User talk:Jim1138

Welcome!

Hello, Jim1138, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

UALR Page Vandalism

The same IP from last time, 99.121.96.73, has repeated the edits but now substantiated their claim with sources that verify their claims. Verified or not, however, their contribution is heavy with malice and negative bias. Quoting them here from talk:

Okay, the statements have been sourced and all the links work. Anyone care to argue that Oak Forest is NOT crime-ridden and filled with crack houses? Anyone care to dispute that the university campus is located in that area? Anyone care to dispute that Patricia Guardado was abducted from across the street and murdered? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.121.96.73 (talk) 19:19, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Though it is factually correct there is only ONE line of crime statistic per page on Wikipedia of the TOP TEN most dangerous universities in the country. This kind of information is slanderous and VERY atypical of content typically on University pages on Wikipedia. I'm considering removing the contribution. Your thoughts? Junipel (talk) 18:35, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This I.P., 99.121.96.73, has vandalized the UALR page at least 3 times within the past week. Are there any steps possible to keep this from reoccurring? Much thanks! Junipel (talk) 17:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would not consider that vandalism, but undue weight. I removed the safety block citing wp:undue Jim1138 (talk) 19:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Much thanks, Jim. I realize now that it is not vandalism. Junipel (talk) 19:40, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Jim1138. You have new messages at Cyberpower678's talk page.
Message added 01:25, 29 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 513,228,387) 01:25, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hello Jim I made somme changes on page "Senegal", forgot to mention my source this is my sources : http://allafrica.com/stories/201202031398.html How do I do to have removed your " Unsourced contributions notification" tks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mamadou.mb (talk • contribs) 23:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tour des feroes change info

hello sorry for move info two times from Tour des Feroes to Tour des Faroes and finish with [Tour of Faroes Islands] because the name was wrong, the version its in english and the name was in french and the first time wrong tiped, i dont know how change the name of the article please if u can send to me a link with help how can change the name thanks Wolfgang 7lsp (talk) 23:00, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For beating me to a bunch of reverts. Cheers! Rm1271 ^talk_contribs 01:36, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Mudvayne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Gray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A happy ending

Great work in connecting those accounts. The result . Sunray (talk) 17:19, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Exeter vandal

Thanks for batting the IP vandalizing Exeter City F.C away from my user page. I am not holding my breath waiting for a lucid explanation from him on my talk page ! Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gabriel Lawrence Sengol

I thought "enormously unhelpful" was no exaggeration. BTW, I looked around for sources but Google News and Books had nothing to offer; I found nothing besides that catholic hierarchy site, which I have used in the past and consider reliable. Maybe you'll have better luck. Thanks for cleaning up, Drmies (talk) 23:48, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After scanning it, my brain froze up and did not know where to begin. I read the history and quoted you. Hope that was OK! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 23:51, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. Wonder what I did to cause that? GoingBatty (talk) 00:17, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IP 24.38.181.81

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brian Boru is awesome. You have seen this same person under another IP before. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 00:35, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Skyward sword" article

Please delete the "Skyward sword" article. If not, have someone else delete it instead. Thank you for informing me. 98.169.110.135 (talk) 00:42, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Johnny Squeaky edits

At least one of Johnny Squeaky's edits was clearly out of line with its opinionated and inappropriate heading change, thus the NPOV warning. However no prejudice against discussion of what may be trivial or not at Talk:Greta Garbo. Dl2000 (talk) 20:03, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Raphaël Onana

Your addition to Raphaël Onana was removed as it was unsourced. Please see wp:rs and wp:citing sources for more information. Please add your content back with a good source. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:38, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Yes ! There is no problems for the reliable source , look the book on the work of Raphaël Onana.

'Un homme blindé à Bir-Hakeim' : Story in french of a officer Cameroonians Who does the War of 39-45, France, Paris, Editions L'Harmattan, 1996, p 272 . (ISBN 2-7384-4239-0)

I have got this book and I copy in Wikipedia. The book is in french and it is not easy to translate in a perfect english. Can you help me ?

Thank you, you know, I'm french... I know the Onana family which I belong. I know Raphaël Onana because he's my grandfather.

You think it is forbidden to translate a french page in english ? People who speak English are entitled to know the status of Raphael Onana ... Also, I have cousins who live in London .... I urge you to read this book before acting recklessly ... Please do not destroy this page that is the truth.

I find : I cannot source my own knowledge, and my information is more accurate than most of the information on here, that is the truth. Some of this information is not accurate, and i would like to add something that is. You have removed something I have wrote because you deemed it unsourced, but this is of my own knowledge. I can assure you this was not reckless and you are confused.

External links

[1] The book of Raphaël Onana in french.

Warinhari — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warinhari (talk • contribs) 08:25, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

yes, it is miss something in english : [2] [User:warinhari] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warinhari (talk • contribs) 20:11, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hurricane gloria

the information i removed from hurricane gloria was not accurate. hurricane gloria struck Long Island as a minimal category 1 hurricane with maximum sustained winds measured at 85 mph. hurricane gloria did NOT make landfall on long island with maximum sustained winds of 95-100 mph as said. gloria was not a category 2 hurricane at landfall, which winds of 95-100 mph fall under. my information is accurate. and yes i will convert the information from mph to mph and kmh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brendonleclair (talk • contribs) 20:36, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hurricane gloria

ok sorry i was confused. yes i converted the information to mph and kmh. i have one other problem though. i am a weather fanatic and consider myself and expert in the field of severe weather. my editing to the 2011 new england tornado oubtreak was from my prior knowledge. i cannot give a source or cite my knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brendonleclair (talk • contribs) 20:46, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Given wp:or, how would you resolve this? I am not accusing you, but many people place rumor, gossip, and outright lies on Wikipedia, so you can see the need for policy like this. Jim1138 (talk) 20:51, 5 February 2012 (UTC

Yes I do understand and I do not wish to cause any trouble or spread any bias or inaccurate information. I am a fanatic when it comes to severe weather, and I do not know everything there is out there but I consider myself an expert. I am in the process of becoming a meteorologist. I live in the town of Springfield, Massachusetts and lived through the tornado. I have studied the scientific Fujita-Scale for years now, and know it by heart. I personally toured the damage in the town of Monson proceeding the tornado. The damage was indefinitely of EF-4 intensity, although officially confirmed an EF-3. The power of the tornado was underestimated by many, and it would be extremely helpful if people got the chance to realize its true intensity. This is simply of my knowledge. I did not find this information from any website, so I cannot possibly cite it or give it a source. It has come from my own knowledge. You have removed it because I have not gave it a source, but I cannot source it, it has come from my own knowledge not something found from a fathering website. I would greatly appreciate it if you did not remove it. Thank You.

Trouted

and 85 mph will convert to 137 kmh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brendonleclair (talk • contribs) 20:49, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Raphaël Onana

I'm agree to find more citations of my article. If I found, I take notes when I can. I'm alone in my article, it's not easy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warinhari (talk • contribs) 21:27, 5 February 2012 (UTC) Ooh ! The text American Civil War is heavy to read ...! But I can understand what do you said. But my grandfather is not a legendary heroe... He's ordinary a man like you. From the American Civil War, it is very difficult to prove because there's not really photography pictures, no Movie-camera before the period 1861–1865... But in the world war II, it is more easy to prove by the reliabilityof the journalism after 1939, the start of the World War II. Warinhari — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warinhari (talk • contribs) 21:59, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Good work. You are a great protector of this project—and one who beats me to so many recent changes issues. NTox (talk) 07:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

user:Panoniann

He is also violated the 3 rever rule in transformer. Please block him too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bornder (talk • contribs) 08:22, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Social Security Act". Thank you.ChristianContributor (talk) 08:28, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tricia Santos Fan Hoax Strike back Again

Hello!!

Another returning vandal of Tricia Santos with IP No 202.137.123.32 and 119.93.51.190. He or she create stories about Tricia but it is already a hoax stories. Can you extended to block this person again to prevent further vandalism stories. She is also candidate for sockpuppet. Tricia Santos is a former Teen PBB Housemate. How neither abs-cbn website nor pep.ph are not post about Tricia news of alleged inclusion of Teleserye or show of abs-cbn due to her attitude problem since during PBB Teen edition days. (talk) 04:27, 06 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.3.182.83 (talk) [reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for clearing my name, Jim! :) -- MacAddct1984 ^{(talk  contribs)} 22:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

uhhh

F*** that. People need a laugh or two. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.206.38.163 (talk) 01:40, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okeyyyyyy :C98.206.38.163 (talk) 01:46, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Temple Run. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Have you heard of undoing it instead of being lazy and reverting it on Huggle? Not acceptable. J (t) 03:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you refrain from making incorrect reversions against Wikipedia policy. In regards to this edit, be aware that I indeed used an edit summary, and removed the content in a manner justifiable under Wikipedia policy. You, on the other hand, have added unsourced material to a BLP, some of which can easily be construed as controversial. I'd like an apology and a promise that this never happen again from you. Wikipedia does not need ignorant, trigger-happy patrollers. It needs sensible, careful ones. Please be the latter type. Very truly yours, 99.92.154.75 (talk) 03:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are not welcome!

This is a sad place where nobodies live to enforce meaningless rules.--172.190.4.163 (talk) 08:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Humanities desk

I undid your reversion of this edit. It was a response to JackOfOz that does not violate any of Wikipedia's rules or principles; therefore, there is no justifiable reason for your revert. --140.180.7.220 (talk) 08:57, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Stop it. Look at the above messages. J (t) 13:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing messages

Jim, sorry for vandalizing some pages at Wikipedia but about the message you gave me, can I delete it? PatrickA.Tagle35 (talk) 22:01, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is your talk page, you can remove it. Thanks for the apology. Please do try to contribute in a constructive way. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 00:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The "Skyward sword" article

No additional Skyward Sword redirect page. Please delete and remove "Skyward sword". 98.169.110.135 (talk) 22:39, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle problems

If you keep on reverting AGF without immediately apologizing I will report you. --J (t) 22:58, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that harsh tone but seriously. At least get off of Huggle and get yourself to admit your mistake. --J (t) 23:00, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is AGF and some specifics please. Jim1138 (talk) 00:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AGF - if you don't know this your rollbacker rights should've been nulled. Specifics: IPs are ranting all about you; you don't immediately apologize, etc. --J (t) 01:28, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Roanoke Times

Hi Jim. I'm not sure about this revert of yours... the IP had removed an unsourced paragraph accusing the paper of "anti-white and anti-Southern news and opinion columns"... seems like that ought to be sourced or removed. 28bytes (talk) 23:08, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted probably as the IP removed some sourced content and did not leave an edit summary. I agree with you on the politics section and removed it entirely. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:27, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate it. 28bytes (talk) 00:28, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Article about Methodism in the Philippines

Hi Jim. I'm quite concerned about a lot of revisions happening in Methodism particularly that part of History of methodism in the Philippines. Edits contained vandalism and inappropriate language and citing some insults, in the other group. If my opinion counts, that would be a kind of discrimination. Isn't it? Are allowing it in Wikipedia? Thanks, Jim. Christian Eilers (talk) 12:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Editors who vandalize will get warned and if they continue, banned for various times. Sometimes pages seem to get targeted by a group, maybe through a chat room. There is a loose network "vandal patrol" who keep watch on thing, though problems do get by. The corrections you saw to Methodism were mostly vandal patrol. If you are especially concerned about Methodism, please add it to your watch list and keep track of it. BTW: are you referring to "Methodism" or some other article "Methodism in the Philippines"? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am referring to a section in Methodism. Thanks Jim. That is a lot helpful. Christian Eilers (talk) 23:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blanked by creator

Re this: I have db-g7 tagged the page. It was blanked by its creator. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 09:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Huggle usually, but not always warns you about reverting a page blanked by its creator. I removed my warning and apologized for my error. Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 10:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps Huggle noticed that the creator/blanker wasn't the only editor: someone else seems to have contributed as well, and the page was tagged for deletion —and refused— before. So, perhaps this isn't clear-cut after all. Let's see what happens :-) Cheers - DVdm (talk) 10:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen Huggle warn "properly" with other editors in the history. Also have had Huggle report a vandal to AIV without recording any warnings on the vandal's talk page. Makes for some uncomfortable discussions with admins! Jim1138 (talk) 10:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! question?

Can I ask you a question on one side of wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.56.252.228 (talk) 10:14, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ask away, I am here to help. I am about to sign off for ten hours. Jim1138 (talk) 10:18, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Taniec z gwiazdami – Best of 1-12 Please, remove this page. I do not know who created it. But they are fooling. This program was never aired on TV and never will. Someone is playing with Wikipedia. And it probably is not for fun? Please, if you do not believe check out the Polish side of Dancing with the Stars. Yours!

Would you please put your concerns on talk:Taniec z gwiazdami – Best of 1-12? That will get the process started. There has been a considerable amount of work put into the page which is unusual for a hoax. You might want to contact the page creator (click the history tab at the top of the page). He is recently active and might be able to give you more information. As this is an established article, the process to delete it is documented on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion I hope this helps. If you have more questions, please feel free to ask. Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 10:32, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not lie. The contribution is, I see. But it is all invented! This program was not! For example, Agata Kulesza, won the program but announced that he would never return to the program ... It is designed in ... Remove it. I know this person, who is doing it. Boy, age 14 Plays and creates tables that are unrealistic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.56.252.228 (talk) 10:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rawalakot- Notable persons

The notable person Ghulam Ahmad you added and claimed to be from rawalakot is plainly untrue, you gave a wiki reference that he is on wikipedia, as per wiki profile, he was born in Indian poonch, and he worked for indian airforce, apart from that he had a company in pakistan for mining, how does it make him notable person. I lived in rawalakot many years and regularly visit there, never heard of Ghulam Ahmad from anyone. This suggests me that either you are Ghulam Ahmead or related to him. I would not like lied to be added on this page.

Ghulam Ahmad died in 2003 as did Sardar Muhammad Ibrahim Khan. There are sources on the web tying him to Rawalakot. Jim1138 (talk) 01:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are running away from facts. You haven't yet told me why Ghulam Ahmad is notable in Rawalakot? Would you like to cite a source here which links him to Rawalakot. All notable person on rawalakot page are very well known in whole state of Jammu & kashmir, all except one remained president of the state. Please explain your relationship with Ghulam Ahmad, are you his sibling? No way Mr Ghulam Ahmad is notable or anyone knows him in rawalakot. I lived and worked in Rawalakot for many years and rawalakot district (poonch) is my birth place. Please correct the page here. riz 13:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Fact is Ghulam Ahmad lived in and is buried in Rawalakot. Why do say otherwise? It is supported by numerous sources: try google. Seem to be many that are not Wikipedia based. BTW: I am American and have no relatives from Pakistan or that area. Jim1138 (talk) 18:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't explained what makes him notable in Rawalakot. I see the wikipedia page about Ghulam Ahmad, only link or connection he had with Rawalakot is that there is a picture of grave presubamly burried somewhere in Rawalakot. There are thousands of people burried in Rawalakot, it does not make any of them notable. Please stop distorting the facts, if you want to make him notable, do something for Rawalakot. Furthermore, President of United Arab Emirates Sheikh Khalifa has donated a multi-million dollar hospital in Rawalakot after earthquake of 2005, he is not even in the list of notable persons, so again I ask you what Ghulam Ahmad has done for rawalakot which makes him notable. Either present the facts or remove him. Thanks riz 00:55, 13 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs)

If Ghulam Ahmad meets Wikipedia:Notability_(people) and lived in Rawalakot then he is notable for inclusion in Rawalakot. If there is policy stating otherwise, please let me know. Jim1138 (talk) 05:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution Jim1138 (talk) 06:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He does not even qualify one single criteria listed on wikipedia notability guidelines. You are not giving reasons for his notability. ONLY reason you give is he lived in Rawalakot a self made claim. Does it mean whole population of Rawalakot is notable? Put up or shut up.

riz 10:22, 13 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs)

I dont really much care about this issue, but I believe that Riztech needs to be more courteneous. There is not need to use such language. Clearly he can say these things nicely and in manner by listing the issues and the criteria, however, there is Wikepedia policy that bans editors for using such languange, as it is not conducive to a debate. I dont know how old you are Riztech, but maybe you should take it easy. Stop threatening and just do edits and in a nice discussions

EagleEye 15:35, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Jim, this is where Ghulam Ahmad fougth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No._1_Squadron,_Indian_Air_Force

EagleEye 02:11, 14 February 2012 (UTC) @EagleEye my comments were for Jim1138 "Put up or shut up" phrase does not come under offensive language criteria of wikipedia. As you and all others can see none of you gave any reason why Ghulam Ahmad is notable and only reason given was "he is burried in Rawalakot". All the links you both provide are wikipedia pages which are made by you guys.

Now I have a firm belief that you both are his siblings, probably his sons. I made a comment about Jim1138 and you felt the pain why? The subject of comment was Ghulam Ahmad so what prompted you to be so offensive? I can see on my talk page, previously you suggested to ban me for a reason another editor ridiculed and I was surprised to see where did you come into the scene. Before your suggestion I did not edit any of your page, neither had any issue with you but you made everything. why? And where did I make any threat? can you point out my threatening words towards you?

It is time for you to make neutral contribution on wikipedia and stop promoting your relatives. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs) 02:29, 14 February 2012 (UTC) Hey Jim I guess we are long lost brothers. This chap is like most people in Pakistan, conspiracy theories ? Maybe he needs to grow up and get a life. In any case. He is violating the Wiki policies for taking things personal so I recommend he be permanently banned.[reply]

EagleEye 15:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Why don't you simply give reasons in favour of your belief? @EagleEye I haven't seen any contribution by you in any article? Why is that. You only contribute in talk pages criticising others? Are you using multiple ids on wikipedia? Who are you really? I would recommend admins to check your ip and compare with Jim1138 and Trueblood786.

Regarding Ghulam Ahmad I have serious concerns on the section "Philanthropy" where it sates as I quote "He gave scholarships for education of residents of Poonch District, particularly members of the Sudhan tribe, resulting in hundreds of graduates in engineering and medicine", can someone give me names an dcontact details of 5 students whom he gave scholarships and they became doctors and engineers? I can provide you direct contact numbers of Legislative Assemby Members from Rawalakot area including president of Azad Kashmir. As claimed by page writer if Ghulam Ahmad gave hundreds of scholarships resulting hundreds of medical doctors and engineers, everyone including president of Azad Kashmir (as they are from same area) will vouch for him. What do you say EagleEye. riz 02:09, 15 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs)

Request for Comment on the Berlin page

Hi - since you edited the Berlin page within the last couple months, I'm writing to ask if you'd like to weigh in on a current content dispute that has resulted in a request for comment. The issue, simply, is whether the Berlin article should include an image of the "Buddy Bears" or not. Thanks for your time, Sindinero (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hello Jim1138. Just a quick note of thanks for reporting IP 209.65.85.135. I was headed to AIV for the same reason. Vandal fighting is a never ending task here and your quick action helped protect WikiP and I appreciate it. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 19:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for ruining my day=

Why did you send this message to me? I have not edited Wikipedia today as I have not logged into my account. What you are doing is harrassment and if it carries on, I will be forced to make a formal complaint to Wikipedia about you. How dare you. How bloody dare you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.4.182.233 (talk) 08:35, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody probably using your computer did edit RI:SE click "My contributions" in the upper right corner of the page. Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 08:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks for cleaning the garbage from my Talk page this morning. I appreciate it. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Khator

I'm not making disruptive edits. Ok I was at first, but look at what I am changing before you judge me. The links that are cited don't substantiate what is said at all. It's public relations' lies and shame on you for allowing them to continue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.197.160.245 (talk) 23:50, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The cited source makes no reference to "Hindu" nor "fundamentalist". Would suggest it is wp:or. Jim1138 (talk) 23:58, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My UALR page "vandalism" is not vandalism at all, thank you

If someone makes an edit you don't like, that doesn't automatically make it vandalism. You might remind Junipel of that.

My edits to the University of Arkansas at Little Rock page are intended to inform the public and are made using sourced, verifiable statements of fact.

In my opinion, the university is located in an area of Little Rock that should be declared a demilitarized zone and patrolled by UN peacekeeping forces, but I didn't write THAT in the article.

Junipel just wants to sweep the facts under the rug, and only allow the establishment-approved information. Moonbeam 2012 (talk) 01:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss it in talk: talk:University of Arkansas at Little Rock. Compared with most articles on universities, there is way too much on safety. This is called undue bias and is not a neutral point of view Also, please read about the 3 revert rule Jim1138 (talk) 01:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you deleting everything I edit now? Who the hell do you think you are? Moonbeam 2012 (talk) 02:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to discuss anything, anywhere. If a university is having an ongoing crime problem, and UALR is, putting that (sourced) information into a wikipedia article is NOT "undue bias" regardless of what you, or Junipel, says. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moonbeam 2012 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was only fixing the WP:UNDUE concern. If there is a source concern also, feel free to reverse my edit, but please discuss the issue with the original contributor :) ZZArch ^{talk to me} 05:33, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ghulam Ahmad

I dont see what the issue is. There has been no issue for yeas, until Riztik makes one up. This article is clearly, accurate, if there are incaccuracies they should be shown, without even stating what the incaccuracies are you have tagged this. I have edited Wikipedia for a long time and never had these issues. I will appreciate if you would tell me what these issues are, so they can be resolved. 75.0.2.227 (talk) 20:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss it in talk, if it is resolved in a few days, then remove the tags. wp:removing tags. Won't hurt anything being there for awhile. Many articles have them. Jim1138 (talk) 20:23, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is simply distortation of facts. Ghulam Ahmad was born in Indian Kashmir, never lived in Rawalakot, no one in Rawalakot knows him except if he has any close relatives there. He is recently added in notable people's section, he was not there as claimed by Jim1138. In his biography on wikipedia he is been linked with Sudhan tribe, he is Sheikh. Jim1138 if you remove him (and donot add again) from notable section of Rawalakot I will overlook other issues. riz 01:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs)

I have no idea what is up with this guy. He keeps on removing things. Whether the person was born in Indian Kashmir, He was born in Poonch, which prior to the partition of Pakistan was the headquarters of Rawalakot as well. In fact Ghulam Ahmad Father was the first Head Master of the school in Rawalakot.

EagleEye 03:35, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

@EagleEye You and Jim haven't explained why this person Ghulam Ahmad should be included in notable person's section of Rawalakot. You come up with strange explanations, as said by you "In fact Ghulam Ahmad Father was the first Head Master of the school in Rawalakot", what that has to do with Ghulam Ahmad, so you think since his father was a headmaster, he should be notable person? There are hundreds of headmasters in Azad Kashmir, by taking your approach all of them should be in notable section. Are you and Jim1138 relative of Ghulam Ahmad or some kind of beneficiary from him? Be fair, should Ghulam Ahmad stay with three presidents of Azad Kashmir as notable person? a BIG NO. riz 03:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs)

Jim, can you explain to me what this riztech guy is trying to do. Also I have added the references and they are no longer dead.

EagleEye 04:13, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Jim: He was a WWII fighter pilot flying over Burma, where he fought against the Japanese. I will find information on his service.

Thanks

99.180.60.46 (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jim: He was a WWII fighter pilot flying over Burma, where he fought against the Japanese. I will find information on his service.

Thanks

EagleEye 22:10, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: Edit in Santiago#Climate // English variants

Why you left me that message?

The {{Template:Weather box}} doesn't work with the word COLOR, but with COLOUR; check this:

Before edit → http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Santiago&oldid=476501092#Climate

Change → http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Santiago&action=historysubmit&diff=476502457&oldid=476501092

After edit → http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Santiago&oldid=476502457#Climate

You should erase the message you lefted me, because I didn't do anything wrong. ★ Nacho ★ (Contact me) ★ 20:28, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apologized on Inhakito's talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 20:43, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for reverting my talk. Dan653 (talk) 00:04, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Subarachnoid hemorrhage

Hi, Jim. I reckon that 68.34.102.69 is Gqcqjq. Axl ¤ [Talk] 00:11, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"tyres" in Bugatti Veyron article.

Just curious, why is it correct for an american website talking about a german car to use british spelling? I wouldn't change tyre in an Aston or TVR page to tire, but talking about a german car it would seem valid to use the most populous english spelling form, which would be TIRE. Thanks, Eric

So you know I'm not a bigot, Top Gear UK rules and Top Gear US sucks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.12.105.119 (talk) 01:29, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the English language Wikipedia. It includes US, Canada, England, Ireland, India, Australia, and many other countries that use English (besides their dominate language). Wikipedia policy is to not change between English variants. If an article starts with Australian English, it should remain that way. One exception is if the article is about, say something specifically British. Then it would be proper to change it to the British spellings. In that it was already tyres means that it probably should remain so. Though it could have been switched (check history). If it was switched, a very clear edit summary and perhaps an entry in the talk page would prevent being flagged. Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 01:37, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About reverting Health in Japan for vandalism

Hi, my edit, which was reverted by you, was intended to remove a sections in one of the two different articles. I just wanted to let you know that the two sections in Health in Japan#Access to care and Health care system in Japan#Access are almost identical, and I believe the access to health care is more appropriate to be placed in the latter article only, which discusses about the health care system itself. Thanks --174.4.174.12 (talk) 05:00, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Neck gaiter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balaclava (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

En Esch article

Hello, I saw your note about my edit of the article on En Esch. I certainly want to comply with all Wiki rules, so I'm respectfully asking you how to handle: En Esch's real name is Nicklaus. (I originally mispelled it as Nicholas). His bandmates call him Nick. I have met him personally several times, and I asked about his name, and he verified that it's Nicklaus. The letter "S" is pronounced as "esh" in German, so he used his initials to form his name. En Esch As far as a source or a verification, I don't know how to verify this. How do you verify that Whitney Houston's name was Whitney? I mean, I'm not writing anything controversial, and I'm not giving an opinion. The man's name is Nicklaus. He told me himslef, and there are many audio clips and interviews where his bandmates call him Nick. "Klaus" is just a German-sounding name that is short form of Nicklaus. Wiki editor MrMustacheMM is perpetuating that mis-information. As his source, he is finding a random website that incorrectly lists "Klaus" as the name. But I can just as easily choose a web site like http://dictionary.sensagent.com/en+esch/en-en/ and use that as my source. "What is En Esch's real name" is a common google search, and Wikipedia is a source that a lot of people turn to. I'd hate to see people get the wrong information just because user MrMustacheMM is wrong. I'd be happy to abide by any rules/suggestions you have, but the bottom line is that the man's name is Nicklaus, and Wiki should reflect that asap.~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.192.44.53 (talk) 01:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you put "Nicholas Schandelmaier" rather than "Nicklaus Schandelmaier" in the name. The reference [1] names him "Klaus Schandelmaier" which is probably what confused me and others. Goggle did not return any hits for "Nicholas Schandelmaier" and "En Esch" likely adding to the assumption that it was vandalism. I added his two names to the top of the page and a couple of references supporting them. A good edit summary indicating your intent always helps support your changes and prevent the vandal patrol thinking it to be vandalism and reverting it. Please check up on my changes to En Esch and fix any problems you see. As it is your talk page, you can remove those rude messages. Thank you for the message and contributions. Happy editing! Jim1138 (talk) 04:20, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well done. I agree with the way you changed the En Esch page, with both names.~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.192.44.53 (talk) 02:05, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

thank you for the advice. it was very helpful. cheers mate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwerty543 (talk • contribs) 23:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC) also just checked the 5 pillars of wikipedia. they will come in handy too. all the best qwerty543[reply]

Spam edit

I am not trying to sound upset, but I just wanted to know why my edit on the article Veal was marked as spam. I was just correcting the format of some links which had been broken, and I received a message from you about improper citations, and my edit was marked as spam. If you could explain what I did wrong, I would appreciate it. Thanks14jbella (talk) 02:25, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. I am glad it was just a misunderstanding, and I am not in trouble :D14jbella (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:33, 16 February 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Hi

Hi Jim hows it going? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwerty543 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My edit

What?? How was that vanalism? I am sorry but I don't see it, one wikipedia member propositioned a view that was incorrect, so I simply corrected him, there is nothing more to this! Do I have to find sources even for topics that I expand upon in the talk pages of articles??? Once again I meant no harm, I did believe I was doing a beautiful thing for this website by helping expand peoples minds =) Peace =)IraqiLion (talk) 10:28, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problem?

Was there a problem with the posted article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.241.19 (talk) 18:28, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Brown

Hi Jim1138. Just a polite note on editing Roy Brown (RAF officer). Although some of your reverts to User:Shawsara's edits have been exempt from WP:3RR as they're just plain disruptive ([3]), others could be construed as a content dispute. While Shawsara is offering no referenced alternative, I fully support your edits – but it would be quite hypocritical of me to warn them of 3RR and not leave you a note. Hope that's OK! All the best, matt (talk) 09:56, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Brown

I will find suitable references and cite the changes I make to the Roy Brown article. Just to be clear though, when I find these sources am I allowed to delete the content when my sources prove it to be wrong? Thanks. (Shawsara (talk) 10:13, 19 February 2012 (UTC))[reply]

There are many sources questioning Roy Brown for shooting down Manfred von Richthofen. Therefore, that should not be removed unless it is overwhelmingly refuted. If you have a good source that strongly supports Roy Brown, I'd love to see it (and read about it). Any good sources should be included (though not to excess). If you find sources calling into question the reliability of the Australian (or other) theories, those should be included. You should consider the chaos that would happen in most articles if someone with theory B deleted all references to theory A. Even Einstein would not be safe. As I said, I don't care who shot down Richthofen, just that the article be accurate. Please take the time to review "both sides". Thanks for your message. Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 10:27, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for keeping that nazi-flag IP vandal away from my talk page. Klilidiplomus+Talk 08:41, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Belafonte Edit

Hello Jim:

You recently reverted changes I made to Harry Belafonte's birth name as well as the name of his father when Mr. Belafonte was born. You indicated that my changes were disruptive and reverted them. First off, the changes are correct and I have a source that cites Mr. Belafonte's birth name.

Harry Belafonte was born Harold George Bellanfanti, Jr. to Melvine Love and Harold George Bellanfanti, Sr. The source is Harry Belafonte My Song a Memoir with Michael Shnayerson published by Albert A. Knopf (2011). His birth name and date of birth are on page 17 of the above-referenced book. Also, Mr. Belafonte's father is Jamaican not Martiniquan. That needs to be changed as well. This is referenced on page 16 of the same book. Please make these changes or allow me to do so.

Also, it would help if you correspond with people before reverting changes. Especially, if you don't possess knowledge of the changes or can prove that the changes are indeed inaccurate.

Thanks,

````tiramc68 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiramc68 (talk • contribs) 11:06, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You edited the PTC article

You undo my changes in the Paid to click article. The changes I made where totally correct and I even added references. I modified the article as per the information which exists today. I am in the PTC industry from last many years and I wouldn't like you to just simply make changes when you don't possess any knowledge about it. Kindly revert back the changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nano245 (talk • contribs) 11:54, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You scrubbed Paid To Click of well-cited source material criticizing PTC, added spam links supporting your position, and turned the article into an advertisement for PTC. No, I will not restore the page. Please do not spam Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 19:19, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Toast" as a verb

Either you are correct, or the current toasting disambig is correct. Which is it gonna be? 174.113.240.160 (talk) 08:00, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Toasting disambig is incomplete. Best not to use Wikipedia as a source. Try other sources. Dictionary.com verb (used with object) 2. to brown, as bread or cheese, by exposure to heat. Applies to more than just bread. wp:bold is acceptable, but please check more sources before doing wholesale changes. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, you're correct. Also, I agree with your edits, just playing devil's advocate because toasting disambig is broken and I'm not so certain how the best way to fix it would be.174.113.240.160 (talk) 08:14, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]