User talk:Renamed user e9fd8a9d63a258f253fc91b94ba901cf

DYK for Handan Chun

On 9 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Handan Chun, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Handan Chun wrote a poem on the game of pitch-pot? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Handan Chun. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Handan Chun), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese dynasties

Hey, I noticed you withdrew a CfD nomination. I have relisted the same categories, but for renaming instead of deletion. See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_November_12#Category:Wei_Jin_Southern_and_Northern_Dynasties. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:34, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Amazon rainforest, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. pipe058 04:30, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hey, nice job on Handan Chun—glad to have you here. We always need more contributors in the vastness that is Chinese history. I'm curious, does your interest reside primarily in the three kingdoms? Best – Aza24 (talk) 23:10, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Slovenia - former names

Hello, I've reverted your recent change that removed the table. There are actually other examples of countries which have lists of former names such as Ukraine and Poland, albeit as seperate articles. That alone justifies inclusion of the details on the Slovenia page although I'm sure the format could be modified to suit as necessary. Stroness (talk) 08:52, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Stroness: The Ukraine and Poland articles don't have tables for official names, but the Name of Ukraine article does. If we are going to have an official names table we should have it in a Name of Slovenia article. Mucube (talk · contribs) 01:02, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mucube: Thanks, your suggestion of using a seperate article is a good solution. I wasn't aware that there was already a Name of Slovenia article in place which should speed things up. Stroness (talk) 11:13, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Huang Guigu

Hi, I see you have removed the prod notice from the article saying you've found some sources. May I ask what those sources are, before I nominate it for AfD? _dk (talk) 20:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Underbar dk: I found a few possible sources using the Chinese name: [1][2][3]. Mucube (talk • contribs) 21:26, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Handan Chun

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Handan Chun you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Aza24 -- Aza24 (talk) 07:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting someone who is trying to properly integrate the article you created into WP's ecosystem does not make them want to review your article... Aza24 (talk) 20:59, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hitler family of Ohio

Hello Mucube,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hitler family of Ohio for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 09:02, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Handan Chun

The article Handan Chun you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Handan Chun and Talk:Handan Chun/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Aza24 -- Aza24 (talk) 21:40, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Handan Chun

The article Handan Chun you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Handan Chun for comments about the article, and Talk:Handan Chun/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Aza24 -- Aza24 (talk) 06:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Xuansha Shibei

Hello, Mucube,

Thank you for creating Xuansha Shibei.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mucube. Thank you for your work on Xuansha Shibei. User:Boleyn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add clear inline citations.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Boleyn (talk) 15:27, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hitler family of Ohio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hitler family of Ohio, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitler family of Ohio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Liu Ji'en

On 20 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Liu Ji'en, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Liu Ji'en was assassinated just 60 days after being crowned the emperor of the Northern Han? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Liu Ji'en. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Liu Ji'en), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Subdistrict vs residential communities

Hi @Mucube, first of all, thanks for accepting my draft :) However, I am pretty sure that subdistricts and residential communities are two different things. Subdistricts (街道) are township-level and residential communities (社区) are a lower level, same as villages. I have reverted the change for now, but feel free to revert that :) Cheers, azpineapple (talk) 02:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct, thanks for pointing that out. Mucube (talk • contribs) 18:44, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2023 March newsletter

So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.
Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.
TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.

The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included LunaEatsTuna, Thebiguglyalien, Sammi Brie, Trainsandotherthings, Lee Vilenski, Juxlos, Unexpectedlydian, SounderBruce, Kosack, BennyOnTheLoose and PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently been editing Falun Gong, which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 10:31, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Western Canada High School has been nominated for deletion

Category:Western Canada High School has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 21:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2023 May newsletter

The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:

Iazyges (1040) with three FAs on Byzantine emperors, and lots of bonus points.
Unlimitedlead (847), with three FAs on ancient history, one GA and nine reviews.
Epicgenius (636), a WikiCup veteran, with one FA on the New Amsterdam Theatre, four GAs and eleven DYKs
BennyOnTheLoose (553), a seasoned competitor, with one FA on snooker, six GAs and seven reviews.
FrB.TG (525), with one FA, a Lady Gaga song and a mass of bonus points.

Other notable performances were put in by Sammi Brie, Thebiguglyalien, MyCatIsAChonk, PCN02WPS, and AirshipJungleman29.

So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I appreciate your acceptance, Su Hu. It's great to see that Chinese Wikipedia has an excellent editor like you. I encourage you to continue creating articles about Chinese historical figures. Keep up the fantastic work, and best wishes! 1.47.16.104 (talk) 06:17, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mucube: Hi, Greeting! I have recently created a draft article titled "Draft:Sangha (monk)". Could you please review the section regarding the legend of Sangha? The historical account states that he was a monk, while the legend suggests that he was a native of Sizhou. If you are fluent in Chinese, could you please help me verify whether these two accounts refer to the same person or different individuals? Thank you. 1.47.16.104 (talk) 06:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Liu Ji'en

The article Liu Ji'en you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Liu Ji'en for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Aintabli -- Aintabli (talk) 05:23, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion

Hello, I notice that you are a native or experienced editor with knowledge of China. I would appreciate it if you could provide your opinion on the name change discussion Talk:Dongyue Emperor#Requested move 23 September 2023 section. Your input would be valuable. Thanks and regards. 82.209.142.239 (talk) 01:26, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Gaoping

Hello, Mucube. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Gaoping, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your reversion of my edit to István Láng

Greetings and felicitations. I noticed that you reverted my edit to the István Láng article without an explanation, and I'm wondering why—what about my changes did you object to? While most of the edit was trivial, the switching of the "Distinguish" and "Short description" templates was perfectly in accordance with MOS:ORDER. Would you please be so kind as to explain your reasoning? —DocWatson42 (talk) 03:59, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DocWatson42 I think your edit broke the infobox, check the page history Mucube (talk • contribs) 04:25, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah—I accidentally deleted a left curly bracket for the template "Birth date", which caused the malfunction. Do you have any objection if I redo my edit with that mistake corrected? —DocWatson42 (talk) 07:01, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you haven't replied, I went ahead and redid the substantial portion of my edit. —DocWatson42 (talk) 03:48, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Gaoping

Hello, Mucube. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Gaoping".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2024 Mozambique boat disaster

On 13 April 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Mozambique boat disaster, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 04:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]