User talk:Rosedelune

Walking on the Chinese Wall

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Please add at least a few lines of text to your article. Just headlines and an infobox aren't sufficient and someone might tag your article for deletion. Feel free to contact me on my talk page for help. De728631 (talk) 20:42, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's better. But then somebody had been faster than you long ago and wrote Chinese Wall (album) ;) Keep up the work though and go on editing Wikipedia. De728631 (talk) 20:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion notice

A tag has been placed on Walking On The Chinese Wall (Song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Looneyman (talk) 21:14, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You could have simply used the Walking on the Chinese Wall page instead of creating a new one. I've started a song stub over there. Let the admins delete the above named (Song)-page, we don't need that one. De728631 (talk) 21:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is a point actually, why create two seperate articles on the same song? Looneyman (talk) 21:20, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Walking On The Chinese Wall

A tag has been placed on Walking On The Chinese Wall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. role^player 21:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you could see, the deletion has been declined. De728631 (talk) 21:30, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello Rosedelune, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Roleplayer Good luck, and have fun. --role^player 21:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination for Walking On The Chinese Wall (German album)

Hi, just a courtesy note to let you know I've nominated the above page for deletion. My rational is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walking On The Chinese Wall (German album). Feel free to add anything to it that might save it from deletion and to contact me if I can be of any assistance in that. Kind regards, HJMitchell You rang? 08:14, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Welcome To The Edge - Billie Hughes.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Welcome To The Edge - Billie Hughes.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 04:43, 19 September 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:43, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editing with a conflict of interest

I'd likek to bring to your attention the Wikipedia policy on editing with a conflict of interest. You can find it at WP:COI. Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:16, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/If You'd Only Believe.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cerebellum (talk) 22:29, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Heart of love

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Heart of love requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WarlordFrederick (talk) 23:52, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Heart of love

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Heart of love requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Peridon (talk) 09:44, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. When you recently edited Heart of love, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cashbox and Jamie Bond (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/If You'd Only Believe.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 21:46, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Rosedelune. You have new messages at Aaron Booth's talk page.
Message added 23:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Aaron Booth (talk) 23:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

If You'd Only Believe (song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Aaron Booth (talk) 02:37, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albert Grossman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lazarus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Private Corner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Double Trouble. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Walking On The Chinese Wall Philip Bailey single.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Walking On The Chinese Wall Philip Bailey single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:38, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bette Midler Night And Day single cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bette Midler Night And Day single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited So Hard To Know, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Let's Get Lost. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Caught in that Feeling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew Tuason, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sam Lee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Andrew Tuason

added a link pointing to Lucky in Love

Fernando Osorio

added a link pointing to Único

Philipp Steinke

added a link pointing to Único

Roxanne Seeman

added a link pointing to Único

Which Way, Robert Frost

added a link pointing to Up

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Paolo Onesa

added a link pointing to Lucky in Love

Which Way, Robert Frost

added a link pointing to Lucky in Love

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Night and Day (Bette Midler song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seeman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lazarus - Lazarus album cover artwork.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lazarus - Lazarus album cover artwork.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rosedelune. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rosedelune. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Private conner 2.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Private conner 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rosedelune. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited People and Places (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BMG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Arif Mardin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Boy Meets Girl

I'd Fly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Michael Thompson

The Greatest Ears in Town: The Arif Mardin Story (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Boy Meets Girl

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Un Uomo Felice

Please note that you still haven't shown any notability for the album itself - if other artists have covered some of the tracks from the album, that demonstrates some notability for the individual songs, not the album. Please also note that Discogs and Secondhandsongs are not reliable sources to use as references because they can be edited by anyone, and the information cannot be verified. Thank you. Richard3120 (talk) 10:38, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Un Uomo Felice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mine and Mina

Eumir Deodato (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Love Island

Roxanne Seeman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Everyday Is Christmas

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tequila Mockingbird (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tequila Mockingbird (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tequila Mockingbird (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richard3120 (talk) 23:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tahiti Hut for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tahiti Hut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tahiti Hut until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richard3120 (talk) 12:18, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hm

Two important questions.

Why did you choose to leave a message for me, out of all people?
What if any is your connection to that song?

Once you've answered those, we can move on to addressing your issue. DS (talk) 14:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Review of Editor Nomination to Delete of pages already reviewed before they can Nominate for Deletion

I now think I answered in the wrong place. I'm exhausted from this. I hope I didn't make a mistake but to answer your question I looked at notifications and saw that you were a reviewer of two articles I created - one around six years ago I think and one this year. There weren't that many articles created and reviewed so you were not very far down the list. I also wrote to Sagospirit who reviewed Tahiti Hut. I think a guideline should be suggested if not in place, that before an editor Nominates to Delete a page that has been reviewed by an administrator, the administrator should be "pinged" to review that editors' Nomination to Delete - and that editors Nominations to Delete and their rationale and the tone of the commentary should be reviewed and evaluated before creators other community members are dragged into a discussion wasting time better spent on improving an article or creating a new one. Rosedelune (talk) 16:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rosedelune (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Never had fake accounts, never paid editors, never sock puppeteering, no sock puppets. PZiders was a young man whom I met around ten years ago. A real person with his own account. I am not requesting an unblock now while you are investigating but I hope you are successful in the pursuit of your investigation so that this can be confirmed to your satisfaction and you can unblock whomever else has been affected and in whatever time it takes, unblock my account. I have no immediate need of editing: administrators have reviewed pages created for over ten years including at least one of the two pages before they were Nominated for Deletion. Would most appreciate your consideration. Rosedelune (talk) 00:14, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. See below. Huon (talk) 03:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How are you related to User:Hiroman60 (an account that has never done anything except vote to keep at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tequila Mockingbird (song) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tahiti Hut)? How about to Roxanne Seeman and the other major contributors to that article, such as User:USC_Ben_Tan and User:CareKidney? ST47 (talk) 00:19, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rosedelune (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

A lot of young people come by my place and want to learn things about the music business. I am a mentor. When they do not know how to record, they observe but want to do something music-related to contribute. I also learn from them because if you review my editing, I am basic. Until this week, I knew nothing about how to even reply on my user page. Over the years (looks like since 2008) pages have mostly been basic - album pages with track listings, song pages, with Billboard citations. I've learned the inline citations over the last year or two because of people coming by. Additionally, young people come by from China and all over the world. They want to do something and offer to translate anything. This is why pages are translated into different languages. No one is being hired to do this. The Double Trouble page for Jacky Cheung in the Chinese wikipedia has a tag that says it is a bad translation. So that would be an instance where one of these young people from China would love to edit it -- but wikipedia is blocked in China. They use Baidu. Chinese in America might see it but they wouldn't even think to look there. Re Hiroman60, I have no relation. I suspect that because Earth, Wind & Fire are being honored at the Kennedy Center and are getting a lot of attention, that wikipedia pages involving the band and members will get more attention. I hope this makes sense. Also I wanted to reply to DS but I put my reply to him on my talk page instead of his before I was blocked, simply because I am just learning how to do this. If he has not seen it, I would most appreciate if you would let him know. DS has reviewed articles I have created 6 years ago and this year which is why I tried writing to him, because I do not know how to contact administrators for help and reached out to two who have reviewed pages created. Rosedelune (talk) 00:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. See below. Huon (talk) 03:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rosedelune (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand you are making an investigation for sock puppetry - I don't know whether the page is going to be closed before your investigation is concluded but it appears on the page as if the it is a conclusion. In looking at prior posts on my talk page, there is what I think an earlier post from Richard3120 for the album page Un Uomo Felice by Riccardo Cocciante saying that notability wasn't established. I then added citations including a Billboard Chart page showing this album was on the Billboard Italy Chart for weeks or months and others. He also said something about the covers by other artists not having to do with the album page not understanding that the Un Uomo Felice album contains duets with notable artists. These are of the most significant artists in Italy. Richard3120 then began redirecting pages I created without tagging or merging. Then Tequila Mockingbird, Nominating for Deletion. I did everything I could to revise, edit per criticisms. add citations to Tequila Mockingbird. Then he Nominated Tahiti Hut for Deletion saying it was on a non-notable album and it was a session out-take. I pointed out the album had been on the chart for months and there was a redirect that I could not see how to revert, as I try to create an album page first, he conceded that the album was notable. All with accusations to open an investigation which then goes on the page branding me as a sock puppet. In your investigation I hope you consider this because if you also go through the notifications I receive, administrators have reviewed my pages with no incident. In the three or less times in over ten years there has been a deletion or something like that, I have never responded. I learn something from it that I didn't know before and move on. I don't know how Wikipedia goes about handling what I am experiencing but this is why I commented in detail in my replies which are now crossed out. I am not asking you to not cross them out but the user Doomsdayer (there's a number after that but I don't have the time to go back and look at it but it's on the page) said he was following the discussion and came out with a compromise to merge. All of this is new to me but I'm guessing others are following the page too and now, before the investigation is concluded, anyone who has looked at it is concluding I am a sock puppet and that everything Richard3120 is saying and doing must be justified or, they just don't want to get involved. There was one reply to my post on my talk page (I think that's where it is) sympathizing about Overzealous deleting. I am guessing it must have been Richard3120 who has now redirected the album page for Un Uomo Felice, in effect deleting all of the information for it, after branding me as a sock puppet and getting me blocked. As I have said, I am not asking you to unblock me now while you are making your investigation as I do not have the time to ask for a discussion on undoing the redirect for Un Uomo Felice but I think in this investigation it should be looked at. When I did decide to take the time to add citations, revise, edit, it was met with the snarky comment "Do they ever sleep?" To begin with, Richard3120 said in his Nomination to Delete the "Tequila Mockingbird (song)" page, "an editor might say three recordings must count for something"... So may I please request that it is clarified that I am under investigation but the results are not conclusive. Say whatever you will, but there is NO sock puppetry, no one's being paid, and nothing like this has occurred since this account was opened at least going back to 2008. May I also suggest that there is a pattern of the behavior of Richard3120 that could also be investigated and that investigation, should you chose to initiate, could also be noted on the talk page or whatever it is called where all of this is being discussed, of the Nomination for Deletion. Rosedelune (talk) 17:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC) Rosedelune (talk) 17:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. See below. Huon (talk) 03:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Multiple unblock requests

It is abusive to have multiple open unblock requests. Which single one do you wish us to review? --Yamla (talk) 13:15, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rosedelune (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have explained, no paid editors, no sock puppetry, no intended or unintended abuse. contributors User:USC_Ben_Tan and User:CareKidney were visiting my place and we were learning together. After the last ten days of reading about the culture of Wikipedia, I understand that what occurred may appear to be fake accounts but these are real people and the edits were such as labelling links, adding citations, creating boxes with credits from allmusic.com for album and related music pages on the same IP. So please unblock CareKidney and USC Ben Tan first but none of us have any intent in misuse or abusive behavior. If anything, now that I have learned more about the back end culture, the commentary of Richard3120 and Sergecross93 on the Nomination for Deletion of Tequila Mockingbird is WP: Incivility. I have no interest in edit warring or getting dragged into unpleasant controversy with WP:OZD. WP:AGF I understand wikipedia has serious issues with paid editors and sock puppeteering but that is not the case herea: this was an unfortunate mistake of editors without experience in the rules of wikipedia making contributions such as adding citations and labelling external links, that were not related to any opinions, facts only, in good faith, on the same IP. Regarding the Un Uomo Felice album page which Richard3120 redirected, this album was in the Wikipedia Italiano. I translated and improved the page. Richard3120 said no notability then redirected it, after all the work to create it, it just disappears. I then added citations including Billboard Hits of the World chart page with a chart for Italy showing the album on the top ten, along with online newspaper article(s) about the notable singers who contributed duet performances. Richard3120 replied that there was no Billboard Italy chart that year, that it was Musica e dischi as that is in small print on the Billboard Hits of The World Charts under the Italy Chart listing, which obviously was recognized by Billboard as they printed it with all of the other countries and Musica e dischi, was in fact the National Chart, but in the view of Richard3120 the Billboard citation was not a reliable source. The arguments and deletions are, in my opinion and with regard to any editor creating a page that is music related: Civil POV pushing, WP:CPP, WP:OWN and WP:OZD, for example A New Hope the administator SoWhy declined the Speedy deletion by Richard3120. When confronted by an administrator the error is acknowledged but from what I am seeing, administrators who do review these pages, do not want to get involved in a discussion that spins out interminably as WP:CPP. The idea of Wikipedia as I understood it, was to encourage improvement of the articles, for which there are appropriate tags, so that editors may continue to edit productively and peacefully. Rosedelune (talk) 18:51, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Much of this request (and the ones above) is completely irrelevant to the issue at hand. This is not the place to re-litigate deletion discussions or whether articles should be turned into redirects. Regarding the sockpuppetry, I refer you to WP:MEAT and WP:COWORKER. There's also an indication that this account may be compromised; see this comment. Huon (talk) 03:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked

I warned you, "It is abusive to have multiple open unblock requests." Your response? Yet another unblock request, while you still had multiple other requests open. I have revoked talk page access. You are either trolling or you aren't sufficiently competent to edit here. If your four open unblock requests are declined, that would leave you with WP:UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 18:54, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamie deRoy has been accepted

Jamie deRoy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 22:00, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access reinstated

As per your email request, I have reinstated your talk page access. This is solely so you can make an unblock request. Note that if you once again post multiple simultaneous open unblock requests at the same time, or if your unblock request does not address the reason for your block, you will once again lose access to your talk page. Take your time, read WP:MEAT and WP:COWORKER and in particular, WP:GAB. You don't need to post an unblock request today, it's far more important that you take yout time and get it right than that you get it done quickly. --Yamla (talk) 11:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Welcome To The Edge Wink b-side single cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Welcome To The Edge Wink b-side single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]