Modal share

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
United Kingdom transport modal share from 1952 to 2014, Department for Transport

A modal share (also called mode split, mode-share, or modal split) is the percentage of travelers using a particular type of transportation or number of trips using said type.[1] In freight transportation, this may be measured in mass.

Modal share is an important component in developing sustainable transport within a city or region. In recent years, many cities have set modal share targets for balanced and sustainable transport modes, particularly 30% of non-motorized (cycling and walking) and 30% of public transport. These goals reflect a desire for a modal shift, or a change between modes, and usually encompasses an increase in the proportion of trips made using sustainable modes.[2]

Comparability of data[edit]

Modal share data is usually obtained by travel surveys, which are often conducted by local governments, using different methodologies. Sampling and interviewing techniques, definitions, the extent of geographical areas and other methodological differences can influence comparability. Most typical surveys refer to the main mode of transport used during trips to work.[3] Surveys covering entire metropolitan areas are preferred over city proper surveys which typically cover only the denser inner city.

Modal split of journeys to work[edit]

The following tables present the modal split of journeys to work. Note that it is better to use a measure of all trips on a typical weekday, but journey to work data is more readily available. It would also be beneficial to disaggregate private motor vehicles figures to car driver, car passengers and motorbikes (especially relevant for Asian cities).

Metropolitan Areas with over 1,000,000 inhabitants[edit]

Metro Area walking cycling public transport private motor vehicle year Survey Area
Australia Adelaide 3% 1% 11% 85% 2016[4] GCCSA
United States Atlanta 1% 0% 3% 86% 2016[5] UA
Greece Athens 8% 2% 37% 53% 2006 [6]
New Zealand Auckland 4% 1% 9% 85% 2011–2014[7] MUA
United States Baltimore 3% 0% 7% 84% 2016[8] UA
Spain Barcelona 32% 2% 39% 27% 2013[9]
China Beijing 21% 32% 26% 21% 2005/2011[10]
Serbia Belgrade 23% 1% 49% 27% 2015
Germany Berlin 30% 18% 27% 26% 2018
Australia Brisbane 4% 1% 14% 81% 2016[11] GCCSA
Belgium Brussels 25% 2.5% 28% 43% 2010[12]
Colombia Bogota 15% 2% 64% 19% 2008[10]
United States Boston 5% 1% 14% 73% 2016[13] UA
Hungary Budapest 32% 1% 47% 20% 2011
Canada Calgary 4.7% 1.5% 14.4% 79.4% 2016
United States Chicago 3% 1% 13% 77% 2016[14] UA
United States Dallas 1% 0% 2% 90% 2016[15] UA
South Korea Daejeon 26% 2% 28% 44% 2012[16]
India Delhi 21% 12% 48% 19% 2008/2011[10]
United States Detroit 1% 0% 2% 92% 2016[17]
Canada Edmonton 3.7% 1.0% 11.3% 84% 2016
Germany Hamburg 28% 12% 18% 42% 2008[18]
Finland Helsinki 29% 9% 22% 39% 2018[19]
United States Houston 1% 0% 2% 91% 2016[20] UA
United States Indianapolis 1% 0% 1% 91% 2016[21] UA
Indonesia Jakarta 1% 0.2% 20% 78%* 2019[22] UA *67% motorbike
United States Las Vegas 1% 0% 4% 90% 2016[23] UA
United Kingdom London 24% 2% 37% 37% 2016[24]
United States Los Angeles 3% 1% 5% 85% 2016[25] UA
Spain Madrid 34% 0.46% 24.35% 39.89% 2018 [26]
Philippines Manila 9% 2% 44% 45% 2019[10]
Australia Melbourne 4% 2% 19% 76% 2016[11] GCCSA
United States Miami 2% 1% 4% 87% 2016[27] UA
Italy Milan 17% 6% 41% 36% 2007 [28]
Belarus Minsk 13% 1% 63% 20% 2016 [29]
Canada Montreal 5% 2% 22% 70% 2016[30] CMA
India Mumbai 27% 6% 52% 15% 2008/2011[10]
Germany Munich 24% 18% 24% 34% 2017
United States New York City 6% 1% 33% 55% 2016[31] UA
Japan Osaka 27% 21% 34% 18% 2000[32]
Canada Ottawa 8% 2% 18% 72% 2016[33] CMA
France Paris 15% 5% 59% 20% 2010[34]
Australia Perth 3% 1% 12% 84% 2016[11] GCCSA
United States Philadelphia 4% 1% 10% 80% 2016[35] UA
United States Phoenix 2% 1% 2% 87% 2016[36] UA
United States Portland 3% 3% 7% 78% 2016[37] UA
Czech Republic Prague 22.4% 0.4% 52% 24.5% 2017[38]
Brazil Rio de Janeiro 29% 3% 43% 25% 2012[39] UA
Italy Rome 4% 1% 29% 66% 2014[40]
United States San Antonio 2% 0% 3% 90% 2016[41] UA
United States San Diego 3% 1% 3% 85% 2016[42] UA
United States San Francisco 5% 2% 20% 64% 2016[43] UA
United States San Jose 2% 2% 5% 84% 2016[44] UA
Brazil São Paulo 32% 1% 36% 31% 2017[45] UA
United States Seattle 4% 1% 10% 77% 2016[46] UA
South Korea Seoul N/A 4% 66% 23% 2014[47]
China Shanghai 27% 20% 33% 20% 2009/2011[10]
Singapore Singapore 22% 1% 44% 33% 2011[10]
Australia Sydney 5% 1% 27% 67% 2016[11] GCCSA
Taiwan Taipei 13% 4% 43% 40% 2016[48]
Japan Tokyo 23% 14% 51% 12% 2008/2009[10]
Canada Toronto 5% 1% 24% 68% 2016[49] CMA
Canada Vancouver 7% 2% 20% 69% 2016 CMA
Austria Vienna 26% 7% 39% 28% 2014[50]
Poland Warsaw 18% 3% 47% 32% 2015[51]
United States Washington, D.C. 4% 1% 16% 72% 2016[52] UA

Metropolitan Areas with over 250,000 inhabitants[edit]

Metro Area walking cycling public transport private motor vehicle year
Denmark Aarhus 7% 27% 19% 43% 2004
Spain Alicante 18% 0% 13% 69% 2004
Netherlands Amsterdam 4% 40% 29% 27% 2014
Italy Bari 13% 1% 14% 72% 2001
Switzerland Basel 33% 17% 27% 22% 2015[53]
Switzerland Bern 30% 15% 32% 22% 2015[54]
Spain Bilbao 23% 0% 34% 43% 2004
United Kingdom Birmingham 1% 1% 25% 66% 2001
Italy Bologna 8% 4% 21% 67% 2001
Germany Bonn 29% 12% 14% 46% 2008
Slovakia Bratislava 4% 0% 70% 26% 2004
Czech Republic Brno 5% 2% 57% 32% 2012 [55]
United States Buffalo 6% 1% 14% 79% 2012
Germany Bremen 25% 23% 16% 36% 2013
United Kingdom Bristol 19% 8% 12% 55% 2011 [56]
Australia Canberra 5% 3% 8% 85% 2016[11]
New Zealand Christchurch 4% 5% 4% 87% 2011–2014 [7]
Germany Cologne 7% 15% 28% 50% 2013
Denmark Copenhagen 10% 30% 36% 26% 2012
Spain Córdoba 18% 1% 10% 71% 2004
Germany Dortmund 19% 10% 22% 49% 2019
Germany Dresden 26% 18% 20% 36% 2018
Republic of Ireland Dublin 13.2% 7.6% 21.5% 48.5% 2016[57]
Germany Düsseldorf 29% 12% 19% 40% 2013
Netherlands Eindhoven 3% 24% 8% 65% 2004
Germany Essen 19% 7% 19% 55% 2019
Italy Florence 8% 4% 21% 69% 2001
Germany Frankfurt 11% 15% 30% 44% 2015
Germany Freiburg im Breisgau 29% 34% 16% 21% 2017
Belgium Gent 13% 33% 15% 40% 2018[58]
Poland Gdańsk 20.8% 5.9% 32.1% 41.2% 2016[59]
Spain Gijón 24% 0% 17% 59% 2004
Sweden Gothenburg 12% 14% 21% 52% 2004
Germany Hanover 26% 19% 19% 36% 2017
Finland Helsinki 37% 10% 30% 22% 2016
Spain Las Palmas 12% 0% 24% 64% 2004
Portugal Lisbon 10% 0% 46% 40% 2001
Spain Málaga 12% 0% 11% 77% 2004
Sweden Malmö 6% 25% 18% 51% 2011
Spain Murcia 18% 1% 7% 74% 2004
Italy Naples 13% 0% 26% 60% 2001
Germany Nuremberg 24% 14% 23% 39% 2019
Norway Oslo 29% 6% 30% 34% 2013
Italy Palermo 12% 1% 9% 78% 2001
Netherlands Rotterdam 5% 14% 25% 56% 2004
Sweden Stockholm 15% 7% 43% 33% 2004
Israel Tel Aviv 16% 13% 28% 43% 2015[60]
Netherlands The Hague 5% 22% 30% 43% 2004
Spain Seville 13% 7% 18% 62% 2014
Germany Stuttgart 26% 5% 24% 45% 2010
Estonia Tallinn 11% 2% 35% 48% 2017[61]
Italy Turin 12% 3% 5% 79% 2004
Netherlands Utrecht 3% 34% 24% 39% 2015
Spain Valencia 16% 1% 21% 62% 2004
Spain Valladolid 22% 1% 20% 57% 2004
Spain Vigo 19% 0% 13% 68% 2004
Lithuania Vilnius 36% 0% 26% 38% 2011[62]
New Zealand Wellington 10% 1% 23% 62% 2011–2014[7]
Canada Victoria (CMA) 10% 7% 11% 70% 2016
Canada Winnipeg 5% 2% 14% 79% 2016[63]
Spain Zaragoza 45.91% 2.90% 23.71% 26.88% 2017 [64]
Switzerland Zürich 33% 12% 32% 21% 2015[65]
Mean ± SD 13±8% 8±9% 24±13% 55±17%

Notes: European data is based on the Urban Audit,[66]

Modal share targets[edit]

The Charter of Brussels, signed by 36 cities including Brussels, Ghent, Milan, Munich, Seville, Edinburgh, Toulouse, Bordeaux, Gdansk, and Timișoara, commits the signatories to achieve at least 15% of bicycling modal share by 2020, and calls upon European institutions to do likewise.[67] The cycling modal share is strongly associated with the size of local cycling infrastructure [68]

The Canadian city of Hamilton adopted a similar modal share target plan in 2005.[69]

See also[edit]

External links[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Glossary (Engineering Services – Transportation, City of Vancouver website. Accessed 2009-06-04.) Archived June 3, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
  2. ^ http://www.ramblers.org.uk/Walking/policy/transport/transportleisure
  3. ^ "Singapore Land and Transport Authority: Journeys, issue 7, November 2011" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-07-14. Retrieved 2014-07-11.
  4. ^ "Trends in journey to work mode shares in Australian cities to 2016 (second edition)". Charting Transport. 2017-10-24. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  5. ^ "Census profile: Atlanta, GA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  6. ^ http://www.epomm.eu/tems/result_city.phtml?city=221
  7. ^ a b c [1]
  8. ^ "Census profile: Baltimore, MD Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  9. ^ http://prod-mobilitat.s3.amazonaws.com/DADESBASIQUES2013_p1.pdf
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h "Passenger Transport Mode Shares in World Cities" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-07-15. Retrieved 2014-07-11.
  11. ^ a b c d e Charting Transport, retrieved 27 October 2017
  12. ^ Camille Thiry (ed.). "Cahiers de l'Observatoire de la mobilité de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale: Les pratiques de déplacement à Bruxelles" (PDF) (in French). Bruxelles mobilité. p. 49. Retrieved 25 November 2013.
  13. ^ "Census profile: Boston, MA--NH--RI Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  14. ^ "Census profile: Chicago, IL--IN Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  15. ^ "Census profile: Dallas--Fort Worth--Arlington, TX Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  16. ^ [KOTI, "2013 National Transportation DB Report" 2013], retrieved 2013-12-31
  17. ^ "Census profile: Detroit, MI Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  18. ^ Page 7 in Infas: Mobilität im Großraum Hamburg
  19. ^ Page 61: Kulkutapajakauma Helsingin seudulla
  20. ^ "Census profile: Houston, TX Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  21. ^ "Census profile: Indianapolis, IN Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  22. ^ [2]
  23. ^ "Census profile: Las Vegas--Henderson, NV Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  24. ^ Transport for London: "Travel in London" Report 10, 2017
  25. ^ "Census profile: Los Angeles--Long Beach--Anaheim, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  26. ^ "Encuesta de movilidad de la Comunidad de Madrid 2018 - Documento de síntesis" (PDF).
  27. ^ "Census profile: Miami, FL Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  28. ^ [3]
  29. ^ [4]
  30. ^ Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics. "Census Profile, 2016 Census – Montréal [Census metropolitan area], Quebec and Quebec [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  31. ^ Bureau, U.S. Census. "American FactFinder – Results". factfinder.census.gov. Archived from the original on 2020-02-14. Retrieved 2017-06-06.
  32. ^ "The Truth About Osaka". janejacobsjapan. 2016-11-09. Retrieved 2018-06-18.
  33. ^ Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics. "Census Profile, 2016 Census – Ottawa – Gatineau [Census metropolitan area], Ontario/Quebec and Ontario [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  34. ^ [5]
  35. ^ "Census profile: Philadelphia, PA--NJ--DE--MD Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  36. ^ "Census profile: Phoenix--Mesa, AZ Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  37. ^ "Census profile: Portland, OR--WA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  38. ^ The yearbook of transportation Prague 2009 Archived 2011-07-26 at the Wayback Machine, page 5, retrieved 2011-03-23
  39. ^ "Page 41 in Monografia UFRJ 2015" (PDF). João Victor Costa. Retrieved 2020-05-15.
  40. ^ FGM-AMOR. "ENDURANCE :: Countries/Cities". www.epomm.eu. Retrieved 2018-04-27.
  41. ^ "Census profile: San Antonio, TX Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  42. ^ "Census profile: San Diego, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  43. ^ "Census profile: San Francisco--Oakland, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  44. ^ "Census profile: San Jose, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  45. ^ "Page 39 in Pesquisa OD 2017". Metrô. Retrieved 2020-05-15.
  46. ^ "Census profile: Seattle, WA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  47. ^ "Public Transport in Seoul Metropolitan – K-Developedia" (PDF). K Developedia. 2014. Retrieved 16 August 2019.
  48. ^ Taipei City Hall. "市政統計週報". Retrieved 19 October 2018.
  49. ^ Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics (2017-02-08). "Census Profile, 2016 Census – Toronto [Census metropolitan area], Ontario and Toronto, Census division [Census division], Ontario". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  50. ^ [6], (German) retrieved 2015-02-10
  51. ^ [7] Archived 2016-08-17 at the Wayback Machine, (Polish) retrieved 2016-01-20
  52. ^ "Census profile: Washington, DC--VA--MD Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  53. ^ "Städtevergleich Mobilität Vergleichende Betrachtung der Städte Basel, Bern, Luzern, St.Gallen, Winterthur und Zürich im Jahr 2015" (PDF).
  54. ^ "Städtevergleich Mobilität Vergleichende Betrachtung der Städte Basel, Bern, Luzern, St.Gallen, Winterthur und Zürich im Jahr 2015" (PDF).
  55. ^ http://www.brno.cz/fileadmin/user_upload/sprava_mesta/magistrat_mesta_brna/OD/dokumenty_OKD/delba_prepravni_prace/Delba_prepravni_prace_2012.pdf
  56. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-07-24. Retrieved 2013-12-04.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  57. ^ https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-nts/nts2016/hwt/
  58. ^ "Verplaatsingsgedrag van de Gentenaar in 2018 2018".
  59. ^ "Gdańskie Badania Ruchu 2016".
  60. ^ (PDF) http://civitas.eu/sites/default/files/tel_aviv-yafo_evolution_of_cycling_patterns_in_tel_aviv_benjamin_maor_haggai_yaron.pdf. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  61. ^ url=https://www.tallinn.ee/eng/g2677s113615[permanent dead link]
  62. ^ Naujų transporto rūšių diegimo Vilniaus mieste specialusis planas Archived 2013-12-03 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 2013-07-03
  63. ^ Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics. "Census Profile, 2016 Census – Winnipeg [Census metropolitan area], Manitoba and Manitoba [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  64. ^ "Revisión del plan de movilidad urbana sostenible Zaragoza" (PDF). Retrieved 2 June 2020.
  65. ^ "Städtevergleich Mobilität Vergleichende Betrachtung der Städte Basel, Bern, Luzern, St.Gallen, Winterthur und Zürich im Jahr 2015" (PDF).
  66. ^ Urban Audit Archived 2009-02-06 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 2009-10-03
  67. ^ Charter of Brussels Archived 2009-07-31 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 2009-10-03
  68. ^ Mueller, N (2018). "Health impact assessment of cycling network expansions in European cities". Preventive Medicine. 109: 62–70. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.12.011. hdl:10230/42143. PMID 29330030.
  69. ^ http://www2.hamilton.ca/NR/rdonlyres/4929A56F-4222-4A62-B399-5E3860F7A764/0/AppendixB.pdf