User talk:Rajsector3

Speedy deletion nomination of Rohtak Radio Station

Hello Rajsector3,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rohtak Radio Station for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Knyzna1 (talk) 17:30, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Deletion of Rohtak Radio Station

Hi Rajsector 3

By the time of creation, all Wikipedia articles need to clearly establish why they are significant and deserve to be included in the encyclopedia. Your article, Rohtak Radio Station, was deleted as per WP:A7 and WP:A1, as there was not enough context to establish the subject of the article and why it is notable. A Wikipedia article's main purpose is to inform the reader on the article's subject, and your article failed to do so, and thus was deleted.

I trust you will take the aforementioned factors into consideration when creating further articles. Kind regards. Knyzna1 (talk) 19:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Crusher in Haryana

The article Crusher in Haryana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a political soapbox, not a neutral article. It must be rewritten in neutral terms and fully referenced or it must go. Wikipedia articles may not do more than report what is documented in reliable sources, and the material must also be notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle 13:40, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know how you are associating crusher with politics as crushers are in few part of the state and they are using their crushers only for their financial gains and polluting the environment and this is not affected/ associated from any political party.Rajsector3 (talk) 06:43, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Congress in Haryana

The article Congress in Haryana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Political propaganda and WP:OR disguised as an article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle 13:42, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is only giving the names of the persons associated with the congress party on one page and only names of the persons already floating on wikipedia...ok so please do not delete and it is not biased in any manner.Rajsector3 (talk) 06:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BJP in Haryana listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect BJP in Haryana. Since you had some involvement with the BJP in Haryana redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Fiddle Faddle 13:46, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed a file deletion tag from Wikipedia. When removing deletion tags, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Please discuss Shrikanthv (talk) 07:50, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rewari- Rohtak Train

The article Rewari- Rohtak Train has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable train service.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 18:54, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yadav (Tundak)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Yadav (Tundak) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 18:58, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Congress in Haryana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Congress in Haryana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Congress in Haryana until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 23:17, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rewari- Rohtak Train for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rewari- Rohtak Train is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rewari- Rohtak Train until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 20:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Anup. I noticed you have been creating articles on settlements of India. It'd be better if you mention demographic data as well citing Census of India Official website. Thank you! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:23, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gughod (Rewari) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| pushpin_map_alt = Map of Haryana showing the location of Gughod (Rewari))

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:21, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bariawas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lalpur

Dhani Riwasa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dharan

Dholera (Mahendragarh) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nizampur

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rajsector3. You have new messages at DPL bot's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:13, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rewari-Rohtak line

The correction has been made on the Rewari-Rohtak line template. The template has also been rectified. In future, you will be able to make corrections directly. Why don't you try creating a Delhi-Jaipur line with properly referenced material? You can see Delhi-Fazilka line and other line pages in the area for guidance. Cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 01:06, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dahima (Hisar), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hisar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lakhnor

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lakhnor, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.onefivenine.com/india/villages/Rewari/Rewari/Lakhnor.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nilaheri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nahar

Salhawas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nahar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Majri (Rajasthan) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* In Himachal Pradesh (State), Solan (District), Nalagarh(Sub District), Majri (VILLAGE

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Khushpura

Hello Rajsector3,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Khushpura, may be copied from http://www.onefivenine.com/india/villages/Rewari/Jatusana/Khushpura. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 07:34, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rohrai

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rohrai, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.onefivenine.com/india/villages/Rewari/Jatusana/Rohrai.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 08:09, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Baldhan Khurd (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kanina

Khushpura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kanina

Rohrai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nahar

Rojhuwas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nahar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deer Park, Hisar

Hello Rajsector3,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Deer Park, Hisar, may be copied from http://hisar.biz/deer-park-hisar/. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 10:50, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Deer Park, Hisar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Deer Park, Hisar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://hisar.biz/deer-park-hisar/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dudel250 (talk) 10:55, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Deer Park, Hisar, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Dudel250 (talk) 10:59, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chinkara Breeding Centre

Hello Rajsector3,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Chinkara Breeding Centre, may be copied from http://haryanaforest.prosixsoftron.com/ChinkaraBreeding.aspx. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 11:10, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chinkara Breeding Centre

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chinkara Breeding Centre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://haryanaforest.prosixsoftron.com/ChinkaraBreeding.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Acalycine^{(talk/contribs)} 11:19, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Reasons of increase in divorces in India

The article Reasons of increase in divorces in India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this topic is encyclopedic. Likely original research and/or synthesis.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kinu ^t/_c 08:09, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have taken a look at this article, and agree with the editor who proposed it for deletion. There is nothing in the article that cannot be included in the Demographics of India article. RomanSpa (talk) 07:13, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Misuse of women laws in India

The article Misuse of women laws in India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this topic is encyclopedic. Likely original research and/or synthesis. Given the list of links, etc., present, and the creation of Reasons of increase in divorces in India by the same author, this might be part of a soapbox.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kinu ^t/_c 08:18, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just to let you know that I have removed the "proposed deletion" template from this article. However, the article itself, as it currently stands, is very weak. In particular, its referencing is entirely inadequate. I shall attempt to do some article clean-up over the next few days, but you should also do everything you can to improve the article, paying particular attention to the concerns other editors have already raised. RomanSpa (talk) 07:11, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jhook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kanina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Divorce and laws concerning women

Sorry, I am not interested in these subjects. - Chandan Guha (talk) 09:10, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Men's rights movement probation notice

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Men's rights movement, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Men's rights movement/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is necessarily any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- Bbb23 (talk) 13:51, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Divorce and women related laws

I have checked both the articles, and I think both of them might need proper references (read journal or articles from leading periodicals). As of now, both the articles look to be biased and not written from a neutral point of view. If you take my opinion, I would request you to create a new article called, Divorce in India and move the existing content of Reasons of increase in divorces in India there (and obviously write it from a NPOV). Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 04:53, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello Rajsector3, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Khushpura has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:52, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks (Regarding Chillar)

Hi,
Regarding the article you created about Chillar, I did see that you put links in to give credit to your sources. But that is not the only thing you must do. You have a few options:

Put the quotes in directly, with quotation marks. Example-
- According to onefivenine.com , "Chillar is a Village in Rewari Tehsil in Rewari District of Haryana State, India. It belongs to Gurgaon Division."^[1]
You can put the ideas into your own words, without relying on the original structure. Then put the reference in at the end.
- Owned by the Gurgaon Division, Chillar is an Indian village inside of Haryana State...(fill in more)^[1]

You cannot closely paraphrase or copy-paste, and then put the reference. It's either a direct quote, or your own words completely.

Thank you for creating the pages- be sure to read WP: CS , and never copy paste unless it is attributed correctly.Keep editing, don't be discouraged.JacobiJonesJr (talk) 04:47, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zehra Naqvi

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Zehra Naqvi, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thestoryplayer.com/zehra-naqvi/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:26, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Waiving of fundamental right

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Waiving of fundamental right requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:12, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 14 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Corruption in Haryana page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy

Please note that the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy applies everywhere on Wikipedia - not just in articles. And please also note that article talk pages are solely intended for discussions of direct relevance to article content - they are not a forum for general discussion of the article subject. Your recent posts at Talk:Bhupinder Singh Hooda are neither in compliance with BLP policy (you were reporting allegations as fact) nor apparently intended to suggest changes to the article - and note that any proposed changes will of course also have to comply with BLP policy. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:55, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Corruption in Haryana

Since this article appears to me to violate several Wikipedia policies, I have started a thread on it atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. You may wish to respond there - but before you do, I suggest you familiarise yourself with WP:BLP policy, for a start. AndyTheGrump (talk) 02:16, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Corruption in Haryana

The article Corruption in Haryana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Violates WP:NOTSOAPBOX. Being questioned at AN/I

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lor^Chat 02:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Constitution of India

Template:Constitution of India has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —SpacemanSpiff 08:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Misuse of women laws in India

Template:Misuse of women laws in India has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —SpacemanSpiff 08:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond on ANI

Hi, Rajsector3. I've made a proposal at the administrators' noticeboard that I'd like you to respond to (respond at AFD, please, not here on your talk). Here it is. Please consider whether you can agree to those conditions. Bishonen | talk 10:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Just to let you know...

... I've made a comment about you here. Thanks. RomanSpa (talk) 11:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Request to remove the redirect template

Answer: No.

--Calton | Talk 12:18, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for tendentious editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:46, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request to Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rajsector3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

'I was working with you in good faith and I was blocked and according to me as undertaking was demanded, I am ready to give and not to create articles but request you for survival of my pages as have been redirected and deleted and moreover will follow your words as suggested by you earlier and even after that you may unblock (block set expiry of short period) for the reason as I have given undertaking I will take care of that and let me associated with you, It was not my thought but it is the prevailing situation and Law are being misused, after all as mentioned that I was in Good Faith depends on you to accept my request and neutral point of view may be seen by seeing my references Rajsector3 (talk) 13:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Accept reason:

There's no point in posting another request while this one is on hold. I've removed your second request, as it'll only confuse the coding. You have been unblocked for the purpose of responding at ANI only. Please don't create any articles or templates in the meantime. Bishonen | talk 14:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]

CCI Notice

Hello, Rajsector3. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to add to your difficulties at this moment, but I'm afraid I have found a good deal of evidence that you make a habit of copy-pasting from other sources. I hope, of course, to find that I am wrong about that. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why no post on ANI?

I'm wondering why you haven't posted on ANI as you were asked to. I unblocked you just half an hour after your last unblock request, for the purpose of doing that, but you haven't taken advantage of it to edit. Is this real life intervening (of course I wouldn't complain about anything like that), or have you decided against explaining yourself on ANI? I hope you'll post there, or here, within the next 24 hours, or I'm afraid it will seem reasonable to reblock you. Bishonen | talk 22:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Fair Conclusion

Hi. I just wanted to give you a bit of encouragement to keep editing Wikipedia, following the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Corruption_in_Haryana_article. I think you've done the right thing by agreeing not to create new articles except through the Articles for Creation process for the next year: it will help you to understand what is expected of a Wikipedia article, and I think you'll learn a lot. I feel that the discussion reached a fair conclusion, and hope you do too. In the meantime, you can still edit existing articles, and (as you probably know) there is a lot of work to be done, particularly in articles about India. If there is anything I can do to help you, please let me know. RomanSpa (talk) 08:05, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder of editing restrictions

Hi, Rajsector. This is just a reminder on your page of the editing restrictions you've agreed to here. You're going to create articles only through Articles for creation, and not create any other types of pages at all (such as for example templates) for the space of one year from now.

You don't have to keep this note visible on your page if you'd rather not; it's for your eyes, not for other people. Again, happy editing! Bishonen | talk 10:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Nomination of Ramesh Dalal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramesh Dalal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramesh Dalal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —SpacemanSpiff 04:29, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Corruption in Haryana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Corruption in Haryana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corruption in Haryana until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amita Pathak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aakrosh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Samita Bangargi (July 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anupmehra -Let's talk! 19:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samita Bangargi (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Samita Bangargi.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 09:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rajsector3, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! (t) Josve05a (c) 09:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Samita Bangargi was accepted

Samita Bangargi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Anupmehra -Let's talk! 20:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ravinder Saini for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ravinder Saini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravinder Saini until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 22:03, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating the conditions you agreed to at [1], namely that you would only create articles via the AfC process, which you broke at Ravinder Saini. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu ^t/_c 22:19, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, other articles you have created directly in the Article namespace without using the AfC process, contravening the editing restriction agreed to on June 20: Jaspinder Cheema (June 30), Amita Pathak (July 12). --Kinu ^t/_c 07:49, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rajsector3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You can see previous message on my talk page just before you User:Anupmehra left the message that you can create directly so through AFC wizard I created, where two options were available through draft and through un reviewed channel and I was of mind that it is through AFC, earlier I created two article and were accepted, Please unblock, I will follow the way to prepare a draft first.

Decline reason:

On top of the other issues noted, you have also been engaging in copyright violations, such as Lakhnor and the now-deleted Chinkara Breeding Centre, among others. For that alone you should be blocked on top of the other issues. Wizardman 02:31, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rajsector3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Only for the reason that you found one or two articles of disruptive writings and I have created about 95 pages for the world and society, allow me for further editing and you may set a expiry time for 4-6 months. I will abstain from the same and keep Fasting and with the same never crack your rules and guidlines Anupmehra wikipedian suggested me to create directly and there was two different ways to create through AFC.

1. through draft
2. through un reviewd

as mentioned thereon Wikipedia:Article wizard/Ready for submission Ravinder Saini is a notable topic because a journalist is the person who works not for himself he provides truth, news and happenings to the society and if Journalists are not notable then what is the need to be a wikipedian, wikipedian also provides info about the topics necessary for years even when the creators dies, I have not advertised my self, The tribune, where Ravinder saini works is the reputed newspaper of India and tribune is the news paper having editions even outside of India. Pages can be improved and deletion is not the only solution. He is working as a journalist should work i.e. fairly. If you unblock I will create it through draft mode. A few Journalists from Haryana are mentioned below and have pages on Wikipedia:-

Khwaja Ahmad Abbas
Sutapa Deb
Syed Hayatullah
Mahendra Pratap
Vijay Kumar Chopra
Kishwar Desai
Ashwini Kumar Chopra
Z. A. Suleri
Thakur Deshraj
Kausar Yazdani
Nasir Kazmi
#Journalists from Kanwari The journalists Dharmender Kanwari, Sanjay Dhanda, Devender Sharma, Narender, Sukhbir Duhan, Pardeep Jakar And Sunil Poonia belong to Kanwari village (Haryana).
Ravinder Saini Rajsector3 (talk) 02:49, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Request does not address your apparent lack of understanding of our copyright policy. MER-C 01:21, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Anupmehra wikipedian suggested me to create directly... I see no evidence that the editor you mentioned (or any other editor, for that matter) suggested that you use Wikipedia:Article wizard to create an article. Furthermore, you agreed to create articles using the WP:AFC process, given the issues mentioned at ANI about your previous creations. Why would you then use the article wizard, not use the {{AFC submission}} template, not title it as a Draft, etc.? --Kinu ^t/_c 03:27, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please pay your attention User:Kinu

Further unblock discussion

Samita Bangargi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Anupmehra -Let's talk! 20:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rajsector3 (talk) 03:34, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the template says you can create articles yourself; because you are a registered user, you technically can. However, you as an editor were told not to do so, because of your editing history, and you agreed to this. Without any legitimate discussion, a template message does not nullify or supersede your editing restrictions. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:37, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, given that you broke the agreed-upon editing restriction prior to receiving this message on July 23 (see your creation of Jaspinder Cheema on June 30 and Amita Pathak on July 12, both in Article namespace and not using the AfC process), claiming that this message is the reason you did so is disingenuous. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:56, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You say you "will abstain from the same" again? You already promised to abstain from direct article creation for a full year! After you had been indefinitely blocked for disruptive editing, I pleaded for a second chance for you on condition you promised to create articles only through Articles for creation. Compare the original ANI thread and my reminder above on this page. You promised to abide by the restrictions but after a mere ten days you started to create new articles directly in mainspace again (Jaspinder Cheema on 20 30 June and other non-viable articles as well as copyright violations). And now you say that was because you misunderstood a template you received on 23 July? As far as I'm concerned, you've already wasted too much community time. Sorry. Bishonen | talk 10:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]

@Kinu:, @Bishonen:, @Rajsector3: - Hi all, Perhaps I'm late to be here. I received an email from the blocked user who has been in my contact since his early days of Wikipedia editing. I also reviewed his last afc draft, He said in the email, "[..]You suggested me create the articles directly and I was confused whether to create through draft or through unreviewed channels, help me to unblock myself[..]". I can now figure out, he made an attempt to lie to me. He has been evading sanctions much earlier prior to the afc template posted on his talk page by me.

The blocked person has given community an impression of being an untrusted editor who does not follow Wikipedia policy and guidelines and even established consensus and sanctions. He has even lost the last chance granted to him.

At best, being blocked, the editor is unable to create community any extra unnecessary work. I'm unsure, but I will not mind giving it a try as if I promise the Wikipedia community, if block removed on the editor, he'll not be wasting community time either and will work hard towards being a productive editor. If unblocked, I'll assume responsibility to mentor him and to make sure he follows the sanctions imposed at Administrator's noticeboard. Is there any little ray of hope for this editor to get his block lifted or block period reduced from indefinite to one or two week or a month or few months? I'll however request for the reduced block period, so that, in the meanwhile he could learn basics of Wikipedia policy and guidelines. May we afford to assume good faith one more time? It might be possible that he followed WP:Article Wizard and after following five steps, he got stuck at WP:Article_wizard/Ready for submission. Regards, Anupmehra -Let's talk! 02:11, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To wit, "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me." This editor agreed to create articles only via the AfC process. By circumventing this editing restriction and then not being forthright about his reason for doing so, I see no reason to assume good faith anymore. Assuming good faith is not a suicide pact, and to allow this editor to continue to create articles that are, quite frankly, terrible, both in terms of language (this editor's command of English is not good, based solely on the comments made on this page) and actual content (the articles are usually biased and terribly sourced) is not beneficial to the encyclopedia. Your willingness to mentor this user is admirable; however, I do not see any benefit in allowing this editor to continue to edit here, and I stand by this indefinite block. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:56, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Anupmehra. I'm changing the section header, which just gets more and more unsuitable. It's pretty heroic of you to offer to mentor the user after he pretty much tried to blame you for his latest block; I'm impressed. But you see how both the declining admins, Wizardman and MER-C, focus on Rajsector's violations of our copyright policies. If you were his mentor, you'd have to take responsibility for teaching him how to apply those policies as well, and for making sure he doesn't try to skirt or evade them. (I'm sorry to have to make the last point, but there it is, compare what Kinu says about AGF.) Copyright issues are taken very seriously as I'm sure you know. It looks to me like you'd be taking on a lot of work for uncertain gain.

Your suggestion that he could perhaps be unblocked in a few months has merit, but I don't think it's likely to happen in the form of a reduced block period at this time. Instead, I suggest that he shouldn't currently post any more unblock requests, but instead, if he wants to, work with your help towards learning as you say the "basics of Wikipedia policy and guidelines". Not really sure how he can do much of that while blocked, but I suppose conversation with you through e-mail and/or on this page might achieve something. Then, if you say he's ready for it, he could post another unblock request in three months and perhaps have it viewed favorably by an uninvolved admin. If he worked at other Wikipedias (Wikiquote? Hindi Wikipedia? He doesn't have any babelboxes, so I'm guessing) in the meantime and did well there, it would certainly count in his favour.

I'm dubious, though. It's up to you, and your heroism is appreciated, but please think again whether you're up for what I have described. And think about it you, too, Rajsector3. For you too it would be a lot of work for uncertain gain, as you may still not be unblocked in the end. There are many websites and message boards out there that you can use without all this palaver. Bishonen | talk 09:24, 28 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]

@Kinu:, @Bishonen: I again apologies for my inadvertent mistakes, properly explained by Anumehra above that through Afc I misunderstood that what is the best way to create through draft or through unreviewed channels, you can see example of my honesty that my talk page may be cleaned by me previously and kept all the previous messages near 60 open for all to know my willingness to create pages for all, I thank Anupmehra and request you to unblock me and see the changes, unreliable references may be denied on talk page for future care and caution, Happy Eid and Teej from India to you and all.Rajsector3 (talk) 16:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've sent an email to the user in reply to his email yesterday, and I'm still waiting for his reply. Please consider that, he is a good faith editor. There are some problems however, and is what his editing privilege revoked for, unfortunately indefinitely.

I'm here to say that, those problems with editing are most common within a majority of new Wikipedia editors. It is not that, he made all mistakes knowingly. He is just not aware of tons of our Wikipedia policy and guidelines and essays, or better say even basics of them. Despite that, he tries to contribute and make together with us, an encyclopedia. It could be evidenced with the multiple valid articles created by him[2]. He has made a few less than a thousand edits.

These problems are not really totally unmanageable. I may help him to understand, What Wikipedia articles should be written about, How Wikipedia articles should be written about, What Wikipedia is not and most importantly, Why we can not simply copy-paste texts/media files available else where over the internet or offline, most of the times. If he stops copy-pasting and agrees to use only wp:drafts to create new articles, I guess, problem no longer exists thereafter.

I'm afraid, we are about to lose an active good faith Wikipedia editor. He may be frustrated and depressed with all these happenings. I acknowledge that, he was warned and apparently made properly understand what he should to do, and what he should not.

And, I've just received his e-mail, and I'd share that here,(it complies with my E-mail notice)

I am thankful to you for conceiving my mistaken thought properly that I was stuck in process of AFC that through draft or through unreviewed channel is best, I also thank for accepting my submission, I am not biased and promoting anyone, English is second language for me but I am educated person, if any mistake is committed inadvertently may be corrected by any person in the world, I again through request the persons raising objections that I will abstain even from editing if there is advertent mistake occurs, I am not earning any penny through creating pages or editing, sole purpose is to provide information to the world and it's Wikipedia's aim.

If possible, grant him one more chance to be a part of the Wikipedia community. I believe, if granted, and he ever draws the community attention that'd be only for his constructive efforts and hard work to make and improve Wikipedia. We are here to build encyclopedia, one more hand would not be less. I'm not saying just unblock him now. I'm saying he is worth to be granted a second chance. It could be done by multiple ways, as one suggested above by Bishonen. Perhaps, Rajsector3 would like to add a little more and explain his further willingness to contribute to the project.

Sorry people for the trouble reading the lengthy message. Regards, Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:43, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request reason

I thought that I am through AFC process as mentioned below, I followed the instructions of as mentioned thereon Wikipedia:Article wizard/Ready for submission I will abstain from the same and keep Fasting and with the same never crack your rules and guidlines Anupmehra wikipedian suggested me to create directly and there was two different ways to create through AFC. 1. through draft 2. through unreviewd Only for the reason that you found one or two articles of disruptive writings and I have created about 95 pages for the world and society, allow me for further editing and you may set a expiry time for 4-6 months. As far as Bishonen is concerned, I've already wasted too much community time and what about my time even ninety five articles exist/ created and thousand of edits for the wikipedia community. Rajsector3 (talk) 10:52, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is incoherent and appears to say nothing of value about the reason for your block. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:16, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can not compel you, lucid answer has been explained by User:Anupmehra Rajsector3 (talk) 07:14, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajsector3. Thank you. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:56, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bad move. You've essentially destroyed any chance of being unblocked. Goodbye. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:45, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know him who has edited the page and I am not concerned with him, @kinuRajsector3 (talk) 02:26, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Rajsector3: - You are all doomed now. You were advised to not evade the block, but you did so. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 14:31, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Anupmehra & @kinu I do not know how you are blaming when I have asserted that I am not concerned with the same as you are accusing me of sockpuppeting.Rajsector3 (talk) 17:26, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove my shackles

I request you to release me and I assure you to follow your guidelines.User:Kinu Rajsector3 (talk) 02:48, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove my shackles

I request you to release me and I assure you to follow your guidelines.User:Kinu Rajsector3 (talk) Rajsector3 (talk) 06:02, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

^ ^a ^b About Chilar

[x-1] About Chilar

[1]