User talk:Nirmaljoshi/Archive2020

Lippmann diagram moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lippmann diagram, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 09:07, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Yukne Hang concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Yukne Hang, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Nepal 10,000 Challenge

Namaste, Nirmaljoshi! You are cordially invited to join the new WikiProject Nepal 10,000 Challenge

Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Nepal. You are invited to join the new WikiProject Nepal 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 article creations. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for Nepal on Wikipedia! Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by using:

{{subst:WikiProject Nepal/The 10,000 Challenge Invite}} ~~~~

Thanks.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Your addition to Butwal Technical Institute has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Nepal Standards

The article List of Nepal Standards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

What makes this list notable, of meeting WP:LISTN? It's just a list of minor government documents.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:31, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Nepal Standards for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Nepal Standards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nepal Standards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:01, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yukne Hang

Hello, Nirmaljoshi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yukne Hang".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 10:25, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Nirmaljoshi

Thank you for creating Coca-Cola in Nepal.

User:Elliot321, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

In the future, please write headings in sentence case, not title case. For example, "Local varieties", not "Local Varieties".

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Elliot321}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 03:31, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dinesh D.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scorpio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your contributions to WP:Nepal! ~~ `CAPTAIN MEDUSA`^talk 11:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for creating Nepal related articles tirelessly.-- Biplab Anand (Talk) 10:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Janapriya Multiple Campus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gandaki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Butwal Technical Institute

Hello Nirmaljoshi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Butwal Technical Institute for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 19:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Udayapur Cement Industries Limited for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Udayapur Cement Industries Limited is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Udayapur Cement Industries Limited until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 19:15, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Edge Band

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Edge Band requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dtt1 (talk) 09:51, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deepa Shree Niraula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tharu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Controversial claims and punchlines by KP Sharma Oli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Controversial claims and punchlines by KP Sharma Oli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversial claims and punchlines by KP Sharma Oli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 08:26, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Budhiganga Hydropower Project for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Budhiganga Hydropower Project is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Budhiganga Hydropower Project until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 13:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anti Oli ?

Why are you so much anti oli ? Believing in different political view or supporting other political leaders is fine, but defaming (purposely) PM of the country in Wikipedia is not right. You are defaming our country too. Let the political dissatisfaction with in the country. Wikipedia is surely not right platform to express political dissatisfaction. You can share in facebook instead. Nepal knowledge (talk) 12:11, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you will delete those statements / Section from his bio. Nepal knowledge (talk) 12:18, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, when I am in Wikipedia, I am only a Wikipedian; I try not to be bound to biassness (nationality or whatever) as per WP Policy (WP:WIKIVOICE). The section about Oli's controversial claims were discussed in AfD.; you can have a look at the archived discussion. Secondly, it is neither defaming nor a political move, they are just facts. The reference are provided for verification. Regarding deletion, you are also free to do that, but I will be obliged to revert it or report WP:VANDAL. Thanks anyway. BTW, I have put invite for 10000 challenge in your talk page. nirmal (talk) 03:10, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lumbini Eye Institute

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lumbini Eye Institute, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Java Hurricane 06:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 10:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The edits that you made at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunji Village, Nepal (made after being warned) are in violation of our policies. In particular, groundless accusations of vandalism are disruptive and writing that I think the author who nominated this article for deletion is an Indian and tagged for deletion just for his political view point which is a conflict of interest is a violation of WP:ASPERSIONS. Consider this a warning, if you persist you will be blocked.

Salvio

11:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re-worded. But it's not baseless. Refer to the edit history and talk page of the author who started the article.

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for helping me to improve article writing as a beginner. Liambutera (talk) 06:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help new Nepali fellow editors and creators

Hello Nirmaljoshi, I am a beginner in Wikipedia. In an article named List of Schools in Pokhara, Saraswati Adarsha Vidyashram was marked red, which meant article with that topic had not been created. Thinking I might contribute, I talked with authorities of the school and created an article with the same name as an educational institution of Nepal. But I am frequently getting warnings that the article does not meet the guidelines. I want you to help me know how the other schools which have cited no references are not in the list of articles for deletion. I will try my best to meet the guidelines and I am fully intended to try creating relevant article by going to the field rather than staying in the corner of the room. I hope you will consider helping the beginners like me! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liambutera (talk • contribs) 06:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

`Liambutera: Welcome to wiki for editing. I understand your frustration especially while creating articles related to Nepal when there is lack of references. As you mentioned, you talked with the school for info, this is an original research, its not allowed WP:NOR. The article should be covered in some reputed newspaper, books or journal articles to make it Notable (offline is also allowed - wiki considers it as Good Faith WP:AAGF). Try to improve the article by adding more references (including those in Nepali websites/books). One more thing- you should contest in the deletion process by providing your reasons to keep the article; else most likely it will be deleted. Also, please do not compare your article with the bad ones- they may be deleted too in the future.

Thanks

Thank you for your suggestion! But my article is no more available now, I think it has been deleted already. I will try to edit articles from now onward with updated data but I still wonder why foreigners are commenting it as non-notable school. You are Nepalese so it'll be right to take your suggestion. But I still can't believe people from other countries commented stating non-notable school. I had heard that Wikipedia is an open library. It is my duty to take suggestions and improve but who are they to give suggestion on Nepal-related article giving their own opinion? Isn't it against Wikipedia guidelines? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liambutera (talk • contribs) 12:53, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:ORDER

... should help. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:55, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Usedtobecool- It did. Thanks! nirmal (talk) 01:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kathmandu Selfie moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kathmandu Selfie, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 07:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kathmandu Selfie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathmandu Selfie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathmandu Selfie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:23, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

By telling a reviewer what to search for, you are insulting the reviewers by dumping poorly researched pages into article space and expecting the reviewers to finish the job. It is the responsibility of the author to provide an article that provides useful information to the reader without having to search in two languages. Do not insult the reviewers. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, Nirmaljoshi! I saw your comment at the AFD. It is the responsibility of the article creator to establish notability of the topic they are writing about. Especially now that you have a lot of experience with Wikipedia, and since you are a prolific article writer, your articles should be more or less ready when published. You don't need to write a long article, but you do need to establish why a topic deserves to be included. Please check the notability guidelines for the topic that you happen to be writing about and do the needful. In case of books, that would mean that you would need to include two-three WP:SIGCOVS to show that the topic likely meets WP:GNG. When you found that GNG could not be met, you should then check WP:BOOKCRIT to see if you can satisfy one of the criteria there: find two reviews or a major award, and so on. If you couldn't show either, you should scrap the article and only create a redirect if there is a suitable target. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:03, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Usedtobecool Thanks for your suggestions. nirmal (talk) 03:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shanta Das Manandhar

Hiya! Since you haven't left any edit/revert summary, thought I'd reach out. Anything in particular that you disliked about the copyedits? --Infogapp1 (talk) 13:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to say but the english was poorer than the original.nirmal (talk) 13:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC):[reply]

Could you be more specific? Are you referring to the MOS when you state this? For example, you called the subject "He has published more than 24 books for children's." With all due respect, does this look accurate? --Infogapp1 (talk) 13:09, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please compare with the origianal. nirmal (talk) 13:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infogapp1, if you are doing copyedits in topic areas you are not familiar with, you should be particularly careful not to change any meanings. You did make some improvements, but also introduced multiple inaccuracies. For example, you removed an instance of the "BS" after the year which is an error of -57 years; in another place, you changed "He studied in this school and also passed bachelor's level" to "he passed bachelor's level from this school" confusing the school the subject passed high school from with the college that was missing. Hope you'll both discuss content with more specificity to resolve grammatical errors without compromising factual accuracy. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 19:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Usedtobecool Are we looking at exactly the same edits? Do keep in mind that there was already an edit before me, and I did not change what it meant. I wouldn't have tagged it as copyedit if I completely changed the meaning. Notice that my edit kept the kp20 as it is. So unless we're looking at the exactly the same edits, then you might be accusing me of a completely different thing.

BEFORE: Shanta Das Manandhar (Nepali:शान्त दास मानन्धर) is a pioneer of children's literature in Nepal. He has published more than 24 books for children's. He was born in Jhoche, Kathmandu and schooled in JP school ^[1] and has completed Bachelor level.

My edit: Shanta Das Manandhar (Nepali:शान्त दास मानन्धर) is a pioneer of children's literature in Nepal. He has published more than 24 children's books. He was born in Jhoche, Kathmandu. He studied a Bachelor's program from JP school <no wiki>^[1]. </no wiki>

If you both feel so inclined that my edits weren't helpful to the subject, feel free to edit as you see fit but to say that my edit wasn't grammatically correct is just incorrect. First, the creator highlighted that it was grammatically wrong. Now, the reason just becomes arbitrary at best. Almost 'ownership' of the subject. --Infogapp1 (talk) 19:42, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infogapp1, I apologise for any confusion. I was saying that you improved grammar but compromised some factual accuracy doing it. Since Nirmaljoshi is familiar with the topic, my suggestion was that the two of you discuss specific facts the sentences needing copyediting are trying to convey. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:27, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ ^a ^b Cite error: The named reference kp20 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

Proposed deletion of List of cement manufactures in Nepal

I've placed a PROD (Proposed deletion) tag on your list of cement manufactures in Nepal. This Afd about a similar list you created was a good example of the consensus about lists of non-notable businesss.

A list should ideally contain links to other notable subjects. It allows our readers to locate similar encyclopedic topics in one place. Please take a look at List of cement manufacturers in Kenya. While not a fantastic example, it shows a list that contains either notable, or plausibly notable entries.

Admittedly WP:NOTDIRECTORY doesn't address that issue directly, but there is an allusion made about unencyclopedic content.

If you disagree with the proposed deletion, remove the tag from the list page, although i hope my explanation above is sufficient to dissuade this course of action. Kind regards, Zindor (talk) 20:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Zindor, thank you for taking interest in the cement related articles. I am not sure why you tagged it for WP:PROD. You should have noted, it's a WP:LIST not article. I suggest you refer WP:LISTCOMPANY. If you are satisfied with this explanation, could you please remove the tag. Also, please note that such kind of lists is also quoted in research paper as a data source, so deleting may not be the right path, instead, improving the article would be a better solution. Since you are also interested in cement, could you please help to improve it? Regards! nirmal (talk) 06:47, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Nirmaljoshi. I was suggesting improvements as the result of a new page review, rather than an interest in cement. I tagged it for PROD because you've recently had at least a couple of other lists be deleted at AfD for the same reasons i'm stating above, and it really is a waste of the community's time to keep rehashing this.

Your interpretation of WP:LISTCOMPANY is too literal. There is a degree of commonsense and context that goes with it. You can include companies that aren't notable, but you do need a good reason to do so, as with any other edit. Without such a reason, other editors can and will delete the content.

If you take the list on List of cement manufacturers in Kenya which i linked above, the list entries that aren't perhaps notable do happen to have a significant market cap; they have plenty of weight for inclusion. Our readers don't need to know about every cement company in Kenya, but they might want to know the major players in the market, whether they meet WP:NCORP or not.

In the interest of not being too pointy, i've deprodded and moved your list into draft space where you can work on it. Perhaps look through the list and filter out companies that don't hold a significant share of the market etc

If you feel it's ready to be in mainspace, either move it back and another reviewer will come along, or give me a shout and i'll see what i can do.

Happy editing, and don't hesitate to ask for advice at my talk page or the Teahouse.

Kind regards, Zindor (talk) 16:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Fertilizer use in Nepal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Fertilizer use in Nepal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f5f9/9b0ff350b1ea0906df75d47b87e60f87ee57.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a troubling edit summary. Please don't do it again. Copyright issues have legal repercussions and are therefore taken extremely seriously. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:59, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Usedtobecool Agree. It was an error in my part. I mistakenly thought i was working in the sandbox. Could you remove the first few histories of the article that has the issue or may be delete it alltogether.nirmal (talk) 05:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update- I moved it to main space with major edit.Plz check the talk page of the article. If you still think its an issue, ping me. nirmal (talk) 08:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, it would not have been appropriate in your sandbox either. Please do not dump copyrighted material anywhere on Wikipedia (or its sister projects). I have removed the CSD template, any kind of deletion has to wait for an admin. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Your recent editing history at List of centenarians (miscellaneous) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 06:07, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:DerbyCountyinNZ reverting the edit with references it not the policy of the wiki. nirmal (talk) 06:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Journey to Kathmandu (book) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, A Journey to Kathmandu (book), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 10:02, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Raju Lama

I removed the content that you added to Raju Lama. Please do not add unsourced claims to WP:BLPs. You added {{citation needed}} to your own edit — why did you add it at all if you didn't have a source? Schazjmd (talk) 15:13, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Champa (novel) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Champa (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Champa (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:38, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your work and references, Rohingya refugees in Nepal Whiteguru (talk) 06:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prakash Sardar

The article Prakash Sardar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It seems speculative, and even if true, this is not groundbreaking. Someone is bound to be the shortest in any given population. He doesn't even break Khagendra Thapa Magar's record.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Usedtobecool ☎️ 01:51, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Malati Rishidev

The article Malati Rishidev has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It's speculative, and even if true, this is not groundbreaking. Someone is bound to be the shortest in any given population. She doesn't even break Khagendra Thapa Magar's record. And there's Prakash Sardar with a better claim.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Usedtobecool ☎️ 01:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Prakash Sardar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prakash Sardar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Sardar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 13:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Bijaya Dashami!

Wishing you joy & happiness during this festive season. Happy Bada Dashain! ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 06:42, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

-Thank you CAPTAIN MEDUSA. Back to wiki after Dashain. nirmal (talk) 11:14, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Missionary in Nepal moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Indian Missionary in Nepal, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Religious history of Nepal

A tag has been placed on Category:Religious history of Nepal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of power stations in Nepal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lalitpur District and Bhojpur District.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Malati Rishidev for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malati Rishidev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malati Rishidev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 16:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rudi A Hydropower Station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rudi A Hydropower Station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudi A Hydropower Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kabeli B1 Hydropower Station and other articles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudi A Hydropower Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Nirmaljoshi

Thank you for creating Purandhara waterfall.

User:MRRaja001, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I have removed spam references and updated with some good references (Marked as reviewed). You can always reach out to me on my talk page for any further help.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MRRaja001}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MRRaja001 ^(talk) 08:28, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MRRaja001: Thank you.nirmal (talk) 09:57, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Nirmaljoshi, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
Happy editing,

MRRaja001 ^(talk) 10:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

December 2020

Your edit to Pancha Kashmiri Takiya Masjid has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 13:45, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[kp20-1] Cite error: The named reference kp20 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[1]