Jump to content

History of Catholic Mariology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Finnusertop (talk | contribs) at 19:19, 14 October 2018 (MOS:ORDER). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Part of a series on the
Mariology
of the Catholic Church
Immaculate Conception
Immaculate Conception by Bartolomé Esteban Murillo (c. 1675)
Overview
Titles of Mary
Prayers and hymns
Devotional practices
Movements and societies
Apparitions
Approved, with widespread liturgical
veneration endorsed by the Holy See:
Key Marian feast days
icon Catholicism portal
Santa Maria Assunta (Church of the Assumption), was built in 1215 in Siena as a precursor to the expression of Marian motifs in Renaissance art and architecture.

The history of Catholic Mariology traces theological developments and views regarding Mary from the early Church to the 21st century. Mariology is a mainly Catholic ecclesiological study within theology, which centers on the relation of Mary and the Church. Catholic Mariology is the encyclopedic area of theology concerned with Mary, the Mother of God. Theologically, it not only deals with her life, but her veneration in daily life, prayer, art, music, architecture, in modern and ancient Christianity throughout the ages.

Throughout history, Catholics have continued to build churches to honor the Blessed Virgin. Today, a large number of Catholic churches dedicated to the Blessed Virgin exist on all continents, and in a sense, their evolving architecture tells the unfolding story of the development of Catholic Mariology. Throughout Catholic history, the veneration of the Blessed Virgin Mary has led to the creation of numerous items of Roman Catholic Marian art. Today, these items may be viewed from an artistic perspective, but also they are part of the fabric of Catholic Mariology.

Mary in the Early Church

Virgin and Child on a wall painting in the early Roman catacombs, 4th century.

"Many centuries were necessary to arrive at the explicit definition of the revealed truths concerning Mary."[1] The importance of Mary and of Marian theology can be seen in the Church from a very early period. The New Testament Gospels, composed during the late 1st century, contain the first references to the life of Mary; the New Testament Epistles, composed earlier, make no mention of her by name. There are, however, references to Mary in the Epistles, most notably in Galatians.[2] In the 2nd century, St. Irenaeus of Lyons called Mary the "second Eve" because through Mary and her willing acceptance of God's choice, God undid the harm that was done through Eve's choice to eat the forbidden fruit. The earliest recorded prayer to Mary is the sub tuum praesidium.

The fact that Hugo Rahner's 20th-century discovery and reconstruction of Saint Ambrose's 4th-century view of Mary as the Mother of the Church, was adopted at the Second Vatican Council, is an example that shows the influence of early traditions and views on Mary in modern times.[3][4][5] This view was then emphasized by Pope John Paul II in 1997, and today Mary is viewed as the Mother of the Church by many Catholics, as Ambrose had proposed.[6][7]

In the 5th century, the Third Ecumenical Council debated the question of whether Mary should be referred to as Theotokos or Christotokos.[8] Theotokos means "God-bearer" or "Mother of God"; its use implies that Jesus, to whom Mary gave birth, is truly God and man in one person. Nestorians preferred the title Christotokos meaning "Christ-bearer" or "Mother of the Messiah" not because they denied Jesus' divinity, but because they believed that God the Son or Logos existed before time and before Mary, and that Mary was mother only of Jesus as a human, so calling her "Mother of God" was confusing and potentially heretical. Both sides agreed that Jesus took divinity from God the Father and humanity from his mother. The majority at the council agreed with the Pope that denying Mary the title Theotokos would either imply that Jesus was not divine, or that Jesus had two separate personhoods, one of whom was son of Mary and the other not. Ultimately, the council affirmed the use of the title Theotokos and by doing so affirmed Jesus' undivided divinity and humanity.

Thus, while the debate was over the proper title for Mary, it was primarily a Christological question about the nature of Jesus Christ, a question which would return at the Fourth Ecumenical Council. Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Lutheran and Anglican theological teaching affirms the title Mother of God, while other Christian denominations give no such title to her.

Mediæval Mariology

The medieval cathedral Notre Dame dedicated to the Virgin Mary, Paris France, was built in the years 1163–1345.

The Middle Ages saw a growth and development of Mariology. Belief in the Assumption of Mary became widespread across the Christian world from the 6th century onward, and is celebrated on 15 August in both the East and the West.[9] The Medieval period brought major champions of Marian devotion to the fore, including Ephraim the Syrian, and John Damascene.

The Dogma of the Immaculate Conception developed within the Catholic Church over time. Conception of Mary was celebrated as a liturgical feast in England from the 9th century, and the doctrine of her "holy" or "immaculate" conception was first formulated in a tract by Eadmer, companion and biographer of the better-known St. Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury (1033–1109), and later popularized by the archbishop's nephew, Anselm the Younger.[10] The Normans had suppressed the celebration, but it lived on in the popular mind. It was rejected by St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Alexander of Hales, and St. Bonaventure (who, teaching at Paris, called it "this foreign doctrine", indicating its association with England), and by St. Thomas Aquinas who expressed questions about the subject, but said that he would accept the determination of the Church. Aquinas and Bonaventure, for example, believed that Mary was completely free from sin, but that she was not given this grace at the instant of her conception.[10]

The majority of Western Marian writers during this period belonged to the monastic tradition, particularly the Benedictines. The twelfth and thirteenth centuries saw an extraordinary growth of the cult of the Virgin in western Europe, in part inspired by the writings of theologians such as Saint Bernard of Clairvaux (1090–1153).[11] Bernard of Clairvaux was one of the most influential churchmen of his time. In the "Sermon on the Sunday in the Octave of the Assumption" he described Mary's participation in redemption.[12] Bernard's Praises on the Virgin Mother was a small but complete treatise on Mariology.[13] Pope Pius XII's 1953 encyclical Doctor Mellifluus, issued in commemoration of the eighth centenary of Bernard's death, quotes extensively from Bernard's sermon on Mary as "Our Lady, Star of the Sea".[14]

Western types of the Virgin’s image, such as the twelfth-century “Throne of Wisdom”, in which the Christ Child is presented frontally as the sum of divine wisdom, seem to have originated in Byzantium.[11] This was much used in Early Netherlandish painting in works like the Lucca Madonna by Jan van Eyck.

Theologically, one major controversy of the age was the Immaculate Conception. Anthony of Padua (1195–1231) supported Mary's freedom from sin and her Immaculate Conception.[15][16] His many sermons on the Virgin Mary shaped the Mariological approach of a large number of Franciscans who followed his approach for centuries after his death.[17]

Oxford Franciscans William of Ware and especially Blessed John Duns Scotus defended the doctrine. Scotus proposed a solution to the theological problem involved of being able to reconcile the doctrine with that of universal redemption in Christ, by arguing that Mary's immaculate conception did not remove her from redemption by Christ. Rather it was the result of a more perfect redemption given to her on account of her special role in history. Furthermore, Scotus said that Mary was redeemed in anticipation of Christ's death on the cross.[18] Scotus' defense of the immaculist thesis was summed up by one of his followers as potuit, decuit ergo fecit – God could do it, it was fitting that He did it, and so He did it.Gradually the idea that Mary had been cleansed of original sin at the very moment of her conception began to predominate, particularly after Duns Scotus dealt with the major objection to Mary's sinlessness from conception, that being her need for redemption.[19] The very divine act, in making Mary sinless at the first instant of her conception was, he argued, the most perfect form of redemption possible.

By the end of the Middle Ages, Marian feasts were firmly established in the calendar of the liturgical year. Pope Clement IV (1265–1268) created a poem on the seven joys of Mary, which in its form is considered an early version of the Franciscan rosary[20]

Renaissance to Baroque

See also: Italian Renaissance painting and Marian art in the Catholic Church
As an example of Baroque painting and architecture, Ettal Abbey:1776 Frescos under the dome, dedicated to the Assumption of Mary unite heaven and earth.

Beginning in the 13th century, a great deal of Marian art began to appear in Europe. The Renaissance period witnessed a dramatic growth in Marian art.[21] In this period, significant works of Marian art by masters such as Botticelli, Leonardo da Vinci and Raphael were produced. Some Marian art was specifically produced to decorate the Marian churches built in this period.

Major Italian artist with Marian motifs include: Fra Angelico, Donatello, Sandro Botticelli, Masaccio, Filippo Lippi, Piero di Cosimo Paolo Uccello Antonello da Messina Andrea Mantegna, Piero della Francesca and Carlo Crivelli. Dutch and German artists with Marian paintings include: Jean Bellegambe, Hieronymus Bosch, Petrus Christus, Gerard David (c.1455–1523), Hubert van Eyck, Geertgen tot Sint Jans, Quentin Matsys, Rogier van der Weyden, Albrecht Altdorfer, Hans Baldung and Albrecht Dürer. French and Spanish artists with Marian paintings include: Jean Fouquet, Jean Clouet, François Clouet, Barthélemy d'Eyck, Jean Hey (formerly known as the Master of Moulins), Bartolomé Bermejo, Ayne Bru, Juan de Flandes, Jaume Huguet, Paolo da San Leocadio.

Francis of Assisi is credited with setting up the first known presepio or crèche (Nativity scene). He was also particularly devoted to Christ's passion and crucifixion.[22] The influence of the Franciscans gave rise to a more affective spirituality. Around the time of the Fall of Constantinople in 1453 many Orthodox monks fled to the West, bringing with them traditions of iconography. Depictions of the Madonna and Child can be traced to the Eastern Theotokos. In the Western tradition, depictions of the Madonna were greatly diversified by Renaissance masters such as Duccio, Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Raphael, Giovanni Bellini, Caravaggio and Rubens. The early Renaissance saw an increased emphasis on Christ crucified and therefore Mary as the Sorrowful Mother, an object of compassionate devotion.[23] Artists such as Titian depicted Mary as the Mater Dolorosa.

The Protestant Reformation caused a difficulty to Marian devotion.[24] Roman Catholic Mariology was under attack as being sacrilegious and superstitious. Protestant leaders like Martin Luther and John Calvin, while personally adhering to Marian beliefs like virgin birth and sinlessness, considered Catholic veneration of Mary as competition to the divine role of Jesus Christ.

Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina composed numerous Marian Masses.

As a reflection of this theological opposition, Protestant reformers destroyed much religious art and Marian statues and paintings in churches in northern Europe and England. Some of the Protestant reformers, in particular Andreas Karlstadt, Huldrych Zwingli and John Calvin, encouraged the removal of religious images by invoking the Decalogue's prohibition of idolatry and the manufacture of graven images of God. Major iconoclastic riots took place in Zürich (in 1523), Copenhagen (1530), Münster (1534), Geneva (1535), Augsburg (1537), and Scotland (1559). Protestant inconoclasm swept through the Seventeen Provinces (now the Netherlands and Belgium and parts of Northern France) in the summer of 1566. In the middle of the 16th century, the Council of Trent confirmed the Catholic tradition of paintings and artworks in churches. This resulted in a great development of Marian art and Mariology during the Baroque Period.

At the same time, the Catholic world was engaged in ongoing Ottoman Wars in Europe against Turkey which were fought and won under the auspices of the Virgin Mary. The victory at Battle of Lepanto (1571) was accredited to her "and signified the beginning of a strong resurgence of Marian devotions, focusing especially on Mary, the Queen of Heaven and Earth and her powerful role as mediator of many graces".[25] The Colloquium Marianum, an elite group, and the Sodality of Our Lady based their activities on a virtuous life, free of cardinal sins.

The baroque literature on Mary experienced unforeseen growth with over 500 pages of Mariological writings during the 17th century alone.[26] The Jesuit Francisco Suárez (1548-1617) was the first theologian, who used the thomist method on Mariology and is considered the father of systematic Mariology.[18] Other well known contributors to baroque Mariology are Lawrence of Brindisi, Robert Bellarmine, Francis of Sales. After 1650, the Immaculate Conception is the subject of over 300 publications from Jesuit authors alone.[27]

This popularity was at times accompanied with Marian excesses and alleged revelations of the Virgin Mary to individuals like María de Ágreda[28] Many of the baroque authors defended Marian spirituality and Mariology. In France, the often anti-Marian Jansenists were combated by John Eudes and Louis de Montfort, canonized by Pope Pius XII[29]

Baroque Mariology was supported by several popes during the period: Pope Paul V and Gregory XV ruled in 1617 and 1622 to be inadmissible to state, that the virgin was conceived non-immaculate. Alexander VII declared in 1661, that the soul of Mary was free from original sin. Pope Clement XI ordered the feast of the Immaculata for the whole Church in 1708. The feast of the Rosary was introduced in 1716, the feast of the Seven Sorrows in 1727. The Angelus prayer was strongly supported by Pope Benedict XIII in 1724 and by Pope Benedict XIV in 1742.[30]

Popular Marian piety was more colorful and varied than ever before: Numerous Marian pilgrimages, Marian Salve devotions, new litanies, Marian theatre plays, Marian hymns, Marian processions. Marian fraternities, today mostly defunct, had millions of members.[31] Lasting impressions from the baroque mariology are in the field of classical music, painting and art architecture, and in the numerous Marian shrines from the baroque period in Spain, France, Italy, Austria and Bavaria but also in some South American cities.

Mariology during the Enlightenment

Santa Maria della Salute, Venice, 1629.

During the Age of Enlightenment, the emphasis on scientific progress and rationalism put Catholic theology and Mariology on the defensive. The Church continued to stress the virginity and special graces, but deemphasized Marian cults.[32] During this period, Marian theology was even discontinued in some seminaries for example in Salzburg Austria in the year 1782[33] The virginity and special graces and "the singular personality of Mary" were adhered to, and even among groups of Catholic Marian devotions began to decline.[34] Some theologians proposed the abolition of all Marian feast days altogether, except those with biblical foundations and the feast of the Assumption.[35]

Nonetheless, in this period, a number of significant Marian churches were built, often laden with Marian symbols, and popular Marian devotions continued in many areas. An example is Santa Maria della Salute in Venice, built to give thanks to thank the Virgin Mary for the city's deliverance from the plague. The church is full of Marian symbolism: the great dome represents her crown, and the eight sides, the eight points on her symbolic star.

Many Benedictines, such as Celestino Sfondrati (died 1696) and Jesuits,[36] supported by pious faithful and their movements and societies fought against the anti-Marian trends. Increasing secularization led to the forced closing of most monasteries and convents, and Marian pilgrimages were either discontinued or greatly reduced in number. Some Catholics criticized the practice of the rosary as not Jesus-oriented and too mechanical.[37] In some places, priests forbade the praying of the rosary during Holy Mass.[38] The highly conservative rural Bavarian dioceses of Passau outlawed Marian prayer books and related articles in 1785.[37]

During this time, Mariologists looked to The Glories of Mary and other Mariological writings of Alphonsus Liguori (1696–1787), an Italian, whose culture was less affected by the Enlightenment. "Overall, Catholic Mariology during the Enlightenment lost its high level of development and sophistication, but the basics were kept, on which the 19th century was able to build."[39]

Mariology in the 19th century

Pope Pius IX (1846–1878) solemnly declared the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception in 1854.

Mariology in the 19th century was dominated by discussions about the dogmatic definition of the Immaculate Conception and the First Vatican Council. In 1854, Pope Pius IX, with the support of the overwhelming majority of Roman Catholic Bishops, whom he had consulted between 1851–1853, proclaimed the dogma of the Immaculate Conception, which had been a traditional belief among the faithful for centuries.[40]

Eight years earlier, in 1846, the Pope had granted the unanimous wish of the bishops from the United States, and declared the Immaculata the patron of the USA.[41] During the First Vatican Council, some 108 council fathers requested adding the words "Immaculate Virgin" to the "Hail Mary" prayer and to add the Immaculata to the Litany of Loreto. Some fathers requested the dogma of the Immaculate Conception to be included in the Creed of the Church.[42]

Many French Catholics supported making dogma both Papal infallibility and the assumption of Mary in the forthcoming ecumenical council.[43] During the First Vatican Council, nine mariological petitions favored a possible assumption dogma. It was strongly opposed by some council fathers, especially those from Germany. On 8 May, a majority of the fathers voted to reject making the Assumption a dogma, a position shared by Pope Pius IX. The concept of Co-Redemptrix was also discussed but left open. In its support, Council fathers highlighted the divine motherhood of Mary and called her the mother of all graces.[44]

"Rosary Pope" is a title given to Pope Leo XIII (1878–1903) because he issued a record eleven encyclicals on the rosary, instituted the Catholic custom of daily rosary prayer during the month of October, and in 1883 created the Feast of Queen of the Holy Rosary.[45]

John Henry Newman, wrote of the Eve-Mary parallel in support of Mary’s original state of grace (Immaculate Conception), her part in 'Redemption', her 'Eschatological' fulfilment and her intercession.[46]

Popular opinion remained firmly behind the celebration of Mary's conception. The doctrine itself had been endorsed by the Council of Basel (1431–1449), and by the end of the 15th century was widely professed and taught in many theological faculties. The Council of Basel was later held not to have been a true General (or Ecumenical) Council with authority to proclaim dogma. Such was the influence of the Dominicans, and the weight of the arguments of Thomas Aquinas (who had been canonised in 1323, and declared "Doctor Angelicus" of the Church in 1567) that the Council of Trent (1545–63)—which might have been expected to affirm the doctrine—instead declined to take a position. It simply reaffirmed the constitutions of Sixtus IV, which had threatened with excommunication anyone on either side of the controversy who accused the others of heresy.

But it was not until 1854 that Pope Pius IX, with the support of the overwhelming majority of Roman Catholic Bishops, whom he had consulted between 1851–1853, proclaimed the doctrine in accordance with the conditions of papal infallibility that would be defined in 1870 by the First Vatican Council.

Mariology in the 20th century

In 1904, in the first year of his pontificate, Pope Pius X celebrated the previous century's proclamation of the dogma of Immaculate Conception with the encyclical Ad diem illum. In 1950, the dogma of the Assumption was defined by Pope Pius XII. The Second Vatican Council spoke of Mary as Mother of the Church. Fifteen hundred years after the Council of Ephesus, Pope Pius XI issued the encyclical Lux Veritatis, reminding the Orthodox Christians of the common faith. He presided over a Mariological congress in 1931.[47]

Mariology in the 20th century reflected an increased membership in Roman Catholic Marian Movements and Societies. At the popular level, the 20th century witnessed growth in the number of lay Marian devotional organizations such as free rosary distribution groups. The number of 20th century pilgrims visiting Marian churches set new records. In South America alone, two major Marian basilicas, the Basilica of the National Shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida in Brazil and the new Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe on Tepeyac hill were constructed and jointly recorded over 10 million visitors per year.

Prior to Vatican II, the French Mariological Society held a three-year series of Marian studies on the theme of Mary in relation to the Church.[48]

Second Vatican Council

Mariological issues were included in the discussions at the Second Vatican Council, (1962–1965) although the Council indicated that it had not addressed all Marian issues. The Council members had in depth discussions regarding the question of whether to treat Mary within the Constitution of the Church or outside it in a separate document.[49] The final decision, by a vote of 1114–1074 resulted in the treatment of Marian issues within the Church Constitution, as chapter eight of Lumen gentium.[49] Chapter eight of Lumen gentium provides a "pastoral summary" of Catholic doctrines on Mary, which does not claim to be complete.[50]

At the conclusion of the Vatican II Council in December 1965, Catholics were presented with a multitude of changes. Some authors such as John W. O’Malley have commented that these issues would forever alter Catholic practices and views, including those surrounding the Virgin Mary. These changes reflected the Council’s desire to make the Church more ecumenical and less isolated as it increasingly had become in the past century.[51] One of the roadblocks towards finding common ground was the complaint by other faiths regarding the Church’s dogmas on the Virgin Mary, and especially the fervor of the Catholic laity to preserve Mary at the center of their devotions.[51][52][53]

Mariologists had hoped for a dogma on Mary as Mediatrix, the foundations of which were laid by several popes especially Leo XIII, Pius X, Benedict XV, and Pius XII. The preparations for the council included an independent schema "About the Blessed Virgin Mary, mother of God and Mother of the People"[50] Some observers interpreted the renunciation of this document on Mary as minimalism, others interpreted her inclusion as a chapter into the Church document as underlining her role for the Church.[50] With the inclusion of Marian issues within the Constitution of the Church rather than in a separate document, at Vatican II the contextual view of Mary was emphasized, namely that Mary belongs "within the Church":[54]

  • For having been the Associate of Christ on earth
  • For being a Heavenly mother to all members of the Church in the order of grace
  • For having been the model disciple, a model which every member of the Church should aim to imitate.[54]

Calling Mary "our mother in the order of grace", Lumen gentium referred to Mary as a model for the Church and stated that:[55][56]

By reason of the gift and role of divine maternity, by which she is united with her Son, the Redeemer, and with His singular graces and functions, the Blessed Virgin is also intimately united with the Church. As St. Ambrose taught, the Mother of God is a type of the Church in the order of faith, charity and perfect union with Christ.[57]

The Marian chapter has five parts which link Mary to the salvation mysteries which continues in the Church, which Christ has founded as his mystical body. Her role in relation to her son is a subordinated one. Highlighted are her personality and fullness of grace. The second part describes her role in salvation history. Her role as a mediator is detailed, as Mary is considered to secure to our salvation through her many intercessions after her assumption into heaven. The Council refused to adopt the title mediator of all graces and defined her unspecified as mediator.[58] Pope Paul VI declared Mary Mother of the Church during the Vatican Council.

Late 20th century

Following Vatican II, the perception that Marian devotions had decreased was expressed by several authors. Other authors have indicated that the continued strength of devotion to Mary within Catholicism following Vatican II has been manifested in multiple forms worldwide.[59] Examples of this are the increase in Marian pilgrimages at major Marian shrines and the construction of major new Marian Basilicas since Vatican II.[59]

At the end of the 20th century, two of the top three most visited Catholic shrines in the world were Marian, with the Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe in Mexico City, built between 1974 and 1976, being the most visited Catholic shrine in the world.[60] In 1968, shortly after Vatican II, the Basilica of the National Shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida in Brazil used to receive about four million pilgrims per year, but the number has since doubled to over eight million pilgrims per year, indicating the significant increase in Marian pilgrimages since Vatican II.[59][61][62]

The perceived impact of concessions to ecumenicalism made at Vatican II, did not, however impact the fundamental loyalties to Mary within Catholics and their attachment Marian veneration.[54] A 1998 survey among young adult Catholics in the United States provided the following results:

  • Devotion to Mary had not been reduced in any significant manner since Vatican II, despite the various statements made about its perceived impact on Catholics.
  • Young Catholics stated that in their view the "passionate love of God" is revealed through Mary, possibly as a result of the Marian emphasis of the pontificate of Pope John Paul II.
  • Mary continues to be a "distinctive marker" of the Catholic identity.[54]

Papal extensions and enhancement to the Mariology of Vatican II continued shortly thereafter, with Pope Paul VI issuing the Apostolic Exhortation Marialis Cultus (to Honor Mary) in 1974, which took four years to prepare.[49][63][64] Marialis Cultus provided four separate guidelines for the renewal of Marian veneration, the last two of which were new in Papal teachings. The four elements were: biblical, liturgical, ecumenical and anthropological.[49][63]

Marian devotions were the hallmark of the pontificate of Pope John Paul II and he reoriented the Catholic Church towards the renewal of Marian veneration.[65][66] In March 1987 he went further than Paul VI in extending the Catholic views on Mary beyond Vatican II by issuing the encyclical Redemptoris Mater.[49][67] Rather than being just a new presentation of the Marian views of Vatican II, Redemptoris Mater was in many aspects a re-reading, re-interpretation and further extension of the teachings of Vatican II.[49][68]

In 1988 in Mulieris Dignitatem Pope John Paul II stated that the Second Vatican Council confirmed that: "unless one looks to the Mother of God, it is impossible to understand the mystery of the Church".[69][70] In 2002 in the Apostolic letter Rosarium Virginis Mariae he emphasized the importance of the rosary as a key devotion for all Catholics and added the Luminous Mysteries to the rosary.[65][71]

The Marian Magisterium of John Paul II may well constitute his single most important contribution to the Catholic legacy he left behind.[66] By 2005, when he died, he had inspired a worldwide renewal of Marian devotions, whose impact was felt worldwide, and was reflected upon on the occasion of his death within non-Catholic media such as US News and World Report.[54]

21st century

Pope Benedict XVI continued the program of redirection of the Catholic Church towards a Marian focus and stated: "Let us carry on and imitate Mary, a deeply Eucharistic soul, and our lives will become a Magnificat".[72][73] In 2008 Pope Benedict XVI introduced a Marian prayer he had composed, which referring to Mary being the Mother of all Christians stated:[74]

"you became, in a new way, the Mother of all those who receive your Son Jesus in faith and choose to follow in his footsteps..."[75]

In the 21st century, Pope Benedict XVI has continued apostolic journeys to Marian shrines such as Lourdes and Fatima to support their messages.[76][77]

See also

Template:Wikipedia books

Notes

  1. ^ Pope John Paul II, "General Audience", 8 November 1995
  2. ^ Sr. M. Danielle Peters, "An Overview of New Testament References," The Mary Page, retrieved 21 January 2015.
  3. ^ Burke, Raymond L.; et al. (2008). Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons ISBN 978-1-57918-355-4 page 587
  4. ^ Heart of the Redeemer by Timothy Terrance O'Donnell 1992 ISBN 0-89870-396-4 page 83
  5. ^ Lumen gentium, Chapter 8 Archived 6 September 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  6. ^ L'Osservatore Romano English edition, 24 Sep 1997, p 11
  7. ^ "Blessed Virgin is Mother of the Church". L'Osservatore Romano. 24 September 1997. Retrieved 18 November 2010.
  8. ^ Braaten Carl E., and Jenson, Robert W. Mary, Mother of God, 2004, ISBN 0-8028-2266-5 p. 84
  9. ^ Butler, Alban and Burns, Paul. Butler's Lives of the Saints, 1998 ISBN 0-86012-257-3 pp. 140-141
  10. ^ a b Mary's Immaculate Conception
  11. ^ a b Department of Medieval Art and The Cloisters. “The Cult of the Virgin Mary in the Middle Ages.” In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, (October 2001)
  12. ^ Pope Benedict XVI. "General Audience", 21 October 2009, L'Osservatore Romano, 28 October 2009, p. 24
  13. ^ Duignan, Brian. Medieval Philosophy, The Rosen Publishing Group, 2011 ISBN 978-1-61530-143-0
  14. ^ Hom. II super "Missus est," 17; Migne, P. L., CLXXXIII, 70-b, c, d, 71-a. Quoted in Doctor Mellifluus 31
  15. ^ Huber, Raphael Mary, St. Anthony of Padua: Doctor of the Church Universal, 1948 ISBN 1-4367-1275-0 p. 31
  16. ^ Huber, Raphael M. “The Mariology of St. Anthony of Padua,” in Studia Mariana 7, Proceedings of the First Franciscan National Marian Congress in Acclamation of the Dogma of the Assumption, October 8–11, 1950 Burlington, Wisconsin
  17. ^ Kleinhenz, Christopher. Medieval Italy: an encyclopedia, Vol. 1, 2003 ISBN 0-415-93930-5 p. 40
  18. ^ a b Fastiggi, Robert. "11 questions answered about Mary, OSV Newsweekly, April 29, 2015
  19. ^ Ludwig Ott, Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma, Mercier Press Ltd., Cork, Ireland, 1955
  20. ^ Otto Stegmüller Clemens IV in Marienkunde, 1159
  21. ^ Renaissance Art: A Very Short Introduction by Geraldine A. Johnson 2005 ISBN 0-19-280354-9 pages 103-104
  22. ^ Robson, Michael J., The Cambridge Companion to Francis of Assisi, Cambridge University Press, 2011 ISBN 9780521760430
  23. ^ Viladesau, Richard. The Triumph of the Cross, Oxford University Press, 2008 ISBN 9780199887378
  24. ^ Naumann, Isabell. "Ecclesiological History of Mariology", International Marian Research Institute
  25. ^ Otto Stegmüller, Barock, in Marienkunde, 1967 566
  26. ^ A Roskovany, conceptu immacolata ex monumentis omnium seculrorum demonstrate III, Budapest 1873
  27. ^ Otto Stegmüller, Mariologisches Schrifttum in der Barockzeit, 1967 568
  28. ^ who was placed on the Index of forbidden book of the Church in 1681.
  29. ^ although in 1673, the Holy Office itself acted against his book on slavery. (Stegmüller, 573)
  30. ^ F Zöpfl, Barocke Frömmigkeit, in Marienkunde, 577
  31. ^ Zöpfl 579
  32. ^ RG Giessler, die geistliche Lieddichting im Zeitalter der Aufklärung. 1928, 987
  33. ^ Narr Zoepfl Mariologie der Aufklärung, 1967, 411
  34. ^ RG Giessler, die geistliche Lieddichting im Zeitalter der Aufklärung. 1928, 987
  35. ^ Benedict Werkmeister, 1801
  36. ^ such as Anton Weissenbach SJ, Franz Neubauer SJ,
  37. ^ a b D Narr 417
  38. ^ In 1790, monastery schools outlawed the praying of the rosary during mass as a distraction. (D Narr 417).
  39. ^ Otto Stegmüller, 1967
  40. ^ Vatican website Archived 10 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  41. ^ Pius IX in Bäumer, 245
  42. ^ Bauer 566
  43. ^ Civilta Catolica, 6 February 1869.
  44. ^ Bäumer 566
  45. ^ Lauretanische Litanei, Marienlexikon, St. Ottilien: Eos, 1988, p.41
  46. ^ Newman, John Henry. The Letters and Diaries of John Henry Newman, ed. C. S. Dessain, Birmingham Oratory, 31 vols. (London: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1972), Vol. XII
  47. ^ Bäumer 534
  48. ^ “Marie et l’Eglise,” ÉtMar 9-11 (1951-53), 3 Vols
  49. ^ a b c d e f Mary for Time and Eternity by William McLoughlin, Jill Pinnock 2007 ISBN 0-85244-651-9-page 66
  50. ^ a b c Leo Cardinal Scheffczyk, Vaticanum II, in Marienlexikon 567
  51. ^ a b What Happened at Vatican II, John W. O’Malley. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. London, 2008.
  52. ^ The Church: The Evolution of Catholicism. Richard P. McBrien. HarperOne. 2008
  53. ^ Vatican Council II: The Basic Sixteen Documents. Rev. Austin Flannery, O.P. Costello Publishing Company, 1996
  54. ^ a b c d e McNally, Terrence, What Every Catholic Should Know about Mary ISBN 1-4415-1051-6-page 30-32
  55. ^ "Dogmatic Constitution on the Church – Lumen gentium, 61". Archived from the original on 6 September 2014. Retrieved 18 November 2010. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  56. ^ Miravalle, Mark Introduction to Mary 1993, ISBN 978-1-882972-06-7, pp 119–124
  57. ^ "Dogmatic Constitution on the Church – Lumen gentium, 63". Archived from the original on 6 September 2014. Retrieved 18 November 2010. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  58. ^ Leo Cardinal Scheffczyk, Vaticanum II, in Marienlexikon 569
  59. ^ a b c Mary in the plan of God and in the communion of the saints by Alain Blancy, Maurice Jourjon 2002 ISBN 0-8091-4069-1-page 46
  60. ^ "Shrine of Gualdalupe Most Popular in World". ZENIT International News Agency. Retrieved 1 October 2010.
  61. ^ Brazil rediscovered by Roberta C. Wigder 1977 ISBN 0-8059-2328-4-page 235
  62. ^ Pilgrimage: from the Ganges to Graceland : an encyclopedia, Volume 1 by Linda Kay Davidson, David Martin Gitlitz 2002 ISBN 1-57607-004-2 page 38
  63. ^ a b Pope Paul VI's Apostolic Letter Marialis Cultus
  64. ^ University of Dayton: History of Marialis Cultus
  65. ^ a b John Paul II: a light for the world by Mary Ann Walsh 2003 ISBN 1-58051-142-2 page 26
  66. ^ a b Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons by Raymond Burke et al. 2008 ISBN 978-1-57918-355-4 pages 392
  67. ^ Redemptoris Mater at the Vatican website
  68. ^ The Vision of John Paul II by Gerard Mannion 2008 ISBN 0-8146-5309-X page 251
  69. ^ John Paul II's book of Mary by Pope John Paul II, Margaret Bunson 1996 ISBN 0-87973-578-3 page 81
  70. ^ Vatican website: Mulieris Dignitatem Archived 7 January 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  71. ^ Apostolic Letter Rosarium Virginis Mariae Archived 9 February 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  72. ^ Miravalle, Mark Introduction to Mary 1993, ISBN 978-1-882972-06-7, pages 13 and 99
  73. ^ Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons by Raymond Burke 2008 ISBN 978-1-57918-355-4 page xxi
  74. ^ Catholic News
  75. ^ Vatican website
  76. ^ Vatican website: Pope Beneict XVI at Lourdes
  77. ^ Vatican website: Pope Beneict XVI at Fatima Archived 14 December 2014 at the Wayback Machine

References

Further reading

  • Gambero, Luigi. Mary and the Fathers of the Church: The Blessed Virgin Mary in Patristic Thought, trans. Thomas Buffer (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1999).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_Catholic_Mariology&oldid=864047232"