User talk:PlaneCrashKing1264

Welcome!

Hello, PlaneCrashKing1264!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, SPF121188 ^{(talk this way)} ^(contribs) 19:55, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I doesn't feel like I'm welcome here... 😔😔😔 PlaneCrashKing1264 (talk) 19:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message

Hello, PlaneCrashKing1264. You have new messages at FormalDude's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

––FormalDude (talk) 16:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm BilCat. An edit that you recently made to Lockheed C-130 Hercules seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! BilCat (talk) 18:59, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced

Hello, I'm Canterbury Tail. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 16:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tailstrike have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tailstrike was changed by PlaneCrashKing1264 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952524 on 2022-12-27T16:25:38+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:25, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:COVID-19. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 18:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 737, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ZLEA _T\^C 00:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Top 10 deadliest air disasters ever

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Top 10 deadliest air disasters ever. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of deadliest aircraft accidents and incidents. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of deadliest aircraft accidents and incidents. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fram (talk) 15:43, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aviation accidents and incidents involving crashes with less then 100 deaths moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aviation accidents and incidents involving crashes with less then 100 deaths, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 14:05, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, PlaneCrashKing1264. I noticed that your recent edit to Global Air (Mexico) added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 21:46, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Mayday episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Xixi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aviation accidents and incidents involving crashes with less then 100 deaths

Hello, PlaneCrashKing1264. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aviation accidents and incidents involving crashes with less then 100 deaths, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User:Richardbroadbridge979 ‎, you may be blocked from editing. Stop creating pages that simply say "Hi", and don't edit other users' main pages. Meters (talk) 01:37, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was fine for you to create your own user page that way, but don't do that on article talk pages or on other users' pages. Meters (talk) 01:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Richardbroadbridge979

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as User:Richardbroadbridge979, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Meters (talk) 01:41, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Disruptive_editing#:~:text=Does%20not%20engage%20in%20consensus%20building%3A

Before continuing to edit the page Japan Airlines Flight 516 against current WP: CONSENSUS, please join the discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Japan_Airlines_Flight_516#Hull_loss. I am happy to discuss with you why you disagree with the current consensus, but repeatedly reverting edits is not appropriate.

Thanks - Timtjtim (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Its not disruptive editing! PlaneCrashKing1264 (talk) 17:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever you want to call it, you're not engaging in consensus building, and are going against current consensus. Please engage in the discussion, and persuade us why your edit is better than the current consensus. Timtjtim (talk) 18:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but im not very good at putting stuff on talk pages. PlaneCrashKing1264 (talk) 14:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Timtjtim (talk) 18:41, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War Notice: 2024 Haneda Airport runway collision

Your recent editing history at 2024 Haneda Airport runway collision shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.)

Today you made two reverts to Borgenland's work [1] [2] without engaging in any discussion on the talk page. This is in addition to the 6 [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] yesterday, for a total of 8 within 24 hours. Again, you didn't participate in discussion for any of these. Writing "Discuss in talk page if you want" in the edit summary is not a substitute for you actually engaging in those disucssions!

Please use the talk page [9] before reverting anyone else's changes. Timtjtim (talk) 00:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had explained in an edit summary that at the beginning of the article the airliner had been provided with an acronym after its full name. Yet said user curiously left that part untouched. If they had been serious about pushing the full I believe they would have removed so immediately rather than leave that loophole for other users to reinsert the acronym and cause this edit war. As for me, I don’t think this is an issue worth fighting over incessantly but my only 2 cents on this is that why waste precious bytes throughout the article and making life harder spelling out a full name when there is an adequately explained acronym. Borgenland (talk) 00:41, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly one place (one of only two places "Japan Airlines" was used after the acronym was explained) was changed in the rollbacks. I'm not sure why PlaneCrashKing1264 was so determined for that specific line to be kept as "Japan Airlines" when "JAL" was used everywhere else. Timtjtim (talk) 09:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heheheh, sorry... PlaneCrashKing1264 (talk) 14:18, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

😔😔😔

I'll use the discussion page next time. PlaneCrashKing1264 (talk) 14:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of mid-air collisions moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of mid-air collisions, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 08:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Im not done yet. PlaneCrashKing1264 (talk) 13:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of mid-air collisions has been accepted

List of mid-air collisions, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mach61 (talk) 03:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of NFL teams (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SounderBruce was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at National Football League instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Would be more useful as a listing of all NFL teams in a proper table, but as it stands it's duplicative.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of NFL teams and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sounder Bruce 23:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PlaneCrashKing1264! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sounder Bruce 23:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Good & The Beautiful (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Good & The Beautiful and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Good & The Beautiful (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrowssapSMM was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Good & The Beautiful and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrowssapSMM 14:57, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Good and The Beautiful (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Good and The Beautiful and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Good and The Beautiful

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Good and The Beautiful requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.goodandbeautiful.com/about-us/ and https://www.goodandbeautiful.com/support-faq/does-the-curriculum-include-doctrines-specific-to-any-certain-christian-denomination/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KylieTastic (talk) 22:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello PlaneCrashKing1264! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source. You must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. Read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Our policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok... 😢😢😢 PlaneCrashKing1264 (talk) 03:23, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diary of an 8-bit Warrior/Diary of a Wimpy Villager (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:NBOOK.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diary of an 8-bit Warrior/Diary of a Wimpy Villager and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 17:42, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of NFL teams

Hello, PlaneCrashKing1264. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of NFL teams, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of NFL teams

Hello, PlaneCrashKing1264. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of NFL teams".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:21, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Diary of an 8-bit Warrior/Diary of a Wimpy Villager

Hello, PlaneCrashKing1264. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Diary of an 8-bit Warrior/Diary of a Wimpy Villager, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sunshine Skyway Bridge Collapse

Hello, PlaneCrashKing1264. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sunshine Skyway Bridge Collapse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Diary of an 8-bit Warrior/Diary of a Wimpy Villager

Hello, PlaneCrashKing1264. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Diary of a Wimpy Villager".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]