User talk:JSowell98

Sources

Hello JSowell98. Do you have sources for the additions you are making? Please keep in mind that all encyclopedia content must meet the verifiability policy. Thanks. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 15:55, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ben Stiller, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 16:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit

Hi. I wanted to let you know that I reverted an edit of yours on KT Tunstall, because it wasn't a useful edit, as it does not show up on the template. If you'd like to test, feel free to try at the WP:Sandbox. Lixxx235 (talk) 21:40, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But you may wish to contribute to this discussion. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:58, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

JSowell98, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi JSowell98! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ivy Renfroe

The article Ivy Renfroe has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. United States Man (talk) 03:08, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to William Moseley (actor). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Elizium23 (talk) 04:44, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Georgie Henley. Elizium23 (talk) 18:04, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ellen Renfroe

Hello, JSowell98. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ellen Renfroe, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Ellen Renfroe to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, ArcAngel (talk) ) 14:54, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States women's national softball team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jessica Moore. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pontius Pilate. NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:37, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited USA Softball Team Bound 4 Beijing Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ASA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm Davey2010. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on William Moseley (actor), but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Davey2010 • (talk) 02:53, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 14:24, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1998 Vanderbilt Commodores football team, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Commonwealth Stadium, Scott Field and Samford Stadium. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm Ebyabe. An edit that you recently made to Laura Marano seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Inspector General ‖ 18:16, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question

What was the reasoning behind this edit? [1] [2] --NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:25, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete

Speedy deletion nomination of Lacey Waldrop

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lacey Waldrop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jersey92 (talk) 20:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Deletion

==  Proposed deletion of Lacey Waldrop ==

The article Lacey Waldrop has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject seems to easily fail WP:SPORTCRIT WP:NCOLLATH - lack of WP:RS establishing any notability. Admin felt article asserts sufficiently to pass A7 so no Speedy Delete.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jersey92 (talk) 22:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Dan Hill, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 03:31, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amber Scott (actress)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amber Scott (actress), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Avono (talk) 18:56, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Amber Scott (actress), a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Avono (talk) 19:09, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Meryl Streep shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:09, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read

Despite the numerous warnings and questions on this page you have never used any talk page even once, never mind using edit summaries to explain what you are doing. Wikipedia is a collaborative project and you are expected to communicate with other editors when the need arises. Simply silently reverting is disruptive and may get you blocked. Please start using talk pages to discuss your edits. Thank you. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:17, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Angela Lansbury may have broken the syntax by modifying 7 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:32, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Natalie Portman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anywhere But Here. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 21 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Eragon (film) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jem and the Holograms (film)

Hi, your edit here was problematic for me, so I've reverted it. Your summary is not consistent with the sources. RT seems to skew negative, but Metacritic's summary thus far is "mixed or average". So those two sources are at odds. Even if we were to use "Mixed to negative" language, that would constitute synthesis, and the phrasing is generally shunned by the WikiProject Film community. Further, there's no reason to summarize what are already summaries: the aggregator scores. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2006 Tennessee Lady Volunteers softball season

Hello JSowell98,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 2006 Tennessee Lady Volunteers softball season for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, 2006 tennessee lady volunteers softball team.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Fbdave (talk) 01:06, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the first article: 2006 Tennessee Lady Volunteers softball team --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:28, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JSowell98. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alison Owen (softball)

The article Alison Owen (softball) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG currently and has not done anything as an athlete, either collegiate or professionally, to garner WP:SIGCOV. A Google Search finds one article about her becoming an assistant coach at a community college.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 05:29, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ali Aguilar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ali Aguilar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Paige Halstead

Hi, I'm Teblick. JSowell98, thanks for creating Paige Halstead!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This person does not appear to meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability for college athletes. See Wikipedia:Notability (sports)#College athletes.) You need to establish her notability with information akin to what is indicated in that link.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Eddie Blick (talk) 20:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kelly Barnhill (softball)

The article Kelly Barnhill (softball) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this subject has received WP:SIGCOV in order for it to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 00:20, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JSowell98. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JSowell98. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]