User talk:Silence of Lambs

Welcome!

Hello, Silence of Lambs! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! StaticVapor message me! 16:49, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Orphaned non-free image File:WWE SmackDown Logo 2019.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WWE SmackDown Logo 2019.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leaders of the Syrian Civil War for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leaders of the Syrian Civil War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leaders of the Syrian Civil War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 07:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Anti-Zionists for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Anti-Zionists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Anti-Zionists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. James Richards (talk) 15:29, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COVID-19 pandemic in the post-Soviet states

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into COVID-19 pandemic in the post-Soviet states. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. --John B123 (talk) 18:30, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of COVID-19 pandemic in the post-Soviet states

The article COVID-19 pandemic in the post-Soviet states has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The Soviet Union ceased to exist nearly three decades before the COVID-19 pandemic, and it doesn't make sense to have an article which consists of a list of ex-Soviet countries and summarises the pandemic in these countries.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Xwejnusgozo (talk) 10:56, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of COVID-19 pandemic in the Commonwealth of Independent States for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article COVID-19 pandemic in the Commonwealth of Independent States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COVID-19 pandemic in the Commonwealth of Independent States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Starzoner (talk) 21:03, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Poland

Please refrain from adding unclear or information which may be not entirely correct on the Poland article. Thanks. Oliszydlowski (talk) 02:36, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arbcom

When you filed your case at Arbcom, you failed to notify the users who you listed as parties to the case. You also failed to link to the previous attempts at Dispute resolution. I've completed these steps. For future reference, these are things that should be done when filing a case. — Ched (talk) 09:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

China-Taiwan articles case request declined

The arbitrators have voted to decline the case request you filed, China-Taiwan articles, for reasons including it being a content dispute and because previous conduct dispute resolution had not been attempted. Arbitration is the last step in the dispute resolution process. Arbitration cases are lengthy (usually 1 month in length) and as such less time consuming dispute resolution such as at the talk page, at the dispute resolution noticeboard, or at the administrator's incidents noticeboard is worthwhile to try first. You can view the declined case request in this permalink. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 08:23, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Silence of Lambs, Please don't unnecessary and obscure request the the arbitration commitee about any topic you can want to request. If you do this again, i want to report you to WP:ANI or WP:AIV for the distruptive edits. 180.254.167.18 (talk) 22:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue

Your edit to Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Ground Forces has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Sennecaster (What now?) 16:48, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Country data Chinese Communist Party

Template:Country data Chinese Communist Party has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. CentreLeftRight ✉ 21:44, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Names of China into Taiwan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 17:23, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:International recognition of China

Hello, Silence of Lambs. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:International recognition of China, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of current heads of state and government. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. 25stargeneral (talk) 05:28, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Democratic backsliding into Hungary. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:34, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on North Korea

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page North Korea, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:16, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited North Korea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dongye. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (third request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from South Korea into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Nobody (talk) 07:03, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on North Korea

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page North Korea, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Framawiki. I noticed that in this edit to Ghana, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Thanks, Framawiki (please notify me when you reply) 21:45, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Standard Chinese. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. A type of cabinet (talk) 21:51, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (5th request)

It appears that you copied or moved text from Xi Jinping to China under Xi Jinping. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Repeated violations of Wikipedia's attribution requirements may result in the loss of editing privileges. DanCherek (talk) 00:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I'm Ppt91. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Vladimir Putin have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Ppt91 ^talk 13:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox changes

You've made changes like the one to Beijing several times, which have now been reverted several times. At some point, this behavior is considered disruptive. On high-attention pages, there is very often a reason things are listed the specific way they are. Please ask on the relevant talk page if you have questions before making edits that seem increasingly tendentious. Cheers! Remsense诉 00:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 10:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

South Korea

Hello, I noticed you changed South Korea to Republic of Korea in some info boxed. Please don't. And please read Wikipedia:COMMONNAME. Thanks! Masterhatch (talk) 21:03, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you did it to North Korea too. And there are no sources for your edits of other or previous names for places. Can you please add sources? Masterhatch (talk) 22:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They are. It's in here or here. Look up the old CIA documents or Google Books via a search term. As for the name, we know people outside of the ROK or DPRK use South Korea or North Korea as they don't recognize each other's legitimacy.I humbly apologize if my edits aren't right. Silence of Lambs (talk) 00:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources have to be added to the articles, not your talk page. Masterhatch (talk) 01:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, can you please stop changing South Korea to Republic of Korea? Masterhatch (talk) 16:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 16:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please add edit summaries to your edits. I noticed you rarely use them. Thank you! Masterhatch (talk) 16:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're still not using edit summaries. Please use them. They really help other users. Masterhatch (talk) 01:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Still no WP:ES? - Amigao (talk) 17:15, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more communicative

Editors routinely have to undo your edits because they go against site guidelines. Please make sure to read our style guidelines on China- and Chinese-related subjects, because many of these edits are specifically addressed there. You also haven't responded to anyone previously trying to communicate about your edits, which is troubling. Please begin doing so, or your editing could be considered disruptive. Remsense诉 02:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You've been warned on many occasions, and no one makes this edit without being deliberately disruptive and trying to have fun. It's starting to appear you're not interested in building a collaborative encyclopaedia, but are instead just here to entertain yourself or WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. When you return from your block I advise you to read Wikipedia's policies and guidelines (something you should already have done and have been pointed out to you) and engage in the community in a collaborative manner. If you continue with your unsourced and disruptive edits, you will be blocked again. Canterbury Tail talk 11:31, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Let's discuss further in your talk page. Silence of Lambs (talk) 12:43, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop piping historical names to earlier forms. Like it says in MOS:ZH which I've asked you to look at, we do not do that. Remsense诉 01:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 11:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Continued disruption

Okay, now it seems you're just being deliberately disruptive. Changing links to Taiwan to be to Taiwan Province, altering things to include them more in mainland China, this is disruptive and it's quite clear you understand this. If you do not desist from such continued disruptive editing you will be blocked. Canterbury Tail talk 12:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually @Canterbury Tail there is a misunderstanding. You do really realize that Taiwan Province is actually one of the ROC's two nominally active provinces right? This and Fuchien along with Taipei and five cities form 8 subdivisions. You may have to go deeper than that. Silence of Lambs (talk) 17:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 12:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, I'm Amigao. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, China–Hungary relations, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amigao (talk) 22:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Slovakia–Taiwan relations, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Amigao (talk) 14:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Moxy🍁 17:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Succession of states, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Removal of references?? Moxy🍁 18:37, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Succession of states. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Amigao (talk) 03:07, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uganda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page G77.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Original research on Two Chinas

You cannot add material to an article claiming some connection or relevance to the topic if the sources are not explicitly making that same connection. That is called original research. Remsense诉 18:00, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Amigao (talk) 03:13, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry. I did not have the time to do so. Silence of Lambs (talk) 00:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

As per the thread on ANI, and your continued

Refusal to communicate

Refusal to listen

POV pushing

Continual unsourced edits

Faking sources (making claims not in the sources)

Using Wikipedia for your own personal workview and soapboxing

Pushing original research

Lack of competence

Attempting to right great wrongs

General disruption

Consensus on the ANI thread

you have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. It seems you are not a good fit for the project. You've had plenty of time to learn, change, listen and participate in a communal project but have refused to do so. Canterbury Tail talk 17:50, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 17:50, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Silence of Lambs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi I wasn't aware, but how do I get unblocked by any chance? Sorry I was largely busy, but I actually want to settle this like fellow Wikipedians. The reason I edited the Taitung County article is because you're not aware the ROC has eight first level provincial subdivisions, albeit two of them are non-functional. If I am indefinitely blocked, what will I do in the meantime? Could I walk away from Wikipedia or get involved in another Wikimedia project?

However, I would also request for a 2nd chance in order to improve my Taiwan-related articles. I admit that my edits to Taiwan-related articles including Taoyuan, Taiwan are poorly edited wrong but I nearly have lost my faith to the Wikipedia community. I even failed to show my trust to everyone involved. If that proposal is denied, I would try using a standard offer as mentioned above and come back when I am ready. --Silence of Lambs (talk) 23:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You may edit another Wikimedia Foundation project where you are not blocked. To be unblocked here, please specifically address the concerns that led to your block and tell what will change in the future. A wait may not be a bad idea, to allow you to build skills elsewhere and to digest the comments that have been made about you. 331dot (talk) 08:55, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.