User:Iadrian yu is a new meta/sock puppet of User:Iaasi. Notice: Iaaasi uses more (ISP) Internet Providers from Romania. He was deleted many times for chauvinism and anti-semitic reasons.
:It is not the Flatlist template that is producing these errors; it looks fine in Firefox and in Chrome. I expect you are viewing the page with an outdated browser, probably an older version of Windows Internet Explorer. The Flatlist template is now an accepted way to present list material in navigation templates, as seen in the documentation at [[Template:Navbox#Examples]]. Regards, --[[User:Diannaa|Dianna]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 02:36, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
:It is not the Flatlist template that is producing these errors; it looks fine in Firefox and in Chrome. I expect you are viewing the page with an outdated browser, probably an older version of Windows Internet Explorer. The Flatlist template is now an accepted way to present list material in navigation templates, as seen in the documentation at [[Template:Navbox#Examples]]. Regards, --[[User:Diannaa|Dianna]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 02:36, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
::I use IE9 at home and the problem still appears. Sadly this is a common problem across Wikipedia that often people solve problems in Firefox, but forget that more people use IE. I'm more than happy for flatlist to be used, but those issues have to be resolved first (including for older versions of IE (probably back to 6 or 7), which are still commonly used). [[User:Number 57|<font color="orange">Number</font>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<font color="green">5</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<font color="blue">7</font>]] 08:42, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
::I use IE9 at home and the problem still appears. Sadly this is a common problem across Wikipedia that often people solve problems in Firefox, but forget that more people use IE. I'm more than happy for flatlist to be used, but those issues have to be resolved first (including for older versions of IE (probably back to 6 or 7), which are still commonly used). [[User:Number 57|<font color="orange">Number</font>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<font color="green">5</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<font color="blue">7</font>]] 08:42, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
== [[User:Iadrian yu]] is a new meta/sock puppet of banned [[User:Iaaasi]] ==
[[User:Iadrian yu]] is a new meta/sock puppet of [[User:Iaasi]]. He was banned many times by anti-semite and chauvinist edits in English Wikipedia. Notice: Iaaasi uses more (ISP) Internet Providers from Romania.
{{History of South Asia}}Y I fixed the color scheme, but two problems remain: The Iron Age is not properly centred; and the header for "kingdoms of Sri Lanka" jumps to the left when you click on "show". I don't know whats wrong.
Yes, it's at Template:GOCEtb. Slon gave me the link. I knew there was a page for it, I just couldn't remember the link. Oh well, just as vandal fighters customize their own warning templates, I have customized my own Requests page notification template (that anybody is welcome to use, by the way). The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs22:03, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"A member of the Guild of Copy Editors reviewed a version of this article for copy editing after a request on the GOCE requests page. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time due to issues found in the article which have been mentioned on the requester's or article's talk page. Once these issues have been addressed, please add the article once again on the GOCE requests page. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English to visit our project page and consider joining!"
There would also be a field for the link to the discussion. I realise it would not be often used, but if things pick up at the rate they are doing, I suspect there may be a use for it. For example the one I raised earlier today, the MIT one you were looking at that I had a quick look at yesterday, and the one Demiurge and Aichikawa are looking at (banned user, plagiarism/copyvio) - all three could have been templated with the GOCEreviewed template, except that it talked about tags on the page and putting the {{Copy edit|for=|date=August 2011}} tl back on.
I would like us all to perform (like I think you have been doing with dashes) some initial checks on a request once it has been posted. If we semi-automate parts of the process with subst templates, which is a possibilty in the future, there will be a need for automatic templating. For example marking those that are already part of a GAN or FAC as more urgent, ones that do not need copyediting, ones that have other issues such as copyvio that prevent an immediate copy-edit etc.
The water has been on for quite a while, reaching boiling point now :¬|
To be honest I have similar concerns regarding GOCE™ quality assurance, though I think that sort of discussion should really take place on the co-ordinators page. Having a discussion like the one on our main talk page is great, it gets it out to all members that their work is crap and they are useless lol. (that is called sarcasm if there are any tps' that are from non-commonwealth countries - ooh I suppose that was as well lol)
I did have a quick read of the two threads but need to get the ce done on the Dragon Quest article and will comment in a little while once on a break or finished. Chaosdruid (talk) 21:33, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Where's Malleus? Normally he would be commenting about now how our level of crappiness has not yet noticeably declined. I think it's nap time, what. I am getting snarky --Dianna (talk) 21:36, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
He did say he was going away for a few days, though his comments have been pretty unbiased so far. Did you notice the comment on the black eye(below)?
Yes, I did. I am listening to the Rodrigo y Gabriela now; its really good.
A proposal to split the Guild has been brought up here. If this proposal were to go through, one part of the Guild would contain members who work on the copyedit backlog, and the other part would contain members who work on higher quality articles (GA, FA) as well as the copyedit backlog. Please see the talk page thread (link above) for more details. The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs18:35, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Diannaa, if it wasn't urgent then I'd go to "Request" page. I've 2002 Asian Games medal table a FLC, and got quick oppose from user on the basis of structured language. It's my fifth nomination (rest all are successful) and IMO other than prose it has nothing to oppose of, so it's my humble request that if you have any time then please do CE there, thanks and regards. — Bill william comptonTalk15:32, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What you need to do is list the article at the Requests page before you take it to FAC. It is not fair to the others that have been waiting several weeks for a copy edit to jump the queue by posting here. I am going to transfer the request to the Requests page. Sorry. --Dianna (talk) 15:37, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Diana :) I wanted to ask you a small favor (don't worry, no advanced c/e :P). SO this article is almost at the top of the list (I don't mind waiting for it to reach the top), but can I ask that the most experienced member of the GOCE be reserved for that article? I am patient. Its been waiting for 2 weeks, I don't mind another two. But this article needs the best job the GOCE editors can give, because I am looking for an FA. Its already gone through extensive work and PR, and is in very good shape, so I need someone experienced. So I hope that's not too much to ask, but do you know pretty much who is "the most experienced" member? Is it you? Well as I said, no issue with waiting, just if I can at some point get the best person for the job. Thanks a lot Lady DI :D--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me23:18, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, I will give you a picture of the most scrumptious cookie you've ever seen, and the cutest kitten you've ever laid eyes on ;). Don't forget me! Thank you my Lady :D--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me01:09, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I also have edits to complete after a GA review, my first nomination for a GA! Hopefully I can get everything up-to-date by tomorrow as well as look through all the GOCE news on the FA and GA ce comments. I already see a need to add something about the fact that there is no shiny reward for an FA or GA copyedit, only that one might get one for doing an article over 5k words. Is there anything I have missed over the last two days? My watchlist is too big, at over 4,500 articles, and I only get the last 12 hours or so - I can change my prefs to only show the most recent change, but that only gets me to 36 hours, anything before that is lost.
Hope you are well though, and looking forwards to the next drive lol I also noticed that you seem to be getting the credit for the "review by co-ordinators" idea, if it goes wrong that will be another bullet I avoided lol :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 03:53, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I started collecting my stuff for my trip to Europe today. I got a new suitcase as my return flight goes through Chicago (pray for me) so I am going to try to fit everything in a carry-on. I will be bringing my laptop and keeping up with events as best I can. It will be like my last two trips, though, where even when I am available I will not feel like doing anything too intense or complex, especially during the last four days of the trip, when the Really Big Event will be happening.
The main thing you have missed is the ongoing discussion, which I think you have already caught up on. I did another round of edits on Holy Wood (In the Shadow of the Valley of Death), which you have worked on in the past, but it still won't pass FA due to issues unrelated to copy editing. My watch-list is 283 articles, and over half of that is user pages (many of which are inactive and being monitored merely for vandalism), GOCE pages, and the like. I recently dropped a lot of watchlist in a spate of WP:DGAF.
I know a few words of German from studying WWII. But probably they are the wrong kind of words! I have a little book of phrases and a friend who speaks German who will be there. Thanks for the e-mail. Yah, I noticed that I do a lot of the work for the Guild, but when it comes time to make the big decisions or talk to other users, I am not so good at that aspect. So I appreciate the help. My computer is acting like a slug so I am signing off now. More later --Dianna (talk) 14:21, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Shoot, now I semi-revealed the secret location. They are gonna take away my shiruken! I am a little stressed out. Anyway, if you could look after maintenance of the Requests page while I am gone that would be great. Also regarding the requests page, I had updated it with some coordinators instructions, but now I am not so sure consensus has been reached on whether or not we are going to do reviews. So the page will have to be brought in line with whatever the final outcome of the discussion is. We will need a drive invitation prepared and sent out; not too many people have signed up yet. Utah is good at writing these newsletters. SMasters knows how to send it out with AWB. I have arranged for an announcement in the Signpost. We could put a post on the Reward Board. I will add more later if I think of anything else. --Ninja Dianna (Talk) 15:39, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, to be honest I am surprised that there was no photoshopping of that church picture - a ninja out of uniform!
Can you and the girls possibly do a quick stop-off? I will pay $lots if these two disappear ;¬)
Yup, req. page and discussion monitoring and awaiting outcomes. I have sort of suggested that if no other proposal can find consensus we could consider a GOCE FA/GA taskforce. I would prefer to keep it in-house, as any new project would probably result in a de facto abandoning ship by the better copy-editors apart from on drives. Oh damn, I forgot to suggest removing the bonuses for request page edits from the drive, in an effort to remove any claims of "shiny awards" for the requests page copyedits.
Luggage, lol. My brother flew from Newark to Stockholm when we had a family get together a couple of years ago. I arrived two days after he did, and carried my bag out to where they all met me. Imagine my surprise when we discovered that I had his bag, it was 95% identical to mine and even had the same plastic tag on it from his business. It turned out his had been lost between Newark and Amsterdam, where they changed flights, and the airline had decided to put it onto my connecting flight from Amsterdam to get it to him. I had to go back through customs to pick mine up which they had put into holding for him to pick up! Gotta love airports :¬)
Anyway, have a good time and try to sample as many Bräus and wursts as possible! (hmmm.. not sure how that will work with the veggie thing lol, best I strike that one then lmao) My other brother spends a lot of time in that country, as he specialises in certain operas, though I never manage to get over to visit him while he is there.
I was hoping to try some good cheese. In France I ate a lot of cheese and bread, as they roll up the sidewalks at around 1-2 PM and there is no food available anywhere until the shops and restaurants re-open around 6 PM. We were constantly on the verge of getting thrown out of our hotel, but why was never quite made clear. We are Canadian, ffs, not a bunch of rowdies. I was afraid to complain that the roof leaked for fear it would somehow be construed as being our fault. I had a snotty waiter mock me in Lyon for wanting coffee at 5 PM. They have a gorgeous park there, 290 acres, but there are no bathrooms. There were two outhouses in the entire park, one for each sex; a hole in the floor, no toilet, no lights. I had to illuminate my cell phone to orient myself. Excuse me, which of us is uncivilised, the one who wants a cup of joe at 5 pm or the one whose country contains those horrific shittoirs? You be the judge.
ChaosDruid, as a copyeditor, you need to read up on famous speeches. "Never have so many owed so much to so few..." ... ever heard of it? Well it was spoofed within months, as "never have so many surrendered so much to so few", in reference to hundreds of thousands of Italians surrendering to tens of thousands of British and Empire forces in the Western Desert. We have articles on it... Operation Compass is a starting point, but they kept surrendering again, and again, and again after that. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:32, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see that - I see support for the checks from 4 or 5 and a couple, mainly Truthkeeper, saying checks might scare people away. He isn't new though, and how does someone know if their work is checked if it is ok? There would be nothing said, so how could they be offended? We check work in the drives and no one seems offended by that, so why not off the requests page - where checks are really more important? Chaosdruid (talk) 03:01, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Malleus Fatuorum brought up the workshop idea earlier, and SMasters brought it up at the end of the section. And I think the workshop idea is a good one. So maybe not everyone is leaning toward that idea, but there are three users. As for the reviews, the difference between reviewing requests and drive copy edits is that we only review 10% of the copy edits in the Backlog elimination drives, and with this new idea, we'll review 100% of the copy edits in the Requests page. And as I said, we must consider the opinion of those outside of the Guild as well as those inside the Guild. That's collaboration, which is what Wikipedia is all about. Regarding people taking Requests page copy edit reviews to offense, I quote myself from the Guild's talk page: "Checking work will probably make some editors feel like they don't have good copy editing skills, and it will cause them to quit working for the Guild....As I said in one of my earlier comments, I understand that the intent of this review proposal is good, but it only takes one misunderstanding to cause another serious problem for the Guild." The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs03:08, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here Truthkeeper implies that we need to be held accountable for what out editors are doing, but I don't see how that's possible unless we check their work. Obviously there will be a few editors whose work will not need to be checked, and we can accumulate that information as we go along. --Dianna (talk) 03:11, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
STALKER HERE Actually, I thought I was the one who first suggested a separate Guild of Writers in this edit. Anyway, I still see copy editing and writing as different skill sets. I do not expect many of our members joining a Writers' Guild. I would think that their members would come from those who work mostly on FA or GA articles, and not from the GOCE. Having a sub-section or a taskforce will only reinforce the confusion between copy editing and pure writing, and we will be blamed for any lack of quality in this area. Hence, my suggestion that it be a completely separate entity. Just my 2 cents. BTW, despite what it says on my user page, I do actually watch a handful of other users' talk pages (like all of the GOCE coordinators). :) – SMasters (talk) 04:29, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
When I first suggested it, I was perhaps not clear "what we need to do now to stop these bad FA and GA copy-edits ..." followed by "... I would like to suggest that only co-ordinators remove listings from the requests page" seemed a little contradictory.
I did try and fix that in a later post "At present we still need to check FA/GA articles and editors work on them. This could be dropped after a time, ..." and then in another post "to checks on those at GA/FA."
In the proposals section I put "Mandatory checks should only be on FA and GA candidates copy-edits by new members and less-experienced editors." and "perhaps asking that anyone wanting to take on FA and GA reviews goes through an initial mentoring process?"
Thanks for your work on The King's Speech article. I know you're busy, but do have have an opinion on the currency format issue? Thanks again and best wishes, --Ktlynch (talk) 10:59, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
P.S. The Guild looks both busy and well organised. I'm going to try and help out more often. See you soon.[reply]
You'll notice a series of overnight edits and reverts, running the IP editor up to level 4 and me into what might look to the new observer as an edit war. I'll be away for the better part of the day - can you follow up? Thanks - JohnInDC (talk) 11:35, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
One of the sources did not contain any of the material they wanted to add. I placed some page protection and somehow hit enter with it on indefinite semi-protection, but thinking about it, I think the article is more or less complete, so I am gonna leave it that way. If new facts come to light, registered users can add them. Thanks, John, for keeping an eye on the article with me. --Dianna (talk) 13:50, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, goodness, thanks to you for bringing a bit of order to what had previously been a haphazard undertaking. With luck the semi-protection will solve the problem! JohnInDC (talk) 01:53, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
September drive requests
Perhaps, for the September drive or maybe for other drives, we should think about a special barnstar that is tied directly to our goals for the drive? Yes, we already add a 50% bonus for requests page articles, but perhaps we should add another way to entice people to copyedit those articles. In the May drive we had a column in our leaderboard for 2009 articles- perhaps we could try the same with requests page articles (or just a barnstar for most articles copyedited from the requests page), to speed up the copyediting of them? Doing the same for 2010 articles would be more reasonable for when we're closer to wiping those off of the backlog, which I don't think will be soon. (Edited to add: I just read the above discussion that included removing shiny awards and the 50% bonus from the requests page. I personally do not agree with this action, as I feel that they can be and are helpful in keeping down backlogs at the requests page, which ultimately are more urgent than anything in the regular backlog.)--Slon02 (talk) 15:21, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I still don't think reviewing all the requests page copy edits is a good idea, but I like the concept. As I said above, maybe we could review users up to a certain point, then once they reach that point they don't have to be reviewed anymore. The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs18:54, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is unlikely we will be able to review everything anyways; we would start with FA and move to GA and do the rest if time permits. Time consuming not just to review but to also give needed feedback and education when things need improving. We can accumulate a list of exempt editors as time goes on. --Dianna (talk) 19:03, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their September 2011 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy editing backlog. The drive will begin on September 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on September 30 at 23:59 (UTC). We will be tracking the number of 2010 articles in the backlog, as we want to copy edit as many of those as possible. Please consider copy editing an article that was tagged in 2010. Barnstars will be given to anyone who edits more than 4,000 words, with special awards for the top 5 in the categories "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". See you at the drive! – Your drive coordinators: Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02, and SMasters.
As promised, a cute little token of my appreciation :) Thanks for all your great work with copy-edits, and for being so nice and friendly! Keep up the good work :D--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me20:02, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Mimi Butterfly Award
As promised, a cute little token of my appreciation :) This one is to accompany that cute kitten :) so you can have a nice little scrumptious bite at the same time :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me20:02, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. We will need to keep going on the references until they all have been converted to the new style. I just got bored and moved onto sonething else, but will return and finish up later. --Ninja Dianna (Talk) 15:30, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Input needed
Hi
It seems I have caused a problem with an editor and they have posted on the coordinators talk page. I have replied but it has hit me a little personally and I cannot continue discussion. I already had a great feeling of guilt about the mistaken edits on the Ducie article when they were reverted, hence my lol on their talk page (meant as a "wow how could I have done that, must have been an off day"). As something else seems to be driving the editor on to reverse their seemingly cordial discussion and strike out their previous comments I feel others should comment as I am too close to the matter.
Thank you. I will try to get back to regular editing tomorrow, but there are still some RL things that i need to do to catch up. :) --Dianna (talk) 04:41, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Help! (New User)
Hi Diannaa, it is my first time here in Wikipedia, would you mind if you can give me some tip/rules about this site? Thank you for your consideration
Hamham31 (talk) 06:46, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Wikid77 (talk) here. We need more people for the Sept. backlog drive, perhaps 80(?) people would be great. I have asked questions at new talk-page:
If that is the wrong page for these issues, then let me know, here, and I will redo those talk-page topics wherever you would prefer them to be listed. Thanks. -Wikid7721:13, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hope you enjoyed your break. Unfortunately one of my nieces was taken very ill and admitted to hospital in NY during the hurricane and that plus a matter here had me AWOL. I am back again as of tonight (hopefully) now I know she is out of danger and recovering.
In the meantime I wondered if you would take a look at these two partial edits which are being claimed as 3x 5k+ articles, and probably as word count totals as well. In light of recent events, and my absence, I though it better that I defer to someone else until I am back properly and caught up with everything. The two edits are [3] and [4]
Welcome back. You are definitely missed when you have to go away. Best wishes to your niece. I will check out these two links right away. --Dianna (talk) 15:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I have recently added the A1 (Croatia) article to GOCE requests page before its FAC, and assumed it was copyedited as it disappeared from the request list. A review pointed out shortcomings with article suggesting a copyedit, and only then did I check if the copyedit was actually performed or not. Apparently you removed the request as duplicate two days ago, so would it be possible to restore the request in its original place in the queue in order to avoid one more wait? Thanks.--Tomobe03 (talk) 00:10, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If an editor copy edits an article and is is later deleted as a result of a prod, the article still counts towards the editor's drive totals. The same applies to articles speedied or deleted at AFD. --Dianna (talk) 18:01, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello
Hi Diannaa, thank you for the c/e on "Rehab" article. I really appreciate it, but could you also do copy-editing on the video section and it's three sub-sections, I personally think that there it is most needed. Thank You Tomica1111 • Question Existing?11:55, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Would you mind taking a look at my work over at Cajun Fiddle? I tried to dive into a copyedit......but it's a mess. Did I convey that? Did I use the right template? I wish I'd been a bit more polite.....seeing how I totally "missed" ref name!! Do I just delete it from my "working" list??Bddmagic (talk) 04:18, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There are really not a lot of people doing copy edits right now. As you probably noticed, the request page is backlogged. Please be patient and list your copy edit requests at the requests page once your other items listed there have been completed. Sorry the reply could not be more favourable. --Dianna (talk) 13:59, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It does not matter Diannaa. I know form my friends that you are very nice and that you always help when possible. Best of luck with your work. See you. Take care. Jivesh • Talk2Me16:16, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have finished dealing with this article. This is a shockingly undersourced article considering the importance of the topic, but the copy editing process won't fix that. --Dianna (talk) 01:24, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that, my previous "I'm back" notice was shat on from a great height! The owner of the company I work for decided he was going to sell up and run away (well, that's my interpretation of it lol!). As a consequence I have been away from home much of the last week and only available for ten minutes here and there before falling asleep with my face in my food lol.
Anyway - things are calming down sort of and I have the rest of today off, though am back at work again till the weekend, so should be able to get some real work done (copyediting on Wiki lmao). Hope all is well - I aim to catch up on the September new additions project User:Chaosdruid/currentgoingson/Other (not touched for a week though) before getting down to some drive work.
I also started to do some checks on Wikid77s work, but got a little stuck on how to proceed on List of Buso Renkin characters. There are some basic omissions, such as boldface left in, grammar and prose issues etc, but the main issue is that the article was tagged as being in-universe and their solution seems to be adding a line to the lead saying "The characters are described, below, using in-universe tone." [5] (also their solution on Chouseishin Gransazer). They are also doing edits in one block, and removing POV and other tags which I am not sure is appropriate. How do you suggest proceeding here? Chaosdruid (talk) 18:06, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have re-added the maintenance tags for the issues that have not been resolved, and done a little clean-up. Wikid should likely not be adding "span" to change the colour of text. That's all i have time to do right now as I have to be somewhere at 1 pm. More to follow. Regards, --Dianna (talk) 18:30, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have checked into it and they should not be adding "span" into the article. So I am going to remove that now. If you could offer suggerstions on their talk page as to how the copy edit itself could have been better, I would appreciate it as I have very limited time on wiki right now as I am doing a real-life thing that is consuming a lot of time right now. Thanks --Dianna (talk) 03:45, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyediting review
Hey, Diannaa. I've signed up to review copyedits in the drive. Several of the "copyedits" I've come across have simply been tag removals. Nothing done in bad faith; the articles simply didn't need copyediting. However, when they're added to a user's "completed" list, it obviously seems like they're taking credit for something they simply did not do. I was wondering if this is considered acceptable or not. Thanks, Swarmu / t18:11, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I notice you have changed your sig a little! I think I preferred the old one, but I am sure this will grow on me :¬)
I think those are not acceptable as there was no editing done on the articles, simply removing tags is not really copyediting them :¬) I would wait for Diannaa to give you an affirmative action to take. There are some fairly obvious mistakes that should have been corrected though (dates with commas missing & the first paragraph of this section being two huge sentences, the second consisting of 78 words) so I am beginning to think that further checks may be needed. Chaosdruid (talk) 19:15, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Swarm, if you have time, it might be worthwhile to check all her drive copy edits and any that consist of only tag removal cannot be counted towards the Drive. Thanks. --Dianna (talk) 03:43, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
After a review, I can confirm that those are the only two simple tag removals. It seems she was addressing copyedit tags that specified problems with ordinals (i.e. 44st, 21th). While she fixed the ordinals, she seemingly neglected to address the rest of the articles before de-tagging. Just within her first six articles, one still needed quite a bit of copyediting, and one was an obvious copyvio (from its single source). Skipping down the list at random, this leaves multiple short, unnecessary sections and lots of redundant information, and here a few commas are added but the language remains sloppy and in need of attention. While I don't enjoy sifting through contributions to find errors, in my opinion, Wilhelmina Will (while obviously capable of doing a great job) simply isn't being thorough enough. Anyway, I'd seek your further advise on the matter (or handle it how you want, or just tell me what you want me to do, really doesn't make a difference :P).
On a more positive note, my skeptical self looked through dozens of other 'completed' articles at random and overall, the thorough, dedicated work that's being done is fantastic. :) Swarmu / t05:55, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see you have added remarks on her section of the drive page and removed one article, so I consider the check complete.. That's fantastic, as I will not have much time of the wiki until the weekend. I appreciate the time and effort you have put into this. I have corrected the leader board. --Dianna (talk) 14:18, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copy edit
Thank you for your recent copy edit of WP:ADMAN. Your efforts have increased the readability by considerable margin. I hope your edit serves also as an endorsement of viability for the essay as well. And that perhaps you can find use for it in notifying some fine prospects that you have likely encountered. Again, thanks for bringing a rather in demand skill to bear on this essay, fine grammar and punctuation. My76Strat (talk) 05:10, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I wish that you had not changed the navbox colors on the steamboat and ferries navboxes without prior consultation with other editors. I'm not going go all wikilawyer here, but it was my understanding that navbox colors, once selected by an editor, were not to be changed. I don't have time to find this guideline now, but I know that it exists. IMHO the standard colors make these navboxes less readable. While certainly I am open to discussion about this, it seems that you should have discussed the matter first.Mtsmallwood (talk) 21:01, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Adding colour to templates has an adverse impact on people reading WIkipedia with a screen reader, and poorly chosen color choices will adversely affect people who are colour blind or who need a high amount of contrast to discern the text (see WP:COLOR). WP:Deviations says that styles for tables and other block-level elements should be set using CSS classes, not with inline style attributes. The site-wide CSS in MediaWiki:Common.css has been carefully tested to ensure accessibility, such as adequate colour contrast, and compatibility with a wide range of browsers. What seems readable to you on your computer with your operating system, your browser, etc. will look very different to me, or to someone reading Wikipedia from an i-phone or a cell phone. In general, it is not a good idea to add random colours to templates or other areas of article space, as when the default site-wide classes are overridden, it makes it far more difficult for an individual to choose his/her own theme in their own preferences to accommodate problems such as visual impairments. --Dianna (talk) 01:25, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Mtsmallwood: We're all volunteers here - getting a thank you is nice (and I see on your talk page history that you've received several over the years). It's a shame to throw out and discount all those past thank yous from multiple editors because someone made some edits with which you disagree. I urge you to consider just taking a break and return if/when you feel like editing again later.
I don't know if it's okay to talk about, I usually keep my nose out of these things. What happened to JM - know who I mean? I can't make it out from the diffs. He seemed like a nice guy, helped me with stuff. SlightSmile01:22, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We have had 55 people sign up for this drive so far, and 31 have participated. If you have signed up but have not yet copy edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! It's not too late to join the drive if you have not already done so. Another great way to help out is to watch-list the Coordinators talk page and participate in the ongoing development of the Guild.
Progress report
So far, we have reduced the backlog by 75 articles, or about 19% of our goal. We have also cleared January 2010 off of the queue and are close to clearing off February and March. If each participant were to copy edit two articles from February and March 2010, they would be completely eliminated from the queue.
Rollover words
Several concerns have been brought up this drive about the usage of rollover words. Rollover words only count if they're from the previous drive. For example, if you received 1,000 rollover words in March and didn't participate in May, your rollover words return to zero. This is to encourage participation in multiple consecutive drives.
Dianaa: Just copyedited my first article for a drive (Ammar Abdulhamid) and wonder (separately, beyond that article): is there any way Wikipedia could have the articles requested for copyediting sliced and diced in ways addition to alphabetical? Most helpful, IMHO, would be by broad wiki topics. For instance, the majority of entries I edit on my own for Wikipedia have to do with the Cold War and Espionage, two major wiki topics. -- Just a thought -- Aboudaqn (talk)
You can sort the articles requiring copy edit using CatScan. Instructions appear here. Thank you for your interest in helping out with copy edits. -- Dianna (talk) 04:32, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good morning (as your clock shows above :))! Could you copy-edit the article Jovan Vladimir? I've listed it for peer review, but I would really appreciate a quality copy-editing. I think that after that the article could be given a try at FAC. Vladimir (talk) 16:29, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Vladimir, and sorry for the delay in replying. I have decided to work on the article and will get started today or tomorrow. --Dianna (talk) 17:43, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad for your decision :) The article is quite comprehensive, and I would also like it to be well written. If you find anything not clear enough, I'll be glad to clarify. Vladimir (talk) 15:42, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interview with Wikimedia Foundation
Hi Diannaa,
I hope you're well. My name is Aaron and I'm one of the Storytellers working on the 2011 fundraiser for the Wikimedia Foundation. For this year's campaign, we're interviewing as many of the very active and productive Wikipedians as we can to broaden the range of appeals we run come November. I wonder if you would want to tell me more about your experiences editing and writing here? If so, I'll ask you your personal story and I'll ask you some general questions about Wikipedia. Please let me know if you're interesting by emailing amuszalskiwikimedia.org. Thanks! Aaron (WMF) (talk) 01:01, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for copyediting the Debra article! (BTW, do you think it could be a GA with a few tweaks?) And also, at the end of the meteorological history section, I added a string of refs for the tornadoes. Is there a way I could make it look less crazy? HurricaneFan2520:38, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that will be most helpful. The usual way I check in an article of that size is to move all the general references into further reading and then systematically go through the each inline citation and move the general reference back up if it is used. I don't think Bibliography is an appropriate heading for two reasons the OED has four definitions for Bibliography (one is archaic) the closes fit to your usage is "4. A list of the books of a particular author, printer, or country, or of those dealing with any particular theme; the literature of a subject." but a general reference section is likely to include bullets points for journals, websites and newspapers all of which are not books so titling a section thus is confusing for readers, and, if the list does not to date include anything but books, may be seen by new editors as restricting. The second reason -- which does not apply in this case is -- is for biography articles. If the subject of the biography wrote books, it is not uncommon to call the section that list them a biography (which does fit the fourth definition in the OED) so naming the general reference section bibliography in biography articles is confusing. -- PBS (talk) 21:51, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
October 2011 Wikification drive
Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's October Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 1,000 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions, including a brand new one for the single largest wikified article! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!
Note: The drive starts October 1, but you can still sign up!
Hi. I've copy edited a few articles for the Sept drive. My first time. Would you mind checking one or two of them to see if my work is up to the expected standards. My articles are listed here. I'm pretty familiar with the MOS, and I read the copy-editing instructions, so I think I've got a good grasp of the expectations. But it is always good to have another pair of eyes. Thanks. --Noleander (talk) 21:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Dianaa. Regarding your changes to the Edmonton elections template, I have a few problems. Firstly the flatlist produces an error in the template, i.e. it produces dot separators after the end of the last link in each group, which shouldn't appear. Secondly, it makes the templates look awkward as the dots are not centrered between the links, but rather very close to the right-hand link, making it unbalanced. Thirdly, this change is not in line with the accessibility policy, which suggests that it is to be used only for lists in articles (Despite having hundreds of templates on my watchlist and editing hundreds more, I've never seen this before). I don't believe in applying it to only one or two templates unless you are going to do all of them, and for this you will need consensus to implement it accross Wikipedia. I suggest first trying to resolve problems 1 and 2, and then bringing up the subject at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility or the Village Pump. Cheers, Number5719:45, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is not the Flatlist template that is producing these errors; it looks fine in Firefox and in Chrome. I expect you are viewing the page with an outdated browser, probably an older version of Windows Internet Explorer. The Flatlist template is now an accepted way to present list material in navigation templates, as seen in the documentation at Template:Navbox#Examples. Regards, --Dianna (talk) 02:36, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I use IE9 at home and the problem still appears. Sadly this is a common problem across Wikipedia that often people solve problems in Firefox, but forget that more people use IE. I'm more than happy for flatlist to be used, but those issues have to be resolved first (including for older versions of IE (probably back to 6 or 7), which are still commonly used). Number5708:42, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
User:Iadrian yu is a new meta/sock puppet of User:Iaasi. He was banned many times by anti-semite and chauvinist edits in English Wikipedia. Notice: Iaaasi uses more (ISP) Internet Providers from Romania.
.JPG)
