User talk:Dhwalin

--Dhwalin (talk) 06:26, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Rajesh Bhavsar[reply]

Mr. Rajesh Bhavsar is a director of Rachna Academy of Career Education Pvt. Ltd. company. Company is based on Traning , Teaching and Coaching. Training Centre for all kinds of competitive exams.

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajesh bhavsar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rajesh bhavsar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Elves Of Dunsimore (talk) 06:34, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Narayan kavach

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Narayan kavach, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 10:58, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 5x5cm Publicity

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 5x5cm Publicity, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:42, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: The article was deleted for the reasons stated above in the message left to you by EvergreenFir. The article did not establish by the website is notable enough for inclusion and also was written in a clearly advertising tone with the capitalized "FREE" and the use of second-person pronouns. You must establish the website's notability for the article to remain on Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk)

Re your message: I see that you recreated the article again and it was deleted for the second time for the same reasons. It is unclear to me why you need to create the article without the reason being for promotional purposes. If you want to write an article that will remain on Wikipedia, you will need to provide citations from reliable sources covering the website in order to show that it is notable enough for inclusion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 5x5cm Publicity

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 5x5cm Publicity, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. freshacconci talk to me 04:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DrinkH2OBot

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DrinkH2OBot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. A picture of a dead fish (talk) 13:34, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Pallavi-joshi-from-iambuddha-website.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pallavi-joshi-from-iambuddha-website.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 05:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Pallavi-joshi-from-iambuddha-website.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pallavi-joshi-from-iambuddha-website.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:11, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bhagwan Mahavir Education Foundation

The article Bhagwan Mahavir Education Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

article has absolutely no sources and is questionably notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chetsford (talk) 04:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bhagwan Mahavir Education Foundation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhagwan Mahavir Education Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhagwan Mahavir Education Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 00:51, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spotless (2018) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Spotless (2018), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 16:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spotless (2018) (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Try resubmitting once it has been released (the infobox suggests the release date is later this year). If it meets WP:NFILM, much of the coverage will be in critical reception.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spotless (2018) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Spotless (2018), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 18:05, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dhwalin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SITH (talk) 18:05, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Vivek Agnihotri, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ∯WBG^converse 10:10, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bhautik Shukla

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bhautik Shukla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. StickyWicket (talk) 22:09, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dhwalin. Just a quick note on creating articles on cricketers. Currently, we only have articles on cricketers who have played at the highest domestic level: first-class, List A and Twenty20. We don't cover club cricketers who have not played at one of the aforementioned levels. For more info see WP:CRIN. Cheers, StickyWicket (talk) 22:13, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shweta Rohira

Hello Dhwalin, thank you for contacting me. Please start by working on your draft article at Draft:Shweta Rohira -- draft articles posted to my talk page will be deleted. Seeing that this article has been deleted several times over, once you are satisfied with your draft you may share the link to Wikipedia:Deletion review for consideration. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:25, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See

WP:NOTPROMO. ∯WBG^converse 12:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Shweta Rohira

User:Sameerbhosle9/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sameerbhosle9/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Shweta Rohira during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:14, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Spotless (2018)

Hello, Dhwalin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spotless".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! GamerPro64 02:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello Dhwalin. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Dhwalin. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Dhwalin|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 07:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This is a barefaced lie, easily disproved by off-wiki evidence. Since you have chosen to be dishonest about your paid editing, your account is now blocked from editing; you are no longer permitted to edit Wikipedia. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating Wikipedia's terms of use by engaging in undisclosed paid editing and using Wikipedia for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dhwalin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Dhwalin (talk) 14:12, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deep fried okra 15:20, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dhwalin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood why I am blocked on Wikipedia. I request you to unblock me. I will continue to contribute useful information on Wikipedia. Sincere apologies for what I did. In future nothing will be done which violate wiki policy. Dhwalin (talk) 16:02, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not addressed the reason for your block. Given that it involves substantial dishonesty on your part, why should we believe you? MER-C 18:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dhwalin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Respected Admins, I am not getting in which cases Wiki recognize that edits are paid or unpaid. But as a Website developer I have develop websites of people and then tried to create wiki. I realized this thing wrong very earlier. So I stopped many years ago. But now if wiki admins thought that I am still doing then it is not. Gradually I am learning Wikipedia. I learnt a lot about its policy and way of serving people. So I apologize for everything what I did mistakenly or intentionally and urge you to unblock User Page: Dhwalin (Me). Dhwalin (talk) 20:01, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 12:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What's your relation with Vivek Agnihotri? How many of you run this account? I note that over here, you claimed to be Vivek and over here, you pointed to a legal notice on his website. I also note that a certain Dhwalin wrote, shot and made a short film, which was entirely supported by Vivek Agnihotri's foundation and another Dhwalin is one of the eight people followed by the same organisation, over Twitter. This is the tip of iceberg and lying with a straight face won't get you unblocked. ∯WBG^converse

Dhwalin (Me) reply:
I am only using this account. In first link I just gave reference of link with Vivek Agnihotri statement. I didn’t say that.
In second link I got news of it so I edited that.

Somebody revoke TPA, please. ∯WBG^converse 08:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Any update please? Dhwalin (talk) 02:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dhwalin, who created this web page and how Vivek Agnihotri or his organisation own the copyrights of the image you uploaded? GSS ^💬 03:49, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They create this webpage. They said it is our copyright, even they showed me Vivek Agnihotri official twitter page too. I can get in written as well if wiki want. Dhwalin (talk) 04:31, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure it wasn't created by you, as you manage their website and can you please give a date when this page was created? also, as per my finding, I feel the copyright belongs to the photojournalist who took this image at Mangaluru Literature Festival so, we need permission from the original copyright holder. GSS ^💬 05:15, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Website is dynamic so from admin team can make webpages & as per they mentioned, I recognized photo was taken by team of Vivek Agnihotri. But will take care of everything in future. Please release blockage. I have already realized what things I did wrong, & those all things will never be repeated Dhwalin (talk) 06:47, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any updates? Dhwalin (talk) 14:22, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies & Request

Admins, I have realized what mistakes I have done in past using Wikipedia. I apologize for same and need permission to contribute in Wikipedia. I am gaining so many contents to contribute on wikipedia. But with the blockage I am not able to share. Hoping for a chance to start contributing again.

Ok. Is there any possibility to unblock me on Wiki so I can add/edit useful contents? I made mistakes in past which violates wiki policy unknowingly. If its there any possibility, please do needful. Thank you. Dhwalin (talk) 20:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shweta Rohira

Hello, Dhwalin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shweta Rohira".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! TheImaCow (talk) 15:56, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cable Bridge (Surat, India)

It is Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Bridge, there is a spelling mistake, Dindayal. Dhwalin (talk) 11:27, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]