User talk:Titodutta
This editor is not on Wikibreak, but is attempting to take one. --Tito Dutta (talk) 21:51, 7 January 2013 (UTC) |
This is Titodutta's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107Auto-archiving period: 10 days |
ACC
Hello Tito, the ~ mark doesn't work at acc interface, you need to sign your messages with your name. And the request 96679 you have custom-closed, the reason you have mentioned doesn't seem reasonable, so let me know. Usually we create accounts, requested from school IPs. So I'd suggest when you are not sure about handling any request, please seek assistance. Thank you. :-) -- ɑηsuмaη « ৳ᶏ ɭϞ » 12:27, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- Please give some suggestions on quickly checking rangeblocks? --Tito Dutta (contact)
- I don't know why he thought that is a school IP (the ip mentioned at #multiple blocks), reasons mentioned anonblock, in such case i'd defer to CU. Is this IP from the request 96679? Range blocks clearly mentioned as schoolblock (only), should be AGF, created and watched. Hope it helps. -- ɑηsuмaη « ৳ᶏ ɭϞ » 15:23, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- a) So, rangeblock are not clearly mentioned in block log? b) I have seen creating accounts for reangblocked IPs results immediate account suspension. Any suggestion how to avoid it? c) #96499 what is your take on this username? --Tito Dutta (contact) 15:32, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- a.They are clearly mentioned at "Active Local Blocks", not Local Blocks. If there is no current, active local blocks, "Active Local Blocks" you won't see any log. And in such cases you only see previous block logs at "Local Blocks". b. If you are not sure, seek help or unreserve, and notice what others are doing, this way you can learn. And you can always and its recommended, you leave requests, you are not sure of to others, even I do now, when I am not sure of a name and so on. c. Username seems fine, unless it conflicts with a similar name while creating. -- ɑηsuмaη « ৳ᶏ ɭϞ » 15:54, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- I don't know why he thought that is a school IP (the ip mentioned at #multiple blocks), reasons mentioned anonblock, in such case i'd defer to CU. Is this IP from the request 96679? Range blocks clearly mentioned as schoolblock (only), should be AGF, created and watched. Hope it helps. -- ɑηsuмaη « ৳ᶏ ɭϞ » 15:23, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- In case you don't know, comments left at interface, Quick reply can't be seen by requested users. So in such cases you may consider writing an email to them. !96771, I'd decline as an UPOL VIO. :-) -- ɑηsuмaη « ৳ᶏ ɭϞ » 15:54, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, so, sing ip anon block can be directly created as in #96275? --Tito Dutta (contact) 16:23, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- No, they need to be reviewed. It was mistaken by me as a range block. In range blocks, the requested IP and Target range IP don't match. The Target IP appears something like 23.23.00.00/26, then you know its a range block. But how you thought it's a proxy, without even looking into it? -- ɑηsuмaη « ৳ᶏ ɭϞ » 18:17, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- That was a comment posted at wrong thread! --Tito Dutta (contact) 22:32, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
ACC
Please go to IRC now. I'd like to discuss some things with you.—cyberpower ChatOnline 16:47, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
- Attended! --Tito Dutta (contact) 17:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Your kind response needed
Hello, this is another mate on the English Wikipedia. If i'm posting in wrong place then sorry but i'd appreciated your comments. I know you're not Muslim but i saw your contributions for Swami Vivekananda and felt you're neutral. I'm requesting your comments as i feel some false accusation are being made without reliable sources in some Islam related articles that were created by a single editor User:BengaliHindu. Specially, i found this article 2013 Canning riots with lots of bias and false accusations against Muslims. May be i'm wrong but it may also possible that such articles were created per Islamophobia. I believe Wikipedia should be free from personal feelings or views and articles on sensitive topics need extra care to maintain a NPOV. I'd deeply appreciate your comments and advises. Best Regards, Mrwikidor ←track 16:48, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- I did GA review of the article Islam too. The Canning riot has nothing to do with Islam or WikiProject Islam UNLESS some head Imam or Delhi or some other major city or state mentions that as a significant event of Islamic culture in India. After the first look (yesterday) I felt, that was more a WikiNews topic (This is not an AFD vote or comment)--Tito Dutta (contact) 16:57, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Debipaksha
On 3 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Debipaksha, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in the film Debipaksha (2004), a Bengali priest named his three daughters Rebati, Haimanti and Jayanti, the names of Hindu goddess Durga? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Debipaksha. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:02, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
INCOTM coordinator
Please consider taking up the volunteer coordinator post of INCOTM, even if for 2-3 months. --Dwaipayan (talk) 17:11, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- I was just reading that thread! To concentrate on the thread of BengaliHindu, that INTCOM got missed. What one needs to actually as a coordinator? --Tito Dutta (contact) 17:14, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- I was thinking to work on WikiProject India's networking and communication part. Have you seen Template:WikiProject India talkback? The template is not finalized, going through changes. --Tito Dutta (contact) 17:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I saw that template, you used it on my talk page once. It looks good.
- I was thinking to work on WikiProject India's networking and communication part. Have you seen Template:WikiProject India talkback? The template is not finalized, going through changes. --Tito Dutta (contact) 17:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- INCOTM coordinator has essentially two parts of the work: one is maintaining the nomination page and announcing the winning nom for each month; and, generating report on the activity in the nominated article over the month. I personally think in case of shortage of time, you need not concentrate much on the report of activity, just before/after diff and whether a GA or FA nom was done/will be done is enough. However, that being said, mentioning the names of most active participants in the INCOTM article could be encouraging to new editors. See this report page, I think such report is quite extensive, and is not always necessary. The main thing is to start the process again. The History page is a good summary.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- I have updated the history page and will update the reports page shortly. Tito can focus on getting the process started. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 18:31, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yup, let's start it. It's great that several editors are taking part in the process. We can ask for nominations for May.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:31, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- I've filed the reports :) for August and September. We can start the nomination process now, finish it by 21–22 April and have a 40 day collaboration instead of the usual 30 days. If we extend the nomination process till May, many editors who are enthusiastic about this now might lose interest. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 00:23, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yup, let's start it. It's great that several editors are taking part in the process. We can ask for nominations for May.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:31, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- I have updated the history page and will update the reports page shortly. Tito can focus on getting the process started. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 18:31, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- INCOTM coordinator has essentially two parts of the work: one is maintaining the nomination page and announcing the winning nom for each month; and, generating report on the activity in the nominated article over the month. I personally think in case of shortage of time, you need not concentrate much on the report of activity, just before/after diff and whether a GA or FA nom was done/will be done is enough. However, that being said, mentioning the names of most active participants in the INCOTM article could be encouraging to new editors. See this report page, I think such report is quite extensive, and is not always necessary. The main thing is to start the process again. The History page is a good summary.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Looking for an adopter/mentor experienced in page layout, design/templates.
You may either hit me on my talk page or email me. if interested. Thanks. johncheverly 21:22, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tito, how are you? it's a long time we don't correspond. Please, I ask your help, 5 minutes of your precious time, to watch this new page, if I made all correct.
I thank yopu a lot for your help
Rex Momo (talk) 17:48, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- The article looks good! Needs expansion and more footnotes! Well done! --Tito Dutta (contact) 17:57, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
GOCE April 2013 newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors March 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter
We have completed our March backlog elimination drive. The drive wrap-up newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis Sign up for the April blitz! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 19:25, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
|
Message at Noticeboard for India-related topics
Message added by Northamerica1000(talk) 19:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time.
The Barnstar of Collaboration | ||
Thanks for improving the Nimpith article and for all of your input regarding this article (and others) at the Noticeboard for India-related topics! Best regards, Northamerica1000(talk) 20:10, 4 April 2013 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 01 April 2013
- Special report: Who reads which Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Special: FAQs
- Featured content: What the ?
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Wikidata phase 2 deployment timetable in doubt
As this being a first film made in Calcutta, would it be possible for you to find any sources in bengali? Article is already 5x expanded but needs more info than what we have. - Vivvt (Talk) 20:11, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- There is almost nothing in Bengali web other than what is already included in the article! --Tito Dutta (contact) 20:16, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- Tough situation here. Anyway, not a problem. - Vivvt (Talk) 20:19, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Invitation to WikiProject Breakfast
Hello, Titodutta.
You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. |
---|
- I have joined! --Tito Dutta (contact) 17:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Parineeti Chopra
Please, talkback on the review page of the article. Your issues were resolved. Thank you.Prashant talk 19:00, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- I have replied and added some more points! This talkback message was helpful, otherwise, I was going to check tomorrow morning! --Tito Dutta (contact) 19:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- Talkback again on the review page as your issues were resolved.Prashant talk 19:43, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- Talkback on the review page.Prashant talk 21:38, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- Please talkback again on the review page. Your issues were resolved.Prashant talk 03:03, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- If you write edit summaries, it'll be helpful follow your edits. For more details, see WP:FIES --Tito Dutta (contact) 09:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- well..i always add summaries, but was in too hurry. I'll follow it. Please, talkback on the review page. Thanks.Prashant talk 14:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Please check users' contributions before welcoming them
Hi Tito, I don't think a welcome template was appropriate at all for Eliwiel, whose only edit was this one. It's hard to tell whether it was a test or blatant vandalism, but it certainly did not improve the article. Graham87 01:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, Graham, that was an automatic welcome posted by WelcomeBot! Check page history. I did not manually post it! --Tito Dutta (contact) 09:34, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oops, sorry, I didn't notice that! The difference between the timestamps of the edit and the welcome template alarmed me a bit, but now I understand what was going on. Let's hope the user in question makes more constructive edits in the future. Graham87 10:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
query
Sir, when adding info can i add info sources from other language sources Uncletomwood (talk) 09:19, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, you can add sources of other languages. You can see details here --Tito Dutta (contact) 09:49, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Titodutta, you haven't been back to this page for a while, even to note that you did some expansion to the article. I've done some editing on your recent additions, and the article's now at 1525 prose characters, just enough. But the "citation needed" tag is still there, and has to be dealt with. If you want the nomination approved, you need to finish the necessary work and let us know that it's done. I hope you do. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:13, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- In this reply, I mentioned that part was already sourced. Did you miss it? I was expecting you to remove the CN tag like the other two CN tags where you told the page did not load completely! Anyway, I have gone ahead and made adjustments there removing the CN tag! --Tito Dutta (contact)
- Titodutta, thanks for doing that. It is up to you to fill in the citation in such cases: if you have a quote, the citation can't wait until the end of a paragraph, but must go no later than the end of the sentence where the quote ends. While I had fixed the other "citation needed" templates I had inserted due to my error in not seeing that the source contained the information, this particular spot had never had a citation and needed it. It looks like everything is done now, and the nomination ready for a final review: I've put out the call for a reviewer. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:03, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hey Tito Dutta! I took a look at the article and there is still at least one more thing that needs a cite and I also think you may want to go with another hook. I made some suggestion for potential alts. I think the article is very close to being ready. AgneCheese/Wine 06:21, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Hey.. Your issues were resolved. Please, reflect as soon as possible. Thank you.Prashant talk 03:30, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- I'll check soon! --Tito Dutta (contact) 10:36, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- Talkback on the GA review talk page.Prashant talk 11:22, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- That is not a suitable excuse See this Article. The actor did only one film that time, passed its GA in 2011 (also a small article). I think this is enough.Prashant talk 14:08, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- Are you reviewing? And reply in the review page! --Tito Dutta (contact) 14:11, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- Please, give your final vertict on the article. I'm very tired now. The article is in a very good position. Please, don't stretch this review as this is getting boring. ThanksPrashant talk 14:25, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- You are in some sort of hurry. Are you aware that a large number of GA reviews run for weeks (if not months)? If you see WP:GAN, you'll find many reviews where reviewers have just added note "I'll review" and have not returned after that! We have started the review just two days ago and you are finding it "stretch"! --Tito Dutta (contact) 14:31, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- Though, I'm seeing if I can finish it in next few days! --Tito Dutta (contact) 14:35, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- No, its not what are you thinking. I'm just worried about the verdict. I must say you are a great reviewer. You notice even small things, which I appreciate. Really, it is very heat warming that you noticed very small things. Apart from that, no I'm not hurry but I'm also working on the other articles as well and i can't work (without tension). My all attention is here. That's why. Thank You for the review. It was a great one.Prashant talk 14:42, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- Note the starting of Talk:Parineeti_Chopra/GA2#Comments_part_04 Though length is not directly a criteria of GA. I never thought to and not going to fail the article because of its length! When I told "start class article", I had actually few suggestions to work on! Be assured! --Tito Dutta (contact) 14:51, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- You are in some sort of hurry. Are you aware that a large number of GA reviews run for weeks (if not months)? If you see WP:GAN, you'll find many reviews where reviewers have just added note "I'll review" and have not returned after that! We have started the review just two days ago and you are finding it "stretch"! --Tito Dutta (contact) 14:31, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- Well, thank you. I can't praise you much. Thank You. Will be happy, if you can give your verdict as soon as possible.Prashant talk 15:08, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- Please, give your final vertict on the article. I'm very tired now. The article is in a very good position. Please, don't stretch this review as this is getting boring. ThanksPrashant talk 14:25, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tito, how are you? I made this new page of a great Brazilian humorist.
Please, I ask your precious help to correct my mistakes. You'll need 5 minutes only. Thanks a lot!
Rex Momo (talk) 10:09, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- I have made some changes! --Tito Dutta (contact) 10:42, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for your help!!! Rex Momo (talk) 10:47, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
This is for all your help on ACC. —cyberpower ChatOffline 11:43, 9 April 2013 (UTC) |
Monty Hall problem
Please Tito could you have a look to the short new "Introduction"? – Imo it can help the average reader to understand the MHP-paradox. Nijdam opposes. Can you give your opinion on the talk page? Thanks Gerhardvalentin (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- I have posted a reply! --Tito Dutta (contact) 23:44, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Project for RfA nominators
Hi -- I notice you've been active in nominating at RfA over the past year, and would like to invite you to join the WikiProject for Nominators, which aims to support editors interested in nominating there. We'd be glad of your expertise in getting this new project off the ground. Apologies for the talk-page spamming if you've already seen this message a dozen times. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 23:51, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- I have joined! --Tito Dutta (contact) 23:55, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Please Take a Look at My Edit Request at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rabindranath_Tagore
Hi Tito,
I have made an edit request of the Rabindranath Tagore page. Please look at it at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rabindranath_Tagore and let me know what you think. In short it is a request to add the Enlish translation of Europe Provasir Patra titled Letters from an Expatriate in Europe which is now available for free from http://smashwords.com/b/147753 to the list of translations.
Thanks and regards,
Webmaestro365 (talk) 02:07, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- I have posted a reply! --Tito Dutta (contact) 07:56, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- I have replied to your post. ~ Webmaestro365 (talk) 13:30, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 April 2013
- Wikizine: WMF scales back feature after outcry
- WikiProject report: Earthshattering WikiProject Earthquakes
- News and notes: French intelligence agents threaten Wikimedia volunteer
- Arbitration report: Subject experts needed for Argentine History
- Featured content: Wikipedia loves poetry
- Technology report: Testing week
Talkback
Message added 07:12, 10 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Yunshui 雲水 07:12, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
↑ and again. Yunshui 雲水 07:58, 10 April 2013 (UTC)