User talk:Nostalgia Zone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nostalgia Zone, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Nostalgia Zone! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

2011–12 United States network television schedule (daytime)
added a link pointing to Justin Time
2014–15 United States network television schedule (daytime)
added a link pointing to Lucky Dog

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 2021–22 United States network television schedule (late night), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — MrE (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2021–22 United States network television schedule (late night). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — MrE (talk) 00:58, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia. While I appreciate your enthusiasm for contributing to Wikipedia, as I stated in my edit summaries, per WP:V, all content must be sourced, and per WP:BURDEN, this is your responsibility to add. Saying "I own it so I know" in an edit summary generally doesn't cut it, readers and editors won't see that when reading/editing/reviewing the article.

Just Google it or something. Surely some website has mentioned this at least once in the past decade if it's true. See WP:VG/S for a list of usable and unusable sources, and WP:REFB if you need help with how to add a source. But stop adding content without a source. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 20:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One question though, I did look for sources but there weren’t any good sources, So I would like some possible recommendations. Thanks for the tips and appreciating my work including United States network television schedules. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 21:21, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Did you not check WP:VG/S? There's tons of recommendations/examples there. Sergecross73 msg me 23:45, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, It’s just that the main sources barely or not even mention that Luigi’s Mansion on 3DS has Circle Pad Pro support let alone a full page dedicated to that. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 23:54, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You don't need a full source dedicated to it, you just need a source that directly states that Luigi's Mansion uses the Circle Pad Pro. A passing mention is fine as long as it verifies it. Sergecross73 msg me 02:46, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The CBS Late Movie ‎[edit]

Hi, just wondering why you undid my edits on The CBS Late Movie. The "History" section contained no references, which is why I added {{unsourced|section}}, and the text I removed was not about The CBS Late Movie, but what aired later in the same time slot. This would be appropriate in an article about CBS late night programming in general, but not in this specific article. Trivialist (talk) 01:47, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point. Hopefully that page will be created soon. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 11:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You can always start a draft version :) Trivialist (talk) 23:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That’s what I just did, sure it’s quite rough to say the least and it’s under review but, at least it’s created. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 15:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, a little bit of help with the process of redirecting and making the page better would be nice. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 15:18, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:CBS Late Night has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:CBS Late Night. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:25, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is not entirely clear to me how this differs from The CBS Late Movie. If it is accepted in its current state, it will probably be confusing to readers also. Are these two different formats for different periods of years? If so, the lede paragraphs of both this draft and the current article should clarify. Please explain. I am marking this draft as under review for about 24 hours while waiting for clarification. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:25, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of tenants in 4 World Trade Center, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:42, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is this necessary? Doesn’t seem like it to me. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 11:46, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Adequate sourcing is mandatory. If it can't be sourced, it has no place here. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It has been sourced already. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 18:06, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
bonadea contributions talk 17:38, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at 1949–50 United States network television schedule (late night) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:35, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1949–50 United States network television schedule (late night), you may be blocked from editing. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:11, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not necessarily vandalizing those lineups, I’m adding them because they’re are significant to the history of television. If you don’t want these lineups to exist then at least mention the shows on the primetime lineup. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 12:56, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, it was boilerplate text. It isn't vandalism exactly, but you are creating articles (from redirects) without reliable sources. I'd suggest that you work on the article in draftspace, add reliable sources, then submit it via the AFC process. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:45, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 1951-52 United States network television schedule (late night). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:54, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 15:51, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have been doing edits to get your article Draft:List of tenants in 4 World Trade Center ready for articles for creation submission, when will you be ready to submiit it? -Darth-Wiki-Man (talk) 23:57, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Probably around tonight or tomorrow. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 01:04, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also thanks a plenty for your work, I appreciate it a lot. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 01:05, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Any time man. Darth-Wiki-Man (talk) 15:12, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the idea to bring the page back, it is important. Darth-Wiki-Man (talk) 15:13, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No rush, but are you ready to submit it. Sorry if I am being rude, that is not my intention. Darth-Wiki-Man (talk) 16:58, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yep I’m ready. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 17:03, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, hopefully it works. Darth-Wiki-Man (talk) 17:10, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am pretty sure you have to be the one to submit it since I am not the creator. Darth-Wiki-Man (talk) 17:42, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would if it weren’t for the fact that I, the creator can’t find the submit button. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 17:48, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strange. Is it just a red box? Darth-Wiki-Man (talk) 17:50, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, apparently it only shows Ask for Advice and don’t not remove this line if someone decided to edit it. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 17:56, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Same here. Darth-Wiki-Man (talk) 18:01, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I will look into the problem. Darth-Wiki-Man (talk) 18:01, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I submitted it. Best of luck! Darth-Wiki-Man (talk) 20:11, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Nostalgia Zone (talk) 22:07, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome. Darth-Wiki-Man (talk) 22:23, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently it got rejected due to it not being notable enough for a page. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 13:57, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strange. Hopefully my additions will make it notable enough. Darth-Wiki-Man (talk) 15:48, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, No one responded so I moved the page from draftspace to article and it worked! It has been accepted and it has become more notable. Once again thanks a lot for the edits! Nostalgia Zone (talk) 18:55, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been edit warring at this article, repeatedly expanding the redirect by adding content. Many other editors disagree with your addition. I have full-protected the article to stop the edit warring. Please go to Talk:1949–50 United States network television schedule (late night) and discuss. Try to obtain consensus for your addition. This is a warning: If you do not obtain consensus but resume adding the material after the full protection expires, you are likely to be blocked for edit warring. MelanieN (talk) 00:25, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1946–47 United States network television schedule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Borden.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning for edit-warring on redirects[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:55, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t block me from editing for this but these shows kinda need representation in the form of schedules and I think a solid amount of people agree with me that these shows need to shown. At the very least they should be mentioned in the primetime schedules and you should realize that just redirecting the page to the primetime schedules well it just doesn’t make any sense. Like I said please don’t block me from editing because I said this, I just wanted to get my word out. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 01:23, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Multiple users currently oppose creating those separate pages, so you'll need to establish a consensus first to replace those pages with redirects. Or, as previously suggested, go through the WP:AFC process. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:29, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I meant it didn’t make sense to redirect those pages to the primetime lineups when they aren’t even mentioned. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 01:32, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. BattleshipMan (talk) 01:48, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CBS Late Night (December 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 16:46, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to 2022–23 United States network television schedule, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — MrE (talk) 18:17, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2022–23 United States network television schedule. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — MrE (talk) 22:29, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022–23 Canadian network television schedule[edit]

Do not remove the dates and do not use months in instead of seasons. Xeditboy (talk) 18:54, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metrocenter (Phoenix, Arizona), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberty House.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sterling Holloway without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Peaceray (talk) 15:23, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 03:15, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Savannah Mall, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Target and Parisian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cobb Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grant City.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Peachtree Mall
added a link pointing to Parisian
Riverbend Mall
added a link pointing to Miller Brothers

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shopping mall articles[edit]

Please don't add anchor lists. The anchors should be sufficiently mentioned in the body of the article, and listing them out violates WP:NOTDIR and WP:IINFO. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:49, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I’ll stop unless some of that info is not already in the article. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 17:54, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not only haven't you stopped, as advised by User talk:TenPoundHammer, you're now edit warring to keep an unnecessary list at Northland Center. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:12, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, fine, you win. I’ll genuinely stop with adding these lists onto already existing mall pages. Fair warning, I have plans to possibly create Shopping Mall articles (for malls that don’t have an article yet) that will have the lists from the beginning so they won’t be completely dead. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 23:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Video Game, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:59, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you redirect my article to the Nickelodeon Kids’ Choice Awards page? I know it doesn’t have any sources but, come on other articles based on the KCA have minimal sources so why are you going after me? Nostalgia Zone (talk) 17:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
…hello? Nostalgia Zone (talk) 02:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Pbritti (talk) 17:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pbritti were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Pbritti (talk) 20:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 07:20, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Video Game, you may be blocked from editing. Onel5969 TT me 01:38, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that I already chatted with you. On a side note you are constantly redirecting pages even though they make sense and you think it’s because there’s minimal sources but let me tell you here’s the sources I used…
THE STINKING KCA PAGES THEMSELVES!
I’m far from disrupting Wikipedia in this case where there’s no other websites that have a page talking about KCA’s Favorite Video Game. If you have a good reason why this article should barely exist then tell me. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 01:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Video Game, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 TT me 21:24, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Book has been accepted[edit]

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Book, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:32, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:CBS Late Night[edit]

Hello, Nostalgia Zone. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CBS Late Night".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 23:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Adrian Mall
added a link pointing to Woolworth
The Shops at Westshore
added a link pointing to Burlington

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Northland Center, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Mall articles do not make lists of the anchors as it violates WP:NOTDIR. Compare Forest Fair Village, Colonial Plaza, and other similar articles, which are GA-class and do NOT contain lists. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:26, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Lourdes 05:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Nostalgia Zone. You can't quietly go back to doing the same thing that you were warned multiple times about (e.g. anchor lists) and where you agreed to not add them; and then you've gone back to adding them back, while reverting corrective edits of other editors. You cannot be taxing the time of productive editors to such an extent as seen above. I have a few questions here:
  1. Have you properly read and understood our editorial policies and guideilnes?
  2. What is the genesis of your name? Is it based on the comic book joint?
  3. What is the reason you ignored multiple warnings earlier and went back to the same disruptive editing schedule?

Your block is indefinite. Once you are ready with the answers, and once you are confident you have complete understanding of our editorial policies and guidelines, request an unblock using the procedure mentioned above and any administrator may unblock you based on their assessment, without checking back with me. Thank you, Lourdes 05:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nostalgia Zone (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

First of all, my name is not based on the comic book joint, I didn’t know it even existed. The reason why I’ve ignored those warnings was somewhat because I liked those anchor lists, but also I thought that those would help the mall articles, now I realized that I was wrong. I’m sorry for what I’ve done and I absolutely promise that I’ll never ever do it again. Heck, I’ll revert those changes and not add them to articles ever again. I’m being honest. I’d love to go back to editing and doing my thing, so I would like to be unblocked.

Decline reason:

Unless you answer all three queries completely, this isn't going to move anywhere. Leave another unblock request after you confirm you have gone through and understood all our editorial policies and guidelines perfectly well. I won't be looking at any further unblock requests. Other administrators can unblock if they deem fit without checking with me. Thanks. Lourdes 19:29, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nostalgia Zone (talk) 13:05, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not inclined to believe you, because I told you to knock it off back in February, you said you wouldn't, and then you immediately went back to doing it again a day later. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Look, if someone unblocks me I will undo my mistakes when it comes to these. I absolutely promise, I’ll stop bugging you or anyone else about anchor lists ever again after I get unblocked. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 17:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello? Nostalgia Zone (talk) 21:33, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello? Nostalgia Zone (talk) 11:40, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Am I going to get unblocked? Nostalgia Zone (talk) 15:22, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nostalgia Zone (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Okay let me explain somethings, First I’ve promptly and properly read the Editing policy and I understand it. Second, my name is not based on the comic book joint, I had absolutely no clue that it even existed. Third and most importantly, I ignored all those warnings when it came to anchor lists on shopping mall articles and the reason why I added those (apart from the fact that I like them) was because I thought that would help the articles. If you or anyone else unbans me then I will undo my mistakes and get rid of the anchor lists that I’ve created and I’ll mostly distance myself from editing on those articles. Editing on Wikipedia is one of my favorite pastimes and I don’t want to lose the ability to edit forever. I’m sorry for what I’ve done and I really want to make it up to everyone. [P.S. if someone does unban me then Thanks so much for that!] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nostalgia Zone (talkcontribs) on 22:33, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

In their responses below, they indicate that they "should’ve only undid them once". This shows that the editor does not understand how consensus is achieved if someone disagrees with their edits. (WP:BRD might be helpful with this). Also, the editor needs to give a more detailed explanation on what they should have done when they received the warnings, instead of adding the information back to the article. Please do not rush your next request, but take some time to read and understand what Wikipedia's policies say you should have done instead. Z1720 (talk) 16:02, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A word of advice... these edits imply that you expect an fast response to your unblock request. This is not guaranteed; there is a long queue of unblock requests. Yours will be evaluated whenever the volunteer admins have time to do so. Until then, please be patient and wait your turn. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 01:07, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I’ll wait for about a few weeks. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 01:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Any updates? Nostalgia Zone (talk) 13:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nostalgia Zone, if I unblock you I will not allow you to edit the articles where you caused the disruption. Are there other articles you are willing to edit? Also, can you please explain why you continued to add these lists when specifically told by two editors not to do so, and explain what you should have done instead? Z1720 (talk) 14:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
With the whole not editing those mall articles anymore, That’s fine. As for the “articles I’m willing to edit” that makes no sense, apart from the shopping mall articles I want to just keeping doing my thing aka Editing whatever I want. For my explanation, I continued with those because I thought those were help those articles that and I liked them. I should’ve only undid them once for the ones I did add and I should’ve not add more. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 21:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nostalgia Zone (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

For pete's sake my explanation, I continued with those because I seriously thought those were help those articles that and I liked them. I should’ve not fight against the people who undid them for the ones I did add and I should’ve not add more. What else can I say? I’ve promptly and properly read the Editing and BRD policy and I understand it. Second, my name is not based on the comic book joint, I had absolutely no clue that it even existed. I want to just keeping doing my thing aka Editing whatever I want, I don't care if I can't edit mall articles anymore, I just want to enjoy one of my pastimes.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:11, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your block is against you personally, not just this account. If your request is rejected and you make additional accounts, it will be considered sockpuppetry, which is another blockable offense. Absolutely do not do this, as it will make your situation worse, not better. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:13, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks for letting me know. I won’t make another account. Regardless I hope to get unblocked. Nostalgia Zone (talk) 22:30, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Any news to report about my status? Nostalgia Zone (talk) 19:54, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Nostalgia Zone (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Well, I understand my reason for why I was blocked, I will not edit mall articles ever again due to my anchor lists. I'll try not to do any more harm and will try and make useful contributions. I personally have been waiting to get unblocked and I just want to get back to editing. Hopefully this time it will work.

Accept reason:

Ok. Just giving you a good faith unblock. Don't let me feel this was a mistake. Lourdes 04:41, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Nostalgia Zone. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1951-52 United States network television schedule (late night), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Nostalgia Zone. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1952-53 United States network television schedule (late night), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Nostalgia Zone. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1953-54 United States network television schedule (late night), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nostalgia Zone. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1951-52 United States network television schedule".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nostalgia Zone. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1952-53 United States network television schedule".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nostalgia Zone. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1953-54 United States network television schedule".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 21:36, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 13:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Nostalgia Zone. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Animal Star, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Charsaddian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Charsaddian (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as List of animated feature films nominated for Golden Raspberry Awards, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hqb (talk) 18:18, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Sergecross73. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sergecross73 msg me 15:25, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What page was it? Nostalgia Zone (talk) 17:47, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This edit. Sergecross73 msg me 18:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Nostalgia Zone. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Apple Arcade games, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Nostalgia Zone. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Teen Choice Award for Choice Video Game, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nostalgia Zone. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Apple Arcade games".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Nostalgia Zone. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Netflix games, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]