User talk:Antidiskriminator

• Archive 1 (February 9, 2010 — April 18, 2011)
• Archive 2 (April 18, 2011 — August 18, 2011)
• Archive 3 (August 18, 2011 — 11 January 2012)
• Archive 4 (12 January 2012 — 10 June 2012)
• Archive 5 (10 June 2012 — 4 February 2013)
• Archive 6 (8 February 2013 — 14 June 2013)
• Archive 7 (16 June 2013 — 4 November 2013)
• Archive 8 (6 November 2013 — 4 February 2014)

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Third League of Prizren may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• page=572|quote=Тахир Заими (касније у емиграцији председник Треће призренске лиге),[ Tahir Zaimi (later in emigration president of the Third League of Prizren]}}</ref>
• Vojske|page=369|quote=Призренска лига и Национални комитет „Слободно Косово" од 1978. године щелу]е на заједничкој платформи...[Xhafer Deva established in New York the Third League of Prizren in

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:British Isles

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:British Isles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Historiography of Albania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scutari (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

False Accusation

Actually, my attention was brought to the Skenderaj talk page after I got a notification that BrownHairedGirl had mentioned me in her comment/ closure. Please rescind/ withdraw this false accusation or I'll rescind it for you. I'm getting sick to death of your false accusations and constant badgering on my talk page, this constitutes as WP:Harassment and a violation of Wikipedia policy. Consider this to by your final warning. Regards IJA (talk) 19:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Johann Erich Thunmann

The DYK project (nominate) 15:48, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Greetings

Hello Antidiscriminator, Thank you very much for your kind words and advice. As you can see; I am new to Wikipedia.

• Now about the edit war dispute between myself and User:Peacemaker67....

After I added several battles and leaders from different factions to the Template talk:Yugoslav Front. I noticed all of that hours of editing I invested into that Template had vanished and reverted back to the original state. I thought for sure that my work was lost forever and that I had to restart all over again.

• Later on I decided the damage could be revived from the Edit History. I reverted the damage User:Peacemaker67 has committed and added few more details to the template.

Again he deleted my work. Complaining "This is not a redfarm link"

• I felt the Template was not complete. All of the battles that took place in occupied Yugoslavia needed to be added there.

Once again User:Peacemaker67 reverted the template back to the previous state. I agreed with him about the redfarm links. Instead I edited the template into one of these versions as you have noticed. diff1, diff2, diff3, diff4

• Later on the template was AGAIN reverted back to the original state....by you guessed it User:Peacemaker67

THERE WERE NO REDFARM LINKS! What was the reason behind that action?? From then on he would undo whatever edit action I performed on that template and I would undo his inappropriate action, thus sparking the edit war. It lasted for several minutes until he send a message that he will be reporting me....like the disgusting coward he truly is.. So much for a former UN personnel serving in war-torn Yugoslavia. Now living in the present, he has an obsession for that region. Hours later after creating a new article. The user administrator that blocked me fron Wikipedia User:Joy undid one of my edits to the Template:Norwegian Campaign It seems that User:Joy is a henchmen for User:Peacemaker67 If you can tell me how to report User:Peacemaker67 for his unnecessary actions in retaliation, I would most appreciate it. I wish to present evidence of his actions by sending you links from the Edit History from the Template talk:Yugoslav Front. I currently don't have the knowledge on how to perform this step.

• Also why and how did the User:Joy follow me to the Template:Norwegian Campaign? This only proves my point that she is behaving like a henchmen.

That's right! She is a Croat... Which proves she is a Ustašhe fanatic! Is it possible to hide all of my activity so no one, not even the high-ranking wikipedians who call themselves "administrator" can see none of my activity - much less follow me around and revert the edits and later misuse the reporting option? When and why was the two articles I created deleted?

• Battle of Zavlaka (1941)
• Action of 10 April 1940
• Action of 16 November 1943

Two of these articles had sources. The sources to Battle of Zavlaka is non-existent on the known internet. There is no need for "sources". This was a battle, not a skirmish. Chetiks fought and died to liberate the village form the Germans. User:The Banner seems to be another henchmen(talk) 11:32, 8 February, 2014 (UTC)

The message above was originally posted in one of your talk page archives. Mathonius (talk) 16:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC) (Feel free to remove this note)

Mr. User:BjeliRabac, let me put it politely: if you go on like this with your personal attacks, your unsourced edits and your POV-pushing you can find yourself quite quickly on the wrong side of a topic ban request. The Banner talk 20:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Centralia, Pennsylvania

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Centralia, Pennsylvania. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Rabaul in World War II and Australia in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Consensus to endorse

I agree that the discussion was far from ideal, especially given that, as you point out ,and as I comment on in my close, all comments were by editors involved in the original RM. That said I can't see any useful purpose being served by keeping the discussion open given that there had been no comments in so long. I stand by the consensus I found although I admit it is a very weak consensus. Dpmuk (talk) 00:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

The MRV had been open for 4 weeks and had had no additional comments in almost as long. I believe the effect that other discussions had on this would have been at best minimal. I also don't like the precedent that keeping the discussion open longer would set. At the end of the day editors had plenty of time to comment and they chose not to, for whatever reason. It's starting to look like you just won't accept the decision and are looking for any possible way that you may be able to change it. I would strongly advise against it but if you wish to ask for review of my close then WP:AN is the place to do so. I will not be undoing my own close due to any argument based on lack of participation. Dpmuk (talk) 16:52, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Puerto Rico

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Puerto Rico. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 February newsletter

And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:

1. Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer whose high-quality scans of rare banknotes represent an unusual, interesting and valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Most of Godot's points this round have come from a large set of pictures used in Treasury Note (1890–91).
2. Adam Cuerden (submissions), a WikiCup veteran and a finalist last year, Adam is also a featured picture specialist, focusing on the restoration of historical images. This month's promotions have included a carefully restored set of artist William Russell Flint's work.
3. WikiRedactor (submissions), another WikiCup newcomer. WikiRedactor has claimed points for good article reviews and good articles relating to pop music, many of which were awarded bonus points. Articles include Sky Ferreira, Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus and "Wrecking Ball" (Miley Cyrus song).

Other competitors of note include:

• Hahc21 (submissions), who helped take Thirty Flights of Loving through good article candidates and featured article candidates, claiming the first first featured article of the competition.
• Prism (submissions), who claimed the first featured list of the competition with Natalia Kills discography.
• Cwmhiraeth (submissions), who takes the title of the contributor awarded the highest bonus point multiplier (resulting in the highest scoring article) of the competition so far. Her high-importance salamander, now a good article, scored 108 points.

After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Books & Bytes, Issue 4

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 4, February 2014

News for February from your Wikipedia Library.

Donations drive: news on TWL's partnership efforts with publishers

Open Access: Feature from Ocaasi on the intersection of the library and the open access movement

American Library Association Midwinter Conference: TWL attended this year in Philadelphia

Royal Society Opens Access To Journals: The UK's venerable Royal Society will give the public (and Wikipedians) full access to two of their journal titles for two days on March 4th and 5th

Going Global: TWL starts work on pilot projects in other language Wikipedias

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sanjak of Nicopolis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gypsies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations

		All-Around Amazing Barnstar
		Working on more than ten WikiProjects is amazing. Congratulations ! Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 19:02, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much!--Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:03, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:The answer to life, the universe, and everything

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:The answer to life, the universe, and everything. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Please move and redirect

Go ahead, I do not mind if you redirect it to Persecution of Ottoman Muslim. Thank you for helping. Star Lord - 星王 (talk) 10:29, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 4 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Persecution of Ottoman Muslims page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:51, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Posts

Do not edit my posts to misleadingly make it appear they are in response to you rather another specific user as you have done here. --◅ PRODUCER (TALK) 10:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

I apologize. Now after I read WP:INDENTATIONS I see that you are right. I wish your comment was not so unnecessary harsh.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 11:21, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Paulina Lebl-Albala

Some strawberries for you, with thanks. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Can you assist with this one, Paulina Lebl-Albala? I really appreciate it. --Rosiestep (talk) 21:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

I will try as soon as I will have some time.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:56, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much for this delicious sweet!--Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:03, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Skaramuca

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Skaramuca. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

WP History in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject History for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 02:47, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Economy of Serbia

Hi Antidiskriminator. If you have time, I'd really appreciate you reviewing the additional article content that I've proposed on the Economy of Serbia talk page. If you aren't already aware the Government of Serbia is a client of mine and I've registered my COI on the noticeboard. Any questions then let me know. Thanks Vivj2012 (talk) 14:43, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Paulina Lebl-Albala

Thanks and have a good weekend Victuallers (talk) 16:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Antidiskriminator. You have new messages at Iryna Harpy's talk page.
Message added 21:29, 15 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:01, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on File talk:Samesex marriage in USA.svg

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on File talk:Samesex marriage in USA.svg. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Sanjak of Nicopolis

Best wishes Victuallers (talk) 16:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Soviet Union

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Soviet Union. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on military command and Nick-D on F-111s in combat

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:15, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Re: Leftist errors

I find it a very interesting topic, even if history is not exactly my cup of tea. I'm not really a copyeditor either - except for minor tweaks - but why not, I'm going to take a look (within a day or two). I'll leave some remarks in the talk page too. The article on my watchlist now. GregorB (talk) 16:16, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Battle of Berlin

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Battle of Berlin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Bajo Stanišić

Cheers and thanks, hope you are having a good weekend Victuallers (talk) 21:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 March newsletter

A quick update as we are half way through round two of this year's competition. WikiCup newcomer Godot13 (submissions) (Pool E) leads, having produced a massive set of featured pictures for Silver certificate (United States), an article also brought to featured list status. Former finalist Adam Cuerden (submissions) (Pool G) is in second, which he owes mostly to his work with historical images, including a number of images from Urania's Mirror, an article also brought to good status. 2010 champion (Pool C) is third overall, thanks to contributions relating to naval history, including the newly featured Japanese battleship Nagato. Cliftonian (submissions), who currently leads Pool A and is sixth overall, takes the title for the highest scoring individual article of the competition so far, with the top importance featured article Ian Smith.

With 26 people having already scored over 100 points, it is likely that well over 100 points will be needed to secure a place in round 3. Recent years have required 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) and 100 (2010). Remember that only 64 will progress to round 3 at the end of April. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page; if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 22:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello

Hello Antidiskriminator you seem very interested in Albanian history,and you seem great supporter of serbian propaganda. You just removed category which i added to Skanderbegs article. Skanderbeg was Albanian,i know you dont like that,and i know that you like propaganda,cause most of your nation are like you. Prek Cali is a chetnik second you,Kelmendi tribe (the oldest Northern Albanian tribe)second you gots serbian decent,now im waiting to see another Cool fairy tale made by communist-serbian propaganda. You can write what you want in wikipedia,cause you got a lot supporters,which support serbian theory's. Stay classy,you can write lies on Wikipedia,but you cannot change the history. Sincerly AlbertBikaj (talk) 20:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)