User talk:Takinzinnia

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Takinzinnia! I am Pharaoh of the Wizards and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:24, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Zoo Important Notice

In line with the recent upgrades to WikiProject Zoo a bulletin board has been created to keep all members up to date with the Project, consider it similiar to the Wikipedia Signpost however focused on WikiProject Zoo. I would ask that you add this page to your watchlist in order to get the latest information about WikiProject Zoo. Kind Regards
- Zoo Pro and The Arbiter^★_★^★

Announcement

Hello! I'm The Arbiter, one of the coordinators for WikiProject Zoo. I am proud to announce the launch of a new portal: Portal:Zoos and Aquariums! ZooPro, ZooFari, and I worked hard to create a new portal for information on zoos, aquariums, and the associated projects and articles on Wikipedia. If you could head on over, take a look at our work, and maybe learn some more about zoos and Wikiproject Zoo, it would be great! Cheers and Happy Editing!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Arbiter (talk) at 03:41, 14 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Oh boy

I hereby award myself this barnstar for signing Belugaboy's GuestBook.

		The Autograph Book Barnstar
		This user signed Belugaboy's guestbook and won a barnstar for it.

Thank you, thank you!

WP Zoo Collaboration

After thinking a bit, I can suggest two pages to start. Cincinnati Zoo was demoted from B to C because one editor refused to follow WP rules and would not cite properly and continued to write like a travelogue. There is plenty of material and some citations for reference if you go back to before he was reverted, but everything needs to be verified and rewritten. The other is Memphis Zoo, which is almost a B but includes a long list instead of a history narrative and most of the photos are animal closeups and don't contribute to information about the zoo. The nomination process seems to be a bit clunky, but I've not been through this yet so maybe there is a good reason. I guess it makes sense if you assume that this is to bring more people into the collaboration, but I guess I've always been more of a "step in and help where necessary" kind of editor. I can make a nomination and see what happens if you want. Don Lammers (talk) 01:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited San Diego Zoo Safari Park, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bongo and Python (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Zoo collaboration - Memphis Zoo

I see that you did some major contributions to Memphis Zoo as part of the Wikipedia Zoo Project. The article looks great and I am wondering when another zoo will be nominated? Any ideas? --Morning277 (talk) 19:36, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may nominate a zoo yourself if you wish. Don Lammers (talk) 01:57, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Monterey Bay Aquarium

I am going through Zoo categories, and noticed a copy of this article in your user space. It's old (I've done some work on the article), so be careful when you go to return text. The article still needs work, mostly with citations (personally I don't think it qualifies as B-class yet, but I'm not going to demote it). I disabled the categories in the article in your user space so that this version doesn't show up in category pages. Don Lammers (talk) 15:22, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--it never occurred to me that the categories would be a problem. Takinzinnia (talk • contribs) 04:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aquarium of the Pacific, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catalina Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

Welcome back. I've been pretty busy at my day job lately and not able to do all that much more than police the zoo articles for vandalism. It's good to have someone else actively editing again. Don Lammers (talk) 15:46, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dresden Zoo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WAZA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 San Diego Padres season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jim Henderson and Marco Estrada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Donkey Kong Jungle Beat, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages G4 and E3 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Wii U software may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| [[Puzzle video game|Puzzle}}
|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:17, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Join the Nintendo Task Force!

Hello, Takinzinnia and welcome! You are receiving this message because we noticed your excellent work on Nintendo-related articles. We need your help at the Nintendo Task Force! There is still much work to be done, so feel free to head over and help us enhance the quality of Nintendo related pages on Wikipedia!

Naruto Shippuden: Clash of Ninja Wii U

Hey Takinzinnia Who the game announced in Naruto Shippuden: Clash of Ninja Wii U English Version similar Naruto Shippūden: Gekitō Ninja Taisen! Special. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.43.63.135 (talk) 21:15, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-responsive IP edits

At the dispute resolution noticeboard, you mentioned an unregistered editor who makes unverifiable edits and does not discuss them. A simpler procedure than the dispute resolution noticeboard would be to request semi-protection of the page, which blocks the IP from editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! All right. Thank you. Takinzinnia (talk • contribs) 05:50, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Zoo

I would like to know if you are still an active participant in the WP:ZOO, If you are please confirm by way of responding on my talk page and or Wikipedia:WikiProject Zoo/Members. I am just trying to get an idea of how many people are still engaged in the project as to better work out how to manage and address things that are listed in the project. Kind Regards Dan Koehl (talk) 10:50, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your message, good to know that soon Im not alone in the project :) Dan Koehl (talk) 23:31, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 11 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the San Diego Zoo Safari Park page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mario vs. Donkey Kong: Tipping Stars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vertex. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mario vs. Donkey Kong Tipping Stars logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mario vs. Donkey Kong Tipping Stars logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:19, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thats fine

if you like to use the logo thats ok, i saw it because it look like a boxart but i have no problem if you want use the logo again, Aozz101x (talk)

Thanks! I'll restore the logo. Takinzinnia (talk • contribs) 08:25, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gigantic (video game)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gigantic (video game), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JBH (talk) 02:12, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gigantic

Hi, thanks for message. The article was tagged by another user for lack of notability and spamming, and I concurred. I deleted your article because

it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you gave some references, they were only to descriptions of the game or its release details, not to support a claim of notability
I can't see that there is any claim of notability anyway in terms of dowmloads, awards etc; This is unsurprising given that it is not yet released. It may become notable, but obviously isn't yet
Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. You describe the game and give release date, but no other facts. It seems a clear attempt to promote the game ahead of its release, and you have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject.

I've seen worse, so I'll restore here shortly for you to work on Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:48, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for putting the page in my userspace. I think I understand that I did not establish notability because I only described gameplay. Would adding a section on reliable sources' opinions of its notability be sufficient? (One of the IGN articles called it a "unique MOBA", so it's different from all other games in its genre.)

Also, I do not understand why you think I have a conflict of interest. What do you mean by "articles about this subject"? Is "this subject" video games in general or this game in particular?

P.S. Now that I've checked WikiProject Video Games' list of reliable sources, I see that the third-party source for one reference (mmorpg.com) had undetermined reliability. Takinzinnia (talk • contribs) 08:42, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've now read the relevant policies and believe the article should not have been speedily deleted in the first place. (Perhaps it could have been subject to a regular deletion discussion or a discussion on notability).

Regarding WP:G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion

The criterion states, "An article which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion." The article was entirely a neutral description of gameplay and a development timeline free of a second-person perspective, extraordinary claims, and puffery (no inclusion of such terms as "influential, famous, highly-anticipated," etc.)/vague or unsupported claims of notability (the fact it was covered in detail in at least one reliable source itself shows notability, per the collapsed box below).
In addition, I do not see how a neutral POV description of an upcoming game is "unambiguous advertising or promotion." Just because the game is not out yet does not automatically mean an article describing it is promotional or unambiguous advertising. WP:NOTADVERTISING part 5 "Advertising, marketing, or public relations" is not violated: The article was written with no regards to aesthetics, "fun factor", "highly-anticipated"-ness, etc. per WP:SUBJECTIVE and WP:PEACOCK/puffery.

Regarding WP:A7: No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events)

It is stated, "This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software, or other creative works" (emphasis added). The page was not about an organization (Motiga Games), only about its software, which is a specific exception to this criterion.

Discussion on notability related to G11

I should first say that unsupported claims of notability or a lack of a WP:Credible claim of significance are not by themselves criteria for speedy deletion for articles about software.

Although notability may not have been clearly established, according to WP:NRVE, "Notability requires only the existence of suitable independent, reliable sources, not their immediate citation. Wikipedia articles are not a final draft, and an article's subject can be notable if such sources exist, even if they have not been named yet. However, once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive..." I have found an additional article from a reliable source per WP:WikiProject Video games/Sources#General: New free-to-play action game Gigantic lumbers onto PC in 2015, so I don't think the page should have been speedily deleted just because I cited only one reliable source, IGN.

Regarding the other notability guidelines:

"Significant coverage addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content..." The cited articles that IGN (the article's main source) wrote were solely about this game and in detail, so the game was addressed "directly and in detail". As far as I can tell, significant in this context means the subject is the primary topic in a reference, not that there are many references about it.
"Reliable means sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline." IGN is reliable per WP:WikiProject Video games/Sources#General.
"Sources should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability. There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected..." I do admit the article only had one reliable secondary/third-party source, and perhaps a "general expectation" of more than one cited reliable source would warrant a deletion discussion, but I don't think it supports speedy deletion. Although the policy does state "It is common for multiple newspapers or journals to publish the same story, sometimes with minor alterations or different headlines, but one story does not constitute multiple works. Several journals simultaneously publishing different articles does not always constitute multiple works, especially when the authors are relying on the same sources, and merely restating the same information...", the articles I cited from the reliable source were half a year apart.
"Independent of the subject excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it. For example, advertising, press releases, autobiographies, and the subject's website are not considered independent." IGN is a reliable and secondary source. The only time I cited the game's/development company's websites, it was to source claims about the development timeline, which should be appropriate per WP:PRIMARY ("A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge").
"Presumed means that significant coverage in reliable sources creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject should be included. A more in-depth discussion might conclude that the topic actually should not have a stand-alone article—perhaps because it violates what Wikipedia is not, particularly the rule that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information." This is the discussion we are having right now.

Finally, I am curious why you believe I have a WP:Conflict of interest.

I would appreciate if we could continue this discussion. Takinzinnia (talk • contribs) 20:06, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mario vs. Donkey Kong Tipping Stars logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mario vs. Donkey Kong Tipping Stars logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:44, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I am happy to withdraw the claim of COI. Usually unreleased games are puffed by the company, but I can see no evidence that that is the case here
You are correct that software cannot be speedied on notability alone. Whether a game can be considered just as software is arguable, but in any case it's irrelevant here. Any article can be tagged as advertising, and it's then appropriate to identify other issues, such as lack of notability, not in English, unsourced BLP etc, so I think the editor who tagged the article acted correctly
An article which consists only of a game description and release details looks spammy to me.

You can recreate at any time, but I strongly suggest that you first expand the article and explain how an unreleased game meets the notability criteria. In its current state, even if not speedied it is likely to end up deleted on notability via a prod or AFD. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Jimfbleak. I see that you go through tons of speedy deletion candidates, so it's understandable there'd be a false positive every once in a while. I do agree that the game's notability is rather borderline, so I'll need to find more coverage at some point. I'll expand the article with what I find and then recreate it within a few months. Thank you for your understanding! Takinzinnia (talk • contribs) 07:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, let me know if you need any help Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:38, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: PS3 Game of Thrones

Hey Takinzinnia, not 100% how these wiki messages works so I'm doing it here. Just in reply to your comment about game of thrones on PS3. There are actually 2 games named Game of Thrones which is a bit confusing, 1 of which is a physical disk release in 2012 see [1] the other being Telltale's downloadable series that started last year. So there is both a physical and digital game but they're entirely different. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BenArms (talk • contribs) 07:58, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's right! My mistake. Thanks for informing me! Takinzinnia (talk • contribs) 19:41, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wii U game addition

Hey, I was wondering if you would want to add Funky Physics to the list. The game was confirmed by Petite Games. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. Thank you and have a nice day.

Zacharyalejandro (talk) 05:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)Zacharyalejandro[reply]

Sure thing. I'll do so once I get up in the morning.Takinzinnia (talk • contribs) 06:14, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update: It seems I can't add that game (yet) since no reliable source has reported on it yet. Surely one of them will as we get closer to release, but as of now it shouldn't be added. Takinzinnia (talk • contribs) 15:59, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPZOO Collaboration

Template:WPZOO Collaboration has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:32, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Wii U software, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Level-5. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Project Zoo

I write to you regarding Wikipedia:WikiProject Zoo/Members where you are presently listed under active members. The project is sadly rather inactive and in severe need of active members. Maybe you would kindly consider investing some efforts and time, as well as inspiring others? best regards, Dan Koehl (talk) 18:48, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Directions to citing things on Wikipedia

I'm sorry about not citing things on Wikipedia, but what I don't completely understand is how to cite things. Could you maybe possibly show me how to cite, or is there a Wiki page for that? Appreciate the help. Zacharyalejandro (talk) 18:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Zacharyalejandro[reply]

I didn't know that you didn't know. I'll make a new section on your talk page with links and descriptions and stuff! Takinzinnia (talk • contribs) 19:58, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Zoo page

Hi there, I need support and an opinion on a zoo page I am working on. Could you help me? Gloucestershiredad (talk) 17:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing! I'll start a new section on your talk page. Takinzinnia (talk • contribs) 21:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Takinzinnia. Here is the page: Noah's_Ark_Zoo_Farm. I just can't seem to get basic things like a conservation section agreed or comments by an internationally recognized elephant consultant. Two editors won't even let me mention the book that is written about the zoo! Any help on any of these topics would be appreciated. Thanks. Gloucestershiredad (talk) 19:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the similar template from List of Wii U software to List of Android games.

Hello. I was wondering if you could help me out with adding the similar template from the List of Wii U software to List of Android games. I want to make it look like the video game list articles that have this template put in. Also I have noticed that there are many Android games that are missing as well, like the recent announcement of Pokémon Comaster, and Pocket Master. If you have time, could you help me with this? I would appreciate it! Thanks. Zacharyalejandro (talk) 17:53, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Zacharyalejandro[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Takinzinnia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Takinzinnia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Zoo mailing list

Hello! You are receiving this message because you have added yourself as a member of the Wikiproject Zoo. This is the first such message, however we hope that this can be used to coordinate editing and development of articles later down the road. If you wish to opt out of further messages remove yourself from the mailing list here , and if consider yourself not active within the project, please remove yourself from member list here. For Wikiproject Zoo general discussions and suggestions, please use the project talk page. (Delivered: 16:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC))

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Collab-zoo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Collab-zoo, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:53, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Xenoblade chronicles x gameplay.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Xenoblade chronicles x gameplay.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:24, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Takinzinnia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Zoo - newsletter No.2 -2017

Newsletter Nr 2, 2017-12-30, for WikiProject Zoo

Wikiproject Zoo wish you a Happy New Year 2018

The activity within the project has been rather low this year, and therefore we want to tell you that any kind of help to develop the project further next year will be extremely valued, like meking some of the red links blue, and participating any categorizing or whatever you want!

Participation:

This is the second newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Zoo, to everyone who added yourself as a member of the Wikiproject Zoo. This is the second such message, however we hope that this can be used to coordinate editing and development of articles later down the road. If you wish to opt out of further messages remove yourself from the mailing list here , and if consider yourself not active within the project, please remove yourself from member list here. For Wikiproject Zoo general discussions and suggestions, please use the project talk page.

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Cheers from your WikiProject Zoo coordinator Dan Koehl.

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Takinzinnia. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Zoo - newsletter No.3 -2018

Newsletter Nr 3, 2018-12-25, for WikiProject Zoo

Wikiproject Zoo wish you a Happy New Year 2019

The activity within the project has been rather low this year, and therefore we want to tell you that any kind of help to develop the project further next year will be extremely valued, like meking some of the red links blue, and participating any categorizing or whatever you want!

Participation:

This is the third newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Zoo, to everyone who added yourself as a member of the Wikiproject Zoo. This is the second such message, however we hope that this can be used to coordinate editing and development of articles later down the road. If you wish to opt out of further messages remove yourself from the mailing list here , and if consider yourself not active within the project, please remove yourself from member list here. For Wikiproject Zoo general discussions and suggestions, please use the project talk page.

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Cheers from your WikiProject Zoo coordinator Dan Koehl.

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Takinzinnia, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Takinzinnia

Thank you for creating 2014 Texas State Senate election.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 00:36, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Texas State Legislature district

Template:Infobox Texas State Legislature district has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 17:13, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]