svg|18px]] '''Done''' - as an [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]], the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.<!-- End Template:UND - g13 --> Firstly go to [[WP:CHU]] and pick a new username. Users here cannot represent organisations. They must represent an individual person. I have restored [[Draft:Milk Crate Theatre]] which you wrote. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 06:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
:*<!-- Begin Template:UND -->[[File:Yes check.svg|18px]] '''Done''' - as an [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]], the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.<!-- End Template:UND - g13 --> Firstly go to [[WP:CHU]] and pick a new username. Users here cannot represent organisations. They must represent an individual person. I have restored [[Draft:Milk Crate Theatre]] which you wrote. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 06:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

== Pocket Aces (Company) ==

*{{revisions|Pocket Aces (Company)}}
The article is about one of India's leading digital content creators and includes facts. It does not contain any promotional activity. The page was compared with pages of similar creators and was found to be similar, if not less ad like and then click the "Save page" button below -[[User:AnubhavRao|AnubhavRao]] ([[User talk:AnubhavRao|talk]]) 10:16, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:16, 24 November 2016


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts
"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.


Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7 or G11 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases


float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Bernie or Bust

Several users have argued over at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Never Hillary about the Bernie or Bust campaign being more significant than the Never Hillary movement, and therefore deserving its own stand-alone article. The article has been deleted (merged) relatively early in the election cycle (August 1). Since then, the Bernie or Bust movement has received significant coverage and has been accredited with contributing to Clinton's loss in the general election ([1][2][3]). So this is worth a revisit. As it stands, the Bernie or Bust movement is virtually non-existent on Wikipedia and is not even mentioned in the article it is currently redirected to. It seems like there's larger systemic issues here at play. A sort of Damnatio memoriae, if you will. -Étienne Dolet (talk) 05:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • It looks like there was an AfD for this back in August, where it received a non-admin close from Dane2007. I think that the main thing you'll have to show right now is how the coverage for this campaign received more coverage after August and how the article could be expanded from this version. I'd recommend working on a version in your userspace first before trying to restore the article, as having a good final product is usually the best way to argue against past AfDs, especially since there's a similar AfD currently in place for the Never Hillary campaign. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • As Tokyogirl79 said, significant, third party reliable sources need to show improved coverage and notability past the August AfD date. You said there is no mention of "Bernie or Bust" in the article it is redirected to, however it is mentioned in the Campaign section of that article. The pieces you linked to are based in more opinion than fact so it is my belief that they would not improve the article alone to pass another AfD. -- Dane2007 talk 07:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, Tokyogirl79 and Dane2007. I did work on it a bit (here). It's a work in progress. Obviously, I can't do everything on my own, so I'm hoping when the article is restored, there can be more users who can work collaboratively in making it better. So I think it's worth another shot. I also don't mind if it immediately heads to another AfD. Lots of things have changed since August 1, and the Wikipedia community should be able to reassess the article at least one more time since that date. Étienne Dolet (talk) 08:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, Tokyogirl79 and Dane2007. Can you guys check out my draft? I think it's good to go. There's always room for improvement, but it should be good enough for a second try. Étienne Dolet (talk) 21:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pika Energy

I, Folded pegasus, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Folded pegasus (talk) 17:08, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for taking so long to edit my page! We're all pretty busy here at Pika and it just slipped though the cracks. We have renewed interest in getting our page up to describe our advances in DC nanogrid technology and would like to have out draft un-deleted. Thanks! -Folded pegasus (talk) 17:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Tokyogirl79: as the deleting admin. Also note the above statements that suggest a significant Conflict of interest (We're all pretty busy here at Pika... describe our advances in DC nanogrid). Hasteur (talk) 20:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
On the other hand WP:AFC is the correct venue for a COI editor to make contributions.
@Folded pegasus: you agreed to disclose your conflict of interest according to the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use when you created your account. Please put the tag {{paid|employer=Pika Energy}} on your user page. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have some concern over the term "we" and "our", which gives off the impression that this is a shared account. The article was also slightly promotional, but not so much that I wouldn't restore it. (The promotional tones would need to be cleaned up, though.) The shared account issue is the biggest concern though - is this a shared account? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:55, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eastbound Strangler

why was this deleted? -TeeVeeed (talk) 21:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@TeeVeeed: because the author of that article requested that it be deleted, in accordance with WP:CSD#G7. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the answer, but now the topic is gone and it had links to other articles as well.TeeVeeed (talk) 00:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you wish this to be restored? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:44, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you to everyone for your attention and help.TeeVeeed (talk) 11:46, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kironide/Cooking

I would like to undelete this page and all of its subsidiary pages (linked at the page itself). These pages were deleted under CSD U5, but I was not notified of this before the deletion. I would like to grab the content (because I spent hours working on it), after which I will request re-deletion of the pages. -Kironide (talk) 00:13, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have already noted that I would email you the content. It was entirely unrelated to Wikipedia.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 00:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
All of the copies of online recipes hosted in the deleted pages have now been emailed to Kironide.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 00:29, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fake Democracy

fake democracy is unexeptional defination at the global level, i have defined the fake democracy with the structure of flow charts -Syed Muneer Hussain Shah 13:11, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Article has not yet been deleted--it is currently at AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fake Democracy‎. --Finngall talk 15:14, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Update: Article was WP:SNOW deleted. --Finngall talk 21:46, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Hernandez

I, 68.126.88.166, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 68.126.88.166 (talk) 21:49, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined. This is a malformed request. It wasdn't deleted under WP:CSD#G13, it was deleted under WP:CSD#A7, re-created, and then re-deleted at the author's request because apparently the content of the article had some incorrect assertions that may have originated from sources. It wouldn't be eligible for restoration here, but you are welcome to start over. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Future years

I have created this in December 2014, which was then deleted by RHaworth as a test page. However, years from 2063 to 2089 already have articles now, and now I would like the page to be restored to userspace, where WP:CSD#G2 does not apply, at User:GeoffreyT2000/Future years. -GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@GeoffreyT2000:  Done. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Downtown by Petula Clark UK vinyl A-side.jpg

I changed the status to free but not transferable to Commons. The revisions should be undeleted. -George Ho (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Large Art Company

I, 73.172.58.84, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 73.172.58.84 (talk) 01:09, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aviva Directory

I, ObadiahKatz, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ObadiahKatz (talk) 01:23, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Large Art Company

I, LargeArtCompany, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. LargeArtCompany (talk) 01:42, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


{{subst:refund|1= The Large Art Company |2= I had an assistant working on this and she left. If the draft she started is still around I would like to start again with that instead of starting over — Preceding unsigned comment added by LargeArtCompany (talk • contribs) 01:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First @LargeArtCompany: I will suggest that you ask for a new username at WP:CHU. User names must represent an individual, not a company. Secondly user names must not be shared by more than one person. Thirdly the submission was like an advertisement. So a page will have to be rewritten from scratch, even if notability can be shown. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:43S preinitiation complex

I, 171.66.213.131, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 171.66.213.131 (talk) 00:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:33, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nano Server

Nano Server : posted by User talk:Psaajid

DR RAI MUHAMMAD AMMAR MADNI

DR RAI MUHAMMAD AMMAR MADNI is the real and official page of one of our doctor working under us , we are contributing to wikipedia on this , and making our members officially on internet . it contains no abuses , no copyright content . plz fix it , so that we should proceed to other page . and should not be suspended in single page. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctorsofyear (talk • contribs) 12:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/i said yes (band)

I, Hughbarne, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hughbarne (talk) 20:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Akshay Agrawal

Wrote a new draft for it. Was suggested by another experienced editor Robert McClenon (the one who read the draft) to look at the previous deleted version of the article and to justify how the new one is an improvement over it. So kindly temporarily undelete the page so that I can follow up on @Robert McClenon:'s suggestion -ThomasMer (talk) 20:40, 20 November 2016 (UTC) ThomasMer (talk) 20:40, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ThomasMer:  Done. I verified that your draft was a significant improvement over the deleted version, so I went ahead and moved it over to main space myself, and undeleted the old history. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:53, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Anachronist Thanks a tonne *Cheers* ThomasMer (talk) 18:39, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Skippa da Flippa

Page was deleted without any form of prior discussion taking place, two moderators who disliked the musician used their power to make sure the page got deleted while making sure nobody who contributed to it had a chance to discuss. Both users claimed they searched the artist to try and find articles claiming notability, I did this (after the page was deleted) and I found said articles in the FIRST PAGE of results on Google. Not only this but the artist has contributed to multiple viral singles, which is just one of numerous ways this article claims notability. I was under the impression that WikiPedia was a COMMUNITY effort, not just a few blokes doing whatever they please with no repercussions. Them not liking the artist isn't what bothered me, but the fact they refused to even listen to other users who might have conflicting opinions (so much so that they didn't even give the opportunity for them to express it). Cheetoburrito (talk) 03:20, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gustavo Mas

I, Dmorales737, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dmorales737 (talk) 03:37, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Dmorales737: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:46, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Krimuk90/List of films and television series seen

Please undelete my page -117.197.139.51 (talk) 07:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why? And how is it 'your' page? The page belonged to Krimuk90, it was apparently created by someone else, and we have no way of knowing that the IP address 117.197.139.51 requesting is either person. Furthermore, the page consists of nothing but personal opinions about movies, and isn't related to the Wikipedia project. Wikipedia isn't a hosting service for indiscriminate collections of information that will never become a Wikipedia article. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:44, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Trust me its my page and i want to restore it because i want to show this list my co-friends on wikipedia.
Please Restore it is a humble request.
Please!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.89.95.208 (talk) 07:50, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nintendo eShop

I, 79.74.99.116, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 79.74.99.116 (talk) 12:07, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Apologies, wasn't signed in when I requested this - it's something I intend to continue developing for resubmission, but unfortunately I haven't had time for a while. If it can be restored, I would be sure to make time to update and resubmit this for consideration over the next month or two. Regards, Jack talk 20:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:42, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Leanplum

A new version of this page, located here, was recently rejected because the deleted version was not available for comparison. The editor requested access to the deleted page. The content has changed significantly since the original page was deleted, and I would like to re-submit the new draft. The new article has citations from several news outlets on the company's history, funding, and research publications. Many of these citations help prove notability and were not present in the old page. -99.242.186.247 (talk) 19:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - Text of deleted article restored, at Draft talk:Leanplum. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pyongyang Sunan International Airport logo.png

Non-free file with legitimate use in Pyongyang Sunan International Airport. It was deleted as unused (F5) when it was replaced with a version from Commons (File:Pyongyang Sunan International Airport logo Reproduction.png) that was subsequently deleted as material unsuitable for Commons (non-free). -– Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:36, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:MondoCon

I, Count3D, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Count3D (talk) 09:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:P. M. de Respour

I, (don't talk secrets), request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. (don't talk secrets) (talk) 09:49, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aboobacker Amani

Aboobacker Amani is notable personality, please check search results on Google and Yahoo. -137.97.93.87 (talk) 10:19, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:SAFID

I, HOgilvy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HOgilvy (talk) 11:20, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sheikh Hamza Ahmed

Why deleted without any reason? -137.97.107.203 (talk) 14:03, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This was deleted for both Advertising and Copypaste Violations and thus will not be restored. Please see WP:What Wikipedia is not. SwisterTwister talk 18:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agneya Singh

I am a film curator and created this page of an Indian Independent filmmaker after a great deal of research and citing many reliable sources including NPR -FilmForum61 (talk) 14:36, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • To state the concerns, he was not satisfying WP:PROF and merely suggesting he is notable now even though it's only been 5 months is still questionable. Like with any request, it helps to show us how exactly he satisfies the needed notability. NPR alone is not a convincing sources unless the contents are substantial, interviews, press releases and other self-published information is unacceptable and will not be considered for an article. SwisterTwister talk 18:57, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was the admin who deleted the page. Essentially, it was because I agreed with the editor who tagged it, in that it was too promotional in nature: it was too close to something the individual might write about themselves. The language was far from neutral. FilmForum61: If you wish to work on it in your userspace, I'm happy to provide a copy, provided you commit to fixing the issue before moving it back to the article-space. Vanamonde (talk) 03:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_William_Knowles

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Voleares195 (talk) 16:54, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The page in Question has been rewritten in its entirety. The deletion was made with an assumption by the reviewer and deleted as such. Edits were provided with additional credits to the subject and links to the subject. This was overlooked and the page was deleted without review. The subject in question is in regard to a show in China that has been a subject of question without proof and confirmation. This has been provided and should not be overlooked in this professional's new wiki page due to a past oversight. This is poor judgement.

This will not be restored since it was deleted as, not only a restart of a past community listing closed as Delete, but the nomination specified the concerns, so there was no " assumptions by someone else". Simply because he's a hard-worker in his field is not, by any means, automatically satisfying the notability here. Also, simply because apparent changes were overlooked in favor of deleting, actually means there was still consensus at that listing for Delete, therefore consensus it was not satisfactory. SwisterTwister talk 18:53, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SwisterTwister the issues in question regarding this page were addressed. Based on the past discussion regarding deletion there was an assumption made by editors that was incorrect causing the push for deletion. This text regarding a specific credit listed on the page was reworded to eliminate the previous confusion and furthermore citations and reference were provided to prove the claim. Additional past concerns about the language used within the article were also address as this article is new in its entirety and should not be penalized by outdated reviews of a previous article. We ask that you reconsider and reinstate this page. thank you. --Voleares195 (talk) 15:26, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Water in The Arab Region

The page was deleted because 'Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Middle East.' This seems to be a mistake, the page Middle East only mentions water in one sentence. Thanks -John Cummings (talk) 20:28, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much Graeme Bartlett, it seems one of the issues isn't the content of the article but the title is to broad and would need other aspects relating to water added. The article covers the relationship between the economy and water in the Arab region so perhaps a title of something like 'Water and the economy in the Arab region' or 'Water and employment in the Arab region' would be more suitable? Thanks again --John Cummings (talk) 09:54, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-chem

PD-chem was deleted about a month ago by BU_Rob13 after a request from Fastily at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 October 18#Template:PD-chem. It was described as unused, which is most likely only because most things tagged with it are ultimately moved to commons (where they are tagged PD-chem, not PD-ineligible). While PD-ineligible may apply as a technical replacement, PD-chem is more informative where images with chemical structures / equations are involved, and explain why these structures are automatically ineligible for copyright protection. I have regularly seen these sorts of images uploaded with CC-BY-SA licenses which do not apply, and would much rather use a replacement which explains ineligibility rather than simply asserting it. I will invite comment from contributors to the Chemistry and Chemicals WikiProjects for input as the most likely to have views (in favour or restoration or opposition), and anywhere else anyone suggests might be appropriate for notification. Thanks. -EdChem (talk) 01:39, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I recall that while it is more specific in name, it still only makes an identical copyright claim to {{PD-ineligible}}. I would also argue that an unused PD license tag serves no realistic purpose, considering that such files where said tag would apply belong at Commons, where they can be a benefit to all WMF projects. -FASTILY 01:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Christopher Carter

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Carroll F. Gray (talk) 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I have had health issues, but will complete my article "Draft:Christopher Carter" within a month and submit for approval. Please undelete my article, thank you Carroll F. Gray (talk) 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I have had health issues which needed my attention; I will be working on the article "Draft:Christopher Carter" and submit for approval in a month or two, please undelete, thank you -Carroll F. Gray (talk) 01:57, 23 November 2016 (UTC) Carroll F. Gray (talk) 01:57, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:BlaccCrab

Just not going to bother interacting with a certain editor who acts ridiculous. -BlaccCrab (talk) 06:35, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@BlaccCrab: Restored to the last non-vandalized version I found in the edit history. I also semi-protected the page so that anonymous IP addresses can't vandalize it. That means also that you must be logged in to edit your own user page. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:54, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gres d'Annot

I, Wilsonaj, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wilsonaj (talk) 08:17, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Constant Regulating Diode.png

I drew this in Paint, so there is no copyright issue. -Plaasjapie (talk) 08:21, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PD-simple is fine, thanks! Plaasjapie (talk) 01:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Utilitywise

our brand page came under attack from a malicious character - and whilst i did try and amend the pages to how it should be - the malicious attack continued to happen. Because information is pulled from wikipedia through to our profile page on google results page i had no other choice but to blank the page - are you able to put the page back to how it was before all the amends started to happen - i.e. prior to August 2016. -Benjamin bicker (talk) 14:36, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew William Knowles

The issue concerning the cause for deletion were addressed. Clear annotations provided. Editors perceived that this page was a duplication of a prior page concerning the same subject, but they were in error. The content on this page had been completely re crafted to address prior concerns, furthermore the speedy deletion was contested prior to the deletion of the page and further review should have been provided. Please restore this page as soon as possible.Voleares195 (talk) 15:15, 23 November 2016 (UTC) -Voleares195 (talk) 15:15, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the contested deletion statement failed to address the notability concern raised by Tokyogirl79 in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Knowles(Actor). I'm willing to restore this to draft space. There is some coverage in the Chinese press, nothing useful in English (press releases don't count), and I find a claim of significance in that he is the first white actor admitted to the Beijing Film Academy.
@MBisanz: Since you deleted this, do you object to draftifying this article? ~Anachronist (talk) 18:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I do not. MBisanz talk 20:37, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Benjamin's Field

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Cap603 (talk) 19:42, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Brandon McCuien

I, Webmercials, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Webmercials (talk) 21:09, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Real Vision

Real Vision's Wikipedia page was live throughout 2016 and conformed to Wikipedia guidelines but an editor erased all page content in November, and replaced it with unformatted, promotional text. It was quickly deleted as per G11. I have re-created the Real Vision Wikipedia page and am attempted to revert it to an original version which I had archived, but would appreciate if there was a way that it could be salvaged from a previous approved version. -Shomar103 (talk) 23:12, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Valid deletion as blatant advertising. Guy (Help!) 00:22, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jose Carlos Gomez Taylor

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ana65s (talk) 01:00, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why was this deleted?

@Ana65s: No such page has ever been created. —C.Fred (talk) 01:11, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think you are on the wrong site. It was deleted off the Spanish wikipedia site: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jose_carlos_gomez_taylor --Mr. Vernon (talk) 01:55, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also, if so, SpanishWiki will not restore it even if you asked because it was explicitly deleted as "Unsuitable materials" and then deleted again because of the first deletion. Please consider WP:What Wikipedia is not. SwisterTwister talk 05:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Milk_Crate_Theatre&action=edit

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Milk Crate Theatre (talk) 05:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Firstly go to WP:CHU and pick a new username. Users here cannot represent organisations. They must represent an individual person. I have restored Draft:Milk Crate Theatre which you wrote. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pocket Aces (Company)

The article is about one of India's leading digital content creators and includes facts. It does not contain any promotional activity. The page was compared with pages of similar creators and was found to be similar, if not less ad like and then click the "Save page" button below -AnubhavRao (talk) 10:16, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=751252315"