Intel Atom: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
This article is about the Atom chip. Removing WP:OR.
Line 104: Line 104:
| rowspan=3 | n/a
| rowspan=3 | n/a
| 2.5 W
| 2.5 W
| rowspan=3 | Yes
| rowspan=3 | Yes
| No
| No
| rowspan=3 | No
| rowspan=3 | No
Line 111: Line 111:
| Atom 2xx
| Atom 2xx
| 4 W
| 4 W
| rowspan=2 | Yes <br><small>(if enabled)</small>
| rowspan=2 | Yes
|-
|-
| Atom 3xx
| Atom 3xx
Line 126: Line 126:
| 6.5&nbsp;W
| 6.5&nbsp;W
| rowspan=4 | Yes
| rowspan=4 | Yes
| rowspan=4 | Yes <br><small>(if enabled)</small>
| rowspan=4 | Yes
| rowspan=4 | No
| rowspan=4 | No
| rowspan=4 | January 2010
| rowspan=4 | January 2010
Line 150: Line 150:
| rowspan=2 | 10&nbsp;W
| rowspan=2 | 10&nbsp;W
| No
| No
| rowspan=4 | Yes <br><small>(if enabled)</small>
| rowspan=4 | Yes
| rowspan=4 | No
| rowspan=4 | No
| rowspan=2 | November 2011
| rowspan=2 | November 2011
Line 170: Line 170:


|}
|}

== 64 Bit Support ==

Intel states<ref>{{cite web | url=http://ark.intel.com/products/58916/ | title=Intel N2600 : Atom Benchmarked: 4W Of Performance | publisher=Intel.com | date=28 Aug 2012 | accessdate=28 Aug 2012 }}</ref> the Atom supports 64-bit operation only "with a processor, chipset, BIOS" that all support Intel 64. Those Atom vendor systems not supporting all these cannot enable Intel 64<ref>{{cite web | url=http://superuser.com/questions/433753/this-cpu-is-not-compatible-with-64-bit-mode-installing-windows-7-ultimate-6 | title=This CPU is not compatible with 64-bit mode - Installing Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit on a netbook with a 64-bit Intel Atom CPU | publisher=Stackexchange.com | date=7 Jun 2012 | accessdate=28 Aug 2012 }}</ref>. This renders the CPU in these cases effectively 32 bit.


== Availability ==
== Availability ==

Revision as of 14:43, 28 September 2012

Intel Atom
Intel Atom Z520 compared to a 1 Eurocent coin. It is 182 mm2.[1]
General information
Launched2008–present
Common manufacturer(s)
  • Intel
Performance
Max. CPU clock rate600 MHz to 2.13 GHz
FSB speeds400 MHz to 667 MHz
Architecture and classification
Technology node45 nm to 32 nm
Instruction setMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, IA-32, x86-64 (not for the N2xx and Z5xx series)
Physical specifications
Cores
  • 1, 2
Package(s)
Products, models, variants
Core name(s)
  • Silverthorne
  • Diamondville
  • Pineview
  • Lincroft

Intel Atom is the brand name for a line of ultra-low-voltage IA-32 and x86-64 CPUs (or microprocessors) from Intel, originally designed in 45 nm CMOS with subsequent models, codenamed Cedar, using a 32 nm process.[2] Atom is mainly used in netbooks, nettops, embedded applications ranging from health care to advanced robotics, and mobile internet devices (MIDs).

Atom processors are based on the Bonnell microarchitecture.[3][4] On 21 December 2009, Intel announced the Pine Trail platform, including new Atom processor code-named Pineview (Atom N450), with total kit power consumption down 20%.[5] On 28 December 2011, Intel updated the Atom line with the Cedar processors.[2]

History

Intel Atom is a direct successor of the Intel A100 and A110 low-power microprocessors (code-named Stealey), which were built on a 90 nm process, had 512 KB L2 cache and ran at 600 MHz/800 MHz with 3W TDP (Thermal Design Power). Prior to the Silverthorne announcement, outside sources had speculated that Atom would compete with AMD's Geode system-on-a-chip processors, used by the One Laptop per Child (OLPC) project, and other cost and power sensitive applications for x86 processors. However, Intel revealed on 15 October 2007 that it was developing another new mobile processor, codenamed Diamondville, for OLPC-type devices.[6]

"Atom" was the name under which Silverthorne would be sold, while the supporting chipset formerly code-named Menlow was called Centrino Atom.[7]

At Spring Intel Developer Forum (IDF) 2008 in Shanghai, Intel officially announced that Silverthorne and Diamondville are based on the same microarchitecture. Silverthorne would be called the Atom Z5xx series and Diamondville would be called the Atom N2xx series. The more expensive lower-power Silverthorne parts will be used in Intel Mobile Internet Devices (MIDs) whereas Diamondville will be used in low-cost desktop and notebooks. Several Mini-ITX motherboard samples have also been revealed.[8] Intel and Lenovo also jointly announced an Atom powered MID called the IdeaPad U8.[9]

In April 2008, a MID development kit was announced by Sophia Systems[10] and the first board called CoreExpress-ECO was revealed by a German company LiPPERT Embedded Computers, GmbH.[11] Intel offers Atom based motherboards.[12][13]

Intel Atom processor family[14]
MID / Ultra-Mobile PC / Lifestyle PC
Logo Code-name Series Core On-Die GPU GPU Speed TDP HT Intel 64 Intel VT-x Release date
Intel Atom logo 2008 Silverthorne Atom Z5xx single (45 nm) No n/a 0.65~2 W No No No April 2008
2~2.4 W Yes Yes
Intel Atom logo 2009 Lincroft Atom Z6xx single (45 nm) Yes 400 MHz 1.3~3 W Yes No Yes May 2010
Classmate PC / Netbook / Nettop / Lifestyle PC
Logo Code-name Series Core On-Die GPU GPU Speed TDP HT Intel 64 Intel VT-x Release date
Intel Atom logo 2008 Diamondville Atom N2xx single (45 nm) No n/a 2.5 W Yes No No June 2008
Atom 2xx 4 W Yes
Atom 3xx dual (45 nm) 8 W September 2008
Intel Atom logo 2009 Pineview Atom N4xx single (45 nm) Yes 200 MHz 6.5 W Yes Yes No January 2010
Atom D4xx 400 MHz 10 W
Atom N5xx dual (45 nm) 200 MHz 8.5 W
Atom D5xx 400 MHz 13 W
Cedarview Atom D2500 dual (32 nm) Yes 400 MHz 10 W No Yes No November 2011
Atom D2700 640 MHz Yes
Atom N2600 400 MHz 3.5 W December 2011
Atom N2800 640 MHz 6.5 W
List of Intel Atom microprocessors

Availability

Atom processors became available to system manufacturers in 2008. Because they are soldered, like northbridges and southbridges, onto a mainboard, Atom processors are not available to home users or system builders as separate processors, although they may be obtained preinstalled on some ITX motherboards. The Diamondville and Pineview[15] Atom is used in the HP Mini Series, aigo MID Asus N10, Lenovo IdeaPad S10, Acer Aspire One & Packard Bell's "dot" (ZG5), recent ASUS Eee PC systems, Sony VAIO M-series, AMtek Elego, Dell Inspiron Mini Series, Gigabyte M912, LG X Series, Samsung NC10, Sylvania g Netbook Meso, Toshiba NB series (100, 200, 205, 255, 300, 500, 505), MSI Wind PC netbooks, RedFox Wizbook 1020i, Sony Vaio X Series, Zenith Z-Book, a range of Aleutia desktops,and the Archos 10

Performance

The performance of a single core Atom is about half that of a Pentium M of the same clock rate. For example, the Atom N270 (1.60 GHz) found in many netbooks such as the Eee PC can deliver around 3300 MIPS and 2.1 GFLOPS in standard benchmarks,[16] compared to 7400 MIPS and 3.9 GFLOPS for the similarly clocked (1.73 GHz) Pentium M 740.[17]

The Pineview platform has proven to be only slightly faster than the previous Diamondville platform. This is because the Pineview platform uses the same Bonnell execution core as Diamondville and is connected to the memory controller via the FSB, hence memory latency and performance in CPU-intensive applications are minimally improved.[18]

Instruction set architecture

Atom implements the x86 (IA-32) instruction set; x86-64 is so far only activated for the desktop Diamondville and desktop and mobile Pineview cores. The Atom N2xx and Z5xx series Atom models cannot run x86-64 code.[19]

Bonnell microarchitecture

Intel Atom processors are based on the Bonnell microarchitecture,[3][4] which can execute up to two instructions per cycle. Like many other x86 microprocessors, it translates x86-instructions (CISC instructions) into simpler internal operations (sometimes referred to as micro-ops, i.e., effectively RISC style instructions) prior to execution. The majority of instructions produce one micro-op when translated, with around 4% of instructions used in typical programs producing multiple micro-ops. The number of instructions that produce more than one micro-op is significantly fewer than the P6 and NetBurst microarchitectures. In the Bonnell microarchitecture, internal micro-ops can contain both a memory load and a memory store in connection with an ALU operation, thus being more similar to the x86 level and more powerful than the micro-ops used in previous designs.[20] This enables relatively good performance with only two integer ALUs, and without any instruction reordering, speculative execution, or register renaming. The Bonnell microarchitecture therefore represents a partial revival of the principles used in earlier Intel designs such as P5 and the i486, with the sole purpose of enhancing the performance per watt ratio. However, Hyper-Threading is implemented in an easy (i.e., low power) way to employ the whole pipeline efficiently by avoiding the typical single thread dependencies.[20]

Future CPU releases

According to Intel spokeswoman Suzy Ramirez, speaking to CNET in June 2011,[21] Intel has the following release plans:

  • 2012: ValleyView (32 nm) Current CedarView but with Ivy Bridge graphics
  • 2013: Silvermont (22 nm) DDR3-1333
  • 2014: Airmont (14 nm)

Collaborations

In March 2009, Intel announced that it would be collaborating with TSMC for the production of the Atom processors.[22] The deal was put on hold due to lack of demand in 2010.

On 13 September 2011 Intel and Google held a joint announcement of a partnership to provide support in Google's Android operating system for Intel processors (beginning with the Atom). This would allow Intel to supply chips for the growing smartphone and tablet market.[23]

Competition

The direct competitor of the Intel Atom is the AMD Fusion C- and E-series. The C-series (C-30: single core, C-50/C-60: dual cores) has a TDP (9W) similar to the Atom, while the higher clocked E-series (E-240: single core, E-350/E-450: dual core) has a TDP of 18 Watts that corresponds more to an Atom including a dedicated GPU (e.g. ION2, ATI 5430). The processors include a single or dual core 64-bit CPU with out-of-order execution, DDR3 memory controller and an 80-core Radeon GPU. The performance of the E-series outperforms Intel Atom in most tests - up to 326.5% better game performance according to "Tom's Hardware.com".[24]

Embedded processors based on the ARM version 7 instruction set architecture (such as Nvidia's Tegra 3 series, TI's OMAP 4 series and Freescale's i.MX51 based on the Cortex-A8 core, or the Qualcomm Snapdragon and Marvell Armada 500/600 based on custom ARMv7 implementations) offer similar performance to the low end Atom chipsets[dubious ] but at roughly one quarter the power consumption, and (like most ARM systems) as a single integrated system on a chip, rather than a two chip solution like the current Atom line. Although the second-generation Atom codenamed "Pineview" should greatly increase its competitiveness in performance/watt, ARM plans to counter the threat with the multi-core capable Cortex-A9 core as used in Nvidia's Tegra 2/3, TI's OMAP 4 series, and Qualcomm's next-generation Snapdragon series, among others.

The Nano and Nano Dual-Core series from VIA is slightly above the average thermal envelope of the Atom, but offers hardware AES support, random number generators, and out-of-order execution. Performance comparisons of the Intel Atom against the Via Nano indicate that a single core Intel Atom is outperformed by the Via Nano which is in turn outperformed by a dual core Intel Atom 330 in tests where the second core is used. The Core 2 Duo SU7300 outperforms the dual-core Nano.[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]

The Xcore86 (also known as the PMX 1000) is x586 based System on Chip (SoC) that offers a below average thermal envelope compared to the Atom.

Kenton Williston of EE Times said that while Atom will not displace ARM from its current markets, the ability to apply the PC architecture into smaller, cheaper and lower power form factors will open up new markets for Intel.[33]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ "Intel® Atom™ Processor Z520". Intel.
  2. ^ a b Anand Lal Shimpi. "Intel's Atom N2600, N2800 & D2700: Cedar Trail, The Heart of the 2012 Netbook". Retrieved 28 December 2011.
  3. ^ a b Jeff Moriarty (1 April 2008). "'Atom 101' - Deciphering the Intel codewords around MIDs". Retrieved 4 August 2010.
  4. ^ a b Anand Lal Shimpi (27 January 2010). "Why Pine Trail Isn't Much Faster Than the First Atom". Retrieved 4 August 2010.
  5. ^ "Intel Announces Next-Generation Atom Platform". Intel.
  6. ^ "Intel to unveil OLPC chips in Shanghai next April". InfoWorld. 15 October 2007.
  7. ^ "Intel Announces Atom Brand for Silverthorne, Menlow". PC World.
  8. ^ "Intel Developer Forum Spring 2008: Day 1 - Hardware Upgrade". Hwupgrade.it. 30 July 2005. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
  9. ^ "Lenovo exhibits Atom based MID Ideapad U8 at IDF 2008 : Specs, reviews and prices".
  10. ^ "MID dev kit sports Centrino Atom chipset". Retrieved 29 January 2011.
  11. ^ "Tiny Centrino Atom-based module unveiled". Retrieved 29 January 2011.
  12. ^ "Intel Desktop Board D945GCLF - Overview". Retrieved 29 January 2011.
  13. ^ "Intel offers $80 "Little Falls" Atom mobo". Retrieved 29 January 2011.
  14. ^ "Products: SPECIFICATIONS: Intel® Atom™ Processor".
  15. ^ "HP Mini 210-2072cl PC Product Specifications".
  16. ^ "SiSoft Sandra : Atom Benchmarked: 4W Of Performance". Tomshardware.com. 29 July 2008. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
  17. ^ "Intel Pentium M 740 PCSTATS Review - Benchmarks: Office Productivity, SiSoft Sandra 2005". PCstats.com.
  18. ^ "Why Pine Trail Isn't Much Faster Than the First Atom". AnandTech. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
  19. ^ "Intel Atom Processor Specifications". Intel.com. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
  20. ^ a b "Intel's Atom Architecture: The Journey Begins". AnandTech. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
  21. ^ Crothers, Brooke (30 June 2011). "Intel maps out tablet plans through 2014". Retrieved 1 January 2011.
  22. ^ "TSMC To Build Intel's Atom-Based Chips". Forbes. 2 March 2009. Retrieved 3 March 2009.
  23. ^ "Intel, Google announce partnership for Android smartphones". 14 September 2011.
  24. ^ "Low-Power Gaming: AMD's E-350 Vs. Intel Atom D525 And Ion 2". Tom's Hardware. 14 April 2011. Retrieved 14 April 2011.
  25. ^ "Intel Atom vs. VIA Nano Platform Comparo Introduction". TweakTown. 11 August 2008. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
  26. ^ "VIA Nano Dual Core Preview". 26 December 2010. Retrieved 26 December 2010.
  27. ^ Kyle Bennett. "Introduction & Power - Intel Atom vs.VIA Nano". Hardocp.com. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
  28. ^ "VIA Nano vs Intel Atom". TrustedReviews. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
  29. ^ "VIA Nano Outperforms Intel Atom in Actual Industry Performance Benchmarking tests". Mydigitallife.info. 31 July 2008. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
  30. ^ "Intel Atom Initial Benchmarking Data vs. Pentium and Celeron M Processors Before Official Release". Mydigitallife.info. 8 March 2008. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
  31. ^ "EEE PC vs MSI Wind - Atom vs Celeron CPU Performance Benchmark: Netbooks, EEE PC, MSI Wind, Aspire One and Akoya Resources". Eeejournal.com. 11 May 2008. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
  32. ^ "Intel Atom 230/330/VIA Nano performances contrasted". En.hardspell.com. 25 September 2008. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
  33. ^ "Analysis: The real scoop on Atom-ARM rivalry". Retrieved 1 January 2012.

References

External links