User talk:User24202

This is User24202's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fairytechno (March 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fairytechno and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fairytechno, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 02:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RileyXeon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 02:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fairytechno[edit]

Hello, RileyXeon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fairytechno, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Great Temple of the Aten.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Great Temple of the Aten.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Akhenaten and Nefertiti raise offerings to the Aten.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Akhenaten and Nefertiti raise offerings to the Aten.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nu (mythology), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heh. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Giza Plateau into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Sennecaster (Chat) 01:44, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Great Sphinx of Giza into Western Desert (Egypt). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. BalinKingOfMoria (talk) 02:57, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RileyXeon: Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Milky Way into Roman mythology. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. BalinKingOfMoria (talk) 01:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you haven't responded to messages, but please stop copying content between articles without attribution. Additionally, I have reverted your edits at Pantheism because the information you were adding pertained to general cosmology and astronomy, rather than to Pantheism. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about all this. I have just released that adding "Main Page" isnt what was asked. I will begin changing those to "copied content from page name"

May i request you reverting taking away all the content I added to the page, since I spent a lot of research across Wikipedia and other sources to make. RileyXeon (talk) 02:06, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also Pantheism is the religious belief that the universe is a deity, so adding sections about the Big Band, which is the birth of that deity is necessary. RileyXeon (talk) 02:09, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since the Pantheistic belief that the universe is a deity, writing about cosmology is necessary RileyXeon (talk) 02:11, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also the reason it has been difficult for me to add the "copied content from page name" is because I haven't been able to find the template (i am new to editing Wikipedia) RileyXeon (talk) 02:15, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can see the connection, but the whole section on astronomy that you added was a tangent, almost entirely WP:OFFTOPIC and WP:IRRELEVANT. For instance, the topic of the Big Bang is irrelevant unless it is specifically in regard to its role in pantheism. In a similar sense, If I were to write an article about an actor, I would not include general information about acting. Especially considering that pantheism predates our modern understanding of astronomy, the structure of galaxies, stars, and planets is not really essential to the belief. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:28, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I suggest taking this matter to the article's talk page rather than continuing to revert in order to avoid an edit war. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:32, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One last thing is that with a page about the actor, their would be a section about their birthday and stuff like that. The Big Bang is the birth/beginning of the universe, which is the deity beleaved in pantheism, so that is why it is added. I have though not added back any of the off topic stuff. RileyXeon (talk) 02:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since the article is about a religious or quasi-religious belief, however discussion of the structure and origin of the universe is not that relevant unless it specifically pertains to pantheism (for instance what effect the advent of the Big Bang Theory had on pantheism). The article also discusses the presence of pantheism in various religions, which have their own creation myths (or something equivalent). Those religions would fit pantheism into that context rather than one of modern astronomy, which they may predate by hundreds or thousands of years. Well, what I'm saying is that the modern understanding of astronomy is not essential to pantheism and is at best tangentially related.

(Also, I apologize if I was blunt in my first comment about copied content; you hadn't responded to previous messages, so I just went with a tl;dr version of it.) TornadoLGS (talk) 03:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand now. Thank you for your awareness :) RileyXeon (talk) 03:09, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Extraterrestrial Alien.webp[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Extraterrestrial Alien.webp. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alcyoneus galaxy.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alcyoneus galaxy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited UGC 2369, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aries.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Extraterrestrism for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Extraterrestrism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extraterrestrism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 00:16, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gokuism[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gokuism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.christianforums.com/threads/dragon-ball-mythology-what-exactly-is-the-worldview-based-on.7965211/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:28, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will be 100% honest with you: I did not at all in the making of this page come across or view the site which you'vr shared. RileyXeon (talk) 10:43, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gokuism moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Gokuism, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:15, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gokuism symbol (2).png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gokuism symbol (2).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 22:50, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gokuism symbol.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gokuism symbol.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 22:50, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Fallen Angel (Cabanel) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, The Fallen Angel (Cabanel), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Fallen Angel (Cabanel) (September 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, lacks any sources or references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Fallen Angel (Cabanel) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:47, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I was looking for where I could find to get somone to help with the articles creation RileyXeon (talk) 02:23, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect for UFO sighting in Brighton, Victoria (1970/71)[edit]

I've redirected this page you started. Thanks for your contribs, but please have a look at WP:GNG (general notability) and WP:NEVENT (event notability). Your article sadly lacked refs, my WP:BEFORE search didn't find any reliable sources (see WP:RS). Still, thanks again for creating the page and contributing to Wikipedia! VickKiang (talk) 09:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding original research to articles[edit]

I explained this in detail above; you need to stop adding original research to articles. You must cite references that are neutral and reliable. You said you understood the problem. But you continue to add original research into articles. Please, please stop. You can and will be blocked from editing Wikipedia if you continue. --Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 07:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understood the OR part, so in my last couple of edits I just added the image with credits, and that's it. No OR was recently added. RileyXeon (talk) 07:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding an image with credits ISN'T original research, so you removing them from the most resent edits makes zero sense RileyXeon (talk) 07:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So I would kindly ask you to not remove images I've added which don't use OR RileyXeon (talk) 07:24, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you see this I would also kindly ask to add make the images I've added RileyXeon (talk) 07:27, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Captions can be OR. The use of images in an article can be OR if what you say about the images, or the context in which you use the images, isn't from some reliable source. So it looks to me like you haven't yet understood WP:OR. --Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 07:30, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The images added are all related to the topic of the articles their in, with captions crediting the artist. I see no problem with adding images to a page related to the image, with the image's caption being credits. RileyXeon (talk) 07:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The images added are all related to the topic of the articles their in RileyXeon (talk) 07:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By saying that, you've told me that you don't understand what original research is. You say that the images are related to the topic of the articles. But you don't get to make that decision on your own or from your imagined personal knowledge. (Especially since I've seen you make wild statements that are actually contradicted by the sources you use.) You need to have someone else say it, and that person must be is neutral, reliable, and a good source. --Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 07:37, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but you're saying me adding an image to an article and saying it's related isn't reliable. I literally added an image of Lucifer to Lucifer. I sorry for adding OR texts, i truly am, but recently all i've done is add a RELATED image to a RELATE page. RileyXeon (talk) 07:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You added an image called "Fallen Angel" to Lucifer and labeled it as something like Lucifer, in the Christian view, being sympathetic. And then you pared back just the "sympathetic" part of the caption when I objected to your original research, and you reinserted the image. Again, the picture is called "Fallen Angel." Not "Lucifer." Nowhere does it say that it's in the Christian view. You have an unfortunate habit of injecting what you "know is correct" into Wikipedia, and what you know to be correct isn't what Wikipedia is about - and often what you have known to be correct was in fact wrong. And in any case, that article has far too many images anyway (and adding the same image to three articles is a terrible idea, too). (see MOS:IMAGES) I am done with this discussion, since you haven't figured out WP:OR yet, and you haven't shown yourself to be willing to work to make your edits better. --Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 07:53, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but the "Fallen Angel" is 100% a painting of Lucifer. If you have a problem with an OR caption, then remove the caption. Look anywhere online and it will say that the painting IS of Lucifer. I'm sorry for the OR caption, but the image itself has no problem in the article. Without drama may I kindly add the image back to Lucifer without an OR caption? RileyXeon (talk) 07:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why you won't understand that the painting IS Lucifer. Please, please listen to me. RileyXeon (talk) 08:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did listen to you. Then I told you to find reliable sources. Which you refuse to do. If you continue to refuse to find reliable sources (not blogs, not junk, not what you think is correct, but reliable, neutral, valuable sources) then you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia by someone with less patience than I have. WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT, which is what you have been doing during this entire discussion, is a reason why people get blocked from Wikipedia every day. --Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 08:08, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some sources proving the "Fallen Angel" is a painting of Lucifer:

(Also Lucifer is titles as a fallen Angel)

The first website when searching "fallen angel alexandre cabanel" https://arthistoryproject.com/artists/alexandre-cabanel/fallen-angel/

https://www.artlegends.org/p/fallen-angel-1847-by-alexandre-cabanel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KB0vTQHLVZ8&t=183s

https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtPorn/comments/c8o4je/lucifer_after_being_expelled_from_heaven_fallen/

https://artincontext.org/fallen-angel-by-alexandre-cabanel/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CFallen%20Angel%E2%80%9D%20by%20Alexandre%20Cabanel%20%E2%80%93%20The%20Famous%20Painting%20of%20Lucifer

https://www.independent.ie/entertainment/what-lies-beneath-lange-dechu-the-fallen-angel-by-alexandre-cabanel-37161827.html

https://artfilemagazine.com/fallen-angel-by-alexandre-cabanel/

https://medium.com/data-driven-fiction/the-famous-painting-of-lucifer-55e689bfb689

https://en.wahooart.com/@@/8BWMPJ-Alexandre-Cabanel-Fallen-Angel

https://ancientsstudies.tumblr.com/post/656066515147374592/the-fallen-angel-alexandre-cabanel-the-fallen RileyXeon (talk) 08:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I just released and apologies some blogs where added into the list, I didn't see you saying to not add that sorry, but reliable sources are in the list RileyXeon (talk) 08:20, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UFO sighting in Brighton, Victoria (1970/71) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, UFO sighting in Brighton, Victoria (1970/71), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 07:28, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor deleted this article and turned it into a redirect. I have made it into a draft instead so you can find sources. --Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 07:31, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nu Papyrus of Ani.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nu Papyrus of Ani.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nu (mythology), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fairytechno[edit]

Hello, RileyXeon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fairytechno".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning about copyvio[edit]

this refers to your edit at Ancient Egyptian creation myths. If you continue to add copyvio, or unsourced material, expect to be blocked. Doug Weller talk 16:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Fallen Angel (Cabanel) (September 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Just two sources are cited. One is a video, written and narrated anonymously and, it would seem, for a young audience. The other is also anonymous and is related to a retailer. This painting may indeed be significant. If so, show it, by summarizing what's written about it in books about art history, etc, and web pages that are written for adults and not for sales.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Fallen Angel (Cabanel) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 11:26, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Fallen Angel (Cabanel) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Fallen Angel (Cabanel). Thanks! Hoary (talk) 03:28, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 3.14 (Poppy song)[edit]

Hello, RileyXeon,

Thank you for creating 3.14 (Poppy song).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hey, thanks for creating this, but as it is now, it needs more sourcing and definitely not those YouTube source. From this I can see that there are some sources to add. For the meantime, I'll be moving it to draft where you can work on it. When you're done, ping me and I'll review it.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Idoghor Melody}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 07:40, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3.14 (Poppy song) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, 3.14 (Poppy song), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 07:42, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Devil in Christianity[edit]

Hey Riley! I appreciate the images you are adding to this article, but it is getting a bit overloaded! It is WP policy [1] to Avoid placing images on the left hand side ... Avoid sandwiching text between two images This article now has so many images, it has caused violation of these 2 guidelines. It would be good if you would consider moving images accordingly. Images should reflect the content they are next to as well, so if they can't be moved, they should just be removed. Thank you so much! Jenhawk777 (talk) 17:42, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Guitarist Jennifer Batten.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Guitarist Jennifer Batten.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:48, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Guitarist Jennifer Batten.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Guitarist Jennifer Batten.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Richard Ramirez (centre) with his attorneys, 1990.png[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Richard Ramirez (centre) with his attorneys, 1990.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See https://www.britannica.com/biography/Richard-Ramirez/images-videos where image credits are provided. -- Whpq (talk) 13:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Poppy performing "Eat" at the 63rd GRAMMY Awards.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Poppy performing "Eat" at the 63rd GRAMMY Awards.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 23:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Sam and Colby during the Estes method.jpeg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Sam and Colby during the Estes method.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 23:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Satanists rally in 'Hail Satan?'.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Satanists rally in 'Hail Satan?'.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 23:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:F-117 Nighthawk.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:F-117 Nighthawk.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 23:53, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Chalchiuhtlicue.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Chalchiuhtlicue.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:39, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Mehet-Weret.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Mehet-Weret.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:41, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Akhenaten raise offerings to the Aten.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Akhenaten raise offerings to the Aten.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:48, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Hi RileyXeon! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Cross of Saint Peter that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. NebY (talk) 13:45, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for this information RileyXeon (talk) 19:47, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jennifer Batten performing with Michael Jackson.webp[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jennifer Batten performing with Michael Jackson.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Loded Diper perfoming at Plainview's Most Talented.webp[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Loded Diper perfoming at Plainview's Most Talented.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:26, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Estes method moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Estes method, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Androgyne Pride-Flag.webp[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Androgyne Pride-Flag.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Chalchiuhtlicue-svg.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Chalchiuhtlicue-svg.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 07:00, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Your edit to Aztec Death Whistle has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for awaring me, thanks RileyXeon (talk) 23:00, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Yeezus, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:59, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gokuism[edit]

Hello, RileyXeon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gokuism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:UFO sighting in Brighton, Victoria (1970/71)[edit]

Hello, RileyXeon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:UFO sighting in Brighton, Victoria (1970/71), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Fallen Angel (Cabanel)[edit]

Hello, RileyXeon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Fallen Angel (Cabanel), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:3.14 (Poppy song)[edit]

Hello, RileyXeon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:3.14 (Poppy song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop messing around with the Egyptian pages.[edit]

Your edits are fruitless and random because they give no new or real information. All you are doing is being a big child with them thinking you know best when it makes me wonder what you know at all.

You are a child not an Egyptologist, leave it alone. 2A00:23EE:15A0:C037:FA5C:4623:1D6A:A327 (talk) 11:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Number one of this seems very unprofessional and rude response, and secondly you can't tell me what pages I can and cannot edit

RileyXeon (talk) 20:21, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Your edit to Hunefer has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 23:57, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you for making me aware, I'll make sure not to add any copyrighted material next time, thanks RileyXeon (talk) 00:03, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Sokar gold statue.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Sokar gold statue.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:UFO sighting in Brighton, Victoria (1970/71)[edit]

Hello, RileyXeon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "71)".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ancient Egyptian winged sun[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ancient Egyptian winged sun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://12160.info/profiles/blogs/illuminati-sun-symbolism-auto-logos-winged-solar-disk-part-3-3. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AmusingWeasel (talk) 14:01, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:3.14 (Poppy song)[edit]

Hello, RileyXeon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "3.14".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Estes method[edit]

Hello, RileyXeon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Estes method, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apollo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Academy of Athens.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring over image at Aphrodite[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Aphrodite. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. This article has Good article status. I have restored the image used in the infobox, prior to your disruptive edit-warring over the most suitable image to use there. If you've a better case to argue, please do so on the article talk page. Haploidavey (talk) 11:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this wasn't an edit war, but an miss understanding. I forgot to add a reason for why I thought a specific image was more suitable to use for the main, and after I have my reason, the user who previously changed it understood and excepted my edit. RileyXeon (talk) 12:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So if I could may I change it back to the image I edited as the main, sorry if that sounds rude I am in no means to be sound that way RileyXeon (talk) 12:18, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You [unpleasant person][edit]

(Redacted) 2A00:23EE:14F0:5DFB:8E53:5021:EB2B:3535 (talk) 02:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry what? I don't understand why you seem so upset with me? RileyXeon (talk) 02:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some disruptive account, pay them no mind. I've redacted this; feel free to remove the rest if you want. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 05:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much :) RileyXeon (talk) 08:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Anubis, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please review WP:IPCV as well. DonIago (talk) 19:48, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 03:09, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anzû, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siris.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vector images of ancient Egyptian deities[edit]

I've userfied (WP:UFY) User:RileyXeon/Vector images of ancient Egyptian deities, as having the article in the mainspace is not WP:NOTABLE, or WP:ENCYCLOPEDIC. However, rather than tagging it for WP:CSD, I've put it in your userspace, as you may want it.

I've had to tag the resulting redirect from the move with WP:R2, as it's now a forbidden cross-namespace redirect (WP:CNR). Please WP:PING me (@) if you reply. – CityUrbanism 🗩 🖉 10:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CityUrbanism Thank you for notifying me. How would I be able to fix the article so it is appropriate to become a public page rathe than a WP:CSD RileyXeon (talk) 10:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only the redirect has been tagged with WP:CSD, and that will be deleted as it's forbidden. The page still exists, in your userspace, as User:RileyXeon/Vector images of ancient Egyptian deities.

If you want to create a mainspace article on the subject, I don't think it's WP:NOTABLE. However, I'm not an expert on Wikipedia articles about Wikipedia things, so I'd recommend putting the tag {{help me}} on the talk page of User:RileyXeon/Vector images of ancient Egyptian deities, and explaining what you want to do. – CityUrbanism 🗩 🖉 10:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you very much. RileyXeon (talk) 10:57, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you added WP:NOWIKI tags to Template:Help me. I've fixed it for you. – CityUrbanism 🗩 🖉 11:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. RileyXeon (talk) 11:04, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Kyokushin Karate Yoko Do Mawashi Kaiten Geri.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Kyokushin Karate Yoko Do Mawashi Kaiten Geri.gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 06:57, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yoko Do Mawashi Kaiten Geri moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Yoko Do Mawashi Kaiten Geri, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:10, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for making me aware. Ill try and find more suitable and reliable sources RileyXeon (talk) 23:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Tsuneari Yahiro at the 2020 Summer Olympics.webp[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tsuneari Yahiro at the 2020 Summer Olympics.webp. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:40, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Tsuneari Yahiro.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tsuneari Yahiro.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Marchjuly (talk) 07:42, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Sanchez Jaime at the 2020 Summer Olympics.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sanchez Jaime at the 2020 Summer Olympics.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sanchez Jaime at the 2020 Summer Olympics.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Sanchez Jaime at the 2020 Summer Olympics.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:54, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sakura Sawashima[edit]

The article Sakura Sawashima has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Meets neither WP:GNG nor WP:NSPORT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:07, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tomb TT3 of Pashedu (Kairoinfo4u) (cropped).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tomb TT3 of Pashedu (Kairoinfo4u) (cropped).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More informations on Horus[edit]

Hello can I add informations on Horus and say that he is also the god of winter, storms, strength and medicine please??? If I found a true source??? 2A02:1388:152:3C13:0:0:4B99:D22B (talk) 15:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Winter Gods[edit]

Or can you make a Page named winter gods??? Gods that are associated with winter. And another page winter goddesses??? 2A02:1388:152:3C13:0:0:4B99:D22B (talk) 15:47, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is already an article related to this topic: Deities and personifications of seasons RileyXeon (talk) 23:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More informations for Agathodaemons[edit]

Hello RileyXeon can you please add more true informations about the agathodaemons from agathodaimones in durban please???Those are more and canon informations/facts about the greek noble spirits one of them claims that agathodaemons are also psychopoms.Im sure you'll find intersting facts about them. 2A02:586:1E33:AA75:9450:AFE9:A79B:1094 (talk) 13:27, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gayatri vintage Indian devotional print.webp[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gayatri vintage Indian devotional print.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kū, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Museum of Ethnology.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Evil entities in Christianity for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evil entities in Christianity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evil entities in Christianity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PepperBeast (talk) 14:03, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RileyXeon, thank you for your contribution, both in creating the article and in considering its deletion: profitable in both cases. — Mark (Mkmcconn) ** 04:15, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hawaii § Campaign to upload Lāhainā photographs[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hawaii § Campaign to upload Lāhainā photographs.

Concern regarding Draft:Yoko Do Mawashi Kaiten Geri[edit]

Hello, RileyXeon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yoko Do Mawashi Kaiten Geri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aztec Death Whistle.mp3[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aztec Death Whistle.mp3. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]