User talk:WMrapids: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
Unnecessary. You were pinged as well. Accusing of WikiHounding is strange as I was just reviewing articles I was previously engaged in.
Line 446: Line 446:
:{{re|Doug Weller}} Yes, please. I tried reaching out to others in the past, though nothing really happened. Thanks! [[User:WMrapids|WMrapids]] ([[User talk:WMrapids#top|talk]]) 21:47, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
:{{re|Doug Weller}} Yes, please. I tried reaching out to others in the past, though nothing really happened. Thanks! [[User:WMrapids|WMrapids]] ([[User talk:WMrapids#top|talk]]) 21:47, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
::Sorry for the delay, trying to get this sorted asap now. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 08:45, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
::Sorry for the delay, trying to get this sorted asap now. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 08:45, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

== Gratuitous and unhelpful canvassing notices ==
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NoonIcarus&diff=prev&oldid=1165568068 This post] is gratuitous and unhelpful, and along with other things mentioned on various talk pages, possibly hounding as well. As you can see clearly at [[Talk:La Patilla]], the ''only'' position I have taken with respect to reliability of La Patilla is that the RFC was at the wrong place. Hence, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SandyGeorgia&diff=prev&oldid=1165523295 notifying me that it has moved elsewhere] is entirely appropriate; {{u|NoonIcarus}} had no way of knowing whether I knew if the forum had changed. And the only reason I haven't yet weighed in on the RFC is I don't have time to get through the posturing, [[WP:BLUDGEON]]ing, POV and misrepresentation. There's not a single clear and usable example there that speaks to reliability as we measure it. All combined, this is not a good look; please stop spreading ill will around. We're all busy in here. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 01:46, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:49, 16 July 2023

Welcome!

Hello, WMrapids, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 10:35, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting the Nomination of 2016 Grand Rapids tornado outbreak for deletion

"A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 Grand Rapids tornado outbreak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Grand Rapids tornado outbreak until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article."

Please, join in the discussion. Thank You.--Halls4521 (talk) 20:55, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Tracklist"

"Tracklist" is the incorrect header for the track list. It's "Track listing". This is per the album style guide, located here: WP:MOSALBUM --Jennica / talk 04:10, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Please stop with the edits on Whitmer's page. First off, the edits seem political and looking at your editing history it appears the only one you haven't edited in the Michigan Dem primary is El-Sayed. More than that, you've listed twice about something irrelevant. You randomly listing a fundraiser on her personal page as the only other thing listed in her gubernatorial run is suspicious editing. The page will be locked if you keep persisting in this edit. --Criticalthinker (talk) 04:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Criticalthinker: Please do not threaten me. I could just as easily accuse you of Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for whitewashing the article, but I will assume good faith just like you should. Could we at least mention the relation to BCBSM? It seems suspicious that you would want to remove this sourced information, so let's at least work on an agreement. Just leave the info about her father, not the funding she received.--WMrapids (talk) 04:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I had absolutely no problem of you listing her father's work in the beginning part of the article. It's relevant background information. But your then mention of BCBS in the section no one has been editing shows bad faith and political bias as do you other edits in this race. I'm not sure who you are trying to fool. You added back the BCBS stuff at the end. If you think this is relevant information, than it can go in an appropriate "controversy" section or something on the main gubernatorial race page. Biographical pages aren't for listing random fundraisers and day-to-day or month-to-month occurences, and I think you know that. --Criticalthinker (talk) 05:09, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Criticalthinker: Well, can you add the details about her father? I did not see a reason to create a "controversy" section surrounding her funding. I have only just begun editing such articles and can add more to balance POV if needed. Thanks again for the quick response. --WMrapids (talk) 05:20, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Why can't you do it? You're the one who originally added the information and thus you have the proper citations and sourcing for it. --Criticalthinker (talk) 05:31, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Criticalthinker: Did not want to have it seem like edit warring.--WMrapids (talk) 05:42, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Standard notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

  // Timothy :: talk  19:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

  // Timothy :: talk  19:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Hello, the war map of Karabakh has been nominated for deletion for the second time. Could you please state your views on the candidacy page?--Emreculha (talk) 00:19, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Beshogur (talk) 17:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Peru Barnstar
I liked your contributions to Peru so I am giving you this barnstar. Cupper52 (talk) 21:06, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Cupper52: Thank you for the barnstar! I really appreciate it!--WMrapids (talk) 18:04, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish citation tags

Hi, could you kindly translate citations when you copy them over from other projects? Stuff like this is just plain unacceptable. Thanks. AngryHarpytalk 07:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AngryHarpy: Of course! Didn't notice that the citations weren't translating properly. I apologize.--WMrapids (talk) 07:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, ever since I noticed that reFill still puts deprecated |deadurl= tags in articles due to its creator having effectively abandoned it, I've learned to always double-check with those pesky tools. Sorry if I came across a little harshly! AngryHarpytalk 08:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wyoming, Michigan lede

I saw you wrote the section currently at the end of the lede... which says Into the 2010s, development began to restart in the southwestern panhandle while efforts to .. Efforts to what?? I am guessing you lost the end of that sentence somehow. Just thought you might like to know! jp×g 03:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JPxG: Thanks for the catch!--WMrapids (talk) 00:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alliance for the Progress of Peru logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alliance for the Progress of Peru logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2021 Colombian protests

On 2 May 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2021 Colombian protests, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. 172.73.7.196 (talk) 23:04, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

good

ITN recognition for 2021 Colombian protests

On 2 May 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2021 Colombian protests, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. 186.168.102.122 (talk) 23:07, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

good article

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Colombian protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFP. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2021 Colombian protests
added a link pointing to The Hill
Democratic Center (Colombia)
added a link pointing to The Hill
Iván Duque Márquez
added a link pointing to The Hill

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism

Hi WMrapids,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 23:09, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


  • Hendrik Meijer (businessman) was absolutely fascinating—had no idea of his history! Thanks for writing it. Also, if you haven't already considered it, this would be a great candidate for WP:DYK. czar 23:09, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Czar: I thought it was interesting as well and was necessary to include. The article needs some expansion still, but overall Hendrik deserved his own page instead of a redirect. Thanks for the invite as well!--WMrapids (talk) 04:55, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Plan Verde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Q&A.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Great Resignation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strike.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Young Dolph

On 18 November 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Young Dolph, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:59, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Republican Party (Chile, 2019), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nativism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Institute of Peruvian Studies moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Institute of Peruvian Studies, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:49, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Institute of Peruvian Studies logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Institute of Peruvian Studies logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:53, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Pence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Pence, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Pence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Killing of Patrick Lyoya

Quote:

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Killing of Patrick Lyoya. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. In your edit here, you incorrectly add that the officer shot Lyoya "[a]fter losing control of the taser". This was not found in any of the included sources and is borderline vandalism. Please be careful with further edits on controversial articles.--WMrapids (talk) 21:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC)}}

WMrapids, I have tried to engage you on the talk page in an effort to bring a more Wikipedia:Neutral point of view to the above article and to encourage you to stay focused on the incident at hand and not make the article about "social justice".
I backed away when you engaged in WP:EDITWARING as you repeatedly reverted my edits and the edits of others. At the time of your posting above, you edits made up 85% of the article content.
When the investigative reports come out (and I'll wait for that),
we will know if your claim was correct: the officer is seen pushing Lyoya face-down with his knee and then shooting Lyoya in the back of the head
or if my claim my was correct After losing control of the taser, the officer draws his service weapon which discharges as the two are scuffling.
If there are videos recording an incident in an article, we certainly have a practical obligation to consider challenges to content that are obviously inconstant with the video.Wiki-psyc (talk) 17:07, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The edit warring [WP:EDITWAR] has been going on for weeks now. I have put together a case to present to the Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring with myself and others. I really don't want a confrontation with you (or anyone), we are upposed to be brothers writing fair and balanced articles. So I will ask, one last time, to please stop edit warring. Wiki-psyc (talk) 22:21, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Wiki-psyc: I have been trying to work with you, but with your addition of false information and your copyright violation edits, it has made it difficult. My last edit had even tried to make it neutral while incorporating what you intended to place. Not sure if you are recognizing that your edits have been troublesome, but I am trying to keep a highly controversial article neutral and accurate.--WMrapids (talk) 00:51, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, WMrapids! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Amazon Labor Union logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Amazon Labor Union logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, WMrapids

Thank you for creating Avión Torpedo.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:14, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Acrisure logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Acrisure logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:The Weather Company logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:The Weather Company IBM Byline.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, WMrapids. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Institute of Peruvian Studies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WMrapids. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Institute of Peruvian Studies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:13, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 December 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article December 2022 Peruvian protests, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Indefensible (talk) 18:00, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For updating the page on the Peru protests. Firestar464 (talk) 10:39, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Peruvian political protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RPP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, WMrapids. Thank you for your work on Juliaca massacre. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to my edits on the article for the “2022-2023 Peruvian political protests”

Hello, I was wondering why you reverted the vast majority of my edits on 1/21/23? I am especially confused by the tonal and phrasal changes I made having all been reverted, did I make a mistake with them? Thank you. TheStarOfTheNorth006 (talk) 16:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TheStarOfTheNorth006: Yeah, there were some errors made. Also, a lot of "specify" tags present in areas that were already pretty concise. Are there any major changes that you think need to be included? I can try to help you with those concerns.--WMrapids (talk) 16:42, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought my specify tags were appropriate? “Mining guilds” is a vague plural term that should at least have a sub-list of known participants. And I marked the charge of “severe injury” because it isn’t clear what that means in the context of local law. And shouldn’t “Riot” be crosslinked in the infobox section for “methods”? I was just overall puzzled by many of your reversions, partially because you didn’t write a very comprehensive edit summary. Thank you for responding so quickly. TheStarOfTheNorth006 (talk) 18:49, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TheStarOfTheNorth006: I removed the mining guilds since it could not be specified. Also updated the methods in the infobox. The severe injury wording is just how it is presented in the source and an explanation of a local law would probably be to cumbersome for readers. Any other concerns?--WMrapids (talk) 19:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oumar Dia (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gentex logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gentex logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Williams International logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Williams International logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Michigan State Police badge.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Michigan State Police badge.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Michigan State Police patch.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Michigan State Police patch.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Plan Verde into Alberto Fujimori. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, on 2022 Peruvian political crisisDiannaa (talk) 21:03, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: I apologize and I think I know which edit it was (forgot that it was copied since I provided different sources). If you look at my history, you can see that I have been attributing when necessary. Thanks for the reminder :)--WMrapids (talk) 00:43, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me for interfering

I have to tell you that I am not a puppet of anyone, this article simply appeared to me when I was looking for random articles with the Wikipedia function. Since I am someone from Peru, I was interested in the topic. Sorry for assuming things hastily. I only took a look at the edition history and saw that two users had contributed to the paragraph, and since your arguments did not convince me, I assumed that an edition war was going to start and that is why I tried to stop it. If the "reversal" seriously bothered you, I can delete the paragraph and you two discuss this. I have to say that I knew you from other articles about Peru where in general your reversals have bothered me, for his part I already knew the user Armando for more than a month and in general he is good at arguing, so I hastily gave him the reason.

I'm sorry I did that, I'm going to finish the paragraph right now. Alfredo18elguapo (talk) 21:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I say that he also did not know that he had been blocked in Spanish, if so he would not have reversed it. Alfredo18elguapo (talk) 22:11, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Alfredo18elguapo: How would you know that another user did not know they were blocked on Spanish Wikipedia?--WMrapids (talk) 22:18, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I just read it in Armando AZ's blocking discussion, I also answered there Alfredo18elguapo (talk) 22:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
i said, cherry picking Alfredo18elguapo (talk) 22:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of coups and coup attempts
added a link pointing to The Telegraph
List of coups and coup attempts since 2010
added a link pointing to The Telegraph

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ultraconservatism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ultraconservatism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultraconservatism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Walt Yoder (talk) 00:19, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fujimorist propaganda moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fujimorist propaganda, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 11:46, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, WMrapids. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Doug Weller talk 20:19, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Im ejrms. I've seen your edits on that aforementioned page. Could you maybe help me rewrite the article so it fits proper date format and also update it as well. I feel like the article needs some serious improvements and I can't really do it all by myself. Maybe you could help? Ejrms (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ejrms: I made some edits to the template you created. Overall, a pretty good template. I have been looking at reviewing the article since it is so large. Thanks for reaching out! WMrapids (talk) 06:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want something done about this editor's usename?

[1]. Doug Weller talk 13:12, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: Yes, please. I tried reaching out to others in the past, though nothing really happened. Thanks! WMrapids (talk) 21:47, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the delay, trying to get this sorted asap now. Doug Weller talk 08:45, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]