User talk:Storye book/Archive 4

Images at Encaustic tile

You added the images File:Bankfield Museum 080.jpg and File:Bankfield Museum 081.jpg to this article last July. I am not sure that the photos are of genuine encaustic (2 or more colour) tiles, but of a mosaic. I have raised this at Talk:Encaustic_tile#Encaustic_or_mosaic, so you may wish to comment there. Globbet (talk) 17:54, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problem now resolved.

2a38fa1e0d2bac7625f8570d678b82ca

Geograph.org2Commons

DYK for Cliffe, Richmondshire

On January 18, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cliffe, Richmondshire, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photo's

Hiya! Like myself you appreciate good photo's. I've just deleted what I though was a very poor quality, out of focuss, low resolution photo that was probably taken on a mobile phone, from the Education section of the Huddersfield article and also the same image from the University of Huddersfield article. However the same 'photographer has also placed an image of the Kingsgate shopping centre entrance to the Huddersfield article. That is passable as a small image however when taken to its full resolution its pretty grotty and I feel it is detrimental to the article. I wondered if you would care to take a look and comment before I get accused of being to bold in deleting them! <lol> Richard Harvey (talk) 19:30, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He has a fair few uploaded to commons, see his gallery [1], some are good, which is why I am surprised those I deleted were actually uploaded. Some are good street scenes, whilst others are debatable in their relevance to Wiki. I would say he's not yet got his eye in, in that the camera does not show what his eyes are seeing, with regards to getting the right image perspective. Though thats probably due to a need for a better quality camera than a Kodak EasyShare (which have a poor optical lens for anything more than a few yards away) to reduce the curvature of walls and lamp posts, etc. I haven't seen the template you mentioned, I will have to go on a hunting session. I will leave the Kingsgate image until I find something 'none Xmassy' to replace it. I don't feel a University of Huddersfield image is required on the article, partly as there is an article on the university, but having one educational establishment image there sets a precedent to include others such as Kirklees College and Greenhead College. Richard Harvey (talk) 02:20, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I read your message and took another look at the image, enlarged to its full resolution, then deleted it from the article. :( Richard Harvey (talk) 16:17, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gabrielle Davis

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gabrielle Davis, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.canterbury.gov.uk/main.cfm?objectid=120. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problem solved; message sent to maintainer; tag removed.--Storye book (talk) 18:26, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - February 2010

Delivered February 2010 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 09:48, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:48, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roman museum

could be a lead DYK hook, but we need to relate the picture to the hook (see my comment at T:TDYK). Materialscientist (talk) 08:12, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Storye book (talk) 13:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Roman Museum

On February 9, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Roman Museum, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 06:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Westgate, Canterbury

On February 9, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Westgate, Canterbury, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 18:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for clarifying that. - Biruitorul ^Talk 02:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Westgate Hall, Canterbury

On February 14, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Westgate Hall, Canterbury, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:01, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Military navboxes

Hiya! Replied on my talkpage for continuity. Richard Harvey (talk) 15:21, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Whitstable Museum and Gallery

On February 15, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Whitstable Museum and Gallery, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 18:01, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Magnificent!

I tell you, it isn't every day a fully-fleshed, top-quality, 26k article suddenly pops up on the new page patrol. Fabulous, fabulous contribution. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:51, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you did it too. It's getting harder and harder to find new subjects with enough documentation to make something like this from scratch. All the really good titles are taken. :) I was lucky early on to discover that Ridge Route had a red link and there was a ton of info which helped me to make it into a feature, not to mention a (sadly) retired user who got some awesome photos. I've been promising myself I'd get involved in another featured article and doggone it, I will. Thanks again for such a marvelous article. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:58, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, good luck with your featured article! I haven't had the courage to try that yet.--Storye book (talk) 17:11, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heaven knows you should and I hope that you do. Gotta run, but thanks yet again for revving up my interest! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:19, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Royal Museum and Art Gallery

On February 28, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Royal Museum and Art Gallery, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ucucha 18:01, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:27, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - March 2010

Delivered March 2010 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 10:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:19, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Museum of Canterbury

On March 5, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Museum of Canterbury, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Herne Bay Pier

On March 7, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Herne Bay Pier, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Calmer Waters 06:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hampton-on-Sea

On March 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hampton-on-Sea, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on a great article, really enjoyed it. Hope you can take it to FA status. yorkshiresky (talk) 18:51, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind comment. Much appreciated.--Storye book (talk) 18:58, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

tb

Hello, Storye book. You have new messages at Skäpperöd's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: Fleas (The Good Wife)

I've responded to your comment at the DYK for Fleas (The Good Wife). Thanks for reaching out! — Hun ter Ka hn 17:13, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK length check

I went bold and added a DYK check script to your account. Revert me at will. After bypassing browser cache (Mozilla/Safari: press Ctrl-Shift-R, Internet Explorer: press Ctrl-F5), you should get a button "DYK check" under "Toolbox" in the left toolbar of your screen. The button will appear only when it is appropriate to use the tool (say, I don't see it while typing this message). The documentation is here. To check article expansion I do the following: click "DYK check" individually, on the two appropriate versions of the article (before and after expansion, as the article history indicates) and then divide the numbers manually - the tool fails too often on autochecking. Materialscientist (talk) 23:49, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

I'm working on, and very close to getting Iowa Soldiers' Orphans' Home copyright free. How long do I have to address the prose concerns until I'm out of luck because the article isn't new enough? CTJF83 chat 04:19, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations are discarded by age when they hit the bottom of the T:TDYK page, which might be a week or so, but, the answer is the sooner the better. Why? Because (i) some admins are not tolerant to old nomination (ii) the article needs time for reviewing after rewriting. If there are serious concerns, you might simply not have time to address them later. Materialscientist (talk) 04:26, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, User:Moonriddengirl is helping me, and the issues should be resolved real soon. CTJF83 chat 04:34, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All fixed, and prose is plenty long. :) CTJF83 chat 19:21, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nom for Birmingham Charity Cup

Hi there

I replied to your comments on this nom

Cheers, ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okey-dokey, cool, cheers. Better to be safe than sorry :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thx

Thanks for finding typos at DYK and approving - cheers Victuallers (talk) 23:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Please note that this is my first week of reviewing DYKs, and I've made an administrator aware of this, so there's the possibility that my reviews could be adjusted.--Storye book (talk) 08:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you back

Welcome back!--Storye book (talk) 20:06, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And it is good to see you again as well! Had i not been so busy with other things then Wikipedia i would certainly have found the time to congratulate you with your DYK spree; I see you collected a nice amount of them while i was away. So even though it is a little late: Congratulations for all those well earned DYK's!. Since i am combining both new page and vandalism patrol, i suspect i might actually run on some of them by chance, which is always a positive thing.

Best of luck editing and writing, and im certain i will see you around wikipedia while being at work :). Kind regards, Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:15, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He he - you shouldn't encourage me - I might start going on about all my DYK noms I've got in the queue which aren't getting any ticks or crosses at all, due to the backlog, e.g.:

John Evan Thomas (1810 - 1873) 10 March
Piercebridge Roman Fort and Piercebridge 12 March
Carlbury 15 March
Ulnaby 17 March

That's why I've been trying (clumsily) to help out with DYK reviewing. It's hard work, but you do learn from it, don't you . . . at least I hope so.--Storye book (talk) 20:33, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

O well, aren't we Wikipedia editors a bit like water, always flowing around to fill all available space? After all, i became a vandalism patrol after i read a swear word in a random article over 2 years ago - and frankly, i kind of came to enjoy patrolling. By the way, if you are interested in learning - have you ever considered submitting one of your articles for GA review - or perhaps even FA review? If they get approved you could display a shiny GA or FA badge next to your DYA awards - and if they don't get approved, you will receive feedback on how to improve your article's. So if you like a challenge... :) Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 22:10, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for encouragement re GA and FA reviews. I've been hesitant so far as it would be like throwing an article to the dogs. Bramhope Tunnel might survive it fairly unscathed, though.--Storye book (talk) 08:33, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Im afraid i'm of fairly little value regarding the judgment of GA and FA articles - So far i have made just a couple of stubs and one DYK article. For me, DYK is the limit of my writing skills (or at least the level i can be bothered with). However, seeing you made a ton of DYK's in a (very) short time, along with the fact that the article's are excellent, makes me confident you should at least try it. Even IF an article doesn't make it, it will always yield some constructive feedback that may help improve this or future article's. Just give it a try! Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 08:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator elections have opened!

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:22, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Thistle, Utah

My apologies, I'm used to not citing things in the lead that are repeated in the body of the article. But I guess such a superlative claim should be sourced at both mentions. The sources have been added.Dave (talk) 21:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Acute exacerbations - the links

Thanks for your comments! I've updated the pdf-reference with page, and rechecked that link at: Template_talk:Did_you_know#Acute_exacerbations_of_chronic_bronchitis. Mikael Häggström (talk) 05:01, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Piercebridge

On March 21, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Piercebridge, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Piercebridge Roman Fort

On March 21, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Piercebridge Roman Fort, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for John Evan Thomas (1810 - 1873)

On March 21, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Evan Thomas (1810 - 1873), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Green Lantern (film)

Just letting you know, I replied to your comment for this nomination.-TriiipleThreat (talk) 04:54, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK views

There are too parts in your post on that: (i) stimulating certain topic (removed that part outright) (ii) actual factors which affect the views - there are too many; I'm daily accumulating statistics on that for some 8 months already and still not sure I understand them all. PS Thank you for DYK reviewing work. It did and does help a lot! Materialscientist (talk) 12:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't hesitate to ask what you wish to know. This might help not only you, but the project as a whole. Materialscientist (talk) 12:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone

T:TDYK#Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone has been expanded past 1500 characters and T:TDYK#1968 in the Vietnam War is ready for review -- Esemono (talk) 01:55, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ulnaby

On March 23, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ulnaby, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lost settlements in the United Kingdom

Just a note to say how impressed I am by the work you're doing here. Jan1naD ^{(talk • contrib)} 17:29, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Carlbury

On March 24, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Carlbury, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass 06:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Park Safety

Hey Storye book. It seems resolving the Andy Samberg picture matter won't be an easy task, so I've just dropped the pic from the Park Safety article and DYK nom. Would you be willing to look at the DYK nom again now that it's gone? — Hun ter Ka hn 21:59, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

??

YOU CAN NEVER HAVE TOO MANY BARNSTARS

Thanks and kudos for your frequent contributions to expediting DYK entries and other things you do for Wikipedia. See...people do notice! - Victuallers (talk) 20:16, 25 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Bramhope vandal

I have not been involved in an edit war before, and I'm afraid of the "three strikes" scenario; this is why I have come to you for advice. IP 80.2.68.243 made a silly change to a geo location template on the Bramhope page yesterday, and I reverted it. The user has today deleted the same template. If I undo this vandalism, I'll be getting into an edit war. What do I do next?--Storye book (talk) 15:59, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In such cases, I provide detailed edit summaries and try to talk to the editor. Then (i) I either get convinced I was wrong or we develop a compromise (ii) the editor responds but I'm not convinced - then I seek advice of other editors (e.g. at a corresponding project or article talk - those some talks are rarely visited) (iii) the editor goes on with blank edit summaries and without replying - report to WP:ANEW or WP:AIV (if their changes are vandalism). Materialscientist (talk) 23:25, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I'll copy this conversation to my talk page for future ref. I've also informed user:Keith D about it, as he watches and protects a lot of the Yorkshire geography pages. He suggested that I put a message on the nuisance IP's talk page, since others had left messages there already. So we'll see what happens.--Storye book (talk) 23:58, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]