User talk:The Master of Mayhem
Userpage | Sandbox | My Talk Page | Guestbook | Bits and Bobs | Awards | Subscribers | My contributions | Your user page | Your talk page | Reviewing policy | Rollbacking policy |
Please note that since this page was last edited by Thomasbum98 and not The Master of Mayhem, vandalism may not have been swiftly reverted. If The Master of Mayhem doesn't appear to be online, any vandalism on his user and/or user talk pages must be reverted immediately.
In case you didn't know....
Welcome to my talk page! Here are the rules. *1: All spam/unwanted messages will be DELETED! *2: Please respect my page(s). I am known for carnage. *3: Always sign your posts. Otherwise, I will respond by sending a message saying that I am blind or something.
Rosie cheeksSomething super-short and blatantly vandalism like that can easily be speedied. No need for AFD. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:17, 1 April 2011 (UTC) re nautical defcon templateOh, OK, I have put in motion the procedure to have this fixed (an admin or filemover has to do it, so it might take a little while). It happened because there were two identical files with different names, and when that happens one gets deleted automatically, and in this case it was the one used by the DefCon template. But this won't happen again. (I'm not sure what happened to your previous request, maybe it slipped under my radar, sorry.) Thanks for pointing this out! Herostratus (talk) 17:53, 4 April 2011 (UTC) The Signpost: 4 April 2011
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:46, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Your recent comment and edits to my talk pageYou recently misidentified my recent edits on my talk page as vandalism. I assure you, this is not the case as per: Talk page vandalism Illegitimately deleting or editing other users' comments. However, it is acceptable to blank comments constituting vandalism, internal spam, or harassment or a personal attack. It is also acceptable to identify an unsigned comment. Users are also permitted to remove comments from their own user talk pages. A policy of prohibiting users from removing warnings from their own talk pages was considered and rejected on the grounds that it would create more issues than it would solve. I am exercising my right to remove comments from my talk page as you may do with yours and this comment. If there is anything else you would like to speak with me about, please don't hesitate to ask me! 96.52.140.81 (talk) 19:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Welcome!
Your edit to my user pageHello. For future reference, please do not edit my user page, as you did here[1] unless you are reverting vandalism. I am aware that the category is currently a redlink. At some point, I may do something about that, but until I do, I kindly ask that you refrain from unnecessarily changing my user page. Thanks!StrikerforceTalk Review me! 07:10, 11 April 2011 (UTC) I enjoyed the kitten very much!![]() EWikist has eaten your {{kitten}}! The kitten made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{kitten}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a kitten with {{subst:munch}}! Talkback![]() Message added 19:50, 11 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. The Signpost: 11 April 2011
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC) Reviewer![]() Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use. Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges. For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Acalamari 16:19, 16 April 2011 (UTC) Position on Pending Changes RFCThe pending changes motion is to remove pending changes temporarily, given your comments have you put your !vote in the correct section? -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:25, 16 April 2011 (UTC) Hi there, sorry for the late replyI've replied to your discussion continuation here, just thought I'd let you know. 71.90.29.110 (talk) 13:51, 17 April 2011 (UTC) Speedy deletion of Tremar Coombe declinedAt the time you nominated it as having no context [2] the first sentence was "Tremar Coombe is situated in the Caradon District north of Liskeard. " Not a lot to go on, I'll grant you that, but it does establish a context and I was easily able to clean it up and find a reliable source to verify it's existence and expand the article slightly. Please be more careful when nominating new articles for speedy deletion, often they are poorly written but perfectly valid topics such as this, which was easily established by a Google search. Thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:18, 17 April 2011 (UTC) Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Wikipedians who contribute using Google ChromeCategory:Wikipedians who contribute using Google Chrome, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 23:38, 18 April 2011 (UTC) The Signpost: 18 April 2011
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 06:53, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ([[User talk:SuggestBot|talk]]) 08:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC) Nothing wrong with user nameThere is nothing wrong with my user name, Thomas was taken and I added my last name to it. (My last name is "Bum") I know it is a silly last name. I do not need to switch accounts, I do not want to go through all the work to change my name. I hope you understand, many people are concerned with the "Bum" part.Thomasbum98 (talk) 21:18, 22 April 2011 (UTC)Thomasbum98 |