Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Books: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 30: Line 30:


Is John a "book," within the definition of this project? I'm not making a judgment; I'm just curious. It was recently added by including {{T|WikiProject Books}} on [[Talk:Gospel of John]] by an experienced editor. The three synoptic gospels have not been added. <span style="background:#C2C2C2">[[User:Gaarmyvet|<b style="color: red;">Georgia Army Vet</b> ]][[Special:Contributions/Gaarmyvet|<i style="color: white;">Contribs</i> ]][[User Talk:Gaarmyvet|<b style="color: blue;">Talk</b>]] </span> 22:10, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Is John a "book," within the definition of this project? I'm not making a judgment; I'm just curious. It was recently added by including {{T|WikiProject Books}} on [[Talk:Gospel of John]] by an experienced editor. The three synoptic gospels have not been added. <span style="background:#C2C2C2">[[User:Gaarmyvet|<b style="color: red;">Georgia Army Vet</b> ]][[Special:Contributions/Gaarmyvet|<i style="color: white;">Contribs</i> ]][[User Talk:Gaarmyvet|<b style="color: blue;">Talk</b>]] </span> 22:10, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

== Author's viewpoint about their own book ==

In a recent discussion [[Talk:The_Forgotten_Holocaust#Lukas|here]], about an academic book, another editor made a claim that "The author's viewpoint about their own book is not a viewpoint that is WP:DUE in the "reviews" section of a Wikipedia article about the book." (This is in the context of an author replying to a critical review mentioned in our article about said book). I disagree, but we could use a [[WP:3O]] and more. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 05:34, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:34, 19 February 2023

Shortcuts
WikiProject iconBooks Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Did you know

Articles for deletion

(3 more...)

Proposed deletions

Categories for discussion

Redirects for discussion

Files for discussion

Miscellany for deletion

Featured article candidates

Good article nominees

Requested moves

Articles to be merged

Articles to be split

Articles for creation

(8 more...)

Category:Non-fiction has been nominated for discussion

Category:Non-fiction has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Οἶδα (talk) 23:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nonfiction or Non-fiction?

The article, currently at Nonfiction, has been moved back and forwards several times, most recently in an undiscussed move in 2019.

The category, currently Category:Non-fiction, is currently being discussed at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_January_16#Category:Non-fiction with a suggestion it be moved to Category:Nonfiction.

This seems relevant to this project. PamD 20:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The CfD discussion was closed as "no consensus". There is now a discussion at Talk:Nonfiction#Requested_move_1_February_2023. PamD 08:47, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gospel of John

Is John a "book," within the definition of this project? I'm not making a judgment; I'm just curious. It was recently added by including {{WikiProject Books}} on Talk:Gospel of John by an experienced editor. The three synoptic gospels have not been added. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 22:10, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Author's viewpoint about their own book

In a recent discussion here, about an academic book, another editor made a claim that "The author's viewpoint about their own book is not a viewpoint that is WP:DUE in the "reviews" section of a Wikipedia article about the book." (This is in the context of an author replying to a critical review mentioned in our article about said book). I disagree, but we could use a WP:3O and more. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:34, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Books&oldid=1140250858"