Jump to content

User talk:64.33.162.67

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Simple Life

[edit]

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia{{{ Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. --> -->}#if:The Simple Life|, as you did to The Simple Life}}. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --JFreeman (talk) 17:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to The Simple Life (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:42, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Talk:James william mcghee

[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Talk:James william mcghee|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —αἰτίας •discussion• 20:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia{{{ Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. --> -->}#if:Margaret Fuller|, as you did to Margaret Fuller}}, you will be blocked from editing. {{{ Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. --> -->}#if:|{{{2}}}|}} --Midnightdreary (talk) 22:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rotten.com, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rotten.com was changed by 64.33.162.67 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-26T21:10:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Rockstar Games. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rockstar Games was changed by 64.33.162.67 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-26T21:18:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

[edit]

Your recent edit to Brandon Schaffer (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

[edit]

Your recent edit to Politics of India (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 15:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC) love shawn anderson[reply]

October 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Nouvelle Cuisine has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. JRHorse (talk) 16:40, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Nouvelle Cuisine constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 16:44, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Talk:Yahoo! Answers has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 20:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page List of horse breeds worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Versus22 talk 15:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page List of horse breeds. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Versus22 talk 16:01, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Polar bear. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:33, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Tasmanian Devil. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 17:58, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Polar bear. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 18:03, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page United States dollar has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cold open, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 18:16, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Universe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 18:16, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at United States Senate, you may be blocked from editing. - DVdm (talk) 18:17, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Some jerk on the Internet (talk) 21:27, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Prophets of Islam has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. rubicon | talk 17:46, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Prophets of Islam constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. TwistOfCain (talk) 17:47, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Electromagnetic spectrum, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

March 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Mary-Claire King worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Golgofrinchian ≤TALK≥ 18:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to H. H. Holmes. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 14:27, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Universe, you may be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:26, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at AK-74. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 15:06, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Snowmobile with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Clarince63 (talk) 17:38, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Metate. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Geremy Hebert (talk | contribs) 15:59, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Stack cake because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 19:48, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cab Calloway may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{S

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:13, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm 78.26. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Cab Calloway without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 18:26, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bamboo coral. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Widr (talk) 19:30, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Coral reef with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Coral reef, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Coral reef was changed by 64.33.162.67 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924737 on 2014-04-17T19:14:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:14, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Pinethicket. I noticed that you recently removed some content from LED lamp without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Pinethicket (talk) 19:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Fried rice— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Wisconsin. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:21, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wisconsin, you may be blocked from editing. ubiquity (talk) 16:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wisconsin. ubiquity (talk) 16:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Andy Grammer— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:40, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Smith & Wesson Model 1— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:11, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Decriminalization. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Widr (talk) 17:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Language arts has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:24, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to History of television seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Personal computer— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 15:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm ThadeusOfNazereth. I noticed that you recently removed content from Government of the United Kingdom without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 16:33, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2022

[edit]

Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that in this edit to Slope, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:39, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm XenonNSMB. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Pillory—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. XenonNSMB (talk, contribs) 15:25, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pillory, you may be blocked from editing. ARoseWolf 15:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Crucifixion. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:33, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:64.33.162.67&oldid=1139045834"