User talk:Gowtham avg

Hello, Gowtham avg! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Petrb (talk) 11:17, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion nomination of The Three Bears (TV series)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Three Bears (TV series), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:34, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Animated series based on Doraemon[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Animated series based on Doraemon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 09:37, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In Chutti TV, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Bonkers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chutti TV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chutti TV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stanley (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Satellizer. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Hero bhakti hi shakti hai without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ~satellizer~~talk~ 00:53, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chutti TV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Amaury. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Transformers - Beast Machines, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amaury (talk) 05:27, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Jam and Sunny[edit]

I declined the speedy deletion of this page under {{db-author}} because you were not the contributor of all or most of the content of the page. If you contributed the content under a different username and still want the page to be deleted, you can log in under the other username and re-post the {{db-author}} notice using the account under which you contributed the content. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chutti TV[edit]

Hello, I'm KrazeeKnight. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Chutti TV because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.--KrazeeKnight (talk) 15:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References section in Chutti TV has external links used for promotion[edit]

Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Chutti TV. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --KrazeeKnight (talk) 21:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm KrazeeKnight. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Chutti TV, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. KrazeeKnight (talk) 17:15, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Chutti TV. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. KrazeeKnight (talk) 18:32, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Chutti TV. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. KrazeeKnight ^talk 16:54, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Disney XD (India) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Big TV, Ratz, Lucky Man and The Monkey King

Toon Disney (India) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mickey Mouse and Friends

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm 117Avenue. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Disney XD (India), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 04:16, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abheera[edit]

Hello Gowtham avg,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Abheera for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. OccultZone (Talk) 08:04, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about The Spider-Men[edit]

Hello, Gowtham avg,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether The Spider-Men should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Spider-Men .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with The Spider-Men. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. — MusikAnimal ^talk 14:44, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. — MusikAnimal ^talk 15:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at The Spider-Men, you may be blocked from editing. — MusikAnimal ^talk 15:20, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at The Spider-Men. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:13, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Toonz India Ltd, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. KJ^{«Click Here»} 06:47, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Power Rangers episodes with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 05:42, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unlink[edit]

Hi, Usually if articles are redlinked it usually mean's there's a high chance of it being created .... With the City of Friends programme it's extremely unlikely to be created and if it were created it would go to AFD anyway so thus it's pointless being linked,
Also when you're reverting please use the edit summary as not using it is distruptive and can and will get you blocked,
Thank you, –Davey2010 • (talk) 06:58, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm failing to see the whole point of both this [1] and this [2] -

1. Part of editing here is communicating and telling an editor to "Mind your own business" is not only unhelpful but disruptive.

2. Again I'm not seeing any point to you reverting as I've explained more than once my reason for removing the link

You should also be aware of WP:EDIT WARRING and specifically WP:3RR - If you don't speak to me I will report you which trust me I don't want to do,

Consider this a final warning. -

Thank you. –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:59, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Gowtham_avg reported by User:Davey2010 (Result: ). Thank you. –Davey2010 • (talk) 05:12, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Your recent editing history at Chutti TV shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. –Davey2010 • (talk) 19:42, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chutti TV. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 14:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring[edit]

Hi,
Your addition to Chutti TV isn't very helpful;

- We don't need a load of redlinks (The programmes wont ever have there own article and if they were too I don't think it'll last for very long!),
"Col-3" is far more better than one gigantic list of programmes (If the list was half the page It would'nt be a problem but it's rather long and so splitting the list in to 3 makes more sense)

Continuing Edit Warring will only see you blocked which none of us want.
Cheers, –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 15:49, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Gowtham_avg reported by User:Davey2010 (Result: ). Thank you. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 07:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Chutti TV. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. slakr^\ talk / 23:16, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Immediately stop adding content which violates WP:NFCC#9 to the page User:Sun TV Network/Chutti TV! --Stefan2 (talk) 15:21, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to User:Sun TV Network/Chutti TV, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 17:54, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 18:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. Your repeated copy-paste page creation and repeated removal of content after the expiration of your previous block is unproductive. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu ^t/_c 18:41, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, what in the world was this? --Kinu ^t/_c 18:43, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reliance Digital TV[edit]

Hello Gowtham avg,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Reliance Digital TV for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. SilverplateDelta (talk) 21:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]