Modal share

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A modal share (also called mode split, mode-share, or modal split) is the percentage of travellers using a particular type of transportation or number of trips using said type.[1] In freight transportation, this may be measured in mass.

Modal share is an important component in developing sustainable transport within a city or region. In recent years, many cities have set modal share targets for balanced and sustainable transport modes, particularly 30% of non-motorized (cycling and walking) and 30% of public transport. These goals reflect a desire for a modal shift, or a change between modes, and usually encompasses an increase in the proportion of trips made using sustainable modes.[2]

Comparability of data[edit]

Modal share data is usually obtained by travel surveys, which are often conducted by local governments, using different methodologies. Sampling and interviewing techniques, definitions, the extent of geographical areas and other methodological differences can influence comparability. Most typical surveys refer to the main mode of transport used during trips to work.[3] Surveys covering entire metropolitan ares are preferred over city proper surveys which typically cover only the denser inner city.

Modal split of journeys to work[edit]

The following tables present the modal split of journeys to work. Note that it is better to use a measure of all trips on a typical weekday, but journey to work data is more readily available. It would also be beneficial to disaggregate private motor vehicles figures to car driver and car passenger.

Cities with over 1,000,000 inhabitants[edit]

City walking cycling public transport private motor vehicle year Survey Area
Australia Adelaide 3% 1% 11% 85% 2016[4] GCCSA
United States Atlanta 1% 0% 3% 86% 2016[5] UA
Greece Athens 8% 2% 37% 53% 2006 [6]
New Zealand Auckland 4% 1% 9% 85% 2011-2014[7] MUA
United States Baltimore 3% 0% 7% 84% 2016[8] UA
Spain Barcelona 32% 2% 39% 27% 2013[9]
China Beijing 21% 32% 26% 21% 2005/2011[10]
Serbia Belgrade 23% 1% 49% 27% 2015
Germany Berlin 29% 15% 26% 30% 2012
Australia Brisbane 4% 1% 14% 81% 2016[11] GCCSA
Belgium Brussels 25% 2.5% 28% 43% 2010[12]
Colombia Bogota 15% 2% 64% 19% 2008[10]
United States Boston 5% 1% 14% 73% 2016[13] UA
Hungary Budapest 32% 1% 47% 20% 2011
Canada Calgary 4.7% 1.5% 14.4% 79.4% 2016
United States Chicago 3% 1% 13% 77% 2016[14] UA
United States Dallas 1% 0% 2% 90% 2016[15] UA
South Korea Daejeon 26% 2% 28% 44% 2012[16]
India Delhi 21% 12% 48% 19% 2008/2011[10]
United States Detroit 1% 0% 2% 92% 2016[17]
Canada Edmonton 3.7% 1.0% 11.3% 84% 2016
Germany Hamburg 28% 12% 18% 42% 2008[18]
United States Houston 1% 0% 2% 91% 2016[19] UA
United States Indianapolis 1% 0% 1% 91% 2016[20] UA
United States Las Vegas 1% 0% 4% 90% 2016[21] UA
United Kingdom London 24% 2% 37% 37% 2016[22]
United States Los Angeles 3% 1% 5% 85% 2016[23] UA
Spain Madrid 36% 0% 34% 30% 2006[10]
Australia Melbourne 4% 2% 19% 76% 2016[11] GCCSA
United States Miami 2% 1% 4% 87% 2016[24] UA
Italy Milan 17% 6% 41% 36% 2007 [25]
Belarus Minsk 13% 1% 63% 20% 2016 [26]
Canada Montreal 5% 2% 22% 70% 2016[27] CMA
India Mumbai 27% 6% 52% 15% 2008/2011[10]
Germany Munich 28% 17% 21% 37% 2011[28]
United States New York City 6% 1% 33% 55% 2016[29] UA
Japan Osaka 27% 21% 34% 18% 2000[30]
Canada Ottawa 8% 2% 18% 72% 2016[31] CMA
France Paris 15% 5% 59% 20% 2010[32]
Australia Perth 3% 1% 12% 84% 2016[11] GCCSA
United States Philadelphia 4% 1% 10% 80% 2016[33] UA
United States Phoenix 2% 1% 2% 87% 2016[34] UA
United States Portland 3% 3% 7% 78% 2016[35] UA
Czech Republic Prague 23% 1% 43% 33% 2009[36]
Italy Rome 4% 1% 29% 66% 2014[37]
United States San Antonio 2% 0% 3% 90% 2016[38] UA
United States San Diego 3% 1% 3% 85% 2016[39] UA
United States San Francisco 5% 2% 20% 64% 2016[40] UA
United States San Jose 2% 2% 5% 84% 2016[41] UA
United States Seattle 4% 1% 10% 77% 2016[42] UA
China Shanghai 27% 20% 33% 20% 2009/2011[10]
Singapore Singapore 22% 1% 44% 33% 2011[10]
Australia Sydney 5% 1% 27% 67% 2016[11] GCCSA
Taiwan Taipei 13% 4% 43% 40% 2016[43]
Japan Tokyo 23% 14% 51% 12% 2008/2009[10]
Canada Toronto 5% 1% 24% 68% 2016[44] CMA
Canada Vancouver 7% 2% 20% 69% 2016 CMA
Austria Vienna 26% 7% 39% 28% 2014[45]
Poland Warsaw 18% 3% 47% 32% 2015[46]
United States Washington, D.C. 4% 1% 16% 72% 2016[47] UA

Cities with over 250,000 inhabitants[edit]

City walking cycling public transport private motor vehicle year
Denmark Aarhus 7% 27% 19% 43% 2004
Spain Alicante 18% 0% 13% 69% 2004
Netherlands Amsterdam 4% 40% 29% 27% 2014
Italy Bari 13% 1% 14% 72% 2001
Switzerland Bern 11% 11% 54% 24% 2001
Spain Bilbao 23% 0% 34% 43% 2004
United Kingdom Birmingham 1% 1% 25% 66% 2001
Italy Bologna 8% 4% 21% 67% 2001
Germany Bonn 9% 13% 21% 57% 2004
Slovakia Bratislava 4% 0% 70% 26% 2004
Czech Republic Brno 5% 2% 57% 32% 2012 [48]
United States Buffalo 6% 1% 14% 79% 2012
Germany Bremen 7% 19% 24% 50% 2004
United Kingdom Bristol 19% 8% 12% 55% 2011 [49]
Australia Canberra 5% 3% 8% 85% 2016[11]
New Zealand Christchurch 6% 8% 9% 78% 2009-2012 [7]
Germany Cologne 7% 15% 28% 50% 2013
Denmark Copenhagen 10% 30% 36% 26% 2012
Spain Córdoba 18% 1% 10% 71% 2004
Germany Dortmund 7% 3% 23% 67% 2004
Germany Dresden 24% 17% 21% 38% 2008
Republic of Ireland Dublin 19% 3% 13% 64% 2014[50]
Germany Düsseldorf 11% 5% 31% 53% 2004
Netherlands Eindhoven 3% 24% 8% 65% 2004
Germany Essen 9% 2% 20% 69% 2004
Italy Florence 8% 4% 21% 69% 2001
Germany Frankfurt 11% 15% 30% 44% 2015
Germany Freiburg im Breisgau 11% 13% 12% 63% 2004
Poland Gdańsk 20.8% 5.9% 32.1% 41.2% 2016[51]
Spain Gijón 24% 0% 17% 59% 2004
Sweden Gothenburg 12% 14% 21% 52% 2004
Germany Hanover 9% 13% 29% 49% 2004
Finland Helsinki 37% 10% 30% 22% 2016
Spain Las Palmas 12% 0% 24% 64% 2004
Portugal Lisbon 10% 0% 46% 40% 2001
Spain Málaga 12% 0% 11% 77% 2004
Sweden Malmö 6% 25% 18% 51% 2011
Spain Murcia 18% 1% 7% 74% 2004
Italy Naples 13% 0% 26% 60% 2001
Germany Nuremberg 11% 7% 30% 52% 2004
Norway Oslo 29% 6% 30% 34% 2013
Italy Palermo 12% 1% 9% 78% 2001
Netherlands Rotterdam 5% 14% 25% 56% 2004
Sweden Stockholm 15% 7% 43% 33% 2004
Israel Tel Aviv 16% 13% 28% 43% 2015[52]
Netherlands The Hague 5% 22% 30% 43% 2004
Spain Seville 13% 7% 18% 62% 2014
Germany Stuttgart 13% 4% 32% 51% 2004
Estonia Tallinn 16% 0% 50% 34% 2004
Italy Turin 12% 3% 5% 79% 2004
Netherlands Utrecht 3% 34% 24% 39% 2015
Spain Valencia 16% 1% 21% 62% 2004
Spain Valladolid 22% 1% 20% 57% 2004
Spain Vigo 19% 0% 13% 68% 2004
Lithuania Vilnius 36% 0% 26% 38% 2011[53]
New Zealand Wellington 9% 2% 18% 70% 2011-2014[7]
Canada Victoria (CMA) 10% 7% 11% 70% 2016
Canada Winnipeg 5% 2% 14% 79% 2016[54]
Spain Zaragoza 17% 0% 29% 54% 2004
Switzerland Zürich 36% 6% 32% 25% 2010[55]

Notes: European data is based on the Urban Audit,[56]

Modal share targets[edit]

The Charter of Brussels, signed by 36 cities including Brussels, Ghent, Milan, Munich, Seville, Edinburgh, Toulouse, Bordeaux, Gdansk, and Timisoara, commits the signatories to achieve at least 15% of bicycling modal share by 2020, and calls upon European institutions to do likewise.[57]. The cycling modal share is strongly associated with the size of local cycling infrastructure [58]

See also[edit]

External links[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Glossary (Engineering Services - Transportation, City of Vancouver website. Accessed 2009-06-04.) Archived June 3, 2006, at the Wayback Machine.
  2. ^ http://www.ramblers.org.uk/Walking/policy/transport/transportleisure
  3. ^ Singapore Land and Transport Authority: Journeys, issue 7, November 2011
  4. ^ "Trends in journey to work mode shares in Australian cities to 2016 (second edition)". Charting Transport. 2017-10-24. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  5. ^ "Census profile: Atlanta, GA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  6. ^ http://www.epomm.eu/tems/result_city.phtml?city=221
  7. ^ a b c [1]
  8. ^ "Census profile: Baltimore, MD Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  9. ^ http://prod-mobilitat.s3.amazonaws.com/DADESBASIQUES2013_p1.pdf
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h Passenger Transport Mode Shares in World Cities
  11. ^ a b c d e Charting Transport, retrieved 27 October 2017
  12. ^ Camille Thiry (ed.). "Cahiers de l'Observatoire de la mobilité de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale: Les pratiques de déplacement à Bruxelles" (PDF) (in French). Bruxelles mobilité. p. 49. Retrieved 25 November 2013.
  13. ^ "Census profile: Boston, MA--NH--RI Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  14. ^ "Census profile: Chicago, IL--IN Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  15. ^ "Census profile: Dallas--Fort Worth--Arlington, TX Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  16. ^ [KOTI, "2013 National Transportation DB Report" 2013], retrieved 2013-12-31
  17. ^ "Census profile: Detroit, MI Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  18. ^ Page 7 in Infas: Mobilität im Großraum Hamburg
  19. ^ "Census profile: Houston, TX Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  20. ^ "Census profile: Indianapolis, IN Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  21. ^ "Census profile: Las Vegas--Henderson, NV Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  22. ^ Transport for London: "Travel in London" Report 10, 2017
  23. ^ "Census profile: Los Angeles--Long Beach--Anaheim, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  24. ^ "Census profile: Miami, FL Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  25. ^ [2]
  26. ^ [3]
  27. ^ Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics. "Census Profile, 2016 Census - Montréal [Census metropolitan area], Quebec and Quebec [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  28. ^ Evaluation of the marketing campaign „Radlhauptstadt München“ Archived 2014-04-08 at the Wayback Machine. (PDF; 764 kB), November 2011, retrieved 2014-10-22
  29. ^ Bureau, U.S. Census. "American FactFinder - Results". factfinder.census.gov. Retrieved 2017-06-06.
  30. ^ "The Truth About Osaka". janejacobsjapan. 2016-11-09. Retrieved 2018-06-18.
  31. ^ Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics. "Census Profile, 2016 Census - Ottawa - Gatineau [Census metropolitan area], Ontario/Quebec and Ontario [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  32. ^ [4]
  33. ^ "Census profile: Philadelphia, PA--NJ--DE--MD Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  34. ^ "Census profile: Phoenix--Mesa, AZ Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  35. ^ "Census profile: Portland, OR--WA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  36. ^ The yearbook of transportation Prague 2009 Archived 2011-07-26 at the Wayback Machine., page 5, retrieved 2011-03-23
  37. ^ FGM-AMOR. "ENDURANCE :: Countries/Cities". www.epomm.eu. Retrieved 2018-04-27.
  38. ^ "Census profile: San Antonio, TX Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  39. ^ "Census profile: San Diego, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  40. ^ "Census profile: San Francisco--Oakland, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  41. ^ "Census profile: San Jose, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  42. ^ "Census profile: Seattle, WA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  43. ^ Taipei City Hall. "市政統計週報". Retrieved 19 October 2018.
  44. ^ Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics. "Census Profile, 2016 Census - Toronto [Census metropolitan area], Ontario and Toronto, Census division [Census division], Ontario". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  45. ^ [5], (German) retrieved 2015-02-10
  46. ^ [6], (Polish) retrieved 2016-01-20
  47. ^ "Census profile: Washington, DC--VA--MD Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  48. ^ http://www.brno.cz/fileadmin/user_upload/sprava_mesta/magistrat_mesta_brna/OD/dokumenty_OKD/delba_prepravni_prace/Delba_prepravni_prace_2012.pdf
  49. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-07-24. Retrieved 2013-12-04.
  50. ^ http://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-nts/nationaltravelsurvey2014/detailedanalysis/howwetravelled/
  51. ^ http://www.brg.gda.pl/planowanie-przestrzenne/inne-opracowania-urbanistyczne/282-gdanskie-badania-ruchu-2016
  52. ^ (PDF) http://civitas.eu/sites/default/files/tel_aviv-yafo_evolution_of_cycling_patterns_in_tel_aviv_benjamin_maor_haggai_yaron.pdf. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  53. ^ Naujų transporto rūšių diegimo Vilniaus mieste specialusis planas Archived 2013-12-03 at the Wayback Machine., retrieved 2013-07-03
  54. ^ Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics. "Census Profile, 2016 Census - Winnipeg [Census metropolitan area], Manitoba and Manitoba [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  55. ^ "Transport (Statistical Yearbook of the City of Zurich 2017, Chapter 11)" (PDF).
  56. ^ Urban Audit Archived 2009-02-06 at the Wayback Machine., retrieved 2009-10-03
  57. ^ Charter of Brussels, retrieved 2009-10-03
  58. ^ Mueller, N (2018). "Health impact assessment of cycling network expansions in European cities". Preventive Medicine.