User talk:Spy007au/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

non-free image in userspace[edit]

Hi, in your userspace draft in User:Spy007au/Sandbox5]] you re-included an image here. Non-free images are only allowed to be used in mainspace articles, they can not be used in userspace drafts (or anywhere outside of mainspace). See WP:NFCC#9 for more info. May I ask you to remove the image while you are still working on it in your userspace, and re-insert it when it has moved to mainspace? Thanks. --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:21, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Long_Gone_Movie.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Long_Gone_Movie.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 05:39, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Long Gone (film)[edit]

Calmer Waters 00:04, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Long time no speak[edit]

Trust all is well SatuSuro 09:37, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yup I am very annoyed I never got you that article you had hoped for all those years ago - I cannot remember the title but... SatuSuro 12:45, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Phil Lamason Interview.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Phil Lamason Interview.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:48, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have subitted an email reply and the image is now "OTRS pending". Spy007au (talk) 06:22, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added name[edit]

Thanks for adding Alfred Balachowsk's name to the Stéphane Hessel article. However, did you check the ref to make sure it was in there? If not, that needs to be fixed. Since you can't fix the ref, the sentence needs to be adjusted (doesn't it?), perhaps by finding an additional ref with his name mentioned. Thanks! Marrante (talk) 07:48, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for picking that up - I have added a reliable reference. Cheers, Spy007au (talk) 08:47, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for following up. Marrante (talk) 09:17, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

KLB Club[edit]

I apologize for contacting you this way but I was unsure of how to reach you. I am hoping to get some information from you regarding the KLB Club. My grandfather was a member but didn't talk about it much and now that he has passed I would very much like to get more information. If you can help me or point me in the right direction I would be very grateful. If this is not the forum for this then again, I apologize. I am new to Wikipedia. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.171.132.46 (talk) 22:53, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help. What information are you after? I own several books related to the KLB Club and also own 2 very good documentary films (DVD's). I have also met Phil Lamason, the senior officer at Buchenwald and spoke extensively with his son recently. If you could let me know exactly what you are after, I'll try and help in any way I can. Regards, Spy007au (talk) 08:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:The sinking of the Steamship Ville du Havre.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:The sinking of the Steamship Ville du Havre.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Finavon (talk) 11:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All fixed. Cheers, Spy007au (talk) 02:54, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Finavon (talk) 21:22, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KLB Club[edit]

Thank you so much for responding. I would appreciate any and all information you are willing to share. I have to tell you that I don't know much and am completely obsessed with getting answers and information specifically pertaining to my grandfather but also about the story as a whole. Is this the best way for us to communicate? I am hesitant to include any personal info (as I told you, I am new to Wikipedia). If you could advise me as to the best way for us to communicate I would be grateful. Thank you. I am so excited to move forward. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.171.132.46 (talk) 20:33, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You can contact me at: spy007au@gmail.com

The clipper Brabloch[edit]

The clipper was part of the Loch Line...according to James Lilburn snr it was the last ship added to the fleet and by far the largest 3 masted ship built for its time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.227.160 (talk) 07:56, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will stand corrected, but can you send me a reliable source or reference for that? Thanks, Spy007au (talk) 10:53, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The clipper Brabloch[edit]

http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/result?q=brabloch&l-category=Advertising

Troll through these ad's you'll see what I mean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.227.160 (talk) 14:33, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I have done some further research and you are in deed correct, so I will stand corrected. The interesting issue here is that in all my research, it states there were only 25 ships in the Lock Line fleet. If that is correct, we now have 26 ships in the list - so one of the other ships should not belong there? More reading and research to do. Appreciate your help. Regards Spy007au (talk) 05:05, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Napoleon III.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Napoleon III.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:09, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All fixed. Cheers, Spy007au (talk) 22:13, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You go to Wikipedia:ITNC. Cheers :) Brian | (Talk) 15:12, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Lamason 11[edit]

Regarding our changes to Phil Lamason, where do we go from here?. You say your reference goes to a book which says "it was a note." (It is not accessible to the readers). I edited per the reference given which is accessible to readers, which states "At great risk, word was sent out to the German Luftwaffe ......". These guys were on death row, so the likelihood of someone deliberately putting incriminating info on paper is zilch. Why don't we simply say "information was passed" to the Luftwaffe? Do you think that gets around it? 03:43, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

I have the book in front of me, so I'll quote exactly what it says: Their future looked bleak, though Lamason and most of his group would eventually make it out of Buchenwald with the help of Burney, who had a note smuggled out to a nearby Luftwaffe station at Nohra, informing them that Allied aircrew were being held at the camp. When you read this in conjunction with the book Destination Buchenwald (page 133) which states: They (Burney & Lamason) decided to smuggle out a note, to be delivered to the Luftwaffe hieracry, to let them know that aircrew personnel were being illegally held in a concentration camp. Given that there is two independent sources of information, both stating it was a note, makes it fairly certain for me. Also, and this is just my opinion, given the severity of their situation, I would think having important facts 'not lost in verbal translation', would be crucial. An actual note, (written by Lamason or Burney I assume?), would be treated far more seriously by the Luftwaffe. The fact that books are being used as references should not be an issue, provided they are legitimate sources (which both books are). Anyway, have a think of what I have said and let me know. Cheers, Spy007au (talk) 04:11, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Jennifer Cheesman at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:54, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Julie Nykiel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Noarlunga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Assistance[edit]

Hey, you mean like this? With the collapsed table. With left from right you mean the col template? Kante4 (talk) 23:52, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karin McRobert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:51, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kathy Foster (basketball), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Launceston and Vice-captain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
For all your fantastic articles on athletes and former athletes :). Ironholds (talk) 22:37, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emily McInerny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Junior World Championships (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nom[edit]

Sorry Ive not had time to nominate the article but I have tweaked it in a number of areas to make sure its OK. I think it will be OK but it does have 1536 characters which is only 36 characters above the limit which may attract some comment. Nice article Victuallers (talk) 07:49, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Emily McInerny at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 18:58, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Emily McInerny[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Emily McInerny at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Redtigerxyz Talk 17:34, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This currently needs your attention: a quid pro quo review is required for it to proceed. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:27, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please excuse my ignorance, but quid pro quo means "this for that". But what exactly are you asking me to do? Thanks, Spy007au (talk) 09:27, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For those people who have previously submitted at least five of their articles to DYK, additional submissions require the nominator to perform a review of another nominated article for their own article to be eligible: a quid pro quo (QPQ) review. Emily McInerny qualifies in terms of its quality, but you have not yet done a review of another person's article, and you have well over five previous submissions. This is the only thing holding up final approval of Emily at this time.
There's a DYK reviewing guide at WP:DYKR, and the rules for articles are at WP:DYK and WP:DYKSG. There's also a brief explanation on the nominations page, and a summary in brief above the edit window when you're editing a nomination template. Please feel free to let me know if you have any further questions. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:39, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the clarification. I have reviewed Indigo Lake (Ohio). Spy007au (talk) 10:01, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied on it, but I think the review was technically incorrect as the 1500 character limit includes spaces (see criterion A1).--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 10:25, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I replied. If the source is reliable, we'll have to find another reviewer as I don't think you can approve a hook you came up with.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 16:18, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That is an important point: if a reviewer proposes a new hook, that hook needs a new reviewer. However, Spy007au doesn't appear to have completed the rest of the review: I see no signs that there have been neutrality or paraphrasing checks on the article, for example, and the first reference citation is a bare ref, something that is not allowed in a nominated article and must be fixed. The Haunted Cuyahoga site is self-published and does not appear sufficiently reliable by Wikipedia standards. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:08, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
With all due respect to everyone, I'll bow out and you can remove my DYK nomination. I enjoy writing articles, and occasionally I would DYK one (this was my first DYK nomination since July last year). But I do not enjoy reviewing or critiquing other peoples work. Sorry, it's not for me. I'll stick with writing articles only and stay away from the DYK process. Regards, Spy007au (talk) 06:37, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lucille Hamilton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Junior World Championships (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Emily McInerny[edit]

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:07, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sue Geh[edit]

I hope to visit the National Library to source her death notice in Canberra Times. I ask sent an email to ACT Sports Hall of Fame suggesting her as a possible nomination.

A well deserved nomination, good luck. Spy007au (talk) 21:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joanne Metcalfe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Junior World Championships (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

oops, good catch[edit]

1998 World championship played in 98 not 99 Thanks --SPhilbrick(Talk) 13:17, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome - nice article BTW. Regards, Spy007au (talk) 03:20, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maree Jackson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lucrative (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of women's basketball history[edit]

First I appreciate your additions to the Timeline of women's basketball history. While I am attempting to search for non-US items, so it isn't overly US oriented, my background is US, so it makes it easier for me to find US related items.

I've been mulling over writing some sort of criteria for inclusion. I haven't yet, but maybe this will spur me to do so.

If noting that Australia being the 52nd member of an organization is notable, then surely there are 51 other items of equal notability. And that would be hopelessly cluttering. I'm going to remove it, but let's talk.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 23:13, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK, no worries. Thanks for letting me know. Cheers, Spy007au (talk) 23:24, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Robyn Maher.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sumanch (talk) 05:20, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Robyn Maher.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Robyn Maher.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.basketball.net.au/index.php?id=942. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Darkwind (talk) 06:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Robyn Maher.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Robyn Maher.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.basketball.net.au/index.php?id=942. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. KTC (talk) 14:46, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Claxton Shield teams[edit]

Hi mate, just brought up a question over on the Claxton Shield talk page, just after your thoughts. --Dan027 (talk) 06:58, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Robbie Cadee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Victoria
Sandra Tomlinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Victoria

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:04, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Argosy Lemal.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Argosy Lemal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:56, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the appropriate link to the file / page that shows all relevant details. This should satisfy your requirements. Regards, Spy007au (talk) 09:31, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barrtelot 1886.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Barrtelot 1886.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:32, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to start a women's basketball task force[edit]

I'm very interested in improving coverage of women's basketball. I thought briefly about forming a Wikiproject, but while researching, realized that a task force would be ideal. There are two major advantages of a task force over a Wikiproject. First is that the task force can leave some of the bureaucracy to the parent Wikiproject. Second, and possibly more important, is that a task force can have more than one parent Wikiproject. While WikiProject Basketball is an obvious parent, so is WikiProject Women's sport, and the task force may be able to draw from both.

According to this process for starting a task force, the first thing to do is gather consensus, so I am sending this to some editors who have been active in editing relevant articles. If there is sufficient interest, I'll take a first stab at filling out the task force template and creating a draft task force page.

At this point, all I need is an answer to two questions:

  1. I would (or would not) be interested in being part of a task force to improve the coverage of women's basketball
  2. I think a different approach would be better (followed by alternative).SPhilbrick(Talk) 12:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Basketball/Women's basketball has been created. I haven't yet added it to the Wikiproject pages, but will do that, however, I wanted to let you know it exists, and has some suggested tasks.SPhilbrick(Talk) 19:12, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

666![edit]

As one of a highly select international group, you are hereby invited to join me in celebrating my 666! (Let the games begin!) Pdfpdf (talk) 11:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jenny Whittle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gold Coast and World Junior Championships (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Fraser Barron.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fraser Barron.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:35, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Ai-Ais.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:32, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Another one of your uploads, File:Bill Parasailing.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:27, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Disambiguation link notification for January 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carla Boyd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World Junior Championships (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Lamason and Crew.JPG[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lamason and Crew.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:35, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]