Jump to content

High-speed rail

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 217.153.194.14 (talk) at 07:26, 24 May 2007 (The 2006-2007 campain included a series of records, but there is no point in listing more than the best one for the campain). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

French designed Eurostar and Thalys TGVs side-by-side in the Paris-Gare du Nord. Eurostar trains connect Paris with Brussels and London through the Channel Tunnel. Thalys trains connect Paris with Brussels, Amsterdam and Cologne.

High-speed rail is a type of passenger rail transport that operates significantly faster than the normal speed of rail traffic. Specific definitions include 200-300 km/h (125-185 mph) - depending on whether the track is upgraded or new - by the European Union and above 90 mph (145 km/h) by the United States Federal Railroad Administration, but there is no single standard, and lower speeds can be required by local constraints.[1][2]

The world speed record for a conventional wheeled train was set by a French TGV that reached a speed of 574.8 km/h (357 mph) on April 3, 2007.[3] The current unofficial world speed record for a train of any type, 581 km/h (361 mph), was reached by the experimental Japanese JR-Maglev MLX01 magnetic levitation train.

The countries that have trains currently operating at over 200 km/h (125 mph) are Belgium, China, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Portugal, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Turkey is building its first high speed rail (due to start operating in the second half of 2007) between its capital, Ankara, and its most populous city of Istanbul. For details of current systems, see High-speed rail by country.

History

German designed 3rd generation InterCityExpress in Cologne main station.

Railways were the first form of mass transportation, and until the development of the motorcar in the early 20th century had an effective monopoly on land transport. Railway companies in Europe and the United States used streamlined trains since 1933 for high speed services with an average speed of up to 130 km/h and top speed of more than 160 km/h. With this service they were able to compete with the upcoming airplanes. World War II stopped these services.

In the decades after World War II, cheap oil, coupled with improvements in automobiles, highways, and aircraft made those means practical for a greater portion of the population than previously. In Europe and Japan, emphasis was given to rebuilding the railways after the war. In the United States, emphasis was given to building a huge national interstate highway system and airports. Urban mass transport systems in the United States were largely neglected. The U.S. railways have been less competitive partly because the government has tended to favour road and air transportation more than in Japan and European countries, and partly because of lower population density in the United States. Travel by rail becomes more competitive in areas of higher population density or where gasoline is expensive, because conventional trains are more fuel efficient than cars (though sometimes less fuel efficient than buses). Very few high-speed trains consume diesel or other fossil fuels but the power stations that provide electric trains with power do consume fuel, usually natural gas or coal. However, in Japan and France, a large proportion of the electricity comes from nuclear power. Even using electricity generated from coal or oil, trains are more fuel efficient per passenger per kilometer travelled than the typical automobile. Upgrading rail networks require large fixed investments and thus require unsubsidizing fuel costs, or high population densities to be competitive against airplanes and automobiles. Population density has always been a key factor in the success of European and Japanese railway transport, especially in countries such as the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland and France.

The world's first "high-speed train" was Japan's Tōkaidō Shinkansen, officially launched in October 1964, construction first began in April 20, 1959 (~48 years ago) on Shin-Tanna Tunnel.[2] The "Series 0" Shinkansen, built by Kawasaki Heavy Industries, achieved speeds of 200 km/h (125 mph) on the TokyoNagoyaKyotoOsaka route.

Comparison with other modes of transport

File:Mountfujijapan.jpg
Mount Fuji with Shinkansen and Sakura trees in the foreground, Japan.

High speed rail is often viewed as an isolated system and simply as advantageous or disadvantageous as compared to other transport systems, but all transport systems must work together to maximize benefits. A good HSR system has capacity for non-stop and local services, and has good connectivity with other transport systems.

Due to current infrastructure designs in many nations, there are constraints on the growth of the highway and air travel systems. Some key factors promoting HSR is that airports and highways have no room to expand, and are often overloaded. High-speed rail has the potential for high capacity on its fixed corridors, and has the potential to relieve congestion on the other systems. High speed trains in themselves are more environmentally friendly than air or road travel. This is due to:

  • lower energy consumption per passenger kilometer
  • reduced land usage for a given capacity compared to motorways
  • displaced usage from more environmentally damaging modes of transport.

Automobiles

File:Shinkansen-100-fukuyama.jpg
Shinkansen 0 Series at Fukuyama Station, April 2002. The first Shinkansen trains ran at speeds of up to 210 km/h (130 mph)[1], soon after increased to 220 km/h (135 mph).

High-speed rail has the advantage over automobiles in that it can move passengers at speeds far faster than those possible by car. The lower limit for HSR (200 km/h, 125 mph) is substantially faster than the highest road speed limit in any country. Ignoring countries without a general speed limit (like the German autobahns), the highest speed limit is 160 km/h (100 mph), experimentally posted on selected test stretches in Austria and the United Arab Emirates [4], while 120 km/h or 75 mph is more typical. Very few public roads have no speed limit. For journeys that connect city center to city center, HSR's advantage is increased due to the lower speed limits within most urban areas. The longer the journey, the better the time advantage of rail over road.

Moreover, train tracks permit a far higher throughput of passengers per hour than a road the same width. A high speed rail needs just a double track railway, one track for each direction. A typical capacity is 15 trains per hour and 800 passengers per train (as for the Eurostar sets), which implies a capacity of 12,000 passengers per hour in each direction. By way of contrast, the Highway Capacity Manual gives a maximum capacity for a single lane of highway of 2,250 passenger cars per hour (without any trucks or RVs). Assuming an average vehicle occupancy of 1.57 people [5], a standard twin track railway has a capacity 13% greater than a 6-lane highway (3 lanes each way), while requiring only 40% of the land (1.0/3.0 versus 2.5/7.5 hectares per kilometer of direct/indirect land consumption). This means that rail carries 2.83 times as many passengers per hour per meter (width) as a road.

Journeys by train have much lower environmental costs in addition to being less stressful, more productive and more reliable than car journeys. Additionally, the link between efficient and competitive public transportation (such as high-speed rail) and sustainable urban planning has been noted by numerous studies over the past 50 years.

Aircraft

South Korea's KTX train can speed up to 300 km/h. French TGV type.

While high-speed trains generally do not travel as fast as jet aircraft, they have advantages over air travel for relatively short distances. When traveling less than about 650 km (400 mi), the process of checking in and going through security screening at airports, as well as the journey to the airport itself makes the total journey time comparable to HSR. Trains can be boarded more quickly in a central location, eliminating the speed advantage of air travel. As a rule of thumb, rail journeys need to be three hours or less to be competitive with air travel on journey time. In terms of distance, such journeys can theoretically span up to 900 kilometers (assuming travel at 300 km/h with no stops en-route). Many people live in suburbs of large cities and drive their own car to the airport when they want to fly. If the option is to drive to the rail station and park there, the location advantage for rail get smaller at least in the home city end of the journey.

Rail lines also permit far greater capacity and frequency of service than what is possible with aircraft, and rail schedules find fewer weather-related interruptions than do airline schedules. Another advantage of high speed rail over aircraft is comfort: the journey involves fewer modal changes, less standing and queuing, no air pressurization issues, and generally more spacious seating. From the operator's point of view, a single train can call in at multiple stops, often far more stops than aircraft. One train stopping pattern can allow a multitude of possible journeys, increasing the potential market.

High speed trains are far more environmentally efficient than aircraft, as trains consume less energy per passenger kilometer. This results in less carbon dioxide emissions, thus reducing the greenhouse effect answerable for the global warming, provided that the required electricity is produced using clean methods. This advantage is particularly strong with short-haul flights (where rail competes best on time). From the point of view of required traffic control systems and infrastructure, high-speed rail has the added advantage of being much simpler to control due to its predictable course, even at very high passenger loads; this issue is becoming more relevant as air traffic reaches its safe limit in busy airspaces over London, New York, and other large centers.

However, it should be noted that train travel is less safe than air travel. Trains have .04 deaths for every 100 million miles while air travel has .01 deaths for every 100 million miles travelled. However, compared to the automobile, with .94 deaths per 100 million miles, both figures are relatively low.[3] Railway suicides may also skew the statistics a bit.

The history of a maximum speed record by a trial run

  • 1963 - Japan - Shinkansen - 256 km/h
  • 1967 - France - TGV - 318 km/h (gas turbine type)
  • 1968 - West Germany - 200 km/h
  • 1972 - Japan - Shinkansen - 286 km/h
  • 1974 - West Germany - EET-01 - 230 km/h
  • 1975 - West Germany - Comet - 401.3 km/h (steam rocket propulsion)
  • 1978 - Japan - HSST01 - 307.8 km/h    (Auxiliary rocket propulsion)
  • 1978 - Japan - HSST02 - 110 km/h
  • 1978 - Italy - Pendolino - 250 km/h
  • 1979 - Japan - Shinkansen - 319 km/h
  • 1979 - Japan - ML500 (unmanned)- 517 km/h  
  • 1981 - France -TGV - 380 km/h
  • 1985 - West Germany - ICE - 300 km/h
  • 1987 - Japan - MLU001 (manned) - 400.8 km/h
  • 1988 - West Germany - ICE - 406 km/h
  • 1988 - West Germany - TR-06 - 412.6 km/h
  • 1989 - West Germany TR-07 - 436 km/h  
  • 1990 - France - TGV - 515.3 km/h
  • 1992 - Japan - Shinkansen - 350 km/h
  • 1993 - Japan - Shinkansen - 425 km/h
  • 1993 - Germany - TR-07 - 450 km/h
  • 1994 - Japan - MLU002N - 431 km/h
  • 1996 - Japan - Shinkansen - 446 km/h
  • 1997 - Japan - MLX01 - 550 km/h
  • 1999 - Japan - MLX01 - 552 km/h
  • 2003 - Germany - Transrapid 08 - 501 km/h
  • 2003 - Japan - MLX01 - 581 km/h
  • 2007 - France - TGV - 574.8 km/h

Target areas for high-speed trains

The TGV Sud-Est fleet was built between 1978 and 1988 and connected Paris with Lyon. Originally the sets were built to run at 270 km/h (168 mph), but most were upgraded to 300 km/h (186 mph) for the opening of the LGV Méditerranée.
Taiwan's Japanese made 700-T train.
Main articles: High-speed rail by country and Planned high-speed rail by country

The early target areas, identified by France, Japan, and the U.S., were connections between pairs of large cities. In France this was ParisLyon, in Japan Tokyo–Osaka, and in the U.S. the proposals are in high-density areas. The only high-speed rail service at present in the U.S. is the Acela Express, in the Northeast Corridor between Boston, New York and Washington, D.C.; it uses tilting trains to achieve high speeds (though much lower than those of their European and Asian counterparts) on existing tracks, since building new, straighter lines was not practical given the amount of development on either side of the right of way.

One notable fact is that in Europe, Korea, and Japan, dense networks of city subways and railways connect seamlessly with high speed rail lines. Despite efforts to create high speed rail in the USA, cities that lack dense intra-city rail infrastructure will find low ridership for high speed rail, as it is incompatible with existing automobile infrastructure. (People will want to drive when travelling in city, so they might as well drive the entire trip). Since in Japan intra-city rail daily usage per capita is the highest, it follows naturally that ridership of 6 billion passengers [4] exceeds the TGV of 1 billion (until 2003), the only other system to reach a billion cumulative passengers. [5] Some systems such as Korea's KTX have been plagued by low ridership, despite having extensive subway systems in Seoul.

The California High Speed Rail Authority is currently studying a San Francisco Bay Area and Sacramento to Los Angeles and San Diego line. The Texas High Speed Rail and Transportation Corporation strives to bring Texas an innovative high-speed rail and multimodal transportation corridor. The Corporation developed the Brazos Express Corridor to link Central Texas.

Later high speed rail lines, such as the LGV Atlantique, the LGV Est, and most high speed lines in Germany, were designed as feeder routes branching into conventional rail lines, serving a larger number of medium-sized cities.

A side effect of the first high-speed rail lines in France was the opening up of previously isolated regions to fast economic development. Some newer high-speed lines have been planned primarily for this purpose, such as the MadridSevilla line and the proposed AmsterdamGroningen line.

Five years after construction began on the line, the first Japanese high-speed rail line opened on the eve of the 1964 Olympics in Tokyo, connecting the capital with Osaka. The first French high-speed rail line, or Ligne à grande vitesse (LGV), was opened in 1981 by SNCF, the French rail agency, planning starting in 1966 and construction in 1976.

Market segmentation has principally focused on the business travel market. The French focus on business travelers is reflected in the nature of their rail cars (including the all-important bar-car). Pleasure travel is a secondary market, though many of the French extensions connect with vacation beaches on the Atlantic and Mediterranean, as well as major amusement parks. Friday evenings are the peak time for TGVs (train à grande vitesse) (Metzler, 1992). The system has lowered prices on long distance travel to compete more effectively with air services, and as a result some cities within an hour of Paris by TGV have become commuter communities, thus increasing the market while restructuring land use.

Technology

File:AVE 350 385835 7954.jpg
The Spanish AVE "Talgo 350" power car, with a distinctive shape designed to cut down on noise pollution.
France's TGV technology has been adapted for use in a number of different countries.

Much of the technology behind high-speed rail is an improved application of existing technology (of the 1950's). By building a new rail infrastructure with 20th century engineering, including elimination of constrictions such as roadway at-grade (level) crossings, frequent stops, a succession of curves and reverse curves, and not sharing the right-of-way with freight or slower passenger trains, higher speeds (250–300 km/h) are maintained. Recent advances in wheeled trains in the last few decades have pushed even these limits past 400 km/h, among the advances being tilting trainsets and airbrakes. The record speed for a wheeled electric train is 574.8 km/h is held by a shortened TGV train and long straight track (see also Land speed record for railed vehicles). The French TGV routes typically combine segments on new track, where the train runs at full commercial speed, with some sections of older track on the extremities of the route, near cities.

In France, the cost of construction (which was €10 m/km ($21.5 m/mile) for LGV Est) is minimised by adopting steeper grades rather than building tunnels and viaducts. Because the lines are dedicated to passengers, gradients of 3.5%, rather than the previous maximum of 1–1.5% for mixed traffic, are used. Possibly more expensive land is acquired in order to build straighter lines which minimize line construction as well as operating and maintenance costs. In other countries high-speed rail was built without those economies so that the railway can also support other traffic, such as freight. Experience has shown however, that trains of significantly different speeds cause massive decreases of line capacity. As a result, mixed-traffic lines are usually reserved for high-speed passenger trains during the daytime, while freight trains go at night. In some cases, nighttime high-speed trains are even diverted to lower speed lines in favor of freight traffic.

In mountainous Japan, most of the costs of high speed rail extension involve blasting long tunnels through mountains, not core technology or right of way itself.

Notes and references

  1. ^ International Union of Railways: General definitions of highspeed, accessed May 2, 2007
  2. ^ Federal Railroad Administration, High-Speed Rail, accessed May 2, 2007
  3. ^ "French high-speed TGV breaks world conventional rail-speed record". EarthTimes.org. 2007-02-14. Retrieved 2007-02-14.
  4. ^ [1]
  5. ^ US Department of Energy - Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy : "Fact #257: March 3, 2003 - Vehicle Occupancy by Type of Vehicle"

See also

The Acela Express, currently the only high-speed rail line in the U.S., with a top speed of 150 mph (240 km/h).

Further reading

  • Hood, Christopher P. (2006). Shinkansen – From Bullet Train to Symbol of Modern Japan. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-32052-6.

Template:Link FA